What a load of nonsense. 140m plus Ronaldo for him? 😂
1. Not even we are daft enough to pay that.
2. Very much doubt we have 14m left in the kitty now after Antony signing let alone 140m.
Welcome to take Ronaldo though.
That's with Forza tacks, right?
Doubtful but I'd be willing to overspend if it meant getting rid of Ronaldo and brining in an elite CF.
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 7 minutes ago
Doubtful but I'd be willing to overspend if it meant getting rid of Ronaldo and brining in an elite CF.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And also showing we want to get behind the manager as much as possible. Glad Chelsea are throwing their dough around; hopefully gives us the shot in the arm.
And, maybe, just maybe, those two humbling defeats were a massive blessing in disguise. Not only for the people spending the money, but the players and manager/coaches as well.
Osimhen is fast, physickle n aggressive, purrfecked 4 EPL
For that price we could get Jao Felix.
I call bull, we're more likely to go for Depay or Aubemeyang for 10-20million as a CF to replace Ronaldo. It'll be more sensible, and we can spend a little on a RB.
How fast on a scale of Carrick to Mbappe?
comment by faranjiniho (U5318)
posted 13 seconds ago
For that price we could get Jao Felix.
I call bull, we're more likely to go for Depay or Aubemeyang for 10-20million as a CF to replace Ronaldo. It'll be more sensible, and we can spend a little on a RB.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Osimhen is long term. Hence the cost. It get's amortised. Spread over the length of the contract.
Melton of the City board is good if you need it explaining. He helped me, for sure.
comment by Shinjury list (U1700)
posted 3 minutes ago
How fast on a scale of Carrick to Mbappe?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fellaini
comment by Shinjury list (U1700)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by faranjiniho (U5318)
posted 13 seconds ago
For that price we could get Jao Felix.
I call bull, we're more likely to go for Depay or Aubemeyang for 10-20million as a CF to replace Ronaldo. It'll be more sensible, and we can spend a little on a RB.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Osimhen is long term. Hence the cost. It get's amortised. Spread over the length of the contract.
Melton of the City board is good if you need it explaining. He helped me, for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I understand the amortisation. I'm just questioning whether this guy is work that price. Jao Felix would be a better long term signing. Although I'm speaking from what I have seen, admittedly I've not seen Osimhen.
I think Abrams could be 60-80million, is still young and tearing Seria A up.
Fair dos.
These days it is hard to keep up, this guy has speed you can't coach, so would be my choice over TA. Although maybe we need both. I mean, one injury to whoever comes in for Ronaldo (hypothetically, of course), and we are back to panicking, if we only acquire one.
Fcking Antony though. Everything about his YouTube vids screams quality. Including attitude, from the little you can glean from YT.
Immensely looking forward to this season now. Two weeks ago I wasn't.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
€140m + Ronaldo 4 Osimhen
Page 1 of 1
posted on 28/8/22
Won’t happen.
posted on 28/8/22
What a load of nonsense. 140m plus Ronaldo for him? 😂
1. Not even we are daft enough to pay that.
2. Very much doubt we have 14m left in the kitty now after Antony signing let alone 140m.
Welcome to take Ronaldo though.
posted on 28/8/22
That's with Forza tacks, right?
posted on 28/8/22
Doubtful but I'd be willing to overspend if it meant getting rid of Ronaldo and brining in an elite CF.
posted on 28/8/22
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 7 minutes ago
Doubtful but I'd be willing to overspend if it meant getting rid of Ronaldo and brining in an elite CF.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And also showing we want to get behind the manager as much as possible. Glad Chelsea are throwing their dough around; hopefully gives us the shot in the arm.
And, maybe, just maybe, those two humbling defeats were a massive blessing in disguise. Not only for the people spending the money, but the players and manager/coaches as well.
posted on 28/8/22
Osimhen is fast, physickle n aggressive, purrfecked 4 EPL
posted on 28/8/22
For that price we could get Jao Felix.
I call bull, we're more likely to go for Depay or Aubemeyang for 10-20million as a CF to replace Ronaldo. It'll be more sensible, and we can spend a little on a RB.
posted on 28/8/22
How fast on a scale of Carrick to Mbappe?
posted on 28/8/22
comment by faranjiniho (U5318)
posted 13 seconds ago
For that price we could get Jao Felix.
I call bull, we're more likely to go for Depay or Aubemeyang for 10-20million as a CF to replace Ronaldo. It'll be more sensible, and we can spend a little on a RB.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Osimhen is long term. Hence the cost. It get's amortised. Spread over the length of the contract.
Melton of the City board is good if you need it explaining. He helped me, for sure.
posted on 28/8/22
comment by Shinjury list (U1700)
posted 3 minutes ago
How fast on a scale of Carrick to Mbappe?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fellaini
posted on 28/8/22
comment by Shinjury list (U1700)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by faranjiniho (U5318)
posted 13 seconds ago
For that price we could get Jao Felix.
I call bull, we're more likely to go for Depay or Aubemeyang for 10-20million as a CF to replace Ronaldo. It'll be more sensible, and we can spend a little on a RB.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Osimhen is long term. Hence the cost. It get's amortised. Spread over the length of the contract.
Melton of the City board is good if you need it explaining. He helped me, for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I understand the amortisation. I'm just questioning whether this guy is work that price. Jao Felix would be a better long term signing. Although I'm speaking from what I have seen, admittedly I've not seen Osimhen.
I think Abrams could be 60-80million, is still young and tearing Seria A up.
posted on 28/8/22
Fair dos.
These days it is hard to keep up, this guy has speed you can't coach, so would be my choice over TA. Although maybe we need both. I mean, one injury to whoever comes in for Ronaldo (hypothetically, of course), and we are back to panicking, if we only acquire one.
Fcking Antony though. Everything about his YouTube vids screams quality. Including attitude, from the little you can glean from YT.
Immensely looking forward to this season now. Two weeks ago I wasn't.
Page 1 of 1