When City sign him, and Wenger can say he almost signed Pato.
Thats good enough for me!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
never you don't have 50 million
General actually with the signings we made in the Summer he would be considered rather young so we should be fine signing him.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Thanks matth, Arsenal's very own ja resident accountant.
He is buying Neymar not Pato
No you didn't hear Wenger right. He said he could buy Neymar if he wanted to.
But he has bought Pato.
he is well overrated.
and would be about 40 million.... only to end up failing in the PL like most Brazillian forwards....
General actually with the signings we made in the Summer he would be considered rather young so we should be fine signing him.
--------------------------------------
True, although we need to sign some 15 year olds to balance it out.
never gonna happen, firstly the transfer fee, then the wages. Rules us out. Man City, Chelsea, Barca or Real the only destinations. The only striker we could sign from AC Milan would be Inzaghi.
The only striker we could sign from AC Milan would be Inzaghi.
====================================
Inzaghi would be welcome. Even the mummified body of King Rameses II would be more welcome then Chamakh.
Exactly.
Lets sign Inzaghi. even if he is offside 99.9% of the time, he would still be better than Chamakh.
nzaghi would be welcome. Even the mummified body of King Rameses II would be more welcome then Chamakh.
____________________
ROFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
No one asked for your opinion Peter.
Yes Petey what do you know about Rameses the second?
Yes Petey what do you know about Rameses the second?
=============================
Pete would struggle to understand that he was the second Rameses.
I can't believe I am cyber bullying!
IM SORRY!!!!!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
King Rameses II is too injury prone.
We'd have to wrap him up in cotton wo... oh no wait... apparently he'd come pre-packaged.
Sign in if you want to comment
So....
Page 1 of 3
posted on 7/12/11
When City sign him, and Wenger can say he almost signed Pato.
posted on 7/12/11
Thats good enough for me!
posted on 7/12/11
22? Too old.
posted on 7/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/12/11
What time Petey?
posted on 7/12/11
never you don't have 50 million
posted on 7/12/11
General actually with the signings we made in the Summer he would be considered rather young so we should be fine signing him.
posted on 7/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/12/11
Thanks matth, Arsenal's very own ja resident accountant.
posted on 7/12/11
He is buying Neymar not Pato
posted on 7/12/11
No you didn't hear Wenger right. He said he could buy Neymar if he wanted to.
But he has bought Pato.
posted on 7/12/11
he is well overrated.
and would be about 40 million.... only to end up failing in the PL like most Brazillian forwards....
posted on 7/12/11
General actually with the signings we made in the Summer he would be considered rather young so we should be fine signing him.
--------------------------------------
True, although we need to sign some 15 year olds to balance it out.
posted on 7/12/11
never gonna happen, firstly the transfer fee, then the wages. Rules us out. Man City, Chelsea, Barca or Real the only destinations. The only striker we could sign from AC Milan would be Inzaghi.
posted on 7/12/11
The only striker we could sign from AC Milan would be Inzaghi.
====================================
Inzaghi would be welcome. Even the mummified body of King Rameses II would be more welcome then Chamakh.
posted on 7/12/11
Exactly.
Lets sign Inzaghi. even if he is offside 99.9% of the time, he would still be better than Chamakh.
posted on 7/12/11
nzaghi would be welcome. Even the mummified body of King Rameses II would be more welcome then Chamakh.
____________________
ROFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
posted on 7/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/12/11
No one asked for your opinion Peter.
posted on 7/12/11
Yes Petey what do you know about Rameses the second?
posted on 7/12/11
Yes Petey what do you know about Rameses the second?
=============================
Pete would struggle to understand that he was the second Rameses.
posted on 7/12/11
Peterbaey
posted on 7/12/11
I can't believe I am cyber bullying!
IM SORRY!!!!!
posted on 7/12/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/12/11
King Rameses II is too injury prone.
We'd have to wrap him up in cotton wo... oh no wait... apparently he'd come pre-packaged.
Page 1 of 3