comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 minutes ago
Why is it that when Spurs play Man City, Man City's awful record against Spurs just gets a throwaway line on Sky Sports before they spend the rest of the build up talking about how great City are and how they'll beat us anyway,
-------------------------------------------
That's probably based on the fact that over the last 10 years, City have won 16 games to Spurs 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now now Boris don’t be reasonable
The media obsession with some spurs fans is embarrassing
There is no facking conspiracy
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 1 hour, 40 minutes ago
There is one or two ( actually loads of 'em ) on the Arsenal boards too.
The amount of "we are nailed on top 4" or "We will challenge the top two" is breath taking.
just seen this on another thread. Word for word what SteveB has posted in the OP. He must have forgot to switch accounts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty sure the names SteveF and SimonB themselves are a parody of all the sock accounts you see pumping up review scores on Google, TripAdvisor and the likes.
I think the starting point for most Spurs fans is that we'll lose. Lost 4 times last season, a very poor record at SB and a history of throwing it away even when well placed. Quite happy to be the underdog here and hopeful we'll put in a 100% professional display and achieve a draw at worst
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 14 minutes ago
Embarrassing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes that would be Liverpool, scrambling a draw against a promoted side.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ahh Sandy and his sock accounts, insecurity at its best
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aint got any sock accounts mate. Stop spreading porkies.
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 25 minutes ago
Spurs fans’,particularly on here, obsession with the media really is fecking bizarre.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And your obsession with Spurs fans is even more bizarre.
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 minutes ago
Why is it that when Spurs play Man City, Man City's awful record against Spurs just gets a throwaway line on Sky Sports before they spend the rest of the build up talking about how great City are and how they'll beat us anyway,
-------------------------------------------
That's probably based on the fact that over the last 10 years, City have won 16 games to Spurs 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now now Boris don’t be reasonable
The media obsession with some spurs fans is embarrassing
There is no facking conspiracy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boris conveniently forgetting that prior to the previous 10 years Spurs beat City 23 times to just five losses in all competitions in the Prem era. Amusing how he selects just the past 10 seasons.
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 1 hour, 40 minutes ago
There is one or two ( actually loads of 'em ) on the Arsenal boards too.
The amount of "we are nailed on top 4" or "We will challenge the top two" is breath taking.
just seen this on another thread. Word for word what SteveB has posted in the OP. He must have forgot to switch accounts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Sandy has 3 accounts
The man spends the day talking to himself
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How wired 😂😂😂😂
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 26 minutes ago
I think the starting point for most Spurs fans is that we'll lose. Lost 4 times last season, a very poor record at SB and a history of throwing it away even when well placed. Quite happy to be the underdog here and hopeful we'll put in a 100% professional display and achieve a draw at worst
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs are not the underdog. Just watching sky sports now saying how improved Spurs are. Other articles saying Spurs have closed the gap, to Chelsea which I think over the course of 38 games will be proven correct.
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 26 minutes ago
I think the starting point for most Spurs fans is that we'll lose. Lost 4 times last season, a very poor record at SB and a history of throwing it away even when well placed. Quite happy to be the underdog here and hopeful we'll put in a 100% professional display and achieve a draw at worst
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs are not the underdog. Just watching sky sports now saying how improved Spurs are. Other articles saying Spurs have closed the gap, to Chelsea which I think over the course of 38 games will be proven correct.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Underdogs Must be a mentality thing
I thought this lot were challenging for the title
When Kulu crosses that white line today he won't give a gnats chuff what our record at SB is.
Luckily he won't be able to here that odious smug t0sser Tyler who will mention it every 2 mins.
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 minutes ago
Why is it that when Spurs play Man City, Man City's awful record against Spurs just gets a throwaway line on Sky Sports before they spend the rest of the build up talking about how great City are and how they'll beat us anyway,
-------------------------------------------
That's probably based on the fact that over the last 10 years, City have won 16 games to Spurs 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now now Boris don’t be reasonable
The media obsession with some spurs fans is embarrassing
There is no facking conspiracy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boris conveniently forgetting that prior to the previous 10 years Spurs beat City 23 times to just five losses in all competitions in the Prem era. Amusing how he selects just the past 10 seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think he’s necessarily forgetting it, but it’s not at all relevant. This isn’t a conversation about our head to head record throughout history. It’s about an ‘alleged’ media bias. So when the media talk about Spurs vs City, they’re likely to focus on the recent record, ie since City got all the money. Before then isn't really relevant to that conversation.
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 minutes ago
Why is it that when Spurs play Man City, Man City's awful record against Spurs just gets a throwaway line on Sky Sports before they spend the rest of the build up talking about how great City are and how they'll beat us anyway,
-------------------------------------------
That's probably based on the fact that over the last 10 years, City have won 16 games to Spurs 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now now Boris don’t be reasonable
The media obsession with some spurs fans is embarrassing
There is no facking conspiracy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boris conveniently forgetting that prior to the previous 10 years Spurs beat City 23 times to just five losses in all competitions in the Prem era. Amusing how he selects just the past 10 seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think he’s necessarily forgetting it, but it’s not at all relevant. This isn’t a conversation about our head to head record throughout history. It’s about an ‘alleged’ media bias. So when the media talk about Spurs vs City, they’re likely to focus on the recent record, ie since City got all the money. Before then isn't really relevant to that conversation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's 65 all if you want to go back to the Dawn of Time.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 minutes ago
Why is it that when Spurs play Man City, Man City's awful record against Spurs just gets a throwaway line on Sky Sports before they spend the rest of the build up talking about how great City are and how they'll beat us anyway,
-------------------------------------------
That's probably based on the fact that over the last 10 years, City have won 16 games to Spurs 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now now Boris don’t be reasonable
The media obsession with some spurs fans is embarrassing
There is no facking conspiracy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boris conveniently forgetting that prior to the previous 10 years Spurs beat City 23 times to just five losses in all competitions in the Prem era. Amusing how he selects just the past 10 seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think he’s necessarily forgetting it, but it’s not at all relevant. This isn’t a conversation about our head to head record throughout history. It’s about an ‘alleged’ media bias. So when the media talk about Spurs vs City, they’re likely to focus on the recent record, ie since City got all the money. Before then isn't really relevant to that conversation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's 65 all if you want to go back to the Dawn of Time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All to play for in the next game then!
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 minutes ago
Why is it that when Spurs play Man City, Man City's awful record against Spurs just gets a throwaway line on Sky Sports before they spend the rest of the build up talking about how great City are and how they'll beat us anyway,
-------------------------------------------
That's probably based on the fact that over the last 10 years, City have won 16 games to Spurs 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now now Boris don’t be reasonable
The media obsession with some spurs fans is embarrassing
There is no facking conspiracy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boris conveniently forgetting that prior to the previous 10 years Spurs beat City 23 times to just five losses in all competitions in the Prem era. Amusing how he selects just the past 10 seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think he’s necessarily forgetting it, but it’s not at all relevant. This isn’t a conversation about our head to head record throughout history. It’s about an ‘alleged’ media bias. So when the media talk about Spurs vs City, they’re likely to focus on the recent record, ie since City got all the money. Before then isn't really relevant to that conversation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's 65 all if you want to go back to the Dawn of Time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All to play for in the next game then!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Counting the hours.
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 40 minutes ago
The media also never mention that between 1915 and 1952, that`s 37 years, Spurs only lost one league game at Stamford Bridge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That can't be right, can it ? I was utterly convinced football was invented in 1992. No wait, actually it was invented in 2009, given Spurs have never won anything.
Or maybe it was 2000 when Chelsea started to buy a history ? or around 2010 when City did the same.
Who knows ? I guess whatever the narrative it, then that's when it all started.
comment by Raptor✡ (U1071)
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
SteveF is gonna fume
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, not really. It just shows I am not the only one who thinks the media are narrative driven.
It usually follows the money, as they ( Sky in
particular ) just love a club with money, as they see it as an opportunity for them to make money. Why do you think they suddenly all love Newcastle. Wind back a year or so, and they were the sh*t on some reporters shoe.
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 54 minutes ago
The media also never mention that between 1915 and 1952, that`s 37 years, Spurs only lost one league game at Stamford Bridge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That might be because it's olds, i.e. the opposite of news.
It might also because 37 years makes it sound like it was a huge amount of games when in reality it was just 11, and that the Chelsea win more or less in the middle means that the longest-ever streak is about 6 or 7 games tops. I honestly can't see why the media ought to revisit such a dull stat.
Pretty much every article I’ve read is very positive about our chances today. Whoever the OP is, posts like this are an utter embarrassment. It’s just getting weirder. Maybe it’s the heat.
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 40 minutes ago
The media also never mention that between 1915 and 1952, that`s 37 years, Spurs only lost one league game at Stamford Bridge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That can't be right, can it ? I was utterly convinced football was invented in 1992. No wait, actually it was invented in 2009, given Spurs have never won anything.
Or maybe it was 2000 when Chelsea started to buy a history ? or around 2010 when City did the same.
Who knows ? I guess whatever the narrative it, then that's when it all started.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or maybe 2022 with spurs attempting to purchase s trophy
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 54 minutes ago
The media also never mention that between 1915 and 1952, that`s 37 years, Spurs only lost one league game at Stamford Bridge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That might be because it's olds, i.e. the opposite of news.
It might also because 37 years makes it sound like it was a huge amount of games when in reality it was just 11, and that the Chelsea win more or less in the middle means that the longest-ever streak is about 6 or 7 games tops. I honestly can't see why the media ought to revisit such a dull stat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope i think they just don't play each other
I for one believe if we lose today it will be 100% due to the media
comment by Fik Tossa (U22768)
posted 1 minute ago
Chelsea 3 Tottenham 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t be, the game hasn’t started yet
comment by chelseadagger64 (U22880)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 54 minutes ago
The media also never mention that between 1915 and 1952, that`s 37 years, Spurs only lost one league game at Stamford Bridge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That might be because it's olds, i.e. the opposite of news.
It might also because 37 years makes it sound like it was a huge amount of games when in reality it was just 11, and that the Chelsea win more or less in the middle means that the longest-ever streak is about 6 or 7 games tops. I honestly can't see why the media ought to revisit such a dull stat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope i think they just don't play each other
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LOL well Spurs won eight times at Stamford Bridge, so they obviously did play each other.
Sign in if you want to comment
Have Spurs already lost....
Page 2 of 3
posted on 14/8/22
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 minutes ago
Why is it that when Spurs play Man City, Man City's awful record against Spurs just gets a throwaway line on Sky Sports before they spend the rest of the build up talking about how great City are and how they'll beat us anyway,
-------------------------------------------
That's probably based on the fact that over the last 10 years, City have won 16 games to Spurs 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now now Boris don’t be reasonable
The media obsession with some spurs fans is embarrassing
There is no facking conspiracy
posted on 14/8/22
Simple Simon maybe
posted on 14/8/22
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 1 hour, 40 minutes ago
There is one or two ( actually loads of 'em ) on the Arsenal boards too.
The amount of "we are nailed on top 4" or "We will challenge the top two" is breath taking.
just seen this on another thread. Word for word what SteveB has posted in the OP. He must have forgot to switch accounts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty sure the names SteveF and SimonB themselves are a parody of all the sock accounts you see pumping up review scores on Google, TripAdvisor and the likes.
posted on 14/8/22
I think the starting point for most Spurs fans is that we'll lose. Lost 4 times last season, a very poor record at SB and a history of throwing it away even when well placed. Quite happy to be the underdog here and hopeful we'll put in a 100% professional display and achieve a draw at worst
posted on 14/8/22
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 14 minutes ago
Embarrassing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes that would be Liverpool, scrambling a draw against a promoted side.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ahh Sandy and his sock accounts, insecurity at its best
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aint got any sock accounts mate. Stop spreading porkies.
posted on 14/8/22
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 25 minutes ago
Spurs fans’,particularly on here, obsession with the media really is fecking bizarre.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And your obsession with Spurs fans is even more bizarre.
posted on 14/8/22
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 minutes ago
Why is it that when Spurs play Man City, Man City's awful record against Spurs just gets a throwaway line on Sky Sports before they spend the rest of the build up talking about how great City are and how they'll beat us anyway,
-------------------------------------------
That's probably based on the fact that over the last 10 years, City have won 16 games to Spurs 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now now Boris don’t be reasonable
The media obsession with some spurs fans is embarrassing
There is no facking conspiracy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boris conveniently forgetting that prior to the previous 10 years Spurs beat City 23 times to just five losses in all competitions in the Prem era. Amusing how he selects just the past 10 seasons.
posted on 14/8/22
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 1 hour, 40 minutes ago
There is one or two ( actually loads of 'em ) on the Arsenal boards too.
The amount of "we are nailed on top 4" or "We will challenge the top two" is breath taking.
just seen this on another thread. Word for word what SteveB has posted in the OP. He must have forgot to switch accounts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Sandy has 3 accounts
The man spends the day talking to himself
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How wired 😂😂😂😂
posted on 14/8/22
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 26 minutes ago
I think the starting point for most Spurs fans is that we'll lose. Lost 4 times last season, a very poor record at SB and a history of throwing it away even when well placed. Quite happy to be the underdog here and hopeful we'll put in a 100% professional display and achieve a draw at worst
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs are not the underdog. Just watching sky sports now saying how improved Spurs are. Other articles saying Spurs have closed the gap, to Chelsea which I think over the course of 38 games will be proven correct.
posted on 14/8/22
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 26 minutes ago
I think the starting point for most Spurs fans is that we'll lose. Lost 4 times last season, a very poor record at SB and a history of throwing it away even when well placed. Quite happy to be the underdog here and hopeful we'll put in a 100% professional display and achieve a draw at worst
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs are not the underdog. Just watching sky sports now saying how improved Spurs are. Other articles saying Spurs have closed the gap, to Chelsea which I think over the course of 38 games will be proven correct.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Underdogs Must be a mentality thing
I thought this lot were challenging for the title
posted on 14/8/22
When Kulu crosses that white line today he won't give a gnats chuff what our record at SB is.
Luckily he won't be able to here that odious smug t0sser Tyler who will mention it every 2 mins.
posted on 14/8/22
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 minutes ago
Why is it that when Spurs play Man City, Man City's awful record against Spurs just gets a throwaway line on Sky Sports before they spend the rest of the build up talking about how great City are and how they'll beat us anyway,
-------------------------------------------
That's probably based on the fact that over the last 10 years, City have won 16 games to Spurs 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now now Boris don’t be reasonable
The media obsession with some spurs fans is embarrassing
There is no facking conspiracy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boris conveniently forgetting that prior to the previous 10 years Spurs beat City 23 times to just five losses in all competitions in the Prem era. Amusing how he selects just the past 10 seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think he’s necessarily forgetting it, but it’s not at all relevant. This isn’t a conversation about our head to head record throughout history. It’s about an ‘alleged’ media bias. So when the media talk about Spurs vs City, they’re likely to focus on the recent record, ie since City got all the money. Before then isn't really relevant to that conversation.
posted on 14/8/22
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 minutes ago
Why is it that when Spurs play Man City, Man City's awful record against Spurs just gets a throwaway line on Sky Sports before they spend the rest of the build up talking about how great City are and how they'll beat us anyway,
-------------------------------------------
That's probably based on the fact that over the last 10 years, City have won 16 games to Spurs 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now now Boris don’t be reasonable
The media obsession with some spurs fans is embarrassing
There is no facking conspiracy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boris conveniently forgetting that prior to the previous 10 years Spurs beat City 23 times to just five losses in all competitions in the Prem era. Amusing how he selects just the past 10 seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think he’s necessarily forgetting it, but it’s not at all relevant. This isn’t a conversation about our head to head record throughout history. It’s about an ‘alleged’ media bias. So when the media talk about Spurs vs City, they’re likely to focus on the recent record, ie since City got all the money. Before then isn't really relevant to that conversation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's 65 all if you want to go back to the Dawn of Time.
posted on 14/8/22
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 minutes ago
Why is it that when Spurs play Man City, Man City's awful record against Spurs just gets a throwaway line on Sky Sports before they spend the rest of the build up talking about how great City are and how they'll beat us anyway,
-------------------------------------------
That's probably based on the fact that over the last 10 years, City have won 16 games to Spurs 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now now Boris don’t be reasonable
The media obsession with some spurs fans is embarrassing
There is no facking conspiracy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boris conveniently forgetting that prior to the previous 10 years Spurs beat City 23 times to just five losses in all competitions in the Prem era. Amusing how he selects just the past 10 seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think he’s necessarily forgetting it, but it’s not at all relevant. This isn’t a conversation about our head to head record throughout history. It’s about an ‘alleged’ media bias. So when the media talk about Spurs vs City, they’re likely to focus on the recent record, ie since City got all the money. Before then isn't really relevant to that conversation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's 65 all if you want to go back to the Dawn of Time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All to play for in the next game then!
posted on 14/8/22
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 minutes ago
Why is it that when Spurs play Man City, Man City's awful record against Spurs just gets a throwaway line on Sky Sports before they spend the rest of the build up talking about how great City are and how they'll beat us anyway,
-------------------------------------------
That's probably based on the fact that over the last 10 years, City have won 16 games to Spurs 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now now Boris don’t be reasonable
The media obsession with some spurs fans is embarrassing
There is no facking conspiracy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boris conveniently forgetting that prior to the previous 10 years Spurs beat City 23 times to just five losses in all competitions in the Prem era. Amusing how he selects just the past 10 seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think he’s necessarily forgetting it, but it’s not at all relevant. This isn’t a conversation about our head to head record throughout history. It’s about an ‘alleged’ media bias. So when the media talk about Spurs vs City, they’re likely to focus on the recent record, ie since City got all the money. Before then isn't really relevant to that conversation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's 65 all if you want to go back to the Dawn of Time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All to play for in the next game then!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Counting the hours.
posted on 14/8/22
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 40 minutes ago
The media also never mention that between 1915 and 1952, that`s 37 years, Spurs only lost one league game at Stamford Bridge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That can't be right, can it ? I was utterly convinced football was invented in 1992. No wait, actually it was invented in 2009, given Spurs have never won anything.
Or maybe it was 2000 when Chelsea started to buy a history ? or around 2010 when City did the same.
Who knows ? I guess whatever the narrative it, then that's when it all started.
posted on 14/8/22
comment by Raptor✡ (U1071)
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
SteveF is gonna fume
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, not really. It just shows I am not the only one who thinks the media are narrative driven.
It usually follows the money, as they ( Sky in
particular ) just love a club with money, as they see it as an opportunity for them to make money. Why do you think they suddenly all love Newcastle. Wind back a year or so, and they were the sh*t on some reporters shoe.
posted on 14/8/22
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 54 minutes ago
The media also never mention that between 1915 and 1952, that`s 37 years, Spurs only lost one league game at Stamford Bridge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That might be because it's olds, i.e. the opposite of news.
It might also because 37 years makes it sound like it was a huge amount of games when in reality it was just 11, and that the Chelsea win more or less in the middle means that the longest-ever streak is about 6 or 7 games tops. I honestly can't see why the media ought to revisit such a dull stat.
posted on 14/8/22
Pretty much every article I’ve read is very positive about our chances today. Whoever the OP is, posts like this are an utter embarrassment. It’s just getting weirder. Maybe it’s the heat.
posted on 14/8/22
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 40 minutes ago
The media also never mention that between 1915 and 1952, that`s 37 years, Spurs only lost one league game at Stamford Bridge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That can't be right, can it ? I was utterly convinced football was invented in 1992. No wait, actually it was invented in 2009, given Spurs have never won anything.
Or maybe it was 2000 when Chelsea started to buy a history ? or around 2010 when City did the same.
Who knows ? I guess whatever the narrative it, then that's when it all started.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or maybe 2022 with spurs attempting to purchase s trophy
posted on 14/8/22
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 54 minutes ago
The media also never mention that between 1915 and 1952, that`s 37 years, Spurs only lost one league game at Stamford Bridge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That might be because it's olds, i.e. the opposite of news.
It might also because 37 years makes it sound like it was a huge amount of games when in reality it was just 11, and that the Chelsea win more or less in the middle means that the longest-ever streak is about 6 or 7 games tops. I honestly can't see why the media ought to revisit such a dull stat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope i think they just don't play each other
posted on 14/8/22
I for one believe if we lose today it will be 100% due to the media
posted on 14/8/22
Chelsea 3 Tottenham 0
posted on 14/8/22
comment by Fik Tossa (U22768)
posted 1 minute ago
Chelsea 3 Tottenham 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t be, the game hasn’t started yet
posted on 14/8/22
comment by chelseadagger64 (U22880)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 54 minutes ago
The media also never mention that between 1915 and 1952, that`s 37 years, Spurs only lost one league game at Stamford Bridge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That might be because it's olds, i.e. the opposite of news.
It might also because 37 years makes it sound like it was a huge amount of games when in reality it was just 11, and that the Chelsea win more or less in the middle means that the longest-ever streak is about 6 or 7 games tops. I honestly can't see why the media ought to revisit such a dull stat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope i think they just don't play each other
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LOL well Spurs won eight times at Stamford Bridge, so they obviously did play each other.
Page 2 of 3