or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 427 comments are related to an article called:

Leeds Utd 2 Queens Park Rangers 2

Page 10 of 18

comment by Stoopo (U4707)

posted on 15/3/25

comment by LIW 100 Points, champions, Lose two games only (U8453)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Shadowcrimes (U19276)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by LIW 100 Points, champions, Lose two games only (U8453)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Shadowcrimes (U19276)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by LIW 100 Points, champions, Lose two games only (U8453)
posted 28 seconds ago
People saying about AO and rothwell playing away today.

Look with ya bloody eyes, thats nothing to do with going two nil down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the goals necessarily - but it’s the shape and balance of the team.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Explain please, because whats wrong with shape and balance of team 🤷🏻‍♂️
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I’ve not seen Rothwell have a meaningful touch yet. So that’s a start.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s poor when we don’t have the ball. Maybe people will see that now?

I’d keep him on now though because we have to attack. Gruev would be a backward move.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

No see it all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Specsavers are good I think 😉

posted on 15/3/25

comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Shadowcrimes (U19276)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by LIW 100 Points, champions, Lose two games only (U8453)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Shadowcrimes (U19276)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by LIW 100 Points, champions, Lose two games only (U8453)
posted 28 seconds ago
People saying about AO and rothwell playing away today.

Look with ya bloody eyes, thats nothing to do with going two nil down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the goals necessarily - but it’s the shape and balance of the team.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Explain please, because whats wrong with shape and balance of team 🤷🏻‍♂️
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I’ve not seen Rothwell have a meaningful touch yet. So that’s a start.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s poor when we don’t have the ball. Maybe people will see that now?

I’d keep him on now though because we have to attack. Gruev would be a backward move.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least Gruev would stem the flow of balls coming through our non-existent defensive midfield. Once theY get the ball in our half, they look extremely dangerous

comment by Stoopo (U4707)

posted on 15/3/25

comment by Batty (U4664)
posted 24 seconds ago
Yep, that lines(wo)man is fit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She was also spot on with our goal!

comment by Batty (U4664)

posted on 15/3/25

She was.

comment by Stoopo (U4707)

posted on 15/3/25

comment by The heart of Farkeness (U19827)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Shadowcrimes (U19276)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by LIW 100 Points, champions, Lose two games only (U8453)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Shadowcrimes (U19276)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by LIW 100 Points, champions, Lose two games only (U8453)
posted 28 seconds ago
People saying about AO and rothwell playing away today.

Look with ya bloody eyes, thats nothing to do with going two nil down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the goals necessarily - but it’s the shape and balance of the team.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Explain please, because whats wrong with shape and balance of team 🤷🏻‍♂️
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I’ve not seen Rothwell have a meaningful touch yet. So that’s a start.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s poor when we don’t have the ball. Maybe people will see that now?

I’d keep him on now though because we have to attack. Gruev would be a backward move.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least Gruev would stem the flow of balls coming through our non-existent defensive midfield. Once theY get the ball in our half, they look extremely dangerous
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but I think second half we will settle into us having lots of possession and I think Rothwell will be better than Gruev.

posted on 15/3/25

Gone down as own goal.

posted on 15/3/25

Pluck a duck, a half time sub

posted on 15/3/25

comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by The heart of Farkeness (U19827)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Shadowcrimes (U19276)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by LIW 100 Points, champions, Lose two games only (U8453)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Shadowcrimes (U19276)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by LIW 100 Points, champions, Lose two games only (U8453)
posted 28 seconds ago
People saying about AO and rothwell playing away today.

Look with ya bloody eyes, thats nothing to do with going two nil down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the goals necessarily - but it’s the shape and balance of the team.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Explain please, because whats wrong with shape and balance of team 🤷🏻‍♂️
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I’ve not seen Rothwell have a meaningful touch yet. So that’s a start.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s poor when we don’t have the ball. Maybe people will see that now?

I’d keep him on now though because we have to attack. Gruev would be a backward move.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least Gruev would stem the flow of balls coming through our non-existent defensive midfield. Once theY get the ball in our half, they look extremely dangerous
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but I think second half we will settle into us having lots of possession and I think Rothwell will be better than Gruev.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And then what, Stoopo? They get a free kick down the wing and score from their only shot in the second half? We have had one effort on target with 60% of the possession, so we are not getting through them the way they are getting through us. Gnonto and Gruev would be obvious changes for me, with BA and DJ combing off and Ao playing the number 10.

posted on 15/3/25

Farkin' hell - half-time change!

posted on 15/3/25

A sub, a sub!,, TBTJ!!!

posted on 15/3/25

Roast them Wilf

posted on 15/3/25

Oooooer

Concentrate FFS lads !!!!

posted on 15/3/25

Defence will concede again.

posted on 15/3/25

OG been our top scorer lately.

posted on 15/3/25

More open this half

posted on 15/3/25

Promising ... Solomon

posted on 15/3/25

get innnn

posted on 15/3/25

Yes!!!

posted on 15/3/25

2-2

Win loading.......

posted on 15/3/25

Yes!!!!

posted on 15/3/25

Yessss

posted on 15/3/25

Come ONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN Leeds!!!!!


YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!

posted on 15/3/25

Yesssssssss

comment by Stoopo (U4707)

posted on 15/3/25

Get in!

comment by Batty (U4664)

posted on 15/3/25

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Page 10 of 18

Sign in if you want to comment