Yeah did they even check to see if Cash handled it looked like it before it hit Havertz.

I thought Jesus was good on crosses what went wrong?

comment by Admiral Ozil is my new favourite Star Wars character (U10178)
posted 11 minutes ago
Yeah did they even check to see if Cash handled it looked like it before it hit Havertz.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well a goal can be ruled out if it hits an arm accidentally evne in a natural position. Yet a penalty in theory shouldn't be given if accidental and arms are in a natural position.

Stone wall penalty, but it Arsenal so not given
Arteta is now a target for the corrupt EPL referees.

They want Varpool to win the league, just look at the refereeing in their game v Palace for all the evidence you need. Palace cruising and then a ridiculous red card swings the game in Varpool`s favour.

And yet Konate made 2 cynical fouls to stop breakaways and was let off with a booking both times, whereas Ayew was booked for essentially nothing.

Talk about dragging their darlings up the league.

comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Admiral Ozil is my new favourite Star Wars character (U10178)
posted 11 minutes ago
Yeah did they even check to see if Cash handled it looked like it before it hit Havertz.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well a goal can be ruled out if it hits an arm accidentally evne in a natural position. Yet a penalty in theory shouldn't be given if accidental and arms are in a natural position.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That doesn't seem right to me Cash is gaining an advantage even if he doesn't deliberately handle the ball where as Havertz is penalised for exactly the same thing he doesn't deliberately handle the ball either.

comment by ubad9jagooner .Ramsey : don't get the hype ! (U7978)
posted 23 minutes ago
Stone wall penalty, but it Arsenal so not given
Arteta is now a target for the corrupt EPL referees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
100%

comment by Admiral Ozil is my new favourite Star Wars character (U10178)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Admiral Ozil is my new favourite Star Wars character (U10178)
posted 11 minutes ago
Yeah did they even check to see if Cash handled it looked like it before it hit Havertz.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well a goal can be ruled out if it hits an arm accidentally evne in a natural position. Yet a penalty in theory shouldn't be given if accidental and arms are in a natural position.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That doesn't seem right to me Cash is gaining an advantage even if he doesn't deliberately handle the ball where as Havertz is penalised for exactly the same thing he doesn't deliberately handle the ball either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
thats why people dont like the rule i guess, look at the one ruled out vs uttd today, did he gain an advantage from it? not at all but it was still ruled out.

comment by ●Billy The Spur● LEVY OUT- ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 50 minutes ago
They want Varpool to win the league, just look at the refereeing in their game v Palace for all the evidence you need. Palace cruising and then a ridiculous red card swings the game in Varpool`s favour.

And yet Konate made 2 cynical fouls to stop breakaways and was let off with a booking both times, whereas Ayew was booked for essentially nothing.

Talk about dragging their darlings up the league.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Konate was booked twice but stayed on the pitch?
Your hate is blinding you again you bitter fool

The goal at the end was disallowed because it was scored by Arsenal.

It was disallowed because Havertz handled the ball.. carry on

The Gabriel Jesus foul is a stonewall Penalty, it’s inexplicable how that is not given.

just seen the jesus foul tbf and lol watch the palace penalty and tell me how thats more of a pen than the jesus one? Theres far more contact on Jesus than Quansah made on Mateta.

I have given up on the amount of howlers we have had via refs and VAR

for me those types shouldnt be penalty theres barely any contact and not enough to send a player down and not really gaining any advantage. But when you are giving palace a penalty for that and not giving Arsenal one for that it just shows how they just make it up as they go along and do as the like depending one what team. Theres no consistency. Give City penalties for stuff we see ignored 10 times every weekend etc.

comment by Admiral Ozil is my new favourite Star Wars character (U10178)
posted 10 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Admiral Ozil is my new favourite Star Wars character (U10178)
posted 11 minutes ago
Yeah did they even check to see if Cash handled it looked like it before it hit Havertz.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well a goal can be ruled out if it hits an arm accidentally evne in a natural position. Yet a penalty in theory shouldn't be given if accidental and arms are in a natural position.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That doesn't seem right to me Cash is gaining an advantage even if he doesn't deliberately handle the ball where as Havertz is penalised for exactly the same thing he doesn't deliberately handle the ball either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal have been on the end of some bad decisions but so have Liverpool. On this occasion the refs applied the rules IMO. Cash wasn't a handball by the rules, ball ricochet, hands in natural position IMO. Havertz was a handball by the rules, attackers cannot score valid goal after handling the ball, accident or no accident.

comment by Keep It Greasy - Music is the BEST (U1396)
posted 9 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by ●Billy The Spur● LEVY OUT- ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 50 minutes ago
They want Varpool to win the league, just look at the refereeing in their game v Palace for all the evidence you need. Palace cruising and then a ridiculous red card swings the game in Varpool`s favour.

And yet Konate made 2 cynical fouls to stop breakaways and was let off with a booking both times, whereas Ayew was booked for essentially nothing.

Talk about dragging their darlings up the league.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Konate was booked twice but stayed on the pitch?
Your hate is blinding you again you bitter fool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He says Konate not booked for stopping break aways, but stopping a break away is exactly why Ayew was sent off, but then he says Ayew was sent off for nothing.

comment by Castor Troy (U8700)
posted 8 hours, 12 minutes ago
I have given up on the amount of howlers we have had via refs and VAR
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's hard enough to win the league, but when officials are taking around 10 points off us every season it's impossible

comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 8 hours, 11 minutes ago
comment by Keep It Greasy - Music is the BEST (U1396)
posted 9 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by ●Billy The Spur● LEVY OUT- ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 50 minutes ago
They want Varpool to win the league, just look at the refereeing in their game v Palace for all the evidence you need. Palace cruising and then a ridiculous red card swings the game in Varpool`s favour.

And yet Konate made 2 cynical fouls to stop breakaways and was let off with a booking both times, whereas Ayew was booked for essentially nothing.

Talk about dragging their darlings up the league.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Konate was booked twice but stayed on the pitch?
Your hate is blinding you again you bitter fool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He says Konate not booked for stopping break aways, but stopping a break away is exactly why Ayew was sent off, but then he says Ayew was sent off for nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
whilst conveniently ignoring Palaces very soft penalty which they actually did what they said they couldnt do vs Spurs and bring play back 5 mins later or w.e it was.

comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 1 day, 23 hours ago
comment by Admiral Ozil is my new favourite Star Wars character (U10178)
posted 10 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Admiral Ozil is my new favourite Star Wars character (U10178)
posted 11 minutes ago
Yeah did they even check to see if Cash handled it looked like it before it hit Havertz.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well a goal can be ruled out if it hits an arm accidentally evne in a natural position. Yet a penalty in theory shouldn't be given if accidental and arms are in a natural position.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That doesn't seem right to me Cash is gaining an advantage even if he doesn't deliberately handle the ball where as Havertz is penalised for exactly the same thing he doesn't deliberately handle the ball either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal have been on the end of some bad decisions but so have Liverpool. On this occasion the refs applied the rules IMO. Cash wasn't a handball by the rules, ball ricochet, hands in natural position IMO. Havertz was a handball by the rules, attackers cannot score valid goal after handling the ball, accident or no accident.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except Havertz didn't touch the ball with his hands, surely VAR can see this
https://twitter.com/spectrumphysic/status/1733611539368644807

comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again (U8398)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 1 day, 23 hours ago
comment by Admiral Ozil is my new favourite Star Wars character (U10178)
posted 10 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Admiral Ozil is my new favourite Star Wars character (U10178)
posted 11 minutes ago
Yeah did they even check to see if Cash handled it looked like it before it hit Havertz.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well a goal can be ruled out if it hits an arm accidentally evne in a natural position. Yet a penalty in theory shouldn't be given if accidental and arms are in a natural position.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That doesn't seem right to me Cash is gaining an advantage even if he doesn't deliberately handle the ball where as Havertz is penalised for exactly the same thing he doesn't deliberately handle the ball either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal have been on the end of some bad decisions but so have Liverpool. On this occasion the refs applied the rules IMO. Cash wasn't a handball by the rules, ball ricochet, hands in natural position IMO. Havertz was a handball by the rules, attackers cannot score valid goal after handling the ball, accident or no accident.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except Havertz didn't touch the ball with his hands, surely VAR can see this
https://twitter.com/spectrumphysic/status/1733611539368644807
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 2 days, 9 hours ago
just seen the jesus foul tbf and lol watch the palace penalty and tell me how thats more of a pen than the jesus one? Theres far more contact on Jesus than Quansah made on Mateta.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yep.

For me is Jesus's was not a stonewaller, I disagree with that. Its in the grey area where you see them both given and not given.

The issue for me is we always seem to be the ones not given, and lots of teams seem to consistently get them.

Jesus was a blatant pen in my book tbh.

Luis kicked through Jesus's leg. How was that not an obvious pen?