Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Are they actually the real shirts, or are United unveiling a new line of pyjamas?
PS: I think our home kits are lovely
Remember Sour Alex making that classic excuse why his team got humped by Southampton was because the players could see each other because of their strip.
There's no danger of that being used again, with those hideous pajama tops.
You liked that Daily Mirror article (sic) did you?
Trust you read this one from that august organ, too:
<http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/opinion/columnists/ian-winwood/Ian-Winwood-column-Why-it-took-Liverpool-s-Stateside-influence-to-stifle-race-row-article866500.html>
Beeb
I only saw the link to the new Utd shirts because it was on the BBC site. I liken the Mirror's journalism standards to that of the other vile red top and never touch either. Post whatever link you want from that paper, I won’t read it because it will be factually inaccurate and just a piece of shoddy sensationalist claptrap.
Hippo
Really? As a Utd fan do you not think that is a bit rich?
The kit is indeed a nit ugly. The YouTube video that showed that kit with Arsenal and Barcas had the Utd kit with red socks which made it look a bit Nottibgham Forrest.
The arsenal shirts are also pretty minging. The red black and white sleves with black socks are just terrible.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Still, your charlton athletic pajamas are horrendous
Hippo
Two can play at that game:
http://www.historicalkits.co.uk/Manchester_United/Manchester_United.htm
As I said, a bit rich eh?
http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/oddballs/890535-arsenal-and-manchester-united-new-kit-picture-leak-causes-twitter-stir#ixzz1mZ7hk6pS
Rotten
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Eugh
Looks like a bledin shortbread tin
i wouldnt let my dog take a sh ite on that thats how disgusting it is
I think it's clear that Luis Suarez is to blame for this.
Just had a look at it, what a horrible design.
Good shirts if your out on a picnic though.
comment by Aggers Right Elbow And His Flat Back Nine Eating Mature Cheddar Since
30-01-2012 Free Arry Redknapp from his Spurs
Shackles. (U3402)
posted 39 seconds ago
Good shirts if your out on a picnic though.
comment by The Stigs student cousin returns! (U8124) posted 6 hours, 50 minutes ago
i wouldnt let my dog take a sh ite on that thats how disgusting it is
=========================
I just took a look at the manu shirts link and every single one looks like your dog's been on them.
Bloody awful kit. How do designs like that get approved?
But a new kit every year for the last five years? I wonder why... Glazer needing fresh stock for his shopping malls?
At least we stick to the charter of one new home strip every two years.
Just goes to show how hard up man u are..
Well change of sponsors must be considered. But I agree that it is too many. Should be a minimum of 2 years per kit. Sponsorship deals should be agreed in 2 year increments too.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I think its a disgrace. By using this design, they're actually forcing United fans to buy two shirts - one to wear for the game and one to lay on their laps to eat their prawn sandwiches off!
Sign in if you want to comment
Haha
Page 1 of 2
posted on 19/2/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/2/12
Are they actually the real shirts, or are United unveiling a new line of pyjamas?
PS: I think our home kits are lovely
posted on 19/2/12
Remember Sour Alex making that classic excuse why his team got humped by Southampton was because the players could see each other because of their strip.
There's no danger of that being used again, with those hideous pajama tops.
posted on 19/2/12
You liked that Daily Mirror article (sic) did you?
Trust you read this one from that august organ, too:
<http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/opinion/columnists/ian-winwood/Ian-Winwood-column-Why-it-took-Liverpool-s-Stateside-influence-to-stifle-race-row-article866500.html>
posted on 19/2/12
Beeb
I only saw the link to the new Utd shirts because it was on the BBC site. I liken the Mirror's journalism standards to that of the other vile red top and never touch either. Post whatever link you want from that paper, I won’t read it because it will be factually inaccurate and just a piece of shoddy sensationalist claptrap.
Hippo
Really? As a Utd fan do you not think that is a bit rich?
posted on 19/2/12
The kit is indeed a nit ugly. The YouTube video that showed that kit with Arsenal and Barcas had the Utd kit with red socks which made it look a bit Nottibgham Forrest.
The arsenal shirts are also pretty minging. The red black and white sleves with black socks are just terrible.
posted on 19/2/12
* a BIT ugly
posted on 19/2/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/2/12
Still, your charlton athletic pajamas are horrendous
posted on 19/2/12
Hippo
Two can play at that game:
http://www.historicalkits.co.uk/Manchester_United/Manchester_United.htm
As I said, a bit rich eh?
posted on 19/2/12
http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/oddballs/890535-arsenal-and-manchester-united-new-kit-picture-leak-causes-twitter-stir#ixzz1mZ7hk6pS
Rotten
posted on 19/2/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/2/12
That is disgusting
posted on 19/2/12
Eugh
Looks like a bledin shortbread tin
posted on 19/2/12
i wouldnt let my dog take a sh ite on that thats how disgusting it is
posted on 19/2/12
I think it's clear that Luis Suarez is to blame for this.
posted on 19/2/12
Just had a look at it, what a horrible design.
posted on 19/2/12
Good shirts if your out on a picnic though.
posted on 19/2/12
comment by Aggers Right Elbow And His Flat Back Nine Eating Mature Cheddar Since
30-01-2012 Free Arry Redknapp from his Spurs
Shackles. (U3402)
posted 39 seconds ago
Good shirts if your out on a picnic though.
posted on 19/2/12
comment by The Stigs student cousin returns! (U8124) posted 6 hours, 50 minutes ago
i wouldnt let my dog take a sh ite on that thats how disgusting it is
=========================
I just took a look at the manu shirts link and every single one looks like your dog's been on them.
posted on 19/2/12
Bloody awful kit. How do designs like that get approved?
posted on 19/2/12
But a new kit every year for the last five years? I wonder why... Glazer needing fresh stock for his shopping malls?
At least we stick to the charter of one new home strip every two years.
Just goes to show how hard up man u are..
posted on 19/2/12
Well change of sponsors must be considered. But I agree that it is too many. Should be a minimum of 2 years per kit. Sponsorship deals should be agreed in 2 year increments too.
posted on 19/2/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/2/12
I think its a disgrace. By using this design, they're actually forcing United fans to buy two shirts - one to wear for the game and one to lay on their laps to eat their prawn sandwiches off!
Page 1 of 2