Once again sizzle you are showing that you cannot make a fair assessment because of your dislike of Ange.
The loss against Chelsea was nothing to do with Poch sussing us out, in fact we were taking them apart until the moments of madness occurred. If we had retained 11 players on the pitch the score in our favour would have been at least 3-4 goals.
Indeed, even with 9 men Chelsea struggled to put us down.
If you cannot be objective then you simply should not post rubbish like this.
comment by Luka Brasi π« The Sons of Ange 'If we lose I don't care' (U22178)
posted 9 seconds ago
First you put up a video of Chas and Dave singing snooker loopy then you posted evidence to support the claim Poch did not give a masterclass. You're doing well ππ».
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know it’s difficult for you to accept that Poch completely got the better of Ange at the first time of asking, so let’s hope he and the players can redeem themselves tomorrow.
However If Chelsea and Poch DO do the double over us, I’ll have plenty to say, and you won’t like any of it.
comment by Gezza-Spurs (U18952)
posted 20 minutes ago
Poch didn't exploit anything in the home game. We ourselves imploded due to lack of discipline and bad luck with injuries to key players who were at the top of their game at the time.
It's hard to predict how tomorrow will turn out. But I think it will be down to luck again (good or bad) for either side.
I know a lot of our fans are struggling to hear Ange's message. He's trying to build a team/squad that can compete for major trophies. That was never going to happen in his first season and I think he should be judged on a full second season. He is working on mentality as well as personnel and tactics. By sticking to the plan he's telling the players to believe in what we're trying to achieve. To chop and change the approach will bring doubt and uncertainty in the minds of the players.
I am confident that the future is a lot brighter for us now than it was this time last year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Correctπ
Say what you like. Ange is on a free pass ππ».
comment by GeniusGreaves (U1302)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Gezza-Spurs (U18952)
posted 20 minutes ago
Poch didn't exploit anything in the home game.
Except our defence, style of play, mentality and temperament.
comment by Luka Brasi π« The Sons of Ange 'If we lose I don't care' (U22178)
posted 1 minute ago
Say what you like. Ange is on a free pass ππ».
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cool. Let’s hope its not to the detriment of our club.
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Luka Brasi π« The Sons of Ange 'If we lose I don't care' (U22178)
posted 1 minute ago
Say what you like. Ange is on a free pass ππ».
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cool. Let’s hope its not to the detriment of our club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Say it now if you want. Lets pretend they have beaten us. What you got to say?
comment by Luka Brasi π« The Sons of Ange 'If we lose I don't care' (U22178)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Luka Brasi π« The Sons of Ange 'If we lose I don't care' (U22178)
posted 1 minute ago
Say what you like. Ange is on a free pass ππ».
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cool. Let’s hope its not to the detriment of our club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Say it now if you want. Lets pretend they have beaten us. What you got to say?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I want to see how we play and what the result is.
comment by Luka Brasi π« The Sons of Ange 'If we lose I don't care' (U22178)
posted 7 minutes ago
πππ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s wrong with that?
I want to see if we’ve learnt anything from the first game.
Davies out for season.
Emerson or Micky at LB then
Sigh, the injuries seem to be piling up again.
Yep no we are imploding even before we play them.
Poch has done it again Z z z
Werner is out for the season too. But I don't mind it.
I’m there tomorrow
I’m looking forward to having a few beers not sure about the game.
That should be it for Werner and Davies at spurs now.
But we all know they will both be here next season…
comment by GeniusGreaves (U1302)
posted 1 hour, 1 minute ago
Once again sizzle you are showing that you cannot make a fair assessment because of your dislike of Ange.
The loss against Chelsea was nothing to do with Poch sussing us out, in fact we were taking them apart until the moments of madness occurred. If we had retained 11 players on the pitch the score in our favour would have been at least 3-4 goals.
Indeed, even with 9 men Chelsea struggled to put us down.
If you cannot be objective then you simply should not post rubbish like this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Right of course, it was just our Spursy bad luck.
comment by Gezza-Spurs (U18952)
posted 1 hour, 56 minutes ago
Poch didn't exploit anything in the home game. We ourselves imploded due to lack of discipline and bad luck with injuries to key players who were at the top of their game at the time.
It's hard to predict how tomorrow will turn out. But I think it will be down to luck again (good or bad) for either side.
I know a lot of our fans are struggling to hear Ange's message. He's trying to build a team/squad that can compete for major trophies. That was never going to happen in his first season and I think he should be judged on a full second season. He is working on mentality as well as personnel and tactics. By sticking to the plan he's telling the players to believe in what we're trying to achieve. To chop and change the approach will bring doubt and uncertainty in the minds of the players.
I am confident that the future is a lot brighter for us now than it was this time last year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This
He has to play Micky at LB and then Dragusin in the centre. Nothing is solved by putting Royal on his wrong side, playing a progressive full back role coming into midfield. On every possible level, it's not his game on the wrong feckin foot.
Compete for major trophies?
We didn’t even compete for the Caribou Cup.
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 1 minute ago
He has to play Micky at LB and then Dragusin in the centre. Nothing is solved by putting Royal on his wrong side, playing a progressive full back role coming into midfield. On every possible level, it's not his game on the wrong feckin foot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt Micky will last a whole match bombing up and down the pitch on the left. Asking for another hammy
Here's some quotes from Ange which will go down a treat
Postecoglou asked about set pieces: "I think I've answered this question and I don't think it satisfies people, but no I don't see it as an issue. It's something that we work on along with everything in our game. There are far more important things that we need to concentrate on at the moment in terms of the team we're building. I think people want to be believe, and it can be, that football is very prescriptive. You've got an illness, here's the tablet and you feel better. I've never believed that.
I've always been about trying to create an environment and a style of football that can win things. I've never worked in a prescriptive manner and I certainly won't be doing it now."
comment by Luka Brasi π« The Sons of Ange 'If we lose I don't care' (U22178)
posted 23 seconds ago
Here's some quotes from Ange which will go down a treat
Postecoglou asked about set pieces: "I think I've answered this question and I don't think it satisfies people, but no I don't see it as an issue. It's something that we work on along with everything in our game. There are far more important things that we need to concentrate on at the moment in terms of the team we're building. I think people want to be believe, and it can be, that football is very prescriptive. You've got an illness, here's the tablet and you feel better. I've never believed that.
I've always been about trying to create an environment and a style of football that can win things. I've never worked in a prescriptive manner and I certainly won't be doing it now."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cool.
Try f*cking harder Ange.
Sign in if you want to comment
Chelsea V Tottenham Match Build Up
Page 2 of 4
posted on 1/5/24
Once again sizzle you are showing that you cannot make a fair assessment because of your dislike of Ange.
The loss against Chelsea was nothing to do with Poch sussing us out, in fact we were taking them apart until the moments of madness occurred. If we had retained 11 players on the pitch the score in our favour would have been at least 3-4 goals.
Indeed, even with 9 men Chelsea struggled to put us down.
If you cannot be objective then you simply should not post rubbish like this.
posted on 1/5/24
comment by Luka Brasi π« The Sons of Ange 'If we lose I don't care' (U22178)
posted 9 seconds ago
First you put up a video of Chas and Dave singing snooker loopy then you posted evidence to support the claim Poch did not give a masterclass. You're doing well ππ».
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know it’s difficult for you to accept that Poch completely got the better of Ange at the first time of asking, so let’s hope he and the players can redeem themselves tomorrow.
However If Chelsea and Poch DO do the double over us, I’ll have plenty to say, and you won’t like any of it.
posted on 1/5/24
comment by Gezza-Spurs (U18952)
posted 20 minutes ago
Poch didn't exploit anything in the home game. We ourselves imploded due to lack of discipline and bad luck with injuries to key players who were at the top of their game at the time.
It's hard to predict how tomorrow will turn out. But I think it will be down to luck again (good or bad) for either side.
I know a lot of our fans are struggling to hear Ange's message. He's trying to build a team/squad that can compete for major trophies. That was never going to happen in his first season and I think he should be judged on a full second season. He is working on mentality as well as personnel and tactics. By sticking to the plan he's telling the players to believe in what we're trying to achieve. To chop and change the approach will bring doubt and uncertainty in the minds of the players.
I am confident that the future is a lot brighter for us now than it was this time last year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Correctπ
posted on 1/5/24
Say what you like. Ange is on a free pass ππ».
posted on 1/5/24
comment by GeniusGreaves (U1302)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Gezza-Spurs (U18952)
posted 20 minutes ago
Poch didn't exploit anything in the home game.
Except our defence, style of play, mentality and temperament.
posted on 1/5/24
comment by Luka Brasi π« The Sons of Ange 'If we lose I don't care' (U22178)
posted 1 minute ago
Say what you like. Ange is on a free pass ππ».
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cool. Let’s hope its not to the detriment of our club.
posted on 1/5/24
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Luka Brasi π« The Sons of Ange 'If we lose I don't care' (U22178)
posted 1 minute ago
Say what you like. Ange is on a free pass ππ».
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cool. Let’s hope its not to the detriment of our club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Say it now if you want. Lets pretend they have beaten us. What you got to say?
posted on 1/5/24
comment by Luka Brasi π« The Sons of Ange 'If we lose I don't care' (U22178)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Luka Brasi π« The Sons of Ange 'If we lose I don't care' (U22178)
posted 1 minute ago
Say what you like. Ange is on a free pass ππ».
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cool. Let’s hope its not to the detriment of our club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Say it now if you want. Lets pretend they have beaten us. What you got to say?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I want to see how we play and what the result is.
posted on 1/5/24
πππ
posted on 1/5/24
comment by Luka Brasi π« The Sons of Ange 'If we lose I don't care' (U22178)
posted 7 minutes ago
πππ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s wrong with that?
I want to see if we’ve learnt anything from the first game.
posted on 1/5/24
Davies out for season.
Emerson or Micky at LB then
posted on 1/5/24
Sigh, the injuries seem to be piling up again.
posted on 1/5/24
Yep no we are imploding even before we play them.
Poch has done it again Z z z
posted on 1/5/24
Werner is out for the season too. But I don't mind it.
posted on 1/5/24
I’m there tomorrow
I’m looking forward to having a few beers not sure about the game.
posted on 1/5/24
Hounslow’s
posted on 1/5/24
That should be it for Werner and Davies at spurs now.
But we all know they will both be here next season…
posted on 1/5/24
comment by GeniusGreaves (U1302)
posted 1 hour, 1 minute ago
Once again sizzle you are showing that you cannot make a fair assessment because of your dislike of Ange.
The loss against Chelsea was nothing to do with Poch sussing us out, in fact we were taking them apart until the moments of madness occurred. If we had retained 11 players on the pitch the score in our favour would have been at least 3-4 goals.
Indeed, even with 9 men Chelsea struggled to put us down.
If you cannot be objective then you simply should not post rubbish like this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Right of course, it was just our Spursy bad luck.
posted on 1/5/24
2-0 Chelsea
posted on 1/5/24
comment by Gezza-Spurs (U18952)
posted 1 hour, 56 minutes ago
Poch didn't exploit anything in the home game. We ourselves imploded due to lack of discipline and bad luck with injuries to key players who were at the top of their game at the time.
It's hard to predict how tomorrow will turn out. But I think it will be down to luck again (good or bad) for either side.
I know a lot of our fans are struggling to hear Ange's message. He's trying to build a team/squad that can compete for major trophies. That was never going to happen in his first season and I think he should be judged on a full second season. He is working on mentality as well as personnel and tactics. By sticking to the plan he's telling the players to believe in what we're trying to achieve. To chop and change the approach will bring doubt and uncertainty in the minds of the players.
I am confident that the future is a lot brighter for us now than it was this time last year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This
posted on 1/5/24
He has to play Micky at LB and then Dragusin in the centre. Nothing is solved by putting Royal on his wrong side, playing a progressive full back role coming into midfield. On every possible level, it's not his game on the wrong feckin foot.
posted on 1/5/24
Compete for major trophies?
We didn’t even compete for the Caribou Cup.
posted on 1/5/24
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 1 minute ago
He has to play Micky at LB and then Dragusin in the centre. Nothing is solved by putting Royal on his wrong side, playing a progressive full back role coming into midfield. On every possible level, it's not his game on the wrong feckin foot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt Micky will last a whole match bombing up and down the pitch on the left. Asking for another hammy
posted on 1/5/24
Here's some quotes from Ange which will go down a treat
Postecoglou asked about set pieces: "I think I've answered this question and I don't think it satisfies people, but no I don't see it as an issue. It's something that we work on along with everything in our game. There are far more important things that we need to concentrate on at the moment in terms of the team we're building. I think people want to be believe, and it can be, that football is very prescriptive. You've got an illness, here's the tablet and you feel better. I've never believed that.
I've always been about trying to create an environment and a style of football that can win things. I've never worked in a prescriptive manner and I certainly won't be doing it now."
posted on 1/5/24
comment by Luka Brasi π« The Sons of Ange 'If we lose I don't care' (U22178)
posted 23 seconds ago
Here's some quotes from Ange which will go down a treat
Postecoglou asked about set pieces: "I think I've answered this question and I don't think it satisfies people, but no I don't see it as an issue. It's something that we work on along with everything in our game. There are far more important things that we need to concentrate on at the moment in terms of the team we're building. I think people want to be believe, and it can be, that football is very prescriptive. You've got an illness, here's the tablet and you feel better. I've never believed that.
I've always been about trying to create an environment and a style of football that can win things. I've never worked in a prescriptive manner and I certainly won't be doing it now."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cool.
Try f*cking harder Ange.
Page 2 of 4