Yeah didn't think they'd rescind it. Unlucky all round.
joke but was expected
maybe due to var?
comment by kammys left foot (U21862)
posted 1 minute ago
joke but was expected
maybe due to var?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think its been confirmed that VAR didn't get involved? Klopp did, though. Probably what swung it. That and the fact we are Leeds.
Definitely unfair as Son's red card on Gomes was overturned
Everyone, including ex players and the player injured himself, said it should be overturned, just the idiots that run the football that don't see any sense. Technically, he did lunge from behind and broke and opposing players leg so ......
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by kammys left foot (U21862)
posted 1 minute ago
joke but was expected
maybe due to var?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think its been confirmed that VAR didn't get involved? Klopp did, though. Probably what swung it. That and the fact we are Leeds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp had nothing to do with the football association upholding a red card.
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by kammys left foot (U21862)
posted 1 minute ago
joke but was expected
maybe due to var?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think its been confirmed that VAR didn't get involved? Klopp did, though. Probably what swung it. That and the fact we are Leeds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp had nothing to do with the football association upholding a red card.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp got the player sent off in the first place
Should have been sent to the stands for his histrionics.
comment by Shaun M - Everywhere you go, always take Rapinha with you! (U9955)
posted 1 minute ago
Everyone, including ex players and the player injured himself, said it should be overturned, just the idiots that run the football that don't see any sense. Technically, he did lunge from behind and broke and opposing players leg so ......
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, no. Technically he dislocated an ankle, and jumped in from an acute side angle.
Klopp should have never entered the field of play
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by kammys left foot (U21862)
posted 1 minute ago
joke but was expected
maybe due to var?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think its been confirmed that VAR didn't get involved? Klopp did, though. Probably what swung it. That and the fact we are Leeds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp had nothing to do with the football association upholding a red card.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp got the player sent off in the first place
Should have been sent to the stands for his histrionics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're being a bit silly. Klopp cannot get people sent off.
comment by Shaun M - Everywhere you go, always take Rapinha with you! (U9955)
posted 9 minutes ago
Everyone, including ex players and the player injured himself, said it should be overturned, just the idiots that run the football that don't see any sense. Technically, he did lunge from behind and broke and opposing players leg so ......
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They very rarely overturn a decision, as they don't want to undermine their incompetent referees.
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by kammys left foot (U21862)
posted 1 minute ago
joke but was expected
maybe due to var?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think its been confirmed that VAR didn't get involved? Klopp did, though. Probably what swung it. That and the fact we are Leeds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
surely var would have looked at it in the back ground, had plenty of time & did not over turn, imo then the fa wouldn't over rule the ref or var......embarrassing
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by kammys left foot (U21862)
posted 1 minute ago
joke but was expected
maybe due to var?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think its been confirmed that VAR didn't get involved? Klopp did, though. Probably what swung it. That and the fact we are Leeds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp had nothing to do with the football association upholding a red card.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp got the player sent off in the first place
Should have been sent to the stands for his histrionics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Grow up, FFS, you are worse than Bitter Billy on the Spurs board.
Lickle Leeds are being punished just cos we're Leeds.
I think football may not be the sport for you. In fact, I think sport in any form may be the wrong choice for you as there will always be an authority to go against your view on how things should be.
comment by פlǝuƃɥᴉs (U19365)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by kammys left foot (U21862)
posted 1 minute ago
joke but was expected
maybe due to var?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think its been confirmed that VAR didn't get involved? Klopp did, though. Probably what swung it. That and the fact we are Leeds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp had nothing to do with the football association upholding a red card.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp got the player sent off in the first place
Should have been sent to the stands for his histrionics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Grow up, FFS, you are worse than Bitter Billy on the Spurs board.
Lickle Leeds are being punished just cos we're Leeds.
I think football may not be the sport for you. In fact, I think sport in any form may be the wrong choice for you as there will always be an authority to go against your view on how things should be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Certain level of irony of this coming from a Liverpool fan.
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Shaun M - Everywhere you go, always take Rapinha with you! (U9955)
posted 1 minute ago
Everyone, including ex players and the player injured himself, said it should be overturned, just the idiots that run the football that don't see any sense. Technically, he did lunge from behind and broke and opposing players leg so ......
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, no. Technically he dislocated an ankle, and jumped in from an acute side angle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Acute side angle lol, he was behind him when he lunged albeit marginally to the side, plus his trailing leg was directly behind Elliotts injured leg. Should have been overturned but can understand why they haven't
Used to like Klopp but he has gone down in my opinion recently. He's getting like Wenger always complaining
Oh well, nevermind, hell be back in a couple of weeks.
Just a pitty Elliott wont.
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 2 minutes ago
Oh well, nevermind, hell be back in a couple of weeks.
Just a pitty Elliott wont.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is a pity. I feel for him. He's show more class than most associated with Liverpool around the issue.
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 2 minutes ago
Oh well, nevermind, hell be back in a couple of weeks.
Just a pitty Elliott wont.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is a pity. I feel for him. He's show more class than most associated with Liverpool around the issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Having read many of your comments on this subject this is pretty rich to say the least.
They were never going to overturn this, I said it before. It does not matter that he didn't intend to injure the player, or that Elliot, great man he has shown himself to be, thinks it wasn't a red. The laws of the game state that you mustn't put another player at risk, and that tackle did, by 0.5 cm, but it did!
Unfortunately a slightly mistimed tackle or leg position can mean that what is normally a clean or fair tackle or at least attempt becomes dangerous. Nobody wants football to be non-contact but nobody wants to see players with bad injuries.
Let's hope Elliott makes a full and speedy recovery because he has been living up to his potential and looks like a great player in the making. Let's also accept Struijk's red but not make him out to be a great devil because he's not.
No surprise, at all, with this decision. I don't agree with it - didn't think it was a red at the time, whatever the laws say, and still don't now. Unfortunate outcome from what is supposed to be a contact sport.
I think Elliott has been excellent since, credit to the guy. Unfortunately the authorities have there own view and I just didn't expect them to drift from it.
Didn't think it was right for Klopp to enter the field of play on Sunday, especially to get into the refs face, but i do understand - clearly a bad injury to one of his players.
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by kammys left foot (U21862)
posted 1 minute ago
joke but was expected
maybe due to var?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think its been confirmed that VAR didn't get involved? Klopp did, though. Probably what swung it. That and the fact we are Leeds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You know no one cares about Leeds don't you mate?
Biggest thing to come out of this is seeing what a class individual Elliott is. Massive respect for him. He's handled this with absolute class and professionalism.
And he's right, it wasn't a malicious tackle with intent
to harm. Neither was it a red. However, Elliott's did suffer an horrendous injury. But, his reaction has also helped Struijk, another young player, who was gutted by the result of his tackle, handle the aftermath.
I think we all hope Elliott makes a swift and full recovery.
I'm pulling for the lad. Exceptional pro.
The Athletic understands that referee Craig Pawson told the FA that the decision to issue the red card was his, despite him failing to award a foul initially.
https://theathletic.com/news/leeds-defender-pascal-struijks-appeal-against-suspension-rejected/q86thV6DJCqP
Seeing an incident and regarding it as fair play, playing on with no advantage to Liverpool and then deciding it's a red card doesn't make any sense. At least not without checking the replay.
Fair tackle and a very unfortunate injury for me.
Sign in if you want to comment
Struijk
Page 1 of 3
posted on 15/9/21
Predictable.
posted on 15/9/21
Yeah didn't think they'd rescind it. Unlucky all round.
posted on 15/9/21
joke but was expected
maybe due to var?
posted on 15/9/21
comment by kammys left foot (U21862)
posted 1 minute ago
joke but was expected
maybe due to var?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think its been confirmed that VAR didn't get involved? Klopp did, though. Probably what swung it. That and the fact we are Leeds.
posted on 15/9/21
Definitely unfair as Son's red card on Gomes was overturned
posted on 15/9/21
Everyone, including ex players and the player injured himself, said it should be overturned, just the idiots that run the football that don't see any sense. Technically, he did lunge from behind and broke and opposing players leg so ......
posted on 15/9/21
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by kammys left foot (U21862)
posted 1 minute ago
joke but was expected
maybe due to var?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think its been confirmed that VAR didn't get involved? Klopp did, though. Probably what swung it. That and the fact we are Leeds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp had nothing to do with the football association upholding a red card.
posted on 15/9/21
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by kammys left foot (U21862)
posted 1 minute ago
joke but was expected
maybe due to var?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think its been confirmed that VAR didn't get involved? Klopp did, though. Probably what swung it. That and the fact we are Leeds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp had nothing to do with the football association upholding a red card.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp got the player sent off in the first place
Should have been sent to the stands for his histrionics.
posted on 15/9/21
comment by Shaun M - Everywhere you go, always take Rapinha with you! (U9955)
posted 1 minute ago
Everyone, including ex players and the player injured himself, said it should be overturned, just the idiots that run the football that don't see any sense. Technically, he did lunge from behind and broke and opposing players leg so ......
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, no. Technically he dislocated an ankle, and jumped in from an acute side angle.
posted on 15/9/21
Klopp should have never entered the field of play
posted on 15/9/21
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by kammys left foot (U21862)
posted 1 minute ago
joke but was expected
maybe due to var?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think its been confirmed that VAR didn't get involved? Klopp did, though. Probably what swung it. That and the fact we are Leeds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp had nothing to do with the football association upholding a red card.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp got the player sent off in the first place
Should have been sent to the stands for his histrionics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're being a bit silly. Klopp cannot get people sent off.
posted on 15/9/21
comment by Shaun M - Everywhere you go, always take Rapinha with you! (U9955)
posted 9 minutes ago
Everyone, including ex players and the player injured himself, said it should be overturned, just the idiots that run the football that don't see any sense. Technically, he did lunge from behind and broke and opposing players leg so ......
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They very rarely overturn a decision, as they don't want to undermine their incompetent referees.
posted on 15/9/21
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by kammys left foot (U21862)
posted 1 minute ago
joke but was expected
maybe due to var?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think its been confirmed that VAR didn't get involved? Klopp did, though. Probably what swung it. That and the fact we are Leeds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
surely var would have looked at it in the back ground, had plenty of time & did not over turn, imo then the fa wouldn't over rule the ref or var......embarrassing
posted on 15/9/21
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by kammys left foot (U21862)
posted 1 minute ago
joke but was expected
maybe due to var?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think its been confirmed that VAR didn't get involved? Klopp did, though. Probably what swung it. That and the fact we are Leeds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp had nothing to do with the football association upholding a red card.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp got the player sent off in the first place
Should have been sent to the stands for his histrionics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Grow up, FFS, you are worse than Bitter Billy on the Spurs board.
Lickle Leeds are being punished just cos we're Leeds.
I think football may not be the sport for you. In fact, I think sport in any form may be the wrong choice for you as there will always be an authority to go against your view on how things should be.
posted on 15/9/21
comment by פlǝuƃɥᴉs (U19365)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by kammys left foot (U21862)
posted 1 minute ago
joke but was expected
maybe due to var?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think its been confirmed that VAR didn't get involved? Klopp did, though. Probably what swung it. That and the fact we are Leeds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp had nothing to do with the football association upholding a red card.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp got the player sent off in the first place
Should have been sent to the stands for his histrionics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Grow up, FFS, you are worse than Bitter Billy on the Spurs board.
Lickle Leeds are being punished just cos we're Leeds.
I think football may not be the sport for you. In fact, I think sport in any form may be the wrong choice for you as there will always be an authority to go against your view on how things should be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Certain level of irony of this coming from a Liverpool fan.
posted on 15/9/21
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Shaun M - Everywhere you go, always take Rapinha with you! (U9955)
posted 1 minute ago
Everyone, including ex players and the player injured himself, said it should be overturned, just the idiots that run the football that don't see any sense. Technically, he did lunge from behind and broke and opposing players leg so ......
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, no. Technically he dislocated an ankle, and jumped in from an acute side angle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Acute side angle lol, he was behind him when he lunged albeit marginally to the side, plus his trailing leg was directly behind Elliotts injured leg. Should have been overturned but can understand why they haven't
posted on 15/9/21
Used to like Klopp but he has gone down in my opinion recently. He's getting like Wenger always complaining
posted on 15/9/21
Oh well, nevermind, hell be back in a couple of weeks.
Just a pitty Elliott wont.
posted on 15/9/21
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 2 minutes ago
Oh well, nevermind, hell be back in a couple of weeks.
Just a pitty Elliott wont.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is a pity. I feel for him. He's show more class than most associated with Liverpool around the issue.
posted on 15/9/21
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 2 minutes ago
Oh well, nevermind, hell be back in a couple of weeks.
Just a pitty Elliott wont.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is a pity. I feel for him. He's show more class than most associated with Liverpool around the issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Having read many of your comments on this subject this is pretty rich to say the least.
posted on 15/9/21
They were never going to overturn this, I said it before. It does not matter that he didn't intend to injure the player, or that Elliot, great man he has shown himself to be, thinks it wasn't a red. The laws of the game state that you mustn't put another player at risk, and that tackle did, by 0.5 cm, but it did!
Unfortunately a slightly mistimed tackle or leg position can mean that what is normally a clean or fair tackle or at least attempt becomes dangerous. Nobody wants football to be non-contact but nobody wants to see players with bad injuries.
Let's hope Elliott makes a full and speedy recovery because he has been living up to his potential and looks like a great player in the making. Let's also accept Struijk's red but not make him out to be a great devil because he's not.
posted on 15/9/21
No surprise, at all, with this decision. I don't agree with it - didn't think it was a red at the time, whatever the laws say, and still don't now. Unfortunate outcome from what is supposed to be a contact sport.
I think Elliott has been excellent since, credit to the guy. Unfortunately the authorities have there own view and I just didn't expect them to drift from it.
Didn't think it was right for Klopp to enter the field of play on Sunday, especially to get into the refs face, but i do understand - clearly a bad injury to one of his players.
posted on 15/9/21
comment by Lubo - Struijk of Genius (U14008)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by kammys left foot (U21862)
posted 1 minute ago
joke but was expected
maybe due to var?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think its been confirmed that VAR didn't get involved? Klopp did, though. Probably what swung it. That and the fact we are Leeds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You know no one cares about Leeds don't you mate?
posted on 15/9/21
Biggest thing to come out of this is seeing what a class individual Elliott is. Massive respect for him. He's handled this with absolute class and professionalism.
And he's right, it wasn't a malicious tackle with intent
to harm. Neither was it a red. However, Elliott's did suffer an horrendous injury. But, his reaction has also helped Struijk, another young player, who was gutted by the result of his tackle, handle the aftermath.
I think we all hope Elliott makes a swift and full recovery.
I'm pulling for the lad. Exceptional pro.
posted on 15/9/21
The Athletic understands that referee Craig Pawson told the FA that the decision to issue the red card was his, despite him failing to award a foul initially.
https://theathletic.com/news/leeds-defender-pascal-struijks-appeal-against-suspension-rejected/q86thV6DJCqP
Seeing an incident and regarding it as fair play, playing on with no advantage to Liverpool and then deciding it's a red card doesn't make any sense. At least not without checking the replay.
Fair tackle and a very unfortunate injury for me.
Page 1 of 3