comment by ●Billy The Yidd● 20*21*22* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 8 minutes ago
He is absolutely correct, with United close behind them.
Varpool are the media darlings though and Klopp can whinge and whine his way to anything. They are desperate for Varpool to push City for the title and are doing their utmost to drag them into it, just like they dragged them into the CL last season and dragged them to a covid title.
VAR is being used as a tool to influence the majority of games in Pool`s favour, anybody with half a brain can see that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anybody with half a brain like you sure. Anybody with s full brain actually looks at that statistics and sees we've suffered more than any other team with var.
So fack off back to your studio apartment in Seven Sister you looting khunt.
https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4182135/how-var-decisions-affected-every-premier-league-club-in-2020-21
joint bottom with -6 net on var decisions last season
https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4452736/how-var-decisions-have-affected-every-premier-league-club-in-2021-22
doing a lot better this season apparently so far, joint 3rd with arsenal chelsea and watford.
but stil behind, drumroll......................
,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
-----------------------
Yep you guessed it, Spurs
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 1 minute ago
https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4182135/how-var-decisions-affected-every-premier-league-club-in-2020-21
joint bottom with -6 net on var decisions last season
https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4452736/how-var-decisions-have-affected-every-premier-league-club-in-2021-22
doing a lot better this season apparently so far, joint 3rd with arsenal chelsea and watford.
but stil behind, drumroll......................
,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
-----------------------
Yep you guessed it, Spurs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This sort of factual basis is too much that facking idiot Billy to understand. Guy is thicker than two thick planks of wood.
Billy filtered me ages ago when he used to bang on about Liverpool getting penalties, i did some research and over like 10 years spurs had had a fair few more he filtered me for it.
then ofc there was that season where spurs had more penalties at anfield than liverpool
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 4 minutes ago
then ofc there was that season where spurs had more penalties at anfield than liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, neither of which were penalties either.
comment by ●Billy The Yidd● 20*21*22* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 32 minutes ago
He is absolutely correct, with United close behind them.
Varpool are the media darlings though and Klopp can whinge and whine his way to anything. They are desperate for Varpool to push City for the title and are doing their utmost to drag them into it, just like they dragged them into the CL last season and dragged them to a covid title.
VAR is being used as a tool to influence the majority of games in Pool`s favour, anybody with half a brain can see that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well that takes you out of the running you thick сunt
Bang on pen.
Anywhere else on pitch its a foul....keeper slides out commects with jota..its a foul.
comment by Alisson Becker, Liverpool's Number 9 (U3979)
posted 10 hours, 16 minutes ago
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 1 minute ago
https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4182135/how-var-decisions-affected-every-premier-league-club-in-2020-21
joint bottom with -6 net on var decisions last season
https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4452736/how-var-decisions-have-affected-every-premier-league-club-in-2021-22
doing a lot better this season apparently so far, joint 3rd with arsenal chelsea and watford.
but stil behind, drumroll......................
,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
-----------------------
Yep you guessed it, Spurs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This sort of factual basis is too much that facking idiot Billy to understand. Guy is thicker than two thick planks of wood.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh dear the stats clearly show it is not working in his argument hahahahaha. What an idiot. Also didn't spits go the longest period without getting a red card i the prem
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
Blatant dive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Blatant wum
Stop being so obvious
comment by Keep It Greasy - Music is the BEST (U1396)
posted 48 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
Blatant dive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Blatant wum
Stop being so obvious
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was looking for the penalty. Its no big deal, we all have these players in our team. Jota has a history of it during his time at Wolves. Not sure why you all have such a hard time admitting it.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Goalkeeper was nowhere near the ball and takes the player out. Stonewall penalty.
comment by TheBlackCountry (U22512)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
Goalkeeper was nowhere near the ball and takes the player out. Stonewall penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only reason he was nowhere near the ball is because Jota miskicked it so badly.
And only reason that there was contact is because Jota stepped into him.
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by TheBlackCountry (U22512)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
Goalkeeper was nowhere near the ball and takes the player out. Stonewall penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only reason he was nowhere near the ball is because Jota miskicked it so badly.
And only reason that there was contact is because Jota stepped into him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suppose Penandes would have jumped over the advancing keeper to avoid contact?
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 3 hours, 51 minutes ago
comment by Keep It Greasy - Music is the BEST (U1396)
posted 48 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
Blatant dive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Blatant wum
Stop being so obvious
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was looking for the penalty. Its no big deal, we all have these players in our team. Jota has a history of it during his time at Wolves. Not sure why you all have such a hard time admitting it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's no big deal, why is this consuming your every waking thought?
comment by TheBlackCountry (U22512)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by TheBlackCountry (U22512)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
Goalkeeper was nowhere near the ball and takes the player out. Stonewall penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only reason he was nowhere near the ball is because Jota miskicked it so badly.
And only reason that there was contact is because Jota stepped into him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suppose Penandes would have jumped over the advancing keeper to avoid contact?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course not. As I said a few posts back, we all have these players in our team. Although there is a difference between not jumping to allow the contact and stepping into the keeper to initiate the contact.
I mean, its not like the keeper was sliding into Jota with his legs out. He'd planted his knees and tried to save the shot with his hands, but Jota totally missed his kick and then stepped into him. The keeper wasn't even going to make contact with Jota until he makes that step towards him.
This narrative that the keeper was out of control is complete BS. He was very much in control and comes to a stop right on the edge of the 6 yard box. No contact would have been made if Jota hadn't initiated it. It is a dive for me, but as Vieira said after the game, Jota was very clever about it.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by TheBlackCountry (U22512)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by TheBlackCountry (U22512)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
Goalkeeper was nowhere near the ball and takes the player out. Stonewall penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only reason he was nowhere near the ball is because Jota miskicked it so badly.
And only reason that there was contact is because Jota stepped into him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suppose Penandes would have jumped over the advancing keeper to avoid contact?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course not. As I said a few posts back, we all have these players in our team. Although there is a difference between not jumping to allow the contact and stepping into the keeper to initiate the contact.
I mean, its not like the keeper was sliding into Jota with his legs out. He'd planted his knees and tried to save the shot with his hands, but Jota totally missed his kick and then stepped into him. The keeper wasn't even going to make contact with Jota until he makes that step towards him.
This narrative that the keeper was out of control is complete BS. He was very much in control and comes to a stop right on the edge of the 6 yard box. No contact would have been made if Jota hadn't initiated it. It is a dive for me, but as Vieira said after the game, Jota was very clever about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is all fair enough until you claim that Jota initiated contact rather than simply having to place his foot where he did due to his body shape and the fact he was looking to retrieve the ball after he missed his attempted shot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That not what happened though. He fluffs the shot, plants his foot, then takes another step into the keeper. Watch the replay from behind the goal line and he clearly changes his direction towards the keeper, not towards the ball, which had gone to his left.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zF0klKLhbVY
Have a look on the 13 seconds mark. A clear step towards the keeper.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
History will say that it was a penalty. It's no big deal. Sometimes they're given, sometimes not.
Deal with it and move on. Not sure why you are finding it difficult to accept this.
comment by TheBlackCountry (U22512)
posted 19 minutes ago
History will say that it was a penalty. It's no big deal. Sometimes they're given, sometimes not.
Deal with it and move on. Not sure why you are finding it difficult to accept this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not finding it hard to accept anything. We just have a difference of opinion and I'm voicing mine the same as everyone else. No big deal.
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by TheBlackCountry (U22512)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by TheBlackCountry (U22512)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
Goalkeeper was nowhere near the ball and takes the player out. Stonewall penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only reason he was nowhere near the ball is because Jota miskicked it so badly.
And only reason that there was contact is because Jota stepped into him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suppose Penandes would have jumped over the advancing keeper to avoid contact?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course not. As I said a few posts back, we all have these players in our team. Although there is a difference between not jumping to allow the contact and stepping into the keeper to initiate the contact.
I mean, its not like the keeper was sliding into Jota with his legs out. He'd planted his knees and tried to save the shot with his hands, but Jota totally missed his kick and then stepped into him. The keeper wasn't even going to make contact with Jota until he makes that step towards him.
This narrative that the keeper was out of control is complete BS. He was very much in control and comes to a stop right on the edge of the 6 yard box. No contact would have been made if Jota hadn't initiated it. It is a dive for me, but as Vieira said after the game, Jota was very clever about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is all fair enough until you claim that Jota initiated contact rather than simply having to place his foot where he did due to his body shape and the fact he was looking to retrieve the ball after he missed his attempted shot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That not what happened though. He fluffs the shot, plants his foot, then takes another step into the keeper. Watch the replay from behind the goal line and he clearly changes his direction towards the keeper, not towards the ball, which had gone to his left.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zF0klKLhbVY
Have a look on the 13 seconds mark. A clear step towards the keeper.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't need to look at anything. I have seen it from every angle and from every angle, it is clear that it was a coming together. Never in a million years is it a penalty or a dive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is 100% a dive. Just because Jota managed to disguise it pretty well doesn't alter that. He went looking for the penalty and he got it. Fair play to him, it was very clever. Its still a dive and I feel sorry for the defender and the keeper, who both did well, only to be robbed.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
"Only Liverpool get a penalty for that"
Page 7 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9
posted on 24/1/22
comment by ●Billy The Yidd● 20*21*22* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 8 minutes ago
He is absolutely correct, with United close behind them.
Varpool are the media darlings though and Klopp can whinge and whine his way to anything. They are desperate for Varpool to push City for the title and are doing their utmost to drag them into it, just like they dragged them into the CL last season and dragged them to a covid title.
VAR is being used as a tool to influence the majority of games in Pool`s favour, anybody with half a brain can see that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anybody with half a brain like you sure. Anybody with s full brain actually looks at that statistics and sees we've suffered more than any other team with var.
So fack off back to your studio apartment in Seven Sister you looting khunt.
posted on 24/1/22
https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4182135/how-var-decisions-affected-every-premier-league-club-in-2020-21
joint bottom with -6 net on var decisions last season
https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4452736/how-var-decisions-have-affected-every-premier-league-club-in-2021-22
doing a lot better this season apparently so far, joint 3rd with arsenal chelsea and watford.
but stil behind, drumroll......................
,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
-----------------------
Yep you guessed it, Spurs
posted on 24/1/22
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 1 minute ago
https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4182135/how-var-decisions-affected-every-premier-league-club-in-2020-21
joint bottom with -6 net on var decisions last season
https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4452736/how-var-decisions-have-affected-every-premier-league-club-in-2021-22
doing a lot better this season apparently so far, joint 3rd with arsenal chelsea and watford.
but stil behind, drumroll......................
,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
-----------------------
Yep you guessed it, Spurs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This sort of factual basis is too much that facking idiot Billy to understand. Guy is thicker than two thick planks of wood.
posted on 24/1/22
Billy filtered me ages ago when he used to bang on about Liverpool getting penalties, i did some research and over like 10 years spurs had had a fair few more he filtered me for it.
posted on 24/1/22
then ofc there was that season where spurs had more penalties at anfield than liverpool
posted on 24/1/22
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 4 minutes ago
then ofc there was that season where spurs had more penalties at anfield than liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, neither of which were penalties either.
posted on 24/1/22
comment by ●Billy The Yidd● 20*21*22* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 32 minutes ago
He is absolutely correct, with United close behind them.
Varpool are the media darlings though and Klopp can whinge and whine his way to anything. They are desperate for Varpool to push City for the title and are doing their utmost to drag them into it, just like they dragged them into the CL last season and dragged them to a covid title.
VAR is being used as a tool to influence the majority of games in Pool`s favour, anybody with half a brain can see that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well that takes you out of the running you thick сunt
posted on 24/1/22
Bang on pen.
Anywhere else on pitch its a foul....keeper slides out commects with jota..its a foul.
posted on 25/1/22
Blatant dive.
posted on 25/1/22
comment by Alisson Becker, Liverpool's Number 9 (U3979)
posted 10 hours, 16 minutes ago
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 1 minute ago
https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4182135/how-var-decisions-affected-every-premier-league-club-in-2020-21
joint bottom with -6 net on var decisions last season
https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4452736/how-var-decisions-have-affected-every-premier-league-club-in-2021-22
doing a lot better this season apparently so far, joint 3rd with arsenal chelsea and watford.
but stil behind, drumroll......................
,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
-----------------------
Yep you guessed it, Spurs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This sort of factual basis is too much that facking idiot Billy to understand. Guy is thicker than two thick planks of wood.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh dear the stats clearly show it is not working in his argument hahahahaha. What an idiot. Also didn't spits go the longest period without getting a red card i the prem
posted on 25/1/22
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
Blatant dive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Blatant wum
Stop being so obvious
posted on 25/1/22
comment by Keep It Greasy - Music is the BEST (U1396)
posted 48 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
Blatant dive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Blatant wum
Stop being so obvious
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was looking for the penalty. Its no big deal, we all have these players in our team. Jota has a history of it during his time at Wolves. Not sure why you all have such a hard time admitting it.
posted on 25/1/22
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 25/1/22
Goalkeeper was nowhere near the ball and takes the player out. Stonewall penalty.
posted on 25/1/22
comment by TheBlackCountry (U22512)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
Goalkeeper was nowhere near the ball and takes the player out. Stonewall penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only reason he was nowhere near the ball is because Jota miskicked it so badly.
And only reason that there was contact is because Jota stepped into him.
posted on 25/1/22
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by TheBlackCountry (U22512)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
Goalkeeper was nowhere near the ball and takes the player out. Stonewall penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only reason he was nowhere near the ball is because Jota miskicked it so badly.
And only reason that there was contact is because Jota stepped into him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suppose Penandes would have jumped over the advancing keeper to avoid contact?
posted on 25/1/22
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 3 hours, 51 minutes ago
comment by Keep It Greasy - Music is the BEST (U1396)
posted 48 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
Blatant dive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Blatant wum
Stop being so obvious
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was looking for the penalty. Its no big deal, we all have these players in our team. Jota has a history of it during his time at Wolves. Not sure why you all have such a hard time admitting it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's no big deal, why is this consuming your every waking thought?
posted on 25/1/22
comment by TheBlackCountry (U22512)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by TheBlackCountry (U22512)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
Goalkeeper was nowhere near the ball and takes the player out. Stonewall penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only reason he was nowhere near the ball is because Jota miskicked it so badly.
And only reason that there was contact is because Jota stepped into him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suppose Penandes would have jumped over the advancing keeper to avoid contact?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course not. As I said a few posts back, we all have these players in our team. Although there is a difference between not jumping to allow the contact and stepping into the keeper to initiate the contact.
I mean, its not like the keeper was sliding into Jota with his legs out. He'd planted his knees and tried to save the shot with his hands, but Jota totally missed his kick and then stepped into him. The keeper wasn't even going to make contact with Jota until he makes that step towards him.
This narrative that the keeper was out of control is complete BS. He was very much in control and comes to a stop right on the edge of the 6 yard box. No contact would have been made if Jota hadn't initiated it. It is a dive for me, but as Vieira said after the game, Jota was very clever about it.
posted on 25/1/22
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 25/1/22
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by TheBlackCountry (U22512)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by TheBlackCountry (U22512)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
Goalkeeper was nowhere near the ball and takes the player out. Stonewall penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only reason he was nowhere near the ball is because Jota miskicked it so badly.
And only reason that there was contact is because Jota stepped into him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suppose Penandes would have jumped over the advancing keeper to avoid contact?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course not. As I said a few posts back, we all have these players in our team. Although there is a difference between not jumping to allow the contact and stepping into the keeper to initiate the contact.
I mean, its not like the keeper was sliding into Jota with his legs out. He'd planted his knees and tried to save the shot with his hands, but Jota totally missed his kick and then stepped into him. The keeper wasn't even going to make contact with Jota until he makes that step towards him.
This narrative that the keeper was out of control is complete BS. He was very much in control and comes to a stop right on the edge of the 6 yard box. No contact would have been made if Jota hadn't initiated it. It is a dive for me, but as Vieira said after the game, Jota was very clever about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is all fair enough until you claim that Jota initiated contact rather than simply having to place his foot where he did due to his body shape and the fact he was looking to retrieve the ball after he missed his attempted shot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That not what happened though. He fluffs the shot, plants his foot, then takes another step into the keeper. Watch the replay from behind the goal line and he clearly changes his direction towards the keeper, not towards the ball, which had gone to his left.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zF0klKLhbVY
Have a look on the 13 seconds mark. A clear step towards the keeper.
posted on 25/1/22
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 25/1/22
History will say that it was a penalty. It's no big deal. Sometimes they're given, sometimes not.
Deal with it and move on. Not sure why you are finding it difficult to accept this.
posted on 25/1/22
comment by TheBlackCountry (U22512)
posted 19 minutes ago
History will say that it was a penalty. It's no big deal. Sometimes they're given, sometimes not.
Deal with it and move on. Not sure why you are finding it difficult to accept this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not finding it hard to accept anything. We just have a difference of opinion and I'm voicing mine the same as everyone else. No big deal.
posted on 25/1/22
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by TheBlackCountry (U22512)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by TheBlackCountry (U22512)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
Goalkeeper was nowhere near the ball and takes the player out. Stonewall penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only reason he was nowhere near the ball is because Jota miskicked it so badly.
And only reason that there was contact is because Jota stepped into him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suppose Penandes would have jumped over the advancing keeper to avoid contact?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course not. As I said a few posts back, we all have these players in our team. Although there is a difference between not jumping to allow the contact and stepping into the keeper to initiate the contact.
I mean, its not like the keeper was sliding into Jota with his legs out. He'd planted his knees and tried to save the shot with his hands, but Jota totally missed his kick and then stepped into him. The keeper wasn't even going to make contact with Jota until he makes that step towards him.
This narrative that the keeper was out of control is complete BS. He was very much in control and comes to a stop right on the edge of the 6 yard box. No contact would have been made if Jota hadn't initiated it. It is a dive for me, but as Vieira said after the game, Jota was very clever about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is all fair enough until you claim that Jota initiated contact rather than simply having to place his foot where he did due to his body shape and the fact he was looking to retrieve the ball after he missed his attempted shot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That not what happened though. He fluffs the shot, plants his foot, then takes another step into the keeper. Watch the replay from behind the goal line and he clearly changes his direction towards the keeper, not towards the ball, which had gone to his left.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zF0klKLhbVY
Have a look on the 13 seconds mark. A clear step towards the keeper.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't need to look at anything. I have seen it from every angle and from every angle, it is clear that it was a coming together. Never in a million years is it a penalty or a dive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is 100% a dive. Just because Jota managed to disguise it pretty well doesn't alter that. He went looking for the penalty and he got it. Fair play to him, it was very clever. Its still a dive and I feel sorry for the defender and the keeper, who both did well, only to be robbed.
posted on 25/1/22
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 7 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9