This article is what html diarrhoea looks like.
You're after Richarlison for more money than all those forewards other than Nunez
Can we try using paragraphs and forming cohesive thoughts? Thanks
Liverpool or City could have freakish campaigns with injuries. Less chance now as both have really deep squads but it's happened to both of them. City look light upfront but get over 90 points with just 1 striker, it's mental.
City will never have $ issues. They can have a 100 m player on the bench. Liverpool can't do that. CL final has bought Nunez. 64 upfront on a long deal. Can finish. Hold the ball up. Poacher in the box and good in the air. Klopp will make him better and kids attitude is spot on.
If Mane goes along with the dead wood Liverpool will still have plenty of $ to spend too.
If he ends up costing the whole 85 he would've been a bargain though. Spurs fans preying they dont buy an Everton striker for over 50 million now 😂
Rome ain't built in a day. Build a good 11. Then build a good squad. Then buy top prospects and the odd marquee signing. Doesn't happen overnight unless u got oil $
Liverpool are a chequebook club. They moan about City, but they spend even more.
Yet Man U offered more and higher wages but he wanted to play for the big boys. Great mentality.
He scored same amount of goals against us last season as Kane and Son combined did
Could you convert it to $ & ¥ also?
comment by (K̇ash) I'm still the Mané - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 7 minutes ago
Yet Man U offered more and higher wages but he wanted to play for the big boys. Great mentality.
He scored same amount of goals against us last season as Kane and Son combined did
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Incorrect mate
Your about to pay 50m for a striker thats proven to be utter mince.
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 14 minutes ago
Liverpool are a chequebook club. They moan about City, but they spend even more.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp when he took charge of Liverpool made astonishing attack on Pep, by saying he isn't a cheque book manager...and we know the rest
IF you can't beat them I guess...join them?
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 58 seconds ago
Your about to pay 50m for a striker thats proven to be utter mince.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Versus
80m Euros for a striker who has proven nothing in PL?
Yeah, makes sense that!
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 58 seconds ago
Your about to pay 50m for a striker thats proven to be utter mince.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Versus
80m Euros for a striker who has proven nothing in PL?
Yeah, makes sense that!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll take my chances with the unproven lad over the proven to be jobbies lad
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 58 seconds ago
Your about to pay 50m for a striker thats proven to be utter mince.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Versus
80m Euros for a striker who has proven nothing in PL?
Yeah, makes sense that!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll take my chances with the unproven lad over the proven to be jobbies lad
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said Klopp while handing out close to 100m Euros
Good deal, said the seller, you sure know a bargain when you see one
Whats worse is one of them has posted something mouthing off that they have "got one over on Utd" with this deal, and at the same time still thinking they "got one over" on Spurs, who apparently perused Diaz to the ends of the world, only for them to snag him.
Mostly paper talk but, the truth is the guy we actually did get, is 3 years younger, cost less and has better PL stats. All facts they seem to just ignore.
They are crowing over paying £100m+ for a player not PL proven, like it's a good thing.
And all overseen by a manager who, according to them, put together a team on a shoe string and got them to ( nearly but not quite ) the top by sheer genius.
Comical gold.
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, ... (U1859)
posted 16 minutes ago
Your about to pay 50m for a striker thats proven to be utter mince.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LOL whereas Liverpool have paid £80 million for a striker no one has ever heard of, and will probably join the long list of expensive flops that have turned up in the Prem, courtesy of clubs mug enough to buy them.
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 3 minutes ago
Whats worse is one of them has posted something mouthing off that they have "got one over on Utd" with this deal, and at the same time still thinking they "got one over" on Spurs, who apparently perused Diaz to the ends of the world, only for them to snag him.
Mostly paper talk but, the truth is the guy we actually did get, is 3 years younger, cost less and has better PL stats. All facts they seem to just ignore.
They are crowing over paying £100m+ for a player not PL proven, like it's a good thing.
And all overseen by a manager who, according to them, put together a team on a shoe string and got them to ( nearly but not quite ) the top by sheer genius.
Comical gold.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chequebook Liverpool, and still only one title in 32 seasons.
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 58 seconds ago
Your about to pay 50m for a striker thats proven to be utter mince.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Versus
80m Euros for a striker who has proven nothing in PL?
Yeah, makes sense that!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll take my chances with the unproven lad over the proven to be jobbies lad
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said Klopp while handing out close to 100m Euros
Good deal, said the seller, you sure know a bargain when you see one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's 64m to start 😂 that's Ndombele $. Amazes me hate Liverpool get for for spending money they earn from success. Liverpools net spend per year is unreal.
Robertson was just a hull player. Matip a free transfer. Salah a Chelsea flop. Mane another Southampton player. Trent a youth player that can't defend etc. There's a reason Liverpool fans trust klopps judgement.
Ndombele, Sissoko, Lo Celso, Soldado, Sanchez… just from the top of my head
Bottleham Flopspur must lead the way in PL duds
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 8 minutes ago
Whats worse is one of them has posted something mouthing off that they have "got one over on Utd" with this deal, and at the same time still thinking they "got one over" on Spurs, who apparently perused Diaz to the ends of the world, only for them to snag him.
Mostly paper talk but, the truth is the guy we actually did get, is 3 years younger, cost less and has better PL stats. All facts they seem to just ignore.
They are crowing over paying £100m+ for a player not PL proven, like it's a good thing.
And all overseen by a manager who, according to them, put together a team on a shoe string and got them to ( nearly but not quite ) the top by sheer genius.
Comical gold.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopps had a net spend of around 30 mill a season. They are competing with a team with 100m player on the bench funded by oil $.
You do realise the max fee is 85m?:64 to start. They are also losing an old player for 40m and just got over 100m for the CL. Selling a few fringe players they will have even more cash.
If levy had invested wisely spurs could be where Liverpool are. Excluding this window til it shuts, spurs have spent pretty much what Liverpool have net over recent seasons.
Makes me laugh when people say “is proven in the Premier League” when talking about potential signings like if they’ve not played in the prem then they won’t make it. Henry, Drogba, Augero, Suarez etc to name a few. Not saying Nunez will be better than them by the way
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 58 seconds ago
Your about to pay 50m for a striker thats proven to be utter mince.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Versus
80m Euros for a striker who has proven nothing in PL?
Yeah, makes sense that!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll take my chances with the unproven lad over the proven to be jobbies lad
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said Klopp while handing out close to 100m Euros
Good deal, said the seller, you sure know a bargain when you see one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's 64m to start 😂 that's Ndombele $. Amazes me hate Liverpool get for for spending money they earn from success. Liverpools net spend per year is unreal.
Robertson was just a hull player. Matip a free transfer. Salah a Chelsea flop. Mane another Southampton player. Trent a youth player that can't defend etc. There's a reason Liverpool fans trust klopps judgement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs current front 3 cost a whopping £22m combined - more or less a quarter of Nunez
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 3 minutes ago
Whats worse is one of them has posted something mouthing off that they have "got one over on Utd" with this deal, and at the same time still thinking they "got one over" on Spurs, who apparently perused Diaz to the ends of the world, only for them to snag him.
Mostly paper talk but, the truth is the guy we actually did get, is 3 years younger, cost less and has better PL stats. All facts they seem to just ignore.
They are crowing over paying £100m+ for a player not PL proven, like it's a good thing.
And all overseen by a manager who, according to them, put together a team on a shoe string and got them to ( nearly but not quite ) the top by sheer genius.
Comical gold.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chequebook Liverpool, and still only one title in 32 seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs chequebooking their way to 4th by signing the worst brazilian seen in the prem since alfonso alves.
And still 1 trophy in god knows how many years
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 - Todger (U18109)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 58 seconds ago
Your about to pay 50m for a striker thats proven to be utter mince.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Versus
80m Euros for a striker who has proven nothing in PL?
Yeah, makes sense that!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll take my chances with the unproven lad over the proven to be jobbies lad
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said Klopp while handing out close to 100m Euros
Good deal, said the seller, you sure know a bargain when you see one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's 64m to start 😂 that's Ndombele $. Amazes me hate Liverpool get for for spending money they earn from success. Liverpools net spend per year is unreal.
Robertson was just a hull player. Matip a free transfer. Salah a Chelsea flop. Mane another Southampton player. Trent a youth player that can't defend etc. There's a reason Liverpool fans trust klopps judgement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs current front 3 cost a whopping £22m combined - more or less a quarter of Nunez
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How does their £/trophy work out?
comment by Harambe (U22339)
posted 8 seconds ago
Ndombele, Sissoko, Lo Celso, Soldado, Sanchez… just from the top of my head
Bottleham Flopspur must lead the way in PL duds
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a mess this is?
Please go back to school and finish your education!
Sign in if you want to comment
80m Euros for an unproven striker
Page 1 of 7
6 | 7
posted on 12/6/22
This article is what html diarrhoea looks like.
posted on 12/6/22
You're after Richarlison for more money than all those forewards other than Nunez
posted on 12/6/22
Can we try using paragraphs and forming cohesive thoughts? Thanks
posted on 12/6/22
Liverpool or City could have freakish campaigns with injuries. Less chance now as both have really deep squads but it's happened to both of them. City look light upfront but get over 90 points with just 1 striker, it's mental.
City will never have $ issues. They can have a 100 m player on the bench. Liverpool can't do that. CL final has bought Nunez. 64 upfront on a long deal. Can finish. Hold the ball up. Poacher in the box and good in the air. Klopp will make him better and kids attitude is spot on.
If Mane goes along with the dead wood Liverpool will still have plenty of $ to spend too.
If he ends up costing the whole 85 he would've been a bargain though. Spurs fans preying they dont buy an Everton striker for over 50 million now 😂
Rome ain't built in a day. Build a good 11. Then build a good squad. Then buy top prospects and the odd marquee signing. Doesn't happen overnight unless u got oil $
posted on 12/6/22
Liverpool are a chequebook club. They moan about City, but they spend even more.
posted on 12/6/22
Yet Man U offered more and higher wages but he wanted to play for the big boys. Great mentality.
He scored same amount of goals against us last season as Kane and Son combined did
posted on 12/6/22
Could you convert it to $ & ¥ also?
posted on 12/6/22
comment by (K̇ash) I'm still the Mané - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 7 minutes ago
Yet Man U offered more and higher wages but he wanted to play for the big boys. Great mentality.
He scored same amount of goals against us last season as Kane and Son combined did
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Incorrect mate
posted on 12/6/22
Your about to pay 50m for a striker thats proven to be utter mince.
posted on 12/6/22
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 14 minutes ago
Liverpool are a chequebook club. They moan about City, but they spend even more.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp when he took charge of Liverpool made astonishing attack on Pep, by saying he isn't a cheque book manager...and we know the rest
IF you can't beat them I guess...join them?
posted on 12/6/22
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 58 seconds ago
Your about to pay 50m for a striker thats proven to be utter mince.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Versus
80m Euros for a striker who has proven nothing in PL?
Yeah, makes sense that!
posted on 12/6/22
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 58 seconds ago
Your about to pay 50m for a striker thats proven to be utter mince.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Versus
80m Euros for a striker who has proven nothing in PL?
Yeah, makes sense that!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll take my chances with the unproven lad over the proven to be jobbies lad
posted on 12/6/22
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 58 seconds ago
Your about to pay 50m for a striker thats proven to be utter mince.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Versus
80m Euros for a striker who has proven nothing in PL?
Yeah, makes sense that!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll take my chances with the unproven lad over the proven to be jobbies lad
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said Klopp while handing out close to 100m Euros
Good deal, said the seller, you sure know a bargain when you see one
posted on 12/6/22
Whats worse is one of them has posted something mouthing off that they have "got one over on Utd" with this deal, and at the same time still thinking they "got one over" on Spurs, who apparently perused Diaz to the ends of the world, only for them to snag him.
Mostly paper talk but, the truth is the guy we actually did get, is 3 years younger, cost less and has better PL stats. All facts they seem to just ignore.
They are crowing over paying £100m+ for a player not PL proven, like it's a good thing.
And all overseen by a manager who, according to them, put together a team on a shoe string and got them to ( nearly but not quite ) the top by sheer genius.
Comical gold.
posted on 12/6/22
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, ... (U1859)
posted 16 minutes ago
Your about to pay 50m for a striker thats proven to be utter mince.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LOL whereas Liverpool have paid £80 million for a striker no one has ever heard of, and will probably join the long list of expensive flops that have turned up in the Prem, courtesy of clubs mug enough to buy them.
posted on 12/6/22
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 3 minutes ago
Whats worse is one of them has posted something mouthing off that they have "got one over on Utd" with this deal, and at the same time still thinking they "got one over" on Spurs, who apparently perused Diaz to the ends of the world, only for them to snag him.
Mostly paper talk but, the truth is the guy we actually did get, is 3 years younger, cost less and has better PL stats. All facts they seem to just ignore.
They are crowing over paying £100m+ for a player not PL proven, like it's a good thing.
And all overseen by a manager who, according to them, put together a team on a shoe string and got them to ( nearly but not quite ) the top by sheer genius.
Comical gold.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chequebook Liverpool, and still only one title in 32 seasons.
posted on 12/6/22
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 58 seconds ago
Your about to pay 50m for a striker thats proven to be utter mince.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Versus
80m Euros for a striker who has proven nothing in PL?
Yeah, makes sense that!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll take my chances with the unproven lad over the proven to be jobbies lad
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said Klopp while handing out close to 100m Euros
Good deal, said the seller, you sure know a bargain when you see one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's 64m to start 😂 that's Ndombele $. Amazes me hate Liverpool get for for spending money they earn from success. Liverpools net spend per year is unreal.
Robertson was just a hull player. Matip a free transfer. Salah a Chelsea flop. Mane another Southampton player. Trent a youth player that can't defend etc. There's a reason Liverpool fans trust klopps judgement.
posted on 12/6/22
Ndombele, Sissoko, Lo Celso, Soldado, Sanchez… just from the top of my head
Bottleham Flopspur must lead the way in PL duds
posted on 12/6/22
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 8 minutes ago
Whats worse is one of them has posted something mouthing off that they have "got one over on Utd" with this deal, and at the same time still thinking they "got one over" on Spurs, who apparently perused Diaz to the ends of the world, only for them to snag him.
Mostly paper talk but, the truth is the guy we actually did get, is 3 years younger, cost less and has better PL stats. All facts they seem to just ignore.
They are crowing over paying £100m+ for a player not PL proven, like it's a good thing.
And all overseen by a manager who, according to them, put together a team on a shoe string and got them to ( nearly but not quite ) the top by sheer genius.
Comical gold.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopps had a net spend of around 30 mill a season. They are competing with a team with 100m player on the bench funded by oil $.
You do realise the max fee is 85m?:64 to start. They are also losing an old player for 40m and just got over 100m for the CL. Selling a few fringe players they will have even more cash.
If levy had invested wisely spurs could be where Liverpool are. Excluding this window til it shuts, spurs have spent pretty much what Liverpool have net over recent seasons.
posted on 12/6/22
Makes me laugh when people say “is proven in the Premier League” when talking about potential signings like if they’ve not played in the prem then they won’t make it. Henry, Drogba, Augero, Suarez etc to name a few. Not saying Nunez will be better than them by the way
posted on 12/6/22
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 58 seconds ago
Your about to pay 50m for a striker thats proven to be utter mince.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Versus
80m Euros for a striker who has proven nothing in PL?
Yeah, makes sense that!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll take my chances with the unproven lad over the proven to be jobbies lad
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said Klopp while handing out close to 100m Euros
Good deal, said the seller, you sure know a bargain when you see one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's 64m to start 😂 that's Ndombele $. Amazes me hate Liverpool get for for spending money they earn from success. Liverpools net spend per year is unreal.
Robertson was just a hull player. Matip a free transfer. Salah a Chelsea flop. Mane another Southampton player. Trent a youth player that can't defend etc. There's a reason Liverpool fans trust klopps judgement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs current front 3 cost a whopping £22m combined - more or less a quarter of Nunez
posted on 12/6/22
Aguero*
posted on 12/6/22
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 3 minutes ago
Whats worse is one of them has posted something mouthing off that they have "got one over on Utd" with this deal, and at the same time still thinking they "got one over" on Spurs, who apparently perused Diaz to the ends of the world, only for them to snag him.
Mostly paper talk but, the truth is the guy we actually did get, is 3 years younger, cost less and has better PL stats. All facts they seem to just ignore.
They are crowing over paying £100m+ for a player not PL proven, like it's a good thing.
And all overseen by a manager who, according to them, put together a team on a shoe string and got them to ( nearly but not quite ) the top by sheer genius.
Comical gold.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chequebook Liverpool, and still only one title in 32 seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs chequebooking their way to 4th by signing the worst brazilian seen in the prem since alfonso alves.
And still 1 trophy in god knows how many years
posted on 12/6/22
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 - Todger (U18109)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Mellor, Lovely Cushioned Header, FOR GERRARD, OOOOOOHHHHHH YAAAAAAA BEEEAAAUUUTTTYYYYY!!!!!!!!! (U1859)
posted 58 seconds ago
Your about to pay 50m for a striker thats proven to be utter mince.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Versus
80m Euros for a striker who has proven nothing in PL?
Yeah, makes sense that!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll take my chances with the unproven lad over the proven to be jobbies lad
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said Klopp while handing out close to 100m Euros
Good deal, said the seller, you sure know a bargain when you see one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's 64m to start 😂 that's Ndombele $. Amazes me hate Liverpool get for for spending money they earn from success. Liverpools net spend per year is unreal.
Robertson was just a hull player. Matip a free transfer. Salah a Chelsea flop. Mane another Southampton player. Trent a youth player that can't defend etc. There's a reason Liverpool fans trust klopps judgement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs current front 3 cost a whopping £22m combined - more or less a quarter of Nunez
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How does their £/trophy work out?
posted on 12/6/22
comment by Harambe (U22339)
posted 8 seconds ago
Ndombele, Sissoko, Lo Celso, Soldado, Sanchez… just from the top of my head
Bottleham Flopspur must lead the way in PL duds
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a mess this is?
Please go back to school and finish your education!
Page 1 of 7
6 | 7