comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Deleted Member - JoeSip Juran O'Vic (U15888)
posted 21 seconds ago
On 4 August 2020, Roofe signed for Rangers, on a four-year deal for an undisclosed fee, reported to be £4.5 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
link
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd have focused on undisclosed myself if I wanted to argue it
https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/sport/leeds-united/kemar-roofe-rangers-leeds-united-18781247
https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/rangers-fc-news/gers-kemar-roofe-transfer-costs/
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/kemar-roofe/transfers/spieler/141350
https://tbrfootball.com/kemar-roofe-cost-rangers-4-5-million-according-to-report/
comment by Miller - Bounce Game Champion (U9310)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Deleted Member - JoeSip Juran O'Vic (U15888)
posted 21 seconds ago
On 4 August 2020, Roofe signed for Rangers, on a four-year deal for an undisclosed fee, reported to be £4.5 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
link
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd have focused on undisclosed myself if I wanted to argue it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cant if im including him in a figure that is less than what Ange spent this year.
even if it is 4.5m (it wasnt) our europa squad still cost less than what Ange spent this year....but aye rangers dont how to spend their money
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Miller - Bounce Game Champion (U9310)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Deleted Member - JoeSip Juran O'Vic (U15888)
posted 21 seconds ago
On 4 August 2020, Roofe signed for Rangers, on a four-year deal for an undisclosed fee, reported to be £4.5 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
link
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd have focused on undisclosed myself if I wanted to argue it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cant if im including him in a figure that is less than what Ange spent this year.
even if it is 4.5m (it wasnt) our europa squad still cost less than what Ange spent this year....but aye rangers dont how to spend their money
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can you tell us how much each club brought in in transfer fees please?
comment by Deleted Member - JoeSip Juran O'Vic (U15888)
posted 1 minute ago
https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/sport/leeds-united/kemar-roofe-rangers-leeds-united-18781247
https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/rangers-fc-news/gers-kemar-roofe-transfer-costs/
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/kemar-roofe/transfers/spieler/141350
https://tbrfootball.com/kemar-roofe-cost-rangers-4-5-million-according-to-report/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
why not post the daily records link showing 4m?
oh i get it .. its cos you already have all those credible links !
comment by Deleted Member - JoeSip Juran O'Vic (U15888)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Miller - Bounce Game Champion (U9310)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Deleted Member - JoeSip Juran O'Vic (U15888)
posted 21 seconds ago
On 4 August 2020, Roofe signed for Rangers, on a four-year deal for an undisclosed fee, reported to be £4.5 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
link
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd have focused on undisclosed myself if I wanted to argue it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cant if im including him in a figure that is less than what Ange spent this year.
even if it is 4.5m (it wasnt) our europa squad still cost less than what Ange spent this year....but aye rangers dont how to spend their money
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can you tell us how much each club brought in in transfer fees please?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i prob could but that has zero relevance in the argument of rangers dont know how to spend their money and that the europa league squad we have costs 30m
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 5 minutes ago
Barisic was £2 million.
Roofe was £4.5 million, and Helander was in your squad before as well. He was about £3 million.
That’s another £6 million…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
helander wasnt part of the europa squad, and yes croatian international barisic cost 2m. and roofe didnt cost 4.5m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Helander played both games against Alashkert.
Haven’t seen anywhere quite Roofe at £3.5 million, and don’t remember that as the figure.
Hagi was also reported at £3 million, and you paid compensation for Aribo and Bassey. That’s another £1 million added to your total.
That’s only the £7 million you’re out then.
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Deleted Member - JoeSip Juran O'Vic (U15888)
posted 1 minute ago
https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/sport/leeds-united/kemar-roofe-rangers-leeds-united-18781247
https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/rangers-fc-news/gers-kemar-roofe-transfer-costs/
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/kemar-roofe/transfers/spieler/141350
https://tbrfootball.com/kemar-roofe-cost-rangers-4-5-million-according-to-report/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
why not post the daily records link showing 4m?
oh i get it .. its cos you already have all those credible links !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suppose the Daily Record might be credible to someone lapping up youtubes from guys punting t-shirts
so just to be clear - we are both happy with our respective seasons - regardless of outcome ?
And we both stand to make loadsa money (in a Scottish league context)
So we now argue who MIGHT make the most money
Celtics net spend this season has been -£10m (as in transfer income has been £10m higher than transfer expenditure).
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 3 minutes ago
Celtics net spend this season has been -£10m (as in transfer income has been £10m higher than transfer expenditure).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s ridiculous to look at net spend given where Rangers from a few years ago. You started from a position of strength. Celtic have spent as much this season as Rangers have in 3 seasons
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 3 minutes ago
Celtics net spend this season has been -£10m (as in transfer income has been £10m higher than transfer expenditure).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s ridiculous to look at net spend given where Rangers from a few years ago. You started from a position of strength. Celtic have spent as much this season as Rangers have in 3 seasons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rangers have spent a bit over £30 million in the first 3 seasons under Gerrard.
Celtic spent about £22-23 million over the last 2 transfer windows.
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 3 minutes ago
Celtics net spend this season has been -£10m (as in transfer income has been £10m higher than transfer expenditure).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s ridiculous to look at net spend given where Rangers from a few years ago. You started from a position of strength. Celtic have spent as much this season as Rangers have in 3 seasons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Celtic have sold as much talent last year as Rangers have in their history.
How far back do you want to go to plead historical circumstances affecting things? Without EBTs maybe a lot changes, eh?
James Forrest signs a new 3 year deal
Oh great .
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 3 minutes ago
Celtics net spend this season has been -£10m (as in transfer income has been £10m higher than transfer expenditure).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s ridiculous to look at net spend given where Rangers from a few years ago. You started from a position of strength. Celtic have spent as much this season as Rangers have in 3 seasons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Celtic have sold as much talent last year as Rangers have in their history.
How far back do you want to go to plead historical circumstances affecting things? Without EBTs maybe a lot changes, eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well Gerrard came in almost 4 years ago, and Edouard was at Celtic for 4 years, so you probably go back 4 years.
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 3 minutes ago
Celtics net spend this season has been -£10m (as in transfer income has been £10m higher than transfer expenditure).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s ridiculous to look at net spend given where Rangers from a few years ago. You started from a position of strength. Celtic have spent as much this season as Rangers have in 3 seasons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Celtic have sold as much talent last year as Rangers have in their history.
How far back do you want to go to plead historical circumstances affecting things? Without EBTs maybe a lot changes, eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well Gerrard came in almost 4 years ago, and Edouard was at Celtic for 4 years, so you probably go back 4 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Since rangers have been in the SPFL, their net spend is c£40m higher than Celtic’s, and at least £30m higher than any other club in the SPFL.
It is ridiculous to look at gross spend in isolation. Hibs have spent half a million more than hearts this season, but hearts are much higher than them. True, but it doesn’t account for Hibs selling Martin Boyle, which had had a huge impact on their ability to score goals. Hibs net spend is c£2m lower than hearts.
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 3 minutes ago
Celtics net spend this season has been -£10m (as in transfer income has been £10m higher than transfer expenditure).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s ridiculous to look at net spend given where Rangers from a few years ago. You started from a position of strength. Celtic have spent as much this season as Rangers have in 3 seasons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Celtic have sold as much talent last year as Rangers have in their history.
How far back do you want to go to plead historical circumstances affecting things? Without EBTs maybe a lot changes, eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well Gerrard came in almost 4 years ago, and Edouard was at Celtic for 4 years, so you probably go back 4 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Since rangers have been in the SPFL, their net spend is c£40m higher than Celtic’s, and at least £30m higher than any other club in the SPFL.
It is ridiculous to look at gross spend in isolation. Hibs have spent half a million more than hearts this season, but hearts are much higher than them. True, but it doesn’t account for Hibs selling Martin Boyle, which had had a huge impact on their ability to score goals. Hibs net spend is c£2m lower than hearts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye because 4 years ago we had O’Halloran, Jason Holt and Rob Kiernan rather than likes of Ajer, Edouard, Dembele, Tierney ya dafty
"Since rangers have been in the SPFL, their net spend is c£40m higher than Celtic’s, and at least £30m higher than any other club in the SPFL."
Genuine question about these figures....is this just transfer net spend we are talking about here?
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 12 minutes ago
James Forrest signs a new 3 year deal
Oh great .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Joy 😕 I assume it's for the home player ratio and if its on reduced terms so be it, but we need another winger https://twitter.com/CelticFC/status/1524797179180814336?t=WENW78Z6G8ClGIuUt-tXSQ&s=19
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 8 seconds ago
"Since rangers have been in the SPFL, their net spend is c£40m higher than Celtic’s, and at least £30m higher than any other club in the SPFL."
Genuine question about these figures....is this just transfer net spend we are talking about here?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes.
From https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/glasgow-rangers/alletransfers/verein/124 and https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/celtic-glasgow/alletransfers/verein/371
comment by GTB Cinched it (U14017)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 12 minutes ago
James Forrest signs a new 3 year deal
Oh great .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Joy 😕 I assume it's for the home player ratio and if its on reduced terms so be it, but we need another winger https://twitter.com/CelticFC/status/1524797179180814336?t=WENW78Z6G8ClGIuUt-tXSQ&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jota and CCV were at Celtic park today getting pics taken for the new strip launch…
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 3 minutes ago
Celtics net spend this season has been -£10m (as in transfer income has been £10m higher than transfer expenditure).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s ridiculous to look at net spend given where Rangers from a few years ago. You started from a position of strength. Celtic have spent as much this season as Rangers have in 3 seasons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Celtic have sold as much talent last year as Rangers have in their history.
How far back do you want to go to plead historical circumstances affecting things? Without EBTs maybe a lot changes, eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well Gerrard came in almost 4 years ago, and Edouard was at Celtic for 4 years, so you probably go back 4 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Since rangers have been in the SPFL, their net spend is c£40m higher than Celtic’s, and at least £30m higher than any other club in the SPFL.
It is ridiculous to look at gross spend in isolation. Hibs have spent half a million more than hearts this season, but hearts are much higher than them. True, but it doesn’t account for Hibs selling Martin Boyle, which had had a huge impact on their ability to score goals. Hibs net spend is c£2m lower than hearts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye because 4 years ago we had O’Halloran, Jason Holt and Rob Kiernan rather than likes of Ajer, Edouard, Dembele, Tierney ya dafty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eddy was a loan player in 17/18 season I think. Tierney a home grown talent who was developed at the club (nearly ruined by some of the “play thru ra pain” rubbish mind you) and the others you mention we have developed. Patterson aside rangers have yet to do that. Hence, the significant disparity in net spend.
comment by GTB Cinched it (U14017)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 12 minutes ago
James Forrest signs a new 3 year deal
Oh great .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Joy 😕 I assume it's for the home player ratio and if its on reduced terms so be it, but we need another winger https://twitter.com/CelticFC/status/1524797179180814336?t=WENW78Z6G8ClGIuUt-tXSQ&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf it's not a bad back up and as you say counts towards the home grown players
"It is ridiculous to look at gross spend in isolation."
Why's that like?
Got one club that's not moved from the top of Scottish Football for a decade...and a club that basically lost all of its most valuable player assets, had to reset and build itself up from the third division, a club that was always going to speculate to accumulate for a period in order to get back to a good operating level
Looking a gross spend in isolation is not ridiculous in that situation...saying as much only suits a particular agenda
Let's really look at things here then using Transfermarkt seeing as others have been quoting figures from there
In 17/18, the market value of Celtics squad was £69.7m
Since then, Celtic have spent £69m, but recouped £103m, so have made a net profit on transfers of £34m
As it stands, Celtic's squad is valued at £71.2m
So Celtic have brought in £34m, and the value of their squad has went up by about £1.5m, so in total that's a £35.5m increase in revenue/squad value
The Rangers squad in 17/18 was valued at a rather paltry £23.5m
Since then, we have spent £33m on transfer fees, and brought in about £18m, so a £15m net spend to strengthen our squad
As it stands, the market value of our current squad is a whopping £118.85m
So we've spent £15m, but our squad value has increased by over £95m.....so that's an £80m increase in squad value having spent just £15m
I'll take that thanks 👍
Sign in if you want to comment
All so unnecessary...
Page 6 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 12/5/22
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Deleted Member - JoeSip Juran O'Vic (U15888)
posted 21 seconds ago
On 4 August 2020, Roofe signed for Rangers, on a four-year deal for an undisclosed fee, reported to be £4.5 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
link
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd have focused on undisclosed myself if I wanted to argue it
posted on 12/5/22
https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/sport/leeds-united/kemar-roofe-rangers-leeds-united-18781247
https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/rangers-fc-news/gers-kemar-roofe-transfer-costs/
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/kemar-roofe/transfers/spieler/141350
https://tbrfootball.com/kemar-roofe-cost-rangers-4-5-million-according-to-report/
posted on 12/5/22
comment by Miller - Bounce Game Champion (U9310)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Deleted Member - JoeSip Juran O'Vic (U15888)
posted 21 seconds ago
On 4 August 2020, Roofe signed for Rangers, on a four-year deal for an undisclosed fee, reported to be £4.5 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
link
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd have focused on undisclosed myself if I wanted to argue it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cant if im including him in a figure that is less than what Ange spent this year.
even if it is 4.5m (it wasnt) our europa squad still cost less than what Ange spent this year....but aye rangers dont how to spend their money
posted on 12/5/22
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Miller - Bounce Game Champion (U9310)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Deleted Member - JoeSip Juran O'Vic (U15888)
posted 21 seconds ago
On 4 August 2020, Roofe signed for Rangers, on a four-year deal for an undisclosed fee, reported to be £4.5 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
link
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd have focused on undisclosed myself if I wanted to argue it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cant if im including him in a figure that is less than what Ange spent this year.
even if it is 4.5m (it wasnt) our europa squad still cost less than what Ange spent this year....but aye rangers dont how to spend their money
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can you tell us how much each club brought in in transfer fees please?
posted on 12/5/22
comment by Deleted Member - JoeSip Juran O'Vic (U15888)
posted 1 minute ago
https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/sport/leeds-united/kemar-roofe-rangers-leeds-united-18781247
https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/rangers-fc-news/gers-kemar-roofe-transfer-costs/
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/kemar-roofe/transfers/spieler/141350
https://tbrfootball.com/kemar-roofe-cost-rangers-4-5-million-according-to-report/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
why not post the daily records link showing 4m?
oh i get it .. its cos you already have all those credible links !
posted on 12/5/22
comment by Deleted Member - JoeSip Juran O'Vic (U15888)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Miller - Bounce Game Champion (U9310)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Deleted Member - JoeSip Juran O'Vic (U15888)
posted 21 seconds ago
On 4 August 2020, Roofe signed for Rangers, on a four-year deal for an undisclosed fee, reported to be £4.5 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
link
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd have focused on undisclosed myself if I wanted to argue it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cant if im including him in a figure that is less than what Ange spent this year.
even if it is 4.5m (it wasnt) our europa squad still cost less than what Ange spent this year....but aye rangers dont how to spend their money
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can you tell us how much each club brought in in transfer fees please?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i prob could but that has zero relevance in the argument of rangers dont know how to spend their money and that the europa league squad we have costs 30m
posted on 12/5/22
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 5 minutes ago
Barisic was £2 million.
Roofe was £4.5 million, and Helander was in your squad before as well. He was about £3 million.
That’s another £6 million…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
helander wasnt part of the europa squad, and yes croatian international barisic cost 2m. and roofe didnt cost 4.5m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Helander played both games against Alashkert.
Haven’t seen anywhere quite Roofe at £3.5 million, and don’t remember that as the figure.
Hagi was also reported at £3 million, and you paid compensation for Aribo and Bassey. That’s another £1 million added to your total.
That’s only the £7 million you’re out then.
posted on 12/5/22
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Deleted Member - JoeSip Juran O'Vic (U15888)
posted 1 minute ago
https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/sport/leeds-united/kemar-roofe-rangers-leeds-united-18781247
https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/rangers-fc-news/gers-kemar-roofe-transfer-costs/
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/kemar-roofe/transfers/spieler/141350
https://tbrfootball.com/kemar-roofe-cost-rangers-4-5-million-according-to-report/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
why not post the daily records link showing 4m?
oh i get it .. its cos you already have all those credible links !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suppose the Daily Record might be credible to someone lapping up youtubes from guys punting t-shirts
posted on 12/5/22
so just to be clear - we are both happy with our respective seasons - regardless of outcome ?
And we both stand to make loadsa money (in a Scottish league context)
So we now argue who MIGHT make the most money
posted on 12/5/22
Celtics net spend this season has been -£10m (as in transfer income has been £10m higher than transfer expenditure).
posted on 12/5/22
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 3 minutes ago
Celtics net spend this season has been -£10m (as in transfer income has been £10m higher than transfer expenditure).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s ridiculous to look at net spend given where Rangers from a few years ago. You started from a position of strength. Celtic have spent as much this season as Rangers have in 3 seasons
posted on 12/5/22
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 3 minutes ago
Celtics net spend this season has been -£10m (as in transfer income has been £10m higher than transfer expenditure).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s ridiculous to look at net spend given where Rangers from a few years ago. You started from a position of strength. Celtic have spent as much this season as Rangers have in 3 seasons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rangers have spent a bit over £30 million in the first 3 seasons under Gerrard.
Celtic spent about £22-23 million over the last 2 transfer windows.
posted on 12/5/22
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 3 minutes ago
Celtics net spend this season has been -£10m (as in transfer income has been £10m higher than transfer expenditure).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s ridiculous to look at net spend given where Rangers from a few years ago. You started from a position of strength. Celtic have spent as much this season as Rangers have in 3 seasons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Celtic have sold as much talent last year as Rangers have in their history.
How far back do you want to go to plead historical circumstances affecting things? Without EBTs maybe a lot changes, eh?
posted on 12/5/22
James Forrest signs a new 3 year deal
Oh great .
posted on 12/5/22
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 3 minutes ago
Celtics net spend this season has been -£10m (as in transfer income has been £10m higher than transfer expenditure).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s ridiculous to look at net spend given where Rangers from a few years ago. You started from a position of strength. Celtic have spent as much this season as Rangers have in 3 seasons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Celtic have sold as much talent last year as Rangers have in their history.
How far back do you want to go to plead historical circumstances affecting things? Without EBTs maybe a lot changes, eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well Gerrard came in almost 4 years ago, and Edouard was at Celtic for 4 years, so you probably go back 4 years.
posted on 12/5/22
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 3 minutes ago
Celtics net spend this season has been -£10m (as in transfer income has been £10m higher than transfer expenditure).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s ridiculous to look at net spend given where Rangers from a few years ago. You started from a position of strength. Celtic have spent as much this season as Rangers have in 3 seasons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Celtic have sold as much talent last year as Rangers have in their history.
How far back do you want to go to plead historical circumstances affecting things? Without EBTs maybe a lot changes, eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well Gerrard came in almost 4 years ago, and Edouard was at Celtic for 4 years, so you probably go back 4 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Since rangers have been in the SPFL, their net spend is c£40m higher than Celtic’s, and at least £30m higher than any other club in the SPFL.
It is ridiculous to look at gross spend in isolation. Hibs have spent half a million more than hearts this season, but hearts are much higher than them. True, but it doesn’t account for Hibs selling Martin Boyle, which had had a huge impact on their ability to score goals. Hibs net spend is c£2m lower than hearts.
posted on 12/5/22
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 3 minutes ago
Celtics net spend this season has been -£10m (as in transfer income has been £10m higher than transfer expenditure).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s ridiculous to look at net spend given where Rangers from a few years ago. You started from a position of strength. Celtic have spent as much this season as Rangers have in 3 seasons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Celtic have sold as much talent last year as Rangers have in their history.
How far back do you want to go to plead historical circumstances affecting things? Without EBTs maybe a lot changes, eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well Gerrard came in almost 4 years ago, and Edouard was at Celtic for 4 years, so you probably go back 4 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Since rangers have been in the SPFL, their net spend is c£40m higher than Celtic’s, and at least £30m higher than any other club in the SPFL.
It is ridiculous to look at gross spend in isolation. Hibs have spent half a million more than hearts this season, but hearts are much higher than them. True, but it doesn’t account for Hibs selling Martin Boyle, which had had a huge impact on their ability to score goals. Hibs net spend is c£2m lower than hearts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye because 4 years ago we had O’Halloran, Jason Holt and Rob Kiernan rather than likes of Ajer, Edouard, Dembele, Tierney ya dafty
posted on 12/5/22
"Since rangers have been in the SPFL, their net spend is c£40m higher than Celtic’s, and at least £30m higher than any other club in the SPFL."
Genuine question about these figures....is this just transfer net spend we are talking about here?
posted on 12/5/22
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 12 minutes ago
James Forrest signs a new 3 year deal
Oh great .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Joy 😕 I assume it's for the home player ratio and if its on reduced terms so be it, but we need another winger https://twitter.com/CelticFC/status/1524797179180814336?t=WENW78Z6G8ClGIuUt-tXSQ&s=19
posted on 12/5/22
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 8 seconds ago
"Since rangers have been in the SPFL, their net spend is c£40m higher than Celtic’s, and at least £30m higher than any other club in the SPFL."
Genuine question about these figures....is this just transfer net spend we are talking about here?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes.
From https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/glasgow-rangers/alletransfers/verein/124 and https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/celtic-glasgow/alletransfers/verein/371
posted on 12/5/22
comment by GTB Cinched it (U14017)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 12 minutes ago
James Forrest signs a new 3 year deal
Oh great .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Joy 😕 I assume it's for the home player ratio and if its on reduced terms so be it, but we need another winger https://twitter.com/CelticFC/status/1524797179180814336?t=WENW78Z6G8ClGIuUt-tXSQ&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jota and CCV were at Celtic park today getting pics taken for the new strip launch…
posted on 12/5/22
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 3 minutes ago
Celtics net spend this season has been -£10m (as in transfer income has been £10m higher than transfer expenditure).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s ridiculous to look at net spend given where Rangers from a few years ago. You started from a position of strength. Celtic have spent as much this season as Rangers have in 3 seasons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Celtic have sold as much talent last year as Rangers have in their history.
How far back do you want to go to plead historical circumstances affecting things? Without EBTs maybe a lot changes, eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well Gerrard came in almost 4 years ago, and Edouard was at Celtic for 4 years, so you probably go back 4 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Since rangers have been in the SPFL, their net spend is c£40m higher than Celtic’s, and at least £30m higher than any other club in the SPFL.
It is ridiculous to look at gross spend in isolation. Hibs have spent half a million more than hearts this season, but hearts are much higher than them. True, but it doesn’t account for Hibs selling Martin Boyle, which had had a huge impact on their ability to score goals. Hibs net spend is c£2m lower than hearts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye because 4 years ago we had O’Halloran, Jason Holt and Rob Kiernan rather than likes of Ajer, Edouard, Dembele, Tierney ya dafty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eddy was a loan player in 17/18 season I think. Tierney a home grown talent who was developed at the club (nearly ruined by some of the “play thru ra pain” rubbish mind you) and the others you mention we have developed. Patterson aside rangers have yet to do that. Hence, the significant disparity in net spend.
posted on 12/5/22
comment by GTB Cinched it (U14017)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 12 minutes ago
James Forrest signs a new 3 year deal
Oh great .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Joy 😕 I assume it's for the home player ratio and if its on reduced terms so be it, but we need another winger https://twitter.com/CelticFC/status/1524797179180814336?t=WENW78Z6G8ClGIuUt-tXSQ&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf it's not a bad back up and as you say counts towards the home grown players
posted on 12/5/22
"It is ridiculous to look at gross spend in isolation."
Why's that like?
Got one club that's not moved from the top of Scottish Football for a decade...and a club that basically lost all of its most valuable player assets, had to reset and build itself up from the third division, a club that was always going to speculate to accumulate for a period in order to get back to a good operating level
Looking a gross spend in isolation is not ridiculous in that situation...saying as much only suits a particular agenda
posted on 12/5/22
Let's really look at things here then using Transfermarkt seeing as others have been quoting figures from there
In 17/18, the market value of Celtics squad was £69.7m
Since then, Celtic have spent £69m, but recouped £103m, so have made a net profit on transfers of £34m
As it stands, Celtic's squad is valued at £71.2m
So Celtic have brought in £34m, and the value of their squad has went up by about £1.5m, so in total that's a £35.5m increase in revenue/squad value
The Rangers squad in 17/18 was valued at a rather paltry £23.5m
Since then, we have spent £33m on transfer fees, and brought in about £18m, so a £15m net spend to strengthen our squad
As it stands, the market value of our current squad is a whopping £118.85m
So we've spent £15m, but our squad value has increased by over £95m.....so that's an £80m increase in squad value having spent just £15m
I'll take that thanks 👍
Page 6 of 8
6 | 7 | 8