5 article

It's articles like this that make me wish we could still post on multiple boards, as before. *sigh*

Evening Manyoo

The delusion continues.

If your fans chose to discuss the team they claim to support this pointless debate wouldn't be happening.

This is a post about Liverpool Meths, so although it s weird that you are on the Chelsea board, it's unsurprising really.

comment by Dispeller of Myths uses mental toughness not buttons. (U3913)

posted 50 seconds ago

Evening Manyoo

=======================

And a good evening to you too, Sir

At least I'm not being a hypocrite about it and running to the mods every 5 mins like your sad lot do.

chopper

Well done for highlighting the hypocrisy of our deluded friends from the North West

comment by Never Blowing Bubbles (U7929)

posted 1 minute ago


Well done for highlighting the hypocrisy of our deluded friends from the North West

=========================

Hey, not all North west fans are deluded!

oh sorry, I forgot, all Man U fans are from the Sarf

Hey, not all North west fans are deluded!
==============================

I think he just meant the one's in red

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

today is 1898-1899 season. liverpool won the PL flashback

To all the muppets on this thread (and that's quite a few) Chelsea with all their millions can never buy the history, success and tradition we have.

You will remain a plastic club with plastic fans. You don't even have the history of Everton, Nottingham Forest or Leeds

While relatively successful over the past few years as it currently stands you are holders of nothing.

When it comes to talking about football and traditions in football, big teams and winning trophies that give you recognition then I'm afraid Plastic Chavski have a lot of catching up to do

PS - Don't think AVB is your new saviour - until Roman (the real manager) realises you need to build a team over time and not in a season then I'm afraid he'll be on his bike.

And remember "Good teams have won it 4 times"

LastChanceForHangingBaskets (U1826)
====================================

Sorry, you are confusing HISTORY with SUCCESS you dingleberry!
All clubs have HISTORY, successful or not.
Bu then you have the dippers, who only regard SUCCESS as relevant to HISTORY! Hmm, sounds abit glory hunting to me!
Love your club for who they are and how long they have been, not for how much success they have had - that bit is just a bonus, you jerkoff.

@EssDoubleYouSix (U1038) -

When you've finished with your insults look at it like this -

Success is as relevant to history as history is relevant to success. You are talking about history? What did Chelsea win last season? You cannot talk about what you might win in the future as it's purely speculative.

You are talking about Chelsea's success - it's in the past if I am not mistaken. All be it more recent than Liverpool''s (considerable more success) but none the less HISTORY

So as it stands both Liverpool and Chelsea have been successful in the past?

When you look at it logically and simply Liverpool are BY FAR the more successful club

AVB needs months not Years to build a winning team.

Liverpool fans stuck in the past.

Modern greats like Mourinho guardiola build title winning trans straight away

Liverpool have spend 495 MILLION quid since start of PL and they've won NOTHING !!!!

IMO that is awesome return on such investment.

When you consider Utd have spend 430 million and only managed to win 12 PL titles out of possible 19.

(fair enough the 430 million was before summer spending)

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Hicks & Gillett spent £400m for zero trophies from 2007. NESV have already spent £350m.

You would think for all that cash you would have won a trophy by now

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

@ Jolly Roger (U6913) -

Incorrect my friend. This is a forum where people may express their views or not?

I happened to comment that Liverpool and Chelsea are currently holders of nothing. I realise that Chelsea have won more silverware lately than we have (no Champions League ) but nowhere in my post did I mention that Liverpool 'are back'.

While the last 20 years have been a very barren period I'm optimistic that things are at last moving in the correct direction.

Regarding your reference to a previous article - I deleted the posts as I do not think a forum is the place to discuss sporting tradgedies hence the removal of offending posts.

If you actually looked at that article you would gather the jist of it immediately and see it was an article to (successfully) reel in the clowns of this forum who pollute the Liverpool board

Hello

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2008/12/17/liverpool-have-more-glory-hunting-fans-than-anyone-else-115875-20976410/

Goodbye.

'after 54 deletions and a further 150 comments claims that his post was intended as a wum article all along '

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

'You were owned in the article and basically became a laughing stock, you wre like a burglar who had clumsily tripped the house alarm on entry only to claim you wre just visiting relatives when caught red-handed'

@comment by Jolly Roger (U6913) -

Wrong article my freind the article in question you deleted the posts because you were exposed as constantly back tracking as to the point of your article. The article was nothing to do with discussing tragedies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I removed the posts by the offender because he wanted to refer to Heysel and Hillsborough on my article. Not happening. I'll leave that for someone elses articles. Not clever.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
What I always find amusing is people who find very simple things hard to understand

I made 'that' article in 2 mins as a reaction to the amount of WUMs who had been polluting the Liverpool board for an entire week. What's amusing is that the offenders who'd been polluting the board immediately 'bit' at the article. I think you'll find that it was the same people who 'bit' and returned the following day to the article are the ones that were made to look a little bit silly

So basically you were Wumming and got Wummed.

And got so wound up by the WUms you deleted their comments to hide your frustration