Cuuunntt of the year winner for a reason. Facking piece of excrement, I wouldn’t piiisss on him if he was on fire.

Hes filtered me too when I've never had any debate with him ever on this site

You are correct in that he offers absolutely nothing. 0 insight on anything, just random one liner rubbish.

But a grown man making articles about him at midnight is just as pathetic 😂

He filtered me ages ago, proper phanny.

Filtered me ages ago too. Think he lives in his own little world.

comment by Ace (U14461)
posted 20 minutes ago
Cuuunntt of the year winner for a reason. Facking piece of excrement, I wouldn’t piiisss on him if he was on fire.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf, there is more deserving than him… such is life

Also not a fan of how he's been acting lately and also got filtered for calling out his weird comments about our manager/Poch. But I think this article is unnecessary and ill judged. He's not going to change.

What I will say is, there's plenty of space for dissenting voices here (or at least should be) if you're willing to have a sensible discussion around why you think a certain way. I wanted Conte. I thought we were right to sack Pochettino at the time. I don't want Kulusevski at cam.. I want Levy to have nothing to do with football but think him and ENIC have been very good owners overall. None of these opinions resulted in filtering or arguments or whatever. It's just football init

comment by BISS Bash BOSSED (U8366)
posted 5 hours, 51 minutes ago
You are correct in that he offers absolutely nothing. 0 insight on anything, just random one liner rubbish.

But a grown man making articles about him at midnight is just as pathetic 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah this, grow up Ace

This tantrum has made his year, exactly the sort of reaction feckwits like him feed off.

He filtered me ages ago. I honestly don't get why anyone filters anyone on this site. I genuinely don't get it. I have never and will never filter anyone.

comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 11 minutes ago
He filtered me ages ago. I honestly don't get why anyone filters anyone on this site. I genuinely don't get it. I have never and will never filter anyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is strange behavior. He's filtered me for God knows why. Not a problem but I wonder why anyone comments on his article. Sort of like sandy

One of the Spurs special bussers along with Sandy moresperm & that detritus Craptor

I'm filtered by all this filth

comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 hour, 31 minutes ago
He filtered me ages ago. I honestly don't get why anyone filters anyone on this site. I genuinely don't get it. I have never and will never filter anyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I filter people who I want nothing to do with. I have the likes of Sizzle and Sandy filtered as I have no wish to read their drivel. But I would never filter anyone just for having different opinions or anything like that.

I do think it can be a useful tool when there are so many trolls who come on here purely to derail the site.

comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
He filtered me ages ago. I honestly don't get why anyone filters anyone on this site. I genuinely don't get it. I have never and will never filter anyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I havent got anyone filtered, but I get it. Hard to have any kind of reasonable discussion on here when the same idiots turn up on every multi-board thread and turn it into childish argument (my club & players are better than yours)

Only one person filtered by me, forza because I can’t be bothered to try and work what he’s writing

Totally get Ace’s point, creates an article with a link, then writes thoughts? And offers none of his, then is the first to comment with an emoji

comment by VAR check (U8711)
posted 9 minutes ago
Totally get Ace’s point, creates an article with a link, then writes thoughts? And offers none of his, then is the first to comment with an emoji
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yh the whole commenting first on your article to make it look like it has comments is embarrassing. Mind you, OP has done that here too, maybe they are 2 sides of the same coin

comment by VAR check (U8711)
posted 22 minutes ago
Only one person filtered by me, forza because I can’t be bothered to try and work what he’s writing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I either ignore that or call him out on his donkey obsession

comment by BISS Bash BOSSED (U8366)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by VAR check (U8711)
posted 9 minutes ago
Totally get Ace’s point, creates an article with a link, then writes thoughts? And offers none of his, then is the first to comment with an emoji
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yh the whole commenting first on your article to make it look like it has comments is embarrassing. Mind you, OP has done that here too, maybe they are 2 sides of the same coin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least the first comment here is actually a comment and not just a picture of a mug (which is fitting for Sizzle's articles actually).

As for filtering in general its petty childish and pointless id much rather call clusterfacks out on here...much more fun...as many have found out

I bet sizzle is wishing he could see this now...🤭

People actually believe that they’re celebrities on here, despite the blatantly obvious flaw that it’s anonymous.

I think that sums up the issue with social media perfectly.

comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by BISS Bash BOSSED (U8366)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by VAR check (U8711)
posted 9 minutes ago
Totally get Ace’s point, creates an article with a link, then writes thoughts? And offers none of his, then is the first to comment with an emoji
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yh the whole commenting first on your article to make it look like it has comments is embarrassing. Mind you, OP has done that here too, maybe they are 2 sides of the same coin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least the first comment here is actually a comment and not just a picture of a mug (which is fitting for Sizzle's articles actually).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah true. I just think its a weird flex in general

Don't want to get involved in the argument but I thought the reason for posting a first comment on your own article is because otherwise you don't see when someone's commented on it on My Member Page

comment by Jalisco Red - Gimme Hope Onana (U4195)
posted 2 minutes ago
Don't want to get involved in the argument but I thought the reason for posting a first comment on your own article is because otherwise you don't see when someone's commented on it on My Member Page
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that’s what I thought. It’s not controversial enough though, so it’s not valid.