Completely agree Kebab.
Being Leeds, of course, we expect most decisions to go against us. The two big ones yesterday definitely did.
I guess it just reinforces the siege mentality eh
I was shouting red when he blatantly dived in the box. Should have been a second yellow for simulation.
comment by VOF - Its all about believing .... (U17124)
posted 13 minutes ago
I was shouting red when he blatantly dived in the box. Should have been a second yellow for simulation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Simulation seems to have stopped being given since a certain player moved to Man City and became an England regular
comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by VOF - Its all about believing .... (U17124)
posted 13 minutes ago
I was shouting red when he blatantly dived in the box. Should have been a second yellow for simulation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Simulation seems to have stopped being given since a certain player moved to Man City and became an England regular
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they signed Harry Kane as well ?!?!?
Rodrigo was in an offside position, however did he prevent any West Ham player getting to the ball, obstruct their line of site, or cause the ball to go in the goal if it would otherwise have missed? No. Not interfering with play, unlike last weeks fiasc
comment by Jbjasus (U22364)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
Rodrigo was in an offside position, however did he prevent any West Ham player getting to the ball, obstruct their line of site, or cause the ball to go in the goal if it would otherwise have missed? No. Not interfering with play, unlike last weeks fiasc
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Rodrigo doesn’t touch the ball, he’s in an offside position but not interfering with play…goal!
Correct decision was made this week, last week it went against us. We didn’t deserve anything from the Cup game and I think we all would prefer 3 points.
Just done a bit more research. Apparently if you touch the ball, even if it makes no difference to the outcome you are interfering.
I guess another example of the law being an ass,
Still think last weeks decision was wrong though.
Sign in if you want to comment
Thoughts from today
Page 3 of 3
posted on 17/1/22
Completely agree Kebab.
Being Leeds, of course, we expect most decisions to go against us. The two big ones yesterday definitely did.
I guess it just reinforces the siege mentality eh
posted on 17/1/22
I was shouting red when he blatantly dived in the box. Should have been a second yellow for simulation.
posted on 17/1/22
comment by VOF - Its all about believing .... (U17124)
posted 13 minutes ago
I was shouting red when he blatantly dived in the box. Should have been a second yellow for simulation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Simulation seems to have stopped being given since a certain player moved to Man City and became an England regular
posted on 17/1/22
comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by VOF - Its all about believing .... (U17124)
posted 13 minutes ago
I was shouting red when he blatantly dived in the box. Should have been a second yellow for simulation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Simulation seems to have stopped being given since a certain player moved to Man City and became an England regular
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they signed Harry Kane as well ?!?!?
posted on 17/1/22
Rodrigo was in an offside position, however did he prevent any West Ham player getting to the ball, obstruct their line of site, or cause the ball to go in the goal if it would otherwise have missed? No. Not interfering with play, unlike last weeks fiasc
posted on 17/1/22
comment by Jbjasus (U22364)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
Rodrigo was in an offside position, however did he prevent any West Ham player getting to the ball, obstruct their line of site, or cause the ball to go in the goal if it would otherwise have missed? No. Not interfering with play, unlike last weeks fiasc
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Rodrigo doesn’t touch the ball, he’s in an offside position but not interfering with play…goal!
Correct decision was made this week, last week it went against us. We didn’t deserve anything from the Cup game and I think we all would prefer 3 points.
posted on 17/1/22
Just done a bit more research. Apparently if you touch the ball, even if it makes no difference to the outcome you are interfering.
I guess another example of the law being an ass,
Still think last weeks decision was wrong though.
Page 3 of 3