or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 1478 comments are related to an article called:

January Transfer Window

Page 51 of 60

posted on 1/2/24

comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 20 seconds ago
FFP🤣🤣🤣

Code for skint.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know if only we had 70m in the bank we could go out really get quality in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You also likely wouldn't go bust and die. Which is a bonus.

posted on 1/2/24

comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 20 seconds ago
FFP🤣🤣🤣

Code for skint.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know if only we had 70m in the bank we could go out really get quality in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure what your point is. Celtic's bank balance is a matter of record. As is Rangers'.

posted on 1/2/24

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 minutes ago
"We have two fir strikers, Dessers and Silva (the guy your not judging til the end of the season?!?! but then judge him after 1 start"

There's a difference between judging a player, and knowing what he is...he is a good player and will contribute, but he isn't an out and out goalscorer, I know that much, so I'm not expecting many goals from him if he starts up top on his own

You totally contradict yourself in what you are saying.....we will have brought 3 players in this window without spending any money you say.....then say to bring in a striker we need to spend £5m...what, can we only get midfielders, number 10s and left backs for no immediate fee like, that how it works?

I do know there needs to be a buyer for a player like Wright, you continue focusing on Wright if you want...there are other players in this squad that have had interest, in this window, so there are people looking at them

Yilmaz being one
Cifuentes another
Matondo
Lammers is already away, for me that's who Silva replaced, and Lammers wasn't an out and out striker either
We've possibly got McCausland going out on loan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
like I said I will judge Silva on the job he has done at the end of the season. I will not say he wont score goals here on the back of 1 start. you judging him now saying he wont score the goals we need.

I gave an example of two strikers from our league that can be trusted to hit double figures, and that they will cost at least 5m. I dont see either of them delaying that payment til summer.

I addressed Yilmaz, Wright and Matondo, re read what I said if you missed it.

none of they players bring in the cash required to get a proven goal scorer mid season like you think.

Also as HB said Silva is our number 9.

Clement addressed it already you might not like it and you clearly feel comfortable saying he wont get the goals we need but, the recruitment team think he is good enough. Danillo and Sima will both be back before end of season. we also have Lovelace as third choice til they do.

posted on 1/2/24

comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 20 seconds ago
FFP🤣🤣🤣

Code for skint.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know if only we had 70m in the bank we could go out really get quality in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure what your point is. Celtic's bank balance is a matter of record. As is Rangers'.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
it should be pretty clear

posted on 1/2/24

Adam Montgomery back to Celtic from Motherwell due to his serious hamstring injury.

posted on 1/2/24

comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 20 seconds ago
FFP🤣🤣🤣

Code for skint.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know if only we had 70m in the bank we could go out really get quality in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You also likely wouldn't go bust and die. Which is a bonus.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ouch .....

posted on 1/2/24

comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided what to change it to yet (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
Adam Montgomery back to Celtic from Motherwell due to his serious hamstring injury.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like a new signing!

comment by St3vie (U11028)

posted on 1/2/24

comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 minutes ago
"We have two fir strikers, Dessers and Silva (the guy your not judging til the end of the season?!?! but then judge him after 1 start"

There's a difference between judging a player, and knowing what he is...he is a good player and will contribute, but he isn't an out and out goalscorer, I know that much, so I'm not expecting many goals from him if he starts up top on his own

You totally contradict yourself in what you are saying.....we will have brought 3 players in this window without spending any money you say.....then say to bring in a striker we need to spend £5m...what, can we only get midfielders, number 10s and left backs for no immediate fee like, that how it works?

I do know there needs to be a buyer for a player like Wright, you continue focusing on Wright if you want...there are other players in this squad that have had interest, in this window, so there are people looking at them

Yilmaz being one
Cifuentes another
Matondo
Lammers is already away, for me that's who Silva replaced, and Lammers wasn't an out and out striker either
We've possibly got McCausland going out on loan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
like I said I will judge Silva on the job he has done at the end of the season. I will not say he wont score goals here on the back of 1 start. you judging him now saying he wont score the goals we need.

I gave an example of two strikers from our league that can be trusted to hit double figures, and that they will cost at least 5m. I dont see either of them delaying that payment til summer.

I addressed Yilmaz, Wright and Matondo, re read what I said if you missed it.

none of they players bring in the cash required to get a proven goal scorer mid season like you think.

Also as HB said Silva is our number 9.

Clement addressed it already you might not like it and you clearly feel comfortable saying he wont get the goals we need but, the recruitment team think he is good enough. Danillo and Sima will both be back before end of season. we also have Lovelace as third choice til they do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still insisting we have to spend big bring in any sort of number 9 that could do a job for us in this league...ok mate

Silva isn't a number 9.....he's a number 10 and would far rather play in that position just in behind the striker, I'm certain of it

If we sold Yilmaz.... you'd say we have to replace him
Sima got injured, we look like bringing Cortes in to replace him
We've signed Diomande, looks like he will replace Cifuentes
We sign Silva, Lammers goes out the door

Danilo gets injured.....ach be fine, we don't need to replace him

I just do not agree with that mate, pure and simple
FFP, no suitors...whatever
We've lost a striker until April...we need another one

posted on 1/2/24

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 minutes ago
"We have two fir strikers, Dessers and Silva (the guy your not judging til the end of the season?!?! but then judge him after 1 start"

There's a difference between judging a player, and knowing what he is...he is a good player and will contribute, but he isn't an out and out goalscorer, I know that much, so I'm not expecting many goals from him if he starts up top on his own

You totally contradict yourself in what you are saying.....we will have brought 3 players in this window without spending any money you say.....then say to bring in a striker we need to spend £5m...what, can we only get midfielders, number 10s and left backs for no immediate fee like, that how it works?

I do know there needs to be a buyer for a player like Wright, you continue focusing on Wright if you want...there are other players in this squad that have had interest, in this window, so there are people looking at them

Yilmaz being one
Cifuentes another
Matondo
Lammers is already away, for me that's who Silva replaced, and Lammers wasn't an out and out striker either
We've possibly got McCausland going out on loan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
like I said I will judge Silva on the job he has done at the end of the season. I will not say he wont score goals here on the back of 1 start. you judging him now saying he wont score the goals we need.

I gave an example of two strikers from our league that can be trusted to hit double figures, and that they will cost at least 5m. I dont see either of them delaying that payment til summer.

I addressed Yilmaz, Wright and Matondo, re read what I said if you missed it.

none of they players bring in the cash required to get a proven goal scorer mid season like you think.

Also as HB said Silva is our number 9.

Clement addressed it already you might not like it and you clearly feel comfortable saying he wont get the goals we need but, the recruitment team think he is good enough. Danillo and Sima will both be back before end of season. we also have Lovelace as third choice til they do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still insisting we have to spend big bring in any sort of number 9 that could do a job for us in this league...ok mate

Silva isn't a number 9.....he's a number 10 and would far rather play in that position just in behind the striker, I'm certain of it

If we sold Yilmaz.... you'd say we have to replace him
Sima got injured, we look like bringing Cortes in to replace him
We've signed Diomande, looks like he will replace Cifuentes
We sign Silva, Lammers goes out the door

Danilo gets injured.....ach be fine, we don't need to replace him

I just do not agree with that mate, pure and simple
FFP, no suitors...whatever
We've lost a striker until April...we need another one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I do ... I gave examples of proven goalscorers in the scottish league that will cost you 5m ..... we aint a big league so to get proven goalscrorers in similar or better leagues will cost that or more.

And like I said you have decided that Silva wont be that guy, then say you aint judging him til end of season?

And I also said selling Yilmaz now would be silly... if he keeps up his form and continues to cement his place in the team his value will be a good bit more in the summer.

We did replace Danillo, we did it with Silva. Silva has had 1 start and two subs, he has played no 9 in all of them.

posted on 1/2/24

I just do not agree with that mate, pure and simple
---
https://www.barbourproductsearch.info/106445cs4b-file012096.jpg

posted on 1/2/24

comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 20 seconds ago
FFP🤣🤣🤣

Code for skint.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know if only we had 70m in the bank we could go out really get quality in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure what your point is. Celtic's bank balance is a matter of record. As is Rangers'.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
it should be pretty clear
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason you're not buying players is that you don't have the money. That's clear. FFP might be a factor but the main reason is that the money isn't there.

Celtic's financial position is completely irrelevant. Not sure why you even brought it up.

posted on 1/2/24

comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 20 seconds ago
FFP🤣🤣🤣

Code for skint.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know if only we had 70m in the bank we could go out really get quality in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure what your point is. Celtic's bank balance is a matter of record. As is Rangers'.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
it should be pretty clear
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason you're not buying players is that you don't have the money. That's clear. FFP might be a factor but the main reason is that the money isn't there.

Celtic's financial position is completely irrelevant. Not sure why you even brought it up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cos as it turns out having 70m doesnt really mean that your gonna be able to bring in "quality" really shouldnt have needed to spell that out I would have thought.

comment by St3vie (U11028)

posted on 1/2/24

"I do ... I gave examples of proven goalscorers in the scottish league that will cost you 5m ..... we aint a big league so to get proven goalscrorers in similar or better leagues will cost that or more."

Still insisting this.....yet in your words, in this window, we've already brought in three players without paying a fee...do you want me to say it again like?

Silva isn't a number 9...not saying he is a bad player, he just isn't an out and out goalscorer....when he was at PSV, he often played left wing with De Jong being the main striker....at Porto, he was often the support striker...at Wolves, he very rarely played up top on his own as the lone striker, was more often one of two and was also used out wide

posted on 1/2/24

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 17 seconds ago
"I do ... I gave examples of proven goalscorers in the scottish league that will cost you 5m ..... we aint a big league so to get proven goalscrorers in similar or better leagues will cost that or more."

Still insisting this.....yet in your words, in this window, we've already brought in three players without paying a fee...do you want me to say it again like?

Silva isn't a number 9...not saying he is a bad player, he just isn't an out and out goalscorer....when he was at PSV, he often played left wing with De Jong being the main striker....at Porto, he was often the support striker...at Wolves, he very rarely played up top on his own as the lone striker, was more often one of two and was also used out wide
----------------------------------------------------------------------
there would still have been fees paid.... and like I said FFP will also restrict us in the summer due to this.

Silva will be a striker for us... you might not like it and might judge him already in that role, but thats how he has been utilised so far and will continue to do so. (he didnt replace Lammers he was in before Lammers left)

He played far more games as a 9 for PSV than he did wide. He played every game for Anderlecht as a striker.

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/fabio-silva/leistungsdaten/spieler/505653/saison/2022/plus/1#gesamt

in 2 seasons he has played 5 games wide, the rest of them (51) as a striker.

posted on 1/2/24

comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 20 seconds ago
FFP🤣🤣🤣

Code for skint.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know if only we had 70m in the bank we could go out really get quality in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure what your point is. Celtic's bank balance is a matter of record. As is Rangers'.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
it should be pretty clear
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason you're not buying players is that you don't have the money. That's clear. FFP might be a factor but the main reason is that the money isn't there.

Celtic's financial position is completely irrelevant. Not sure why you even brought it up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cos as it turns out having 70m doesnt really mean that your gonna be able to bring in "quality" really shouldnt have needed to spell that out I would have thought.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's completely irrelevant to why Rangers can't but players.

comment by St3vie (U11028)

posted on 1/2/24

.....and his record is 16 goals in 56 games at various clubs

He played 20 league games for Anderlecht, as a striker, and scored 7 goals

Matondo played 26 games mainly as a winger for Cercle Brugge and scored 9....is he an out and out goalscorer like?

posted on 1/2/24

Silva isn’t a 10. He’s just not a typical in the box striker, but neither is Shankland. Difference is Shankland is a proven finisher.

Lammers has gone to Holland and is playing well as an out and striker too, no surprise he’s still not scoring though. Don’t know why we think we should play strikers in midfield.

posted on 1/2/24

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 6 minutes ago
.....and his record is 16 goals in 56 games at various clubs

He played 20 league games for Anderlecht, as a striker, and scored 7 goals

Matondo played 26 games mainly as a winger for Cercle Brugge and scored 9....is he an out and out goalscorer like?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
dont know , we will see come the end of the season. He doesnt need to be one like I said. If Dessers continues the form seen since Clement came in he will be that.

Like I said I will judge him at the end of the season , and not how he did as a 19 and 20 yr old and take that as the outlier for him.

posted on 1/2/24

comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided what to change it to yet (U10636)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
Tilio away back to Australia on loan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Never to be seen again, would be my guess.

As a general point, anyone else think it’s time we canned the “Asian” market? Other than Ange’s magnificent first foray (Kyogo, Hatate, Maeda), where he clearly had specialist knowledge, it’s been a stream of utter dross for us.

comment by JFK (U8919)

posted on 1/2/24

Ange wanted those 3 but outwith ange knowledge what success have we had

i do recall ange wanted Oh though.

posted on 1/2/24

From today’s Beeb footie gossip:

“Sydney van Hooijdonk was keen on a move to Celtic this month, but as his agent waited for a concrete offer, the Glasgow club instead targeted Norwich City striker Adam Idah, with the Dutch 23-year-old now lined up to replace the Irishman at Carrow Road. (Tuttobologna)“

Classic us that.

posted on 1/2/24

comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 20 seconds ago
FFP🤣🤣🤣

Code for skint.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know if only we had 70m in the bank we could go out really get quality in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure what your point is. Celtic's bank balance is a matter of record. As is Rangers'.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
it should be pretty clear
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason you're not buying players is that you don't have the money. That's clear. FFP might be a factor but the main reason is that the money isn't there.

Celtic's financial position is completely irrelevant. Not sure why you even brought it up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cos as it turns out having 70m doesnt really mean that your gonna be able to bring in "quality" really shouldnt have needed to spell that out I would have thought.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's completely irrelevant to why Rangers can't but players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
we can buy players

comment by St3vie (U11028)

posted on 1/2/24

comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 6 minutes ago
.....and his record is 16 goals in 56 games at various clubs

He played 20 league games for Anderlecht, as a striker, and scored 7 goals

Matondo played 26 games mainly as a winger for Cercle Brugge and scored 9....is he an out and out goalscorer like?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
dont know , we will see come the end of the season. He doesnt need to be one like I said. If Dessers continues the form seen since Clement came in he will be that.

Like I said I will judge him at the end of the season , and not how he did as a 19 and 20 yr old and take that as the outlier for him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We need another striker mate...fck sake there folk saying we need two

posted on 1/2/24

And …

“Celtic manager Brendan Rodgers has defended the use of loan signings following the arrival of Adam Idah from Norwich City without an option to buy, pointing out that permanent deals are not always possible. (The Herald)“

Just GTF. Of course, it might also be easier if we started looking before the “bargain bucket” last 48 hours of the window … even more so when we’ve only had 1 available striker.

posted on 1/2/24

comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 20 seconds ago
FFP🤣🤣🤣

Code for skint.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know if only we had 70m in the bank we could go out really get quality in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure what your point is. Celtic's bank balance is a matter of record. As is Rangers'.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
it should be pretty clear
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason you're not buying players is that you don't have the money. That's clear. FFP might be a factor but the main reason is that the money isn't there.

Celtic's financial position is completely irrelevant. Not sure why you even brought it up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cos as it turns out having 70m doesnt really mean that your gonna be able to bring in "quality" really shouldnt have needed to spell that out I would have thought.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's completely irrelevant to why Rangers can't but players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
we can buy players
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ. Why do you persevere with these stupid arguments every day.
Earlier on you were blaming FFP. Now it's not an issue.
Enjoy wasting everyone else's enjoyment of the site.

Page 51 of 60

Sign in if you want to comment