comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why does it need to become public for the club to decide to keep him ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because if it is true, it would paint him in a much better light. There would be less damage to the club's reputation and they may decide to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it would make things easier, but they can still keep him without it going public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I don't think so. The financial/reputational damage would be too great unless it comes out.
Ofcourse this would all rest on what culer claims, which lets face it is probably a massive load of bollox.
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 8 minutes ago
Ofcourse this would all rest on what culer claims, which lets face it is probably a massive load of bollox.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh you of little faith.
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why does it need to become public for the club to decide to keep him ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because if it is true, it would paint him in a much better light. There would be less damage to the club's reputation and they may decide to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it would make things easier, but they can still keep him without it going public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I don't think so. The financial/reputational damage would be too great unless it comes out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A complete assumption
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why does it need to become public for the club to decide to keep him ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because if it is true, it would paint him in a much better light. There would be less damage to the club's reputation and they may decide to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it would make things easier, but they can still keep him without it going public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I don't think so. The financial/reputational damage would be too great unless it comes out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A complete assumption
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The problem with assumption is it makes an ass of you, and rdd
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 19 minutes ago
You have given him your own email address by emailing him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I haven't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Call me naive but I actually think Culer may be telling the truth. It's not beyond the realms of possibility as for the Ched Evans case my mate from school was the night receptionist (https://www.irishexaminer.com/world/arid-30758120.html) at the hotel and had to give evidence. Someone in the Manchester area knows more than the public at large so why not Culer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I appears to have been common knowledge that they are back together. Pretty sure that Culer also said that she had stopped cooperating with the police, which we now know is the case.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yes I have heard from a few that they were back together
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why does it need to become public for the club to decide to keep him ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because if it is true, it would paint him in a much better light. There would be less damage to the club's reputation and they may decide to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it would make things easier, but they can still keep him without it going public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I don't think so. The financial/reputational damage would be too great unless it comes out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A complete assumption
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all. We have seen the lads own sponsors distance themselves. We have seen club sponsors say they are monitoring the situation and do not condone abuse of women. We have a lawyer giving his expert opinion saying that the bad press could impact on the sale price of the club. On the other side we have you talking guff as usual.
This may be one of Barry’s better wums
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why does it need to become public for the club to decide to keep him ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because if it is true, it would paint him in a much better light. There would be less damage to the club's reputation and they may decide to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it would make things easier, but they can still keep him without it going public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I don't think so. The financial/reputational damage would be too great unless it comes out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A complete assumption
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all. We have seen the lads own sponsors distance themselves. We have seen club sponsors say they are monitoring the situation and do not condone abuse of women. We have a lawyer giving his expert opinion saying that the bad press could impact on the sale price of the club. On the other side we have you talking guff as usual.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sponsors dropped him before they found out the case was dropped.
The sponsors haven’t commented since yesterday’s news.
Lots of things could impact the sale price of the club. You thought a transfer would ffs.
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why does it need to become public for the club to decide to keep him ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because if it is true, it would paint him in a much better light. There would be less damage to the club's reputation and they may decide to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it would make things easier, but they can still keep him without it going public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I don't think so. The financial/reputational damage would be too great unless it comes out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A complete assumption
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all. We have seen the lads own sponsors distance themselves. We have seen club sponsors say they are monitoring the situation and do not condone abuse of women. We have a lawyer giving his expert opinion saying that the bad press could impact on the sale price of the club. On the other side we have you talking guff as usual.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sponsors dropped him before they found out the case was dropped.
The sponsors haven’t commented since yesterday’s news.
Lots of things could impact the sale price of the club. You thought a transfer would ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sponsors dropped him before they knew the outcome of the the investigation, because the audio itself was damaging enough.
The sponsors (of the club) will likely be waiting for the outcome of United's investigation and discussions with them before making any decisions.
A big transfer would impact on the value of the club. Its not rocket science. The owners aren't going to go out and splash 120m on Kane, for example, when they are in the middle of trying to sell the club.
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 3 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why does it need to become public for the club to decide to keep him ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because if it is true, it would paint him in a much better light. There would be less damage to the club's reputation and they may decide to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it would make things easier, but they can still keep him without it going public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I don't think so. The financial/reputational damage would be too great unless it comes out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A complete assumption
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all. We have seen the lads own sponsors distance themselves. We have seen club sponsors say they are monitoring the situation and do not condone abuse of women. We have a lawyer giving his expert opinion saying that the bad press could impact on the sale price of the club. On the other side we have you talking guff as usual.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sponsors dropped him before they found out the case was dropped.
The sponsors haven’t commented since yesterday’s news.
Lots of things could impact the sale price of the club. You thought a transfer would ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sponsors dropped him before they knew the outcome of the the investigation, because the audio itself was damaging enough.
The sponsors (of the club) will likely be waiting for the outcome of United's investigation and discussions with them before making any decisions.
A big transfer would impact on the value of the club. Its not rocket science. The owners aren't going to go out and splash 120m on Kane, for example, when they are in the middle of trying to sell the club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So NIke drop him Immediately, but club sponsors don't do anything. Interesting.
As for the transfer talk. Odd you think the club would be reluctant to add an asset like Kane, but be prepared to write off best part of £100m on Greenwood.
I emailed Culer and he didn't send me anything.
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 1 hour, 39 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 3 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why does it need to become public for the club to decide to keep him ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because if it is true, it would paint him in a much better light. There would be less damage to the club's reputation and they may decide to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it would make things easier, but they can still keep him without it going public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I don't think so. The financial/reputational damage would be too great unless it comes out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A complete assumption
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all. We have seen the lads own sponsors distance themselves. We have seen club sponsors say they are monitoring the situation and do not condone abuse of women. We have a lawyer giving his expert opinion saying that the bad press could impact on the sale price of the club. On the other side we have you talking guff as usual.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sponsors dropped him before they found out the case was dropped.
The sponsors haven’t commented since yesterday’s news.
Lots of things could impact the sale price of the club. You thought a transfer would ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sponsors dropped him before they knew the outcome of the the investigation, because the audio itself was damaging enough.
The sponsors (of the club) will likely be waiting for the outcome of United's investigation and discussions with them before making any decisions.
A big transfer would impact on the value of the club. Its not rocket science. The owners aren't going to go out and splash 120m on Kane, for example, when they are in the middle of trying to sell the club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So NIke drop him Immediately, but club sponsors don't do anything. Interesting.
As for the transfer talk. Odd you think the club would be reluctant to add an asset like Kane, but be prepared to write off best part of £100m on Greenwood.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The club sponsors sponsor the club. Not Mason. The clue is in the name. Think about it.
Trying to sign Kane or not is in no way related to making a decision on whether the club should keep Mason or let him go. Or the financial impact of doing either. Totally different scenarios. Even you should know this
comment by Thorgen son of Kloppin - Mjolnir... To me! (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
I emailed Culer and he didn't send me anything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's got high standards
comment by Thorgen son of Kloppin - Mjolnir... To me! (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
I emailed Culer and he didn't send me anything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His mum will have confiscated internet time. He’ll be back to make up more bollox after he’s done his homework
Diafol and the other lads I was talking to on email…
Check your inbox. You’ll now see something I was revealing a few days ago is making its way into the press.
The lads I was talking to on email…
Check your inboxes and tell me I was lying all along.
A lot of people are going to be apologising to me when it all comes out
I would Culer but I don't remember what email I created to contact you. Remind me would you?
rmndjohnso
When it all comes out you have my permission to let everyone else know what I told you, so I can be verified as telling the truth.
Sign in if you want to comment
Mason Greenwood Statement
Page 4 of 4
posted on 3/2/23
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why does it need to become public for the club to decide to keep him ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because if it is true, it would paint him in a much better light. There would be less damage to the club's reputation and they may decide to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it would make things easier, but they can still keep him without it going public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I don't think so. The financial/reputational damage would be too great unless it comes out.
posted on 3/2/23
Ofcourse this would all rest on what culer claims, which lets face it is probably a massive load of bollox.
posted on 3/2/23
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 8 minutes ago
Ofcourse this would all rest on what culer claims, which lets face it is probably a massive load of bollox.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh you of little faith.
posted on 3/2/23
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why does it need to become public for the club to decide to keep him ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because if it is true, it would paint him in a much better light. There would be less damage to the club's reputation and they may decide to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it would make things easier, but they can still keep him without it going public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I don't think so. The financial/reputational damage would be too great unless it comes out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A complete assumption
posted on 3/2/23
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why does it need to become public for the club to decide to keep him ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because if it is true, it would paint him in a much better light. There would be less damage to the club's reputation and they may decide to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it would make things easier, but they can still keep him without it going public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I don't think so. The financial/reputational damage would be too great unless it comes out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A complete assumption
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The problem with assumption is it makes an ass of you, and rdd
posted on 3/2/23
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 19 minutes ago
You have given him your own email address by emailing him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I haven't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Call me naive but I actually think Culer may be telling the truth. It's not beyond the realms of possibility as for the Ched Evans case my mate from school was the night receptionist (https://www.irishexaminer.com/world/arid-30758120.html) at the hotel and had to give evidence. Someone in the Manchester area knows more than the public at large so why not Culer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I appears to have been common knowledge that they are back together. Pretty sure that Culer also said that she had stopped cooperating with the police, which we now know is the case.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yes I have heard from a few that they were back together
posted on 3/2/23
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why does it need to become public for the club to decide to keep him ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because if it is true, it would paint him in a much better light. There would be less damage to the club's reputation and they may decide to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it would make things easier, but they can still keep him without it going public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I don't think so. The financial/reputational damage would be too great unless it comes out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A complete assumption
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all. We have seen the lads own sponsors distance themselves. We have seen club sponsors say they are monitoring the situation and do not condone abuse of women. We have a lawyer giving his expert opinion saying that the bad press could impact on the sale price of the club. On the other side we have you talking guff as usual.
posted on 3/2/23
This may be one of Barry’s better wums
posted on 3/2/23
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why does it need to become public for the club to decide to keep him ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because if it is true, it would paint him in a much better light. There would be less damage to the club's reputation and they may decide to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it would make things easier, but they can still keep him without it going public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I don't think so. The financial/reputational damage would be too great unless it comes out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A complete assumption
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all. We have seen the lads own sponsors distance themselves. We have seen club sponsors say they are monitoring the situation and do not condone abuse of women. We have a lawyer giving his expert opinion saying that the bad press could impact on the sale price of the club. On the other side we have you talking guff as usual.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sponsors dropped him before they found out the case was dropped.
The sponsors haven’t commented since yesterday’s news.
Lots of things could impact the sale price of the club. You thought a transfer would ffs.
posted on 3/2/23
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why does it need to become public for the club to decide to keep him ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because if it is true, it would paint him in a much better light. There would be less damage to the club's reputation and they may decide to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it would make things easier, but they can still keep him without it going public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I don't think so. The financial/reputational damage would be too great unless it comes out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A complete assumption
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all. We have seen the lads own sponsors distance themselves. We have seen club sponsors say they are monitoring the situation and do not condone abuse of women. We have a lawyer giving his expert opinion saying that the bad press could impact on the sale price of the club. On the other side we have you talking guff as usual.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sponsors dropped him before they found out the case was dropped.
The sponsors haven’t commented since yesterday’s news.
Lots of things could impact the sale price of the club. You thought a transfer would ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sponsors dropped him before they knew the outcome of the the investigation, because the audio itself was damaging enough.
The sponsors (of the club) will likely be waiting for the outcome of United's investigation and discussions with them before making any decisions.
A big transfer would impact on the value of the club. Its not rocket science. The owners aren't going to go out and splash 120m on Kane, for example, when they are in the middle of trying to sell the club.
posted on 3/2/23
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 3 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why does it need to become public for the club to decide to keep him ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because if it is true, it would paint him in a much better light. There would be less damage to the club's reputation and they may decide to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it would make things easier, but they can still keep him without it going public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I don't think so. The financial/reputational damage would be too great unless it comes out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A complete assumption
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all. We have seen the lads own sponsors distance themselves. We have seen club sponsors say they are monitoring the situation and do not condone abuse of women. We have a lawyer giving his expert opinion saying that the bad press could impact on the sale price of the club. On the other side we have you talking guff as usual.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sponsors dropped him before they found out the case was dropped.
The sponsors haven’t commented since yesterday’s news.
Lots of things could impact the sale price of the club. You thought a transfer would ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sponsors dropped him before they knew the outcome of the the investigation, because the audio itself was damaging enough.
The sponsors (of the club) will likely be waiting for the outcome of United's investigation and discussions with them before making any decisions.
A big transfer would impact on the value of the club. Its not rocket science. The owners aren't going to go out and splash 120m on Kane, for example, when they are in the middle of trying to sell the club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So NIke drop him Immediately, but club sponsors don't do anything. Interesting.
As for the transfer talk. Odd you think the club would be reluctant to add an asset like Kane, but be prepared to write off best part of £100m on Greenwood.
posted on 3/2/23
I emailed Culer and he didn't send me anything.
posted on 3/2/23
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 1 hour, 39 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 3 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why does it need to become public for the club to decide to keep him ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because if it is true, it would paint him in a much better light. There would be less damage to the club's reputation and they may decide to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it would make things easier, but they can still keep him without it going public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I don't think so. The financial/reputational damage would be too great unless it comes out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A complete assumption
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all. We have seen the lads own sponsors distance themselves. We have seen club sponsors say they are monitoring the situation and do not condone abuse of women. We have a lawyer giving his expert opinion saying that the bad press could impact on the sale price of the club. On the other side we have you talking guff as usual.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sponsors dropped him before they found out the case was dropped.
The sponsors haven’t commented since yesterday’s news.
Lots of things could impact the sale price of the club. You thought a transfer would ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sponsors dropped him before they knew the outcome of the the investigation, because the audio itself was damaging enough.
The sponsors (of the club) will likely be waiting for the outcome of United's investigation and discussions with them before making any decisions.
A big transfer would impact on the value of the club. Its not rocket science. The owners aren't going to go out and splash 120m on Kane, for example, when they are in the middle of trying to sell the club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So NIke drop him Immediately, but club sponsors don't do anything. Interesting.
As for the transfer talk. Odd you think the club would be reluctant to add an asset like Kane, but be prepared to write off best part of £100m on Greenwood.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The club sponsors sponsor the club. Not Mason. The clue is in the name. Think about it.
Trying to sign Kane or not is in no way related to making a decision on whether the club should keep Mason or let him go. Or the financial impact of doing either. Totally different scenarios. Even you should know this
posted on 3/2/23
comment by Thorgen son of Kloppin - Mjolnir... To me! (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
I emailed Culer and he didn't send me anything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's got high standards
posted on 3/2/23
comment by Thorgen son of Kloppin - Mjolnir... To me! (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
I emailed Culer and he didn't send me anything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His mum will have confiscated internet time. He’ll be back to make up more bollox after he’s done his homework
posted on 4/2/23
Diafol and the other lads I was talking to on email…
Check your inbox. You’ll now see something I was revealing a few days ago is making its way into the press.
posted on 24/2/23
The lads I was talking to on email…
Check your inboxes and tell me I was lying all along.
A lot of people are going to be apologising to me when it all comes out
posted on 25/2/23
I would Culer but I don't remember what email I created to contact you. Remind me would you?
posted on 25/2/23
rmndjohnso
When it all comes out you have my permission to let everyone else know what I told you, so I can be verified as telling the truth.
Page 4 of 4