The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 6 seconds ago

OP, are you saying he shouldnt get a ban, or that no one should talk about it? Are you judging others by your own standards?
==

I'm saying people are trying to come accross like they themselves have done nothing wrong.

Wrong

-------------------

Errrmmm, sorry but it's 100% correct.

He's been found guilty of racially abusing Evra.

"A hearing took place from 14-20 December 2011 before an Independent Regulatory Commission of The FA to consider the charge.

"The Independent Regulatory Commission announced its decision on 20 December 2011, which is as follows:

1. Mr Suarez used insulting words towards Mr Evra during the match contrary to FA Rule E3(1);

2. the insulting words used by Mr Suarez included a reference to Mr Evra's colour within the meaning of Rule E3(2);

3. Mr Suarez shall be warned as to his future conduct, be suspended for eight matches covering all first team competitive matches and fined the sum of £40,000;

4. the [penalty] is suspended pending the outcome of any appeal lodged by Mr Suarez against this decision.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Source - sky sports

JSA you seem to be VERY angry, your local GP should have a counsellor on staff, who you can talk to for free, that might be able to help you get some issues out.

I'm saying people are trying to come accross like they themselves have done nothing wrong.

-----------------------------------

So me nicking a Mars bar when I was 10, precludes me from commenting on a player who's been found guilty of racist abuse?

I'm saying people are trying to come accross like they themselves have done nothing wrong.

----------------------

I have never been convicted of any crime, nor supported someone who has.

So why am i a hypocrite for commenting on this case?

Toblerone Boots
=======


Who has charged Suarez then?

Mars bar?

Not a toblerone then?

Javier, let me get this straight.

You're accusing people of racist leanings without any evidence to deter them from commenting on a player who's got a ban for racial abuse, you believe without any evidence?

Post man


You have it wrong.

Pathetic article.

Put me right, javier

Toblerone Boots (U4965)

100% wrong


Source: FA

An Independent Regulatory Commission has today [Tuesday 20 December 2011] found a charge of misconduct against Luis Suarez proven, and have issued a suspension for a period of eight matches as well as fining him £40,000, pending appeal.

On 16 November 2011, The Football Association charged Luis Suarez with misconduct contrary to FA Rule E3 in relation to the Liverpool FC versus Manchester United FC fixture on 15 October 2011.


Improper conduct.
Back later, I actually have to do some work. You lot must either be unemployed or have a cracking desk job in a call centre.
Back to work cretins.

He's a bit slow on the up take is JSA (Hmm JSA, Javier Steve Acquilani or Job Seekers Allowance?)

HEre we go again....

"A hearing took place from 14-20 December 2011 before an Independent Regulatory Commission of The FA to consider the charge.

"The Independent Regulatory Commission announced its decision on 20 December 2011, which is as follows:

1. Mr Suarez used insulting words towards Mr Evra during the match contrary to FA Rule E3(1);

2. the insulting words used by Mr Suarez included a reference to Mr Evra's colour within the meaning of Rule E3(2);

3. Mr Suarez shall be warned as to his future conduct, be suspended for eight matches covering all first team competitive matches and fined the sum of £40,000;

4. the [penalty] is suspended pending the outcome of any appeal lodged by Mr Suarez against this decision.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Source - sky sports

He's a bit slow on the up take is JSA

(Hmm JSA, Javier Steve Acquilani or Job Seekers Allowance?

Work is the enemy of the drinking classes

Post man.
I called nobody a racist. Tell me where I have. You wont. Like i said, back later. Congrats on all being pure. Keep singing the WENGER chants.

That's acceptable.
Bye.

I like the way JSA sprinkles abuse amongst random posts, never actually responds to any points made, or to where people show him up to be wrong, then runs away

Back to work cretins.
_____________________

I literally stare out of a window all day. Onslaughts like this keep me going!

(Hmm JSA, Javier Steve Acquilani or Job Seekers Allowance?

Who has charged Suarez then?

--------------------------------

The FA charged him, are you saying that they shouldn't have???

They then handed over the case to an independant panel headed by a QC, who reviewed the evidence & delivered the verdict.

I think it's abhorent that some of you lot are that lost in your 'man love' of this player, that you can't look at what he's done with any sense of perspective & see it for what it has been proven to be.

In continuing to defend the player post the verdict, then you are by definition condoning his actions, which means that it's obviously something that you consider acceptable behaviour.

For shame.

Back later, I actually have to do some work.

-----------



Course you do, princess.

Toblerone Boots (U4965)

100% wrong
------------------------

You'd better let the BBC know this revelation then;

"Liverpool's Luis Suarez has been handed an eight-match ban and a £40,000 fine by the Football Association after being found guilty of racially abusing Manchester United's Patrice Evra".

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/16186556.stm

comment by newWAYNEorder, the smiley looney (U1015) posted 9 minutes ago

I like the way JSA sprinkles abuse amongst random posts, never actually responds to any points made, or to where people show him up to be wrong, then runs away


- - - -

Where's JSA gone?

Devenshire
-----------------------
Here' a clue..

(Hmm JSA, Javier Steve Acquilani or Job Seekers Allowance?