For the last time, the only thing people have been arguing on this thread is that it's not healthy in a relationship for a man to control a woman (or vice versa). I dont really see what thats got to do with politics but you've extrapolated and gone on this bizarre, nonsensical rant about the far left.
———
It’s easier to attack a so called movement than address legitimate arguments.
comment by Pun (U21588)
posted 4 minutes ago
1000
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hag
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - Simp (U2958)
posted 4 hours, 54 minutes ago
As i've said a thousand times though... "Wokism" as you call it is not a group like, for example, the Labour party... It's not even a movement, like BLM, where you can reach out to leaders and organisers.
It's an undefined mindset that simply means you are aware of and actively attentive to important facts and issues. A thought process doesn't have a CEO, or manager, or local branch etc etc. The only "house" you can get in order regarding being woke is your own.
You surely know this... Or you are so naive that you believe the right wing rhetoric that "wokism" is a defined group, an enemy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's see if you can understand this:
The mainstream right has to disassociate with extreme elements on the far right, otherwise they would be considered one and the same.
The left on the other hand, instead of doing similar they defend the extreme left and leave sections of society thinking you're all crazy. The left really doesn't help itself.
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 4 hours, 39 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 2 hours, 21 minutes ago
Whataboutery—why am I not surprised?
You guys don't want to get your house in order but expect people to visit.
After nearly 1000 comments we come to the same conclusion; Jordan Peterson was right, you don't want to clean your room.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are so fixated on 'wokism' that you're not actually reading what is being said.
There are only three people on this thread who have been talking about things like gender-neutrality, radical feminism and female sports players being paid equally. Guess which three.
For the last time, the only thing people have been arguing on this thread is that it's not healthy in a relationship for a man to control a woman (or vice versa). I dont really see what thats got to do with politics but you've extrapolated and gone on this bizarre, nonsensical rant about the far left.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That topic itself had nothing to do with the article. Anyway, I said I advocate men taking the lead, not being controlling.
The others got aggressive and started attacking us, so I hit back. They're under the illusion they're not controlled by anything, so I showed they are—that's why they have identical opinions.
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 4 hours, 39 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 2 hours, 21 minutes ago
Whataboutery—why am I not surprised?
You guys don't want to get your house in order but expect people to visit.
After nearly 1000 comments we come to the same conclusion; Jordan Peterson was right, you don't want to clean your room.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are so fixated on 'wokism' that you're not actually reading what is being said.
There are only three people on this thread who have been talking about things like gender-neutrality, radical feminism and female sports players being paid equally. Guess which three.
For the last time, the only thing people have been arguing on this thread is that it's not healthy in a relationship for a man to control a woman (or vice versa). I dont really see what thats got to do with politics but you've extrapolated and gone on this bizarre, nonsensical rant about the far left.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That topic itself had nothing to do with the article. Anyway, I said I advocate men taking the lead, not being controlling.
The others got aggressive and started attacking us, so I hit back. They're under the illusion they're not controlled by anything, so I showed they are—that's why they have identical opinions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Identical opinions? That people shouldn't be controlled by their partners? Weird huh? Or not.
Let's face it, you lot have almost identical social/political opinions. It's groupthink, but you're not controlled, eh Elvis?
Let's face it, you lot have almost identical social/political opinions
----------------------
Go on, humour me...this assumption is based on what exactly?
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - Simp (U2958)
posted 4 hours, 54 minutes ago
As i've said a thousand times though... "Wokism" as you call it is not a group like, for example, the Labour party... It's not even a movement, like BLM, where you can reach out to leaders and organisers.
It's an undefined mindset that simply means you are aware of and actively attentive to important facts and issues. A thought process doesn't have a CEO, or manager, or local branch etc etc. The only "house" you can get in order regarding being woke is your own.
You surely know this... Or you are so naive that you believe the right wing rhetoric that "wokism" is a defined group, an enemy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's see if you can understand this:
The mainstream right has to disassociate with extreme elements on the far right, otherwise they would be considered one and the same.
The left on the other hand, instead of doing similar they defend the extreme left and leave sections of society thinking you're all crazy. The left really doesn't help itself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are truly the dumbest poster i have ever encountered on here... That's a serious accomplishment.
"The mainstream right has to disassociate with extreme elements on the far right"
That has not happened.
"The left on the other hand, instead of doing similar they defend the extreme left"
That has not happened.
I don't think you actually know what extreme left and right means. You use buzzwords you've heard on twitter and don't think to learn the actual politics behind them.
The extreme left is basically authoritarian communism... Nothing, and i really do mean nothing, in common with any kind of "woke" thinking.
We've broke 1000 posts... So I will stop given you any more oxygen.
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 2 minutes ago
Let's face it, you lot have almost identical social/political opinions. It's groupthink, but you're not controlled, eh Elvis?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please explain these political views that I have expressed.
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
Let's face it, you lot have almost identical social/political opinions
----------------------
Go on, humour me...this assumption is based on what exactly?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just another example of the guys reading they want and not understanding what is being discussed.
These people don’t know what the far left or far right actually are.
Anything N2 about my political leanings? How do they align with the other posters that have disagreed with you, UWW and Schoey?
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - Simp (U2958)
posted 1 day, 14 hours ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - Simp (U2958)
posted 4 hours, 54 minutes ago
As i've said a thousand times though... "Wokism" as you call it is not a group like, for example, the Labour party... It's not even a movement, like BLM, where you can reach out to leaders and organisers.
It's an undefined mindset that simply means you are aware of and actively attentive to important facts and issues. A thought process doesn't have a CEO, or manager, or local branch etc etc. The only "house" you can get in order regarding being woke is your own.
You surely know this... Or you are so naive that you believe the right wing rhetoric that "wokism" is a defined group, an enemy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's see if you can understand this:
The mainstream right has to disassociate with extreme elements on the far right, otherwise they would be considered one and the same.
The left on the other hand, instead of doing similar they defend the extreme left and leave sections of society thinking you're all crazy. The left really doesn't help itself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are truly the dumbest poster i have ever encountered on here... That's a serious accomplishment.
"The mainstream right has to disassociate with extreme elements on the far right"
That has not happened.
"The left on the other hand, instead of doing similar they defend the extreme left"
That has not happened.
I don't think you actually know what extreme left and right means. You use buzzwords you've heard on twitter and don't think to learn the actual politics behind them.
The extreme left is basically authoritarian communism... Nothing, and i really do mean nothing, in common with any kind of "woke" thinking.
We've broke 1000 posts... So I will stop given you any more oxygen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it’s important to differentiate between the UK and the US. The US is notably more extreme on both sides than what we typically have over here. Or at least less commonplace than what they have over in the US.
There’s plenty of shootin’ toot in’ redneck types in the US, much like there are plenty of people who genuinely advocate for extreme socialist policies and quite happily wear apparel of the hammer & sickle.
Words and their meaning change over time.
alert to injustice in society, especially racism.
"we need to stay angry, and stay woke“
I think that what is being put to you is that those who fit into that above definition are almost exclusively leftists, a lot of the time quite extreme too and some of them very extreme ideologues who are quite simply so strange to most people that the term woke became somewhat of a pejorative.
https://amp.theguardian.com/politics/2009/jun/08/labour-conservatives-condemn-bnp-europe
Can you think of examples where Labour MPs have openly come out against extremist measures taken by some on the left? Extinction rebellion types I mean. They probably have done but I can’t remember much
Words and their meaning change over time.
alert to injustice in society, especially racism.
"we need to stay angry, and stay woke“
I think that what is being put to you is that those who fit into that above definition are almost exclusively leftists
=====
That's a good thing actually for the left to be associated with. On the other hand, the right is associated with the exact opposite. Not just not alert to injustice in society, but often flat out denial of the racism/injustice even when there is irrefutable proof; Unless it affects their own agenda in which case they almost always get angry and start cancelling opinions, filtering comments and the worst behaviour of all, playing the victim.
Sign in if you want to comment
The problem
Page 41 of 41
37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41
posted on 19/7/22
For the last time, the only thing people have been arguing on this thread is that it's not healthy in a relationship for a man to control a woman (or vice versa). I dont really see what thats got to do with politics but you've extrapolated and gone on this bizarre, nonsensical rant about the far left.
———
It’s easier to attack a so called movement than address legitimate arguments.
posted on 19/7/22
comment by Pun (U21588)
posted 4 minutes ago
1000
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hag
posted on 19/7/22
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - Simp (U2958)
posted 4 hours, 54 minutes ago
As i've said a thousand times though... "Wokism" as you call it is not a group like, for example, the Labour party... It's not even a movement, like BLM, where you can reach out to leaders and organisers.
It's an undefined mindset that simply means you are aware of and actively attentive to important facts and issues. A thought process doesn't have a CEO, or manager, or local branch etc etc. The only "house" you can get in order regarding being woke is your own.
You surely know this... Or you are so naive that you believe the right wing rhetoric that "wokism" is a defined group, an enemy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's see if you can understand this:
The mainstream right has to disassociate with extreme elements on the far right, otherwise they would be considered one and the same.
The left on the other hand, instead of doing similar they defend the extreme left and leave sections of society thinking you're all crazy. The left really doesn't help itself.
posted on 19/7/22
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 4 hours, 39 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 2 hours, 21 minutes ago
Whataboutery—why am I not surprised?
You guys don't want to get your house in order but expect people to visit.
After nearly 1000 comments we come to the same conclusion; Jordan Peterson was right, you don't want to clean your room.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are so fixated on 'wokism' that you're not actually reading what is being said.
There are only three people on this thread who have been talking about things like gender-neutrality, radical feminism and female sports players being paid equally. Guess which three.
For the last time, the only thing people have been arguing on this thread is that it's not healthy in a relationship for a man to control a woman (or vice versa). I dont really see what thats got to do with politics but you've extrapolated and gone on this bizarre, nonsensical rant about the far left.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That topic itself had nothing to do with the article. Anyway, I said I advocate men taking the lead, not being controlling.
The others got aggressive and started attacking us, so I hit back. They're under the illusion they're not controlled by anything, so I showed they are—that's why they have identical opinions.
posted on 19/7/22
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 4 hours, 39 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 2 hours, 21 minutes ago
Whataboutery—why am I not surprised?
You guys don't want to get your house in order but expect people to visit.
After nearly 1000 comments we come to the same conclusion; Jordan Peterson was right, you don't want to clean your room.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are so fixated on 'wokism' that you're not actually reading what is being said.
There are only three people on this thread who have been talking about things like gender-neutrality, radical feminism and female sports players being paid equally. Guess which three.
For the last time, the only thing people have been arguing on this thread is that it's not healthy in a relationship for a man to control a woman (or vice versa). I dont really see what thats got to do with politics but you've extrapolated and gone on this bizarre, nonsensical rant about the far left.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That topic itself had nothing to do with the article. Anyway, I said I advocate men taking the lead, not being controlling.
The others got aggressive and started attacking us, so I hit back. They're under the illusion they're not controlled by anything, so I showed they are—that's why they have identical opinions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Identical opinions? That people shouldn't be controlled by their partners? Weird huh? Or not.
posted on 19/7/22
Let's face it, you lot have almost identical social/political opinions. It's groupthink, but you're not controlled, eh Elvis?
posted on 19/7/22
Let's face it, you lot have almost identical social/political opinions
----------------------
Go on, humour me...this assumption is based on what exactly?
posted on 19/7/22
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - Simp (U2958)
posted 4 hours, 54 minutes ago
As i've said a thousand times though... "Wokism" as you call it is not a group like, for example, the Labour party... It's not even a movement, like BLM, where you can reach out to leaders and organisers.
It's an undefined mindset that simply means you are aware of and actively attentive to important facts and issues. A thought process doesn't have a CEO, or manager, or local branch etc etc. The only "house" you can get in order regarding being woke is your own.
You surely know this... Or you are so naive that you believe the right wing rhetoric that "wokism" is a defined group, an enemy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's see if you can understand this:
The mainstream right has to disassociate with extreme elements on the far right, otherwise they would be considered one and the same.
The left on the other hand, instead of doing similar they defend the extreme left and leave sections of society thinking you're all crazy. The left really doesn't help itself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are truly the dumbest poster i have ever encountered on here... That's a serious accomplishment.
"The mainstream right has to disassociate with extreme elements on the far right"
That has not happened.
"The left on the other hand, instead of doing similar they defend the extreme left"
That has not happened.
I don't think you actually know what extreme left and right means. You use buzzwords you've heard on twitter and don't think to learn the actual politics behind them.
The extreme left is basically authoritarian communism... Nothing, and i really do mean nothing, in common with any kind of "woke" thinking.
We've broke 1000 posts... So I will stop given you any more oxygen.
posted on 19/7/22
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 2 minutes ago
Let's face it, you lot have almost identical social/political opinions. It's groupthink, but you're not controlled, eh Elvis?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please explain these political views that I have expressed.
posted on 19/7/22
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
Let's face it, you lot have almost identical social/political opinions
----------------------
Go on, humour me...this assumption is based on what exactly?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just another example of the guys reading they want and not understanding what is being discussed.
posted on 19/7/22
These people don’t know what the far left or far right actually are.
posted on 20/7/22
Anything N2 about my political leanings? How do they align with the other posters that have disagreed with you, UWW and Schoey?
posted on 21/7/22
Nothing?
posted on 21/7/22
One Hag
posted on 21/7/22
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - Simp (U2958)
posted 1 day, 14 hours ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - Simp (U2958)
posted 4 hours, 54 minutes ago
As i've said a thousand times though... "Wokism" as you call it is not a group like, for example, the Labour party... It's not even a movement, like BLM, where you can reach out to leaders and organisers.
It's an undefined mindset that simply means you are aware of and actively attentive to important facts and issues. A thought process doesn't have a CEO, or manager, or local branch etc etc. The only "house" you can get in order regarding being woke is your own.
You surely know this... Or you are so naive that you believe the right wing rhetoric that "wokism" is a defined group, an enemy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's see if you can understand this:
The mainstream right has to disassociate with extreme elements on the far right, otherwise they would be considered one and the same.
The left on the other hand, instead of doing similar they defend the extreme left and leave sections of society thinking you're all crazy. The left really doesn't help itself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are truly the dumbest poster i have ever encountered on here... That's a serious accomplishment.
"The mainstream right has to disassociate with extreme elements on the far right"
That has not happened.
"The left on the other hand, instead of doing similar they defend the extreme left"
That has not happened.
I don't think you actually know what extreme left and right means. You use buzzwords you've heard on twitter and don't think to learn the actual politics behind them.
The extreme left is basically authoritarian communism... Nothing, and i really do mean nothing, in common with any kind of "woke" thinking.
We've broke 1000 posts... So I will stop given you any more oxygen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it’s important to differentiate between the UK and the US. The US is notably more extreme on both sides than what we typically have over here. Or at least less commonplace than what they have over in the US.
There’s plenty of shootin’ toot in’ redneck types in the US, much like there are plenty of people who genuinely advocate for extreme socialist policies and quite happily wear apparel of the hammer & sickle.
Words and their meaning change over time.
alert to injustice in society, especially racism.
"we need to stay angry, and stay woke“
I think that what is being put to you is that those who fit into that above definition are almost exclusively leftists, a lot of the time quite extreme too and some of them very extreme ideologues who are quite simply so strange to most people that the term woke became somewhat of a pejorative.
https://amp.theguardian.com/politics/2009/jun/08/labour-conservatives-condemn-bnp-europe
Can you think of examples where Labour MPs have openly come out against extremist measures taken by some on the left? Extinction rebellion types I mean. They probably have done but I can’t remember much
posted on 14/8/22
Words and their meaning change over time.
alert to injustice in society, especially racism.
"we need to stay angry, and stay woke“
I think that what is being put to you is that those who fit into that above definition are almost exclusively leftists
=====
That's a good thing actually for the left to be associated with. On the other hand, the right is associated with the exact opposite. Not just not alert to injustice in society, but often flat out denial of the racism/injustice even when there is irrefutable proof; Unless it affects their own agenda in which case they almost always get angry and start cancelling opinions, filtering comments and the worst behaviour of all, playing the victim.
Page 41 of 41
37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41