or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 51 comments are related to an article called:

Struijk

Page 3 of 3

comment by Stoopo (U4707)

posted on 17/9/21

comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 3 hours, 36 minutes ago
When it happened and i saw the injury i was angry, when i saw the replay i felt it was a desperate tackle from behind which 99% of the time means you're going to take the player out from behind before you do the ball or at the very best same time. But its a tackle we see all the time and will continue to do so from everyteam our own included.

It was an unfortunate injury and i dont think leeds can have any complaints of the red for the game however the suspension should have been overturned. It wasnt malicious or anything and the suspension no longer benefits Liverpool anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tosh! It wasn’t from behind. It wasn’t desperate! Elliott wasn’t “taken out” - his leg simply got caught in an unnatural position, under Struijk’s trailing knee.

How can you says it’s a definite red card yet think the suspension should have been overturned?

I’ll have some of what you’re drinking please

Page 3 of 3

Sign in if you want to comment