or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 22 comments are related to an article called:

Tevez On Loan, Why Not?

Page 1 of 1

posted on 30/1/12

Reliable???!

comment by (U6361)

posted on 30/1/12

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 30/1/12

We all know he won't stay, but he can showcase his skills to any overseas clubs.

And score goals for us.

Just like a certain Spaniard did just before he jumped overboard.

And a fat load of use it did him.

But we won't care.

posted on 30/1/12

I think it is wrong to loan players from other EPL team

comment by LC (U1826)

posted on 30/1/12

Sorry, but Tevez is a horrible, egotistical, selfish, half hearted little man

I feel sorry for whichever club eventually gets him.

There's no doubting his ability but his attitude stinks. I hope City can find a way to sue him or whatever.

I wouldn't want him anywhere near Anfield

comment by (U10788)

posted on 30/1/12

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by ice2011 (U8296)

posted on 30/1/12

Reliable? i think not. Definitely the wrong word to choose in this case. It will serve him right if city Bankrupt him just like how Chelsea sued Mutu. They spent £30m on him and this is how he repays them.

posted on 30/1/12

'Sorry, but Tevez is a horrible, egotistical, selfish, half hearted little man'

We don't have to like him, just his goals. I'm looking at a couple of months tops.

'I feel sorry for whichever club eventually gets him.'

'I wouldn't want him anywhere near Anfield'

His goals will do.
Their problem.

'I hope City can find a way to sue him or whatever.'

Their perogative.






posted on 30/1/12

Something went wrong with that previous comment!

comment by LC (U1826)

posted on 30/1/12

wishi - I'm shocked that you'd even consider it

Someone like Tevez doesn't deserve to be paid millions to play football

posted on 30/1/12

He seems to do well at the beginning of his stay at a club so maybe he could be lethal for a few months get us the extra goals we need to push for top 4 then back to city at end of season and let them deal with all the nonsense.

Maybe he could find life at Liverpool good and maybe his wife will like life on the Wirral!!!! Probably not but still a few months I can see it's value.

posted on 30/1/12

'Someone like Tevez doesn't deserve to be paid millions to play football'

I agree, but we won't be paying him, will we? We'll be borrowing.

I'm not just a pretty face, you know.

posted on 30/1/12

Though man city didnt want to loan him out though

posted on 30/1/12

Yes let your hard working supporters pay the wages of a selfish, no good leech.

That's if he turns up for the games.

posted on 30/1/12

He also wants to leave the country

comment by fitlfc (U2366)

posted on 30/1/12

I can understand where Wishi is coming from. We are not willing to buy him, but just use him for our benefit. Some of us are saying "what a horrible person, etc." but how many of our rivals say the same about Luis Suarez, but we love him despite his history. So put aside the personal stuff and just think "can he score us the goals we need?"

posted on 30/1/12

"So put aside the personal stuff"

What about your club values? Do they count for anything?

posted on 30/1/12

I agree it'd be good business for LFC and genius business if it paid off

comment by Red Led (U1731)

posted on 30/1/12

Devonshirespur (U6316)

"I think it is wrong to loan players from other EPL team"

I think we may be in the minority, but I agree.
Loans to Championship teams are fine, but loans between PL teams is a mockery.
I believe that deals between PL teams should be permanent transfers. The only exception being if a club buys a player on the agreement to 'loan' him back to the team he was bought from for the remainder of the season.

comment by Red Led (U1731)

posted on 30/1/12

Just to add to what I said above, and to be totally contrary
I can also see that Wishi's idea does make sense, and have it's merits.

posted on 30/1/12

No wishi, sorry mate, a non-starter in my view. The word "bagge" taken on a whole new meaning, especially when taking into consideration the consortium who own him lock stock and £250K per week. Both he and his own management are so unpredictable, stability being a key to our success, he isn't worth the risk. Now if Ya Ya, Silva, or Auguero are offered free .... YNWA JimmyTheRed

posted on 30/1/12

Because he is vile that is why. No football team should touch him. Remember Mascha. Hypocrites.

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment