comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 8 seconds ago
If you have RDD filtered you won’t get it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So almost nobody gets it then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I certainly don't. Has there been a mass filtering?
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 24 minutes ago
Shall we make this post about RDD instead of Amad, it's what Elvis would want (and RDD).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am ok with that, providing it becomes exhaustingly repetitive.
comment by kinsang (U3346)
posted 17 minutes ago
The loan spell at Rangers didn't really work out for him.
Given the lack of depth in our team, it's not a great sign that he hasn't had much of a chance, maybe this will change ETH's mind and he'll give him a bit more time.
Of course it could simply turn out to be a Macheda moment, but even if it is, he'll be remembered for it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Rangers loan didn't work, but perhaps it made him realise he had to work on his strength? As his loan move to Sunderland did work out and having watched quite a lot of their highlights whilst he was on loan, he looked much more prepared for the physicality of English football.
Amad is a better player than Antony, and he should be playing ahead of him. As for signing a new right winger, it is best to give the money to the new manager. Even with FA cup win, it will be shortsighted to keep ETH more than this season.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 4 minutes ago
Our problem has been not killing off games early enough to give him more minutes on the pitch.
As simple as that really.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I get what you are saying, but also hard to agree when we are bringing on Antony ahead of him. Even if we are chasing a game, he should really be playing ahead of Antony at this point. Maybe Antony gets on ahead of him if we are likely to be denfeding.
Amad was very good yesterday, started the move on the edge of our area by nicking the ball and passing to Nacho, sprinted to the other end to score with a precise low finish. That alone is enough for a place in the squad. Many have done far less only to be rewarded, Amad deserves better.
Long term, I don't know where he fits as a starter, is he a winger or AM? Too good for the Championship, may be decent somewhere else in the PL. Still looks a little lightweight.
From what I read the Rangers loan was actually very beneficial for Amad. Started off very badly but by all accounts by the end the Rangers fans really grew to like him and he grew massively as a person there. Loans are just about the stats, if a young player can go to a big club and handle the pressure and grow mentally then that's just as important as anything else.
comment by Zacab (U18502)
posted 1 minute ago
Amad is a better player than Antony, and he should be playing ahead of him. As for signing a new right winger, it is best to give the money to the new manager. Even with FA cup win, it will be shortsighted to keep ETH more than this season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Amad may be better attack wise but Antony is better tracking back, can be a strength going forwards too. I think Antony's off field issues have affected his game, he is nothing like last season and miles off the player we saw at Ajax. He's not "sheite" as many simpletons accuse him of being, frustrating, lacking confidence and form yes but there is talent there.
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by kinsang (U3346)
posted 17 minutes ago
The loan spell at Rangers didn't really work out for him.
Given the lack of depth in our team, it's not a great sign that he hasn't had much of a chance, maybe this will change ETH's mind and he'll give him a bit more time.
Of course it could simply turn out to be a Macheda moment, but even if it is, he'll be remembered for it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Rangers loan didn't work, but perhaps it made him realise he had to work on his strength? As his loan move to Sunderland did work out and having watched quite a lot of their highlights whilst he was on loan, he looked much more prepared for the physicality of English football.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the loan spell did actually work. Id argue it was the naking of the boy.
When he started tou could see his ability was there but not his attitude, he wasnt up for the commitment side.
By the time the end of the season came up he got a few other chances and you could see the massive change in attitude. if you asked Gers fans in Feb if they wanted him on loan another year most would say no, if you asked again in May there was much more positive group that would have wanted it (including me)
Id say he left Rangers in a complete different mindset to which he joined.
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by kinsang (U3346)
posted 17 minutes ago
The loan spell at Rangers didn't really work out for him.
Given the lack of depth in our team, it's not a great sign that he hasn't had much of a chance, maybe this will change ETH's mind and he'll give him a bit more time.
Of course it could simply turn out to be a Macheda moment, but even if it is, he'll be remembered for it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Rangers loan didn't work, but perhaps it made him realise he had to work on his strength? As his loan move to Sunderland did work out and having watched quite a lot of their highlights whilst he was on loan, he looked much more prepared for the physicality of English football.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the loan spell did actually work. Id argue it was the naking of the boy.
When he started tou could see his ability was there but not his attitude, he wasnt up for the commitment side.
By the time the end of the season came up he got a few other chances and you could see the massive change in attitude. if you asked Gers fans in Feb if they wanted him on loan another year most would say no, if you asked again in May there was much more positive group that would have wanted it (including me)
Id say he left Rangers in a complete different mindset to which he joined.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good stuff. Thanks for the detail - I think we have discussed that in the past.
I get what you are saying, but also hard to agree when we are bringing on Antony ahead of him.
.........
True. I am not an Antony fan myself.
IMO, Sanch's demise with ETH was due to Antony playing ahead of him which should never have happened. Even though Sancho doesn't have what it takes to be a top player, himself.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 3 minutes ago
I get what you are saying, but also hard to agree when we are bringing on Antony ahead of him.
.........
True. I am not an Antony fan myself.
IMO, Sanch's demise with ETH was due to Antony playing ahead of him which should never have happened. Even though Sancho doesn't have what it takes to be a top player, himself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, perhaps he let his standards drop in training as a result.
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 52 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴 (U2462)
posted 39 minutes ago
This chant.
https://twitter.com/Manutdfan2022/status/1769643631361614161?t=6xGl-yAiImFScyROYQtHig&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FFS.
They way he hit that note at the end, he must have had the op.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m looking to the chant that is to the tune of a Martha Reeves and the Vandellas song.
I noticed amad has quite a high leap on him in the little time he's played for us which is interesting
He's not afraid to jump in the air and contest for the ball, like rashford
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 52 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴 (U2462)
posted 39 minutes ago
This chant.
https://twitter.com/Manutdfan2022/status/1769643631361614161?t=6xGl-yAiImFScyROYQtHig&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FFS.
They way he hit that note at the end, he must have had the op.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m looking to the chant that is to the tune of a Martha Reeves and the Vandellas song.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He sure is brave, I'll give him that
comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted 2 minutes ago
I noticed amad has quite a high leap on him in the little time he's played for us which is interesting
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My brain makes this noise when I see him jumping:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FHMg75ekPbE
Taking nothing away from Amad's performance... but those were two of the daftest bookings you'll ever see
For the first, Dalot should really have been booked for obstructing their free-kick. He wasn't, so Amad thought: "I'll have some of that." And then he apparently forgot it had even happened.
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 3 minutes ago
Taking nothing away from Amad's performance... but those were two of the daftest bookings you'll ever see
For the first, Dalot should really have been booked for obstructing their free-kick. He wasn't, so Amad thought: "I'll have some of that." And then he apparently forgot it had even happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Off topic but getting bookings for taking your shirt off is, imo, the worst rule in football.
I actually had to google why they do it and it’s classed as an excessive celebration.
Is it fvck! In fact it seems quite natural which is why so many do it.
Nonsense rule, the kid has just hit the winner in a huge cup game.
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 3 minutes ago
Taking nothing away from Amad's performance... but those were two of the daftest bookings you'll ever see
For the first, Dalot should really have been booked for obstructing their free-kick. He wasn't, so Amad thought: "I'll have some of that." And then he apparently forgot it had even happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Off topic but getting bookings for taking your shirt off is, imo, the worst rule in football.
I actually had to google why they do it and it’s classed as an excessive celebration.
Is it fvck! In fact it seems quite natural which is why so many do it.
Nonsense rule, the kid has just hit the winner in a huge cup game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was because of sponsorship - that in iconic moments like a goal celebration, the sponsor has to be visible. But I guess that would mean Cole Palmer getting booked when he folds his arms to celebrate...
Still remember Forlan running round tackling Saints players with no top on
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 3 minutes ago
Taking nothing away from Amad's performance... but those were two of the daftest bookings you'll ever see
For the first, Dalot should really have been booked for obstructing their free-kick. He wasn't, so Amad thought: "I'll have some of that." And then he apparently forgot it had even happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Off topic but getting bookings for taking your shirt off is, imo, the worst rule in football.
I actually had to google why they do it and it’s classed as an excessive celebration.
Is it fvck! In fact it seems quite natural which is why so many do it.
Nonsense rule, the kid has just hit the winner in a huge cup game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was because of sponsorship - that in iconic moments like a goal celebration, the sponsor has to be visible. But I guess that would mean Cole Palmer getting booked when he folds his arms to celebrate...
Still remember Forlan running round tackling Saints players with no top on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its cos political stuff started getting put on t-shirts so it was banned. which makes perfect sense
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 3 minutes ago
Taking nothing away from Amad's performance... but those were two of the daftest bookings you'll ever see
For the first, Dalot should really have been booked for obstructing their free-kick. He wasn't, so Amad thought: "I'll have some of that." And then he apparently forgot it had even happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Off topic but getting bookings for taking your shirt off is, imo, the worst rule in football.
I actually had to google why they do it and it’s classed as an excessive celebration.
Is it fvck! In fact it seems quite natural which is why so many do it.
Nonsense rule, the kid has just hit the winner in a huge cup game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was because of sponsorship - that in iconic moments like a goal celebration, the sponsor has to be visible. But I guess that would mean Cole Palmer getting booked when he folds his arms to celebrate...
Still remember Forlan running round tackling Saints players with no top on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its cos political stuff started getting put on t-shirts so it was banned. which makes perfect sense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So why not ban... political stuff on T-shirts?
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 3 minutes ago
Taking nothing away from Amad's performance... but those were two of the daftest bookings you'll ever see
For the first, Dalot should really have been booked for obstructing their free-kick. He wasn't, so Amad thought: "I'll have some of that." And then he apparently forgot it had even happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Off topic but getting bookings for taking your shirt off is, imo, the worst rule in football.
I actually had to google why they do it and it’s classed as an excessive celebration.
Is it fvck! In fact it seems quite natural which is why so many do it.
Nonsense rule, the kid has just hit the winner in a huge cup game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was because of sponsorship - that in iconic moments like a goal celebration, the sponsor has to be visible. But I guess that would mean Cole Palmer getting booked when he folds his arms to celebrate...
Still remember Forlan running round tackling Saints players with no top on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its cos political stuff started getting put on t-shirts so it was banned. which makes perfect sense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 3 minutes ago
Taking nothing away from Amad's performance... but those were two of the daftest bookings you'll ever see
For the first, Dalot should really have been booked for obstructing their free-kick. He wasn't, so Amad thought: "I'll have some of that." And then he apparently forgot it had even happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Off topic but getting bookings for taking your shirt off is, imo, the worst rule in football.
I actually had to google why they do it and it’s classed as an excessive celebration.
Is it fvck! In fact it seems quite natural which is why so many do it.
Nonsense rule, the kid has just hit the winner in a huge cup game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was because of sponsorship - that in iconic moments like a goal celebration, the sponsor has to be visible. But I guess that would mean Cole Palmer getting booked when he folds his arms to celebrate...
Still remember Forlan running round tackling Saints players with no top on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its cos political stuff started getting put on t-shirts so it was banned. which makes perfect sense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Players must not reveal undergarments that show political, religious, personal slogans, statements or images, or advertising other than the manufacturer's logo. For any offence the player and/or the team will be sanctioned by the competition organiser, national football association or by FIFA."
Still remember Forlan running round tackling Saints players with no top on
———
One of my favourite moments from that era.
Sign in if you want to comment
What next for Amad?
Page 2 of 3
posted on 18/3/24
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 8 seconds ago
If you have RDD filtered you won’t get it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So almost nobody gets it then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I certainly don't. Has there been a mass filtering?
posted on 18/3/24
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 24 minutes ago
Shall we make this post about RDD instead of Amad, it's what Elvis would want (and RDD).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am ok with that, providing it becomes exhaustingly repetitive.
posted on 18/3/24
comment by kinsang (U3346)
posted 17 minutes ago
The loan spell at Rangers didn't really work out for him.
Given the lack of depth in our team, it's not a great sign that he hasn't had much of a chance, maybe this will change ETH's mind and he'll give him a bit more time.
Of course it could simply turn out to be a Macheda moment, but even if it is, he'll be remembered for it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Rangers loan didn't work, but perhaps it made him realise he had to work on his strength? As his loan move to Sunderland did work out and having watched quite a lot of their highlights whilst he was on loan, he looked much more prepared for the physicality of English football.
posted on 18/3/24
Amad is a better player than Antony, and he should be playing ahead of him. As for signing a new right winger, it is best to give the money to the new manager. Even with FA cup win, it will be shortsighted to keep ETH more than this season.
posted on 18/3/24
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 4 minutes ago
Our problem has been not killing off games early enough to give him more minutes on the pitch.
As simple as that really.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I get what you are saying, but also hard to agree when we are bringing on Antony ahead of him. Even if we are chasing a game, he should really be playing ahead of Antony at this point. Maybe Antony gets on ahead of him if we are likely to be denfeding.
posted on 18/3/24
Amad was very good yesterday, started the move on the edge of our area by nicking the ball and passing to Nacho, sprinted to the other end to score with a precise low finish. That alone is enough for a place in the squad. Many have done far less only to be rewarded, Amad deserves better.
Long term, I don't know where he fits as a starter, is he a winger or AM? Too good for the Championship, may be decent somewhere else in the PL. Still looks a little lightweight.
posted on 18/3/24
From what I read the Rangers loan was actually very beneficial for Amad. Started off very badly but by all accounts by the end the Rangers fans really grew to like him and he grew massively as a person there. Loans are just about the stats, if a young player can go to a big club and handle the pressure and grow mentally then that's just as important as anything else.
posted on 18/3/24
comment by Zacab (U18502)
posted 1 minute ago
Amad is a better player than Antony, and he should be playing ahead of him. As for signing a new right winger, it is best to give the money to the new manager. Even with FA cup win, it will be shortsighted to keep ETH more than this season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Amad may be better attack wise but Antony is better tracking back, can be a strength going forwards too. I think Antony's off field issues have affected his game, he is nothing like last season and miles off the player we saw at Ajax. He's not "sheite" as many simpletons accuse him of being, frustrating, lacking confidence and form yes but there is talent there.
posted on 18/3/24
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by kinsang (U3346)
posted 17 minutes ago
The loan spell at Rangers didn't really work out for him.
Given the lack of depth in our team, it's not a great sign that he hasn't had much of a chance, maybe this will change ETH's mind and he'll give him a bit more time.
Of course it could simply turn out to be a Macheda moment, but even if it is, he'll be remembered for it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Rangers loan didn't work, but perhaps it made him realise he had to work on his strength? As his loan move to Sunderland did work out and having watched quite a lot of their highlights whilst he was on loan, he looked much more prepared for the physicality of English football.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the loan spell did actually work. Id argue it was the naking of the boy.
When he started tou could see his ability was there but not his attitude, he wasnt up for the commitment side.
By the time the end of the season came up he got a few other chances and you could see the massive change in attitude. if you asked Gers fans in Feb if they wanted him on loan another year most would say no, if you asked again in May there was much more positive group that would have wanted it (including me)
Id say he left Rangers in a complete different mindset to which he joined.
posted on 18/3/24
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by kinsang (U3346)
posted 17 minutes ago
The loan spell at Rangers didn't really work out for him.
Given the lack of depth in our team, it's not a great sign that he hasn't had much of a chance, maybe this will change ETH's mind and he'll give him a bit more time.
Of course it could simply turn out to be a Macheda moment, but even if it is, he'll be remembered for it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Rangers loan didn't work, but perhaps it made him realise he had to work on his strength? As his loan move to Sunderland did work out and having watched quite a lot of their highlights whilst he was on loan, he looked much more prepared for the physicality of English football.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the loan spell did actually work. Id argue it was the naking of the boy.
When he started tou could see his ability was there but not his attitude, he wasnt up for the commitment side.
By the time the end of the season came up he got a few other chances and you could see the massive change in attitude. if you asked Gers fans in Feb if they wanted him on loan another year most would say no, if you asked again in May there was much more positive group that would have wanted it (including me)
Id say he left Rangers in a complete different mindset to which he joined.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good stuff. Thanks for the detail - I think we have discussed that in the past.
posted on 18/3/24
I get what you are saying, but also hard to agree when we are bringing on Antony ahead of him.
.........
True. I am not an Antony fan myself.
IMO, Sanch's demise with ETH was due to Antony playing ahead of him which should never have happened. Even though Sancho doesn't have what it takes to be a top player, himself.
posted on 18/3/24
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 3 minutes ago
I get what you are saying, but also hard to agree when we are bringing on Antony ahead of him.
.........
True. I am not an Antony fan myself.
IMO, Sanch's demise with ETH was due to Antony playing ahead of him which should never have happened. Even though Sancho doesn't have what it takes to be a top player, himself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, perhaps he let his standards drop in training as a result.
posted on 18/3/24
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 52 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴 (U2462)
posted 39 minutes ago
This chant.
https://twitter.com/Manutdfan2022/status/1769643631361614161?t=6xGl-yAiImFScyROYQtHig&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FFS.
They way he hit that note at the end, he must have had the op.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m looking to the chant that is to the tune of a Martha Reeves and the Vandellas song.
posted on 18/3/24
I noticed amad has quite a high leap on him in the little time he's played for us which is interesting
posted on 18/3/24
He's not afraid to jump in the air and contest for the ball, like rashford
posted on 18/3/24
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 52 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴 (U2462)
posted 39 minutes ago
This chant.
https://twitter.com/Manutdfan2022/status/1769643631361614161?t=6xGl-yAiImFScyROYQtHig&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FFS.
They way he hit that note at the end, he must have had the op.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m looking to the chant that is to the tune of a Martha Reeves and the Vandellas song.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He sure is brave, I'll give him that
posted on 18/3/24
comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted 2 minutes ago
I noticed amad has quite a high leap on him in the little time he's played for us which is interesting
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My brain makes this noise when I see him jumping:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FHMg75ekPbE
posted on 18/3/24
Taking nothing away from Amad's performance... but those were two of the daftest bookings you'll ever see
For the first, Dalot should really have been booked for obstructing their free-kick. He wasn't, so Amad thought: "I'll have some of that." And then he apparently forgot it had even happened.
posted on 18/3/24
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 3 minutes ago
Taking nothing away from Amad's performance... but those were two of the daftest bookings you'll ever see
For the first, Dalot should really have been booked for obstructing their free-kick. He wasn't, so Amad thought: "I'll have some of that." And then he apparently forgot it had even happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Off topic but getting bookings for taking your shirt off is, imo, the worst rule in football.
I actually had to google why they do it and it’s classed as an excessive celebration.
Is it fvck! In fact it seems quite natural which is why so many do it.
Nonsense rule, the kid has just hit the winner in a huge cup game.
posted on 18/3/24
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 3 minutes ago
Taking nothing away from Amad's performance... but those were two of the daftest bookings you'll ever see
For the first, Dalot should really have been booked for obstructing their free-kick. He wasn't, so Amad thought: "I'll have some of that." And then he apparently forgot it had even happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Off topic but getting bookings for taking your shirt off is, imo, the worst rule in football.
I actually had to google why they do it and it’s classed as an excessive celebration.
Is it fvck! In fact it seems quite natural which is why so many do it.
Nonsense rule, the kid has just hit the winner in a huge cup game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was because of sponsorship - that in iconic moments like a goal celebration, the sponsor has to be visible. But I guess that would mean Cole Palmer getting booked when he folds his arms to celebrate...
Still remember Forlan running round tackling Saints players with no top on
posted on 18/3/24
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 3 minutes ago
Taking nothing away from Amad's performance... but those were two of the daftest bookings you'll ever see
For the first, Dalot should really have been booked for obstructing their free-kick. He wasn't, so Amad thought: "I'll have some of that." And then he apparently forgot it had even happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Off topic but getting bookings for taking your shirt off is, imo, the worst rule in football.
I actually had to google why they do it and it’s classed as an excessive celebration.
Is it fvck! In fact it seems quite natural which is why so many do it.
Nonsense rule, the kid has just hit the winner in a huge cup game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was because of sponsorship - that in iconic moments like a goal celebration, the sponsor has to be visible. But I guess that would mean Cole Palmer getting booked when he folds his arms to celebrate...
Still remember Forlan running round tackling Saints players with no top on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its cos political stuff started getting put on t-shirts so it was banned. which makes perfect sense
posted on 18/3/24
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 3 minutes ago
Taking nothing away from Amad's performance... but those were two of the daftest bookings you'll ever see
For the first, Dalot should really have been booked for obstructing their free-kick. He wasn't, so Amad thought: "I'll have some of that." And then he apparently forgot it had even happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Off topic but getting bookings for taking your shirt off is, imo, the worst rule in football.
I actually had to google why they do it and it’s classed as an excessive celebration.
Is it fvck! In fact it seems quite natural which is why so many do it.
Nonsense rule, the kid has just hit the winner in a huge cup game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was because of sponsorship - that in iconic moments like a goal celebration, the sponsor has to be visible. But I guess that would mean Cole Palmer getting booked when he folds his arms to celebrate...
Still remember Forlan running round tackling Saints players with no top on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its cos political stuff started getting put on t-shirts so it was banned. which makes perfect sense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So why not ban... political stuff on T-shirts?
posted on 18/3/24
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 3 minutes ago
Taking nothing away from Amad's performance... but those were two of the daftest bookings you'll ever see
For the first, Dalot should really have been booked for obstructing their free-kick. He wasn't, so Amad thought: "I'll have some of that." And then he apparently forgot it had even happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Off topic but getting bookings for taking your shirt off is, imo, the worst rule in football.
I actually had to google why they do it and it’s classed as an excessive celebration.
Is it fvck! In fact it seems quite natural which is why so many do it.
Nonsense rule, the kid has just hit the winner in a huge cup game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was because of sponsorship - that in iconic moments like a goal celebration, the sponsor has to be visible. But I guess that would mean Cole Palmer getting booked when he folds his arms to celebrate...
Still remember Forlan running round tackling Saints players with no top on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its cos political stuff started getting put on t-shirts so it was banned. which makes perfect sense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not
posted on 18/3/24
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Amrabats in the Belfry (U4892)
posted 3 minutes ago
Taking nothing away from Amad's performance... but those were two of the daftest bookings you'll ever see
For the first, Dalot should really have been booked for obstructing their free-kick. He wasn't, so Amad thought: "I'll have some of that." And then he apparently forgot it had even happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Off topic but getting bookings for taking your shirt off is, imo, the worst rule in football.
I actually had to google why they do it and it’s classed as an excessive celebration.
Is it fvck! In fact it seems quite natural which is why so many do it.
Nonsense rule, the kid has just hit the winner in a huge cup game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was because of sponsorship - that in iconic moments like a goal celebration, the sponsor has to be visible. But I guess that would mean Cole Palmer getting booked when he folds his arms to celebrate...
Still remember Forlan running round tackling Saints players with no top on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its cos political stuff started getting put on t-shirts so it was banned. which makes perfect sense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Players must not reveal undergarments that show political, religious, personal slogans, statements or images, or advertising other than the manufacturer's logo. For any offence the player and/or the team will be sanctioned by the competition organiser, national football association or by FIFA."
posted on 18/3/24
Still remember Forlan running round tackling Saints players with no top on
———
One of my favourite moments from that era.
Page 2 of 3