Roberto,
it is back to the coaching manual for you amigo.

A greater authority on tactical formations than your good self ( i know you have won 3 Serie A`s on the bounce,and you have your current team on top of the league) has decided that the 4-3-3 system you profess to play does not exist.

So none of the three "attackers" he plays ever drop into midfield then Sven?

Back to Football Manager for you.........kick it! Run fasssssst!

Off course they do you silly chap.
Any one who has any idea of football will know 4-3-3 is the formation they start with,a formation they use for attacking situations when they have the ball.
When the opposition have the ball you have to adapt
to what the opposition are doing...do you imagine the players saying to themselves"i cant track your run as i have to maintain a rigid 4-3-3 system"

You really,without scoring points,have no idea about basic football tactics.

So the same could be said for my 352 proposal.




Just never give up trying ..........

Have you been on guard ALL morning?

Obsessed

Go on then,i will humour you.

Explain how your 3-5-2 system adapts to combat 4-3-3.

Like the 433 its not rigid

..do you imagine the players saying to themselves"i cant track your run as i have to maintain a rigid 4-3-3 system"

=====

By posting that little gem you hsvr blown your whole dance on the perfect 433 out of the water.

Trying yo score points has seen you with the 'egg on face' shame.


Do you know anything about football......ever had a pair of boots.........<roll>

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Glad you make that clear

Glad you make that clear?

He has just blew your argument out of the water you clown

If he has made it clear, can you show how you would have your back 3 play in a 3-5-2 system,against 3 forwards.When the opposition play an early ball into the space behind the wingback,dragging a centre back wide & leaving you 3 on 3?

Dont wait for others to show you

CC,
pleasure to see at least there are some people on this thread who know their stuff.

His proposed formation is 451. You have had to rely on someone's mistakes to try and score points.

How can a long ball over the top leave three on three, you even admitted that 1 or 2 of the attacking three would help defend.


So they would need to run faster than the hoofed long bill to make the three up front .


Im making the hitch hiker sign minus the thumb for you

Are you doing it under your desk?

Read his post again....
Clue ? 3-5-2 = too cumbersome.

Another clue ? 4-2-31 = is popular.

CC,for phooks sake explain to him.

4-2-3-1 obviously

You have become so desperate that you now cling onto anyone who has an opinion that goes against mine 
So in your world of 4-3-3. With 1 or 2 of the front three filling into midfield when defending to make either 4-4-2 or 4-5-1;
Explain how a long ball up the field will leave 3 centre backs up against three attackers?
Do these attackers have pace to run faster than a ball is quickly punted up field?
I know we have struggled in defence recently but I am sure three centre backs can mark one attacker

Be careful CC, you have a Klingon

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCARADb9asE

I think you have a deluded view of your own self importance.

This is a forum with anonymous posters remember.

Are you first on the invite list for your office colleagues crimbo do`s

Don't try and wriggle out of you hole little fella. you stick to your guns............that's the Doncaster .......err Shefield........way.......


Hold on while i get the right account or it could get Rufford on here for me

Ouch,
it`s like being savaged by a dead sheep

Steady on old chap,you will be getting detention

Are you waiting for others to try and dig you out of this hole you are in

Donny, Sheffield,Rufford.....

Theres a very relative one you have orverlooked

Hope your not waiting for others to pull out of your own hole

pull YOU out of your own hole

You seem obsessed with my whole......

Anyone else given you more football lessons.......

relatively speaking?
Nor