comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 3 hours, 30 minutes ago
comment by GunnerGuy (U9900)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 26 minutes ago
100 m is too much for a player who will be Rodris back up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No too much as such for club like City...they are well capable of buying him just so that we don't get him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I happen to think he isn't worth 100m to anyone but each to their ownand say what you like about Citys spending I do not think they would ever spend 100m just to stop another club getting a player?
Think he will end up, eventually at Arsenal anyway
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you not think it’s possible they’re going on a huge splurge, just in case by some miracle they’ve don’t weasel out of their charges?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Possible, that could be on their mind but I don't think so, pretty well run club in certain ways and tend to buy quite well but who knows? Could be a last hurrah?
Arsenal pressured the PL into making the charges, without any evidence being revealed at present.
If they don't stick they'll be some pretty heavy lawsuits and claims for legal expenses flying about.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
Arsenal pressured the PL into making the charges, without any evidence being revealed at present.
If they don't stick they'll be some pretty heavy lawsuits and claims for legal expenses flying about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What?
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 hours, 15 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 50 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Aggers Right Elbow (U3402)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
Until City have been able to the address the charges hanging over the club I don’t see why they should be able to spend another 100 million on one player🤷🏼♂️ The financial doping goes on it seems.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guilty until proven innocent i see. Interesting concept
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get realThe whole world knew what you lot were doing way before any charges were brought.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only the people in your twisted world
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your constant state of denial is hilarious
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Come on then, what are the charges and what's the evidence?
Give us a hint.
Liverpool pretended they'd spent nearly £60m on a new stadium without a single piece of work being carried out to avoid FFp sanctions, they also had to buy their way out of legal action for hacking City's computers.
That's the definition of 'weazling out'.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 hours, 15 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 50 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Aggers Right Elbow (U3402)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
Until City have been able to the address the charges hanging over the club I don’t see why they should be able to spend another 100 million on one player🤷🏼♂️ The financial doping goes on it seems.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guilty until proven innocent i see. Interesting concept
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get realThe whole world knew what you lot were doing way before any charges were brought.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only the people in your twisted world
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your constant state of denial is hilarious
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Come on then, what are the charges and what's the evidence?
Give us a hint.
Liverpool pretended they'd spent nearly £60m on a new stadium without a single piece of work being carried out to avoid FFp sanctions, they also had to buy their way out of legal action for hacking City's computers.
That's the definition of 'weazling out'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Paying City was basically an admission of guilt, so not sure how they weaselled out of anything?
Why are you asking what the charges are?
Liverpool pretended they'd spent nearly £60m on a new stadium without a single piece of work being carried out to avoid FFp sanctions,
—————-
What’s this?
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/sep/25/liverpool-investigated-ffp-uefa-monaco
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/sep/25/liverpool-investigated-ffp-uefa-monaco
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe read the article, then you’ll see how desperate you are
35m of those losses were from Hicks and Gillett’s sham plans for a new stadium. If you’re using those two for whataboutery then you may as well log off before you embarrass yourself more than usual.
Why are you even on this thread?
Surely you have enough money left from the £3bn you got for Coutinho to buy Rice yourselves.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 53 seconds ago
Why are you even on this thread?
Surely you have enough money left from the £3bn you got for Coutinho to buy Rice yourselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GSM
Sign in if you want to comment
Rice pursuit
Page 3 of 3
posted on 27/6/23
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 3 hours, 30 minutes ago
comment by GunnerGuy (U9900)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 26 minutes ago
100 m is too much for a player who will be Rodris back up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No too much as such for club like City...they are well capable of buying him just so that we don't get him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I happen to think he isn't worth 100m to anyone but each to their ownand say what you like about Citys spending I do not think they would ever spend 100m just to stop another club getting a player?
Think he will end up, eventually at Arsenal anyway
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you not think it’s possible they’re going on a huge splurge, just in case by some miracle they’ve don’t weasel out of their charges?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Possible, that could be on their mind but I don't think so, pretty well run club in certain ways and tend to buy quite well but who knows? Could be a last hurrah?
posted on 27/6/23
Arsenal pressured the PL into making the charges, without any evidence being revealed at present.
If they don't stick they'll be some pretty heavy lawsuits and claims for legal expenses flying about.
posted on 27/6/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
Arsenal pressured the PL into making the charges, without any evidence being revealed at present.
If they don't stick they'll be some pretty heavy lawsuits and claims for legal expenses flying about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What?
posted on 27/6/23
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 hours, 15 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 50 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Aggers Right Elbow (U3402)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
Until City have been able to the address the charges hanging over the club I don’t see why they should be able to spend another 100 million on one player🤷🏼♂️ The financial doping goes on it seems.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guilty until proven innocent i see. Interesting concept
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get realThe whole world knew what you lot were doing way before any charges were brought.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only the people in your twisted world
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your constant state of denial is hilarious
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Come on then, what are the charges and what's the evidence?
Give us a hint.
Liverpool pretended they'd spent nearly £60m on a new stadium without a single piece of work being carried out to avoid FFp sanctions, they also had to buy their way out of legal action for hacking City's computers.
That's the definition of 'weazling out'.
posted on 27/6/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 hours, 15 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 50 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Aggers Right Elbow (U3402)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
Until City have been able to the address the charges hanging over the club I don’t see why they should be able to spend another 100 million on one player🤷🏼♂️ The financial doping goes on it seems.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guilty until proven innocent i see. Interesting concept
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get realThe whole world knew what you lot were doing way before any charges were brought.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only the people in your twisted world
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your constant state of denial is hilarious
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Come on then, what are the charges and what's the evidence?
Give us a hint.
Liverpool pretended they'd spent nearly £60m on a new stadium without a single piece of work being carried out to avoid FFp sanctions, they also had to buy their way out of legal action for hacking City's computers.
That's the definition of 'weazling out'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Paying City was basically an admission of guilt, so not sure how they weaselled out of anything?
Why are you asking what the charges are?
posted on 27/6/23
Liverpool pretended they'd spent nearly £60m on a new stadium without a single piece of work being carried out to avoid FFp sanctions,
—————-
What’s this?
posted on 27/6/23
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/sep/25/liverpool-investigated-ffp-uefa-monaco
posted on 27/6/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/sep/25/liverpool-investigated-ffp-uefa-monaco
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe read the article, then you’ll see how desperate you are
posted on 27/6/23
35m of those losses were from Hicks and Gillett’s sham plans for a new stadium. If you’re using those two for whataboutery then you may as well log off before you embarrass yourself more than usual.
posted on 27/6/23
Why are you even on this thread?
Surely you have enough money left from the £3bn you got for Coutinho to buy Rice yourselves.
posted on 27/6/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 53 seconds ago
Why are you even on this thread?
Surely you have enough money left from the £3bn you got for Coutinho to buy Rice yourselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GSM
Page 3 of 3