or to join or start a new Discussion

20 Comments
Article Rating 5 Stars

17 too young!

Really???

Kenny as good as said that Sterling is unlikely to figure again as he is too young!
Well, I say if he is good enough (and I think he is), he is old enough, or is Kenny embarrassed that in his ten minutes Sterling did more than some of his over priced so called super stars and showed them up!

As Wishi said in another post; "it never did Rooney any harm".

I agree, and what about Owen and Fowler?

If Kenny's reasoning had prevailed when they made their debuts, Owen and Fowler would never have got a game as they were 'too young', and would probably have ended up moving on to another club, as so many of our promising youngsters have.

Owen, Fowler, Rooney, Oxlade-Chamberlain, Walcott, and others...all too young Kenny????

posted on 25/3/12

Agrred entirely led,why bother,what bugs me the most,is the same culprits are failing time after time,thats why we are where we are,and they deserve to be dropped now,they wont come good,there past the sell by date,or just not commited enough to the cause.
I find the whole saga very insulting to the fans,if it we're'nt kenny he'd be drinking in last chance saloon by now!

posted on 25/3/12

I'd still keep him on the bench and then unliesh him in the Europa next season to make it worth viewing next season.

posted on 25/3/12

Just because Kenny Dalglish doesn't perform the way people think he should when infront of the TV cameras is no reason to dispense with his services. Bringing on Raheem was on reflection an act of desperation, not an opportunity, as it should have been, to let the faithful see the latest coming off the assembly line at Melwood. Where do we go from here? Summertime, time for a clear-out, together with an admission, not an apology, that Andy Carroll is not an LFC player. Also, it gives us all time to reflect on how far our manager has taken us, good, or not so good. I hope Kenny Dalglish is our manager next season? On commitment alone, he is second to none. YNWA JimmyTheRed

posted on 25/3/12

an admission would be an apology considering the situation unless you dont believe the adequate response to a mistake is an apology.

posted on 25/3/12

Hold on, hold on...did someone mention it didnt do Owen or Fowler any harm?? err..yes it did!!!!

They were played too young for too long, hence Owens injuries all his career and Fowlers fall from grace. Also, didnt Gerrard suffer as well by playing too much too young!!!

KD was RIGHT, its just people want a superstar now and skrew the consequences to the poor youngster!!

posted on 25/3/12

Nobody is saying that GB we don't expect him to play all the time, we want him to have atleast a few 20 mins run outs and see how he does, we don't want him starting every game we aren't stupid

comment by Red Led (U1731)

posted on 25/3/12

The problem with Owen and Fowler, where I agree with you GB, is that they were played too much.
League, cups, internationals, without a break.
I'm not saying that Sterling, for instance, should play the full 90 mins week in week out, but 20 to 30 minute run outs will help him.
A 20 to 30 minute game for the first team would probably be less strain than playing a full 90 mins plus in a youth / reserve game every week, where the tempo of the game is often much faster.
Sterling can only improve by getting experience of playing against the type of player he will come up against, and also the players he will be playing with, once he does break into the first team.

posted on 25/3/12

Exactly Red_led.

posted on 25/3/12

The way Ajax handle their youngsters,is to introduce them for 15-20 minute cameos,usually when the game is won.This way gives them the experience and also builds their confidence.The way we are playing at the moment,I cant see us being in that position,QPR game?,maybe this is what Kenny meant.
Ajax also have alot of their ex players returning to coach their youngsters and didnt seem to do them any harm in their game against us.

posted on 25/3/12

I read something else into his comments, in that, why should he have to rely on a 17 year old to get the team out of the poo when so-called, more experienced, and what's more, more EXPENSIVE players should be doing it.

I agree.

However I'd much rather he had said, 'It was left to a 17 year old to show them how it was done, 'cos they were a pile of shiite, and that's not fair!'

Of course you can't say things like that before the watershed, and especially not on the BBC.

Dunno. After the Bolton match the gauntlet was thrown down, threats were made. Now it seems to me like he's saying, 'Ah billhooks to it!'

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 5 from 2 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available