or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 20 comments are related to an article called:

17 too young!

Page 1 of 1

posted on 25/3/12

At 17, you really have to have exceptional talent to make up for all the other shortcomings inherent to your game due to lack of experience.

If that's Sterling's case - I'm not in a position to judge that - then sure, the sooner he gets that much-needed experience the better.

posted on 25/3/12

He's got to go Kenny, legend or not, this is not good enough. I hate his interviews they are embarrassing.

Journalists are within right to ask certain questions, such as with Sterling and why is Carroll so poor etc and he just bats them away. GOT TO GO.

posted on 25/3/12

Arsene also said that he needs to protect the Ox from playing too much. i know you guys are so upset with Kenny for other reasons but may be just may be he is right there about the kid.

posted on 25/3/12

Sir
That's probably what Kenny meant. Came out wrongly though.

posted on 25/3/12

Not wumming but that was truly an embarrassing comment by Kenny. Sterling will have zero motivation now, what will be the point of working hard if he's not gonna be given a chance even though the first team are not performing well?

Is he just being held back because of his age? Should he just hibernate for 5 years until he's 22?

posted on 25/3/12

He should be using the rest of the season to give players like sterling game time and the essential experience it will give for next season
Carroll and Suarez should also start every game to get them trying to form a partnership

posted on 25/3/12

He's got no chance of forcing his way into that side past talent like Henderson................

posted on 25/3/12

Kenny wants to show he made good signings. In 5 mins Sterling created a better chance than Downing managed in 80mins.

comment by Red Led (U1731)

posted on 25/3/12

Sir

I agree with protecting him, but what Kenny actually said was:
"It's not fair on us to bring on a 17 year old boy, It's not fair on him. He's a good player, he's a good lad, but at the end of the day, we're going to have to manage him. He may have enjoyed getting on the pitch, but I don't think it's the way forward for us".

Now take that as you will, but saying "...but I don't think it's the way forward for us" is not exactly managing the lad and filling him with confidence.
I take it from that statement that he has no intention of giving the lad any game time at all within the near future. If that's the case, why name him in the squad at all. The lad must have thought this was his chance; came on for ten minutes and played well, only to hear that from the manager.

Yes, I agree he needs to be managed, but he should get game time along the lines of Ox.
Our season is pretty much over now, apart from the FA cup, so it would be the ideal time to give Sterling game time and start bringing him through.

posted on 25/3/12

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 25/3/12

Agrred entirely led,why bother,what bugs me the most,is the same culprits are failing time after time,thats why we are where we are,and they deserve to be dropped now,they wont come good,there past the sell by date,or just not commited enough to the cause.
I find the whole saga very insulting to the fans,if it we're'nt kenny he'd be drinking in last chance saloon by now!

posted on 25/3/12

I'd still keep him on the bench and then unliesh him in the Europa next season to make it worth viewing next season.

posted on 25/3/12

Just because Kenny Dalglish doesn't perform the way people think he should when infront of the TV cameras is no reason to dispense with his services. Bringing on Raheem was on reflection an act of desperation, not an opportunity, as it should have been, to let the faithful see the latest coming off the assembly line at Melwood. Where do we go from here? Summertime, time for a clear-out, together with an admission, not an apology, that Andy Carroll is not an LFC player. Also, it gives us all time to reflect on how far our manager has taken us, good, or not so good. I hope Kenny Dalglish is our manager next season? On commitment alone, he is second to none. YNWA JimmyTheRed

posted on 25/3/12

an admission would be an apology considering the situation unless you dont believe the adequate response to a mistake is an apology.

posted on 25/3/12

Hold on, hold on...did someone mention it didnt do Owen or Fowler any harm?? err..yes it did!!!!

They were played too young for too long, hence Owens injuries all his career and Fowlers fall from grace. Also, didnt Gerrard suffer as well by playing too much too young!!!

KD was RIGHT, its just people want a superstar now and skrew the consequences to the poor youngster!!

posted on 25/3/12

Nobody is saying that GB we don't expect him to play all the time, we want him to have atleast a few 20 mins run outs and see how he does, we don't want him starting every game we aren't stupid

comment by Red Led (U1731)

posted on 25/3/12

The problem with Owen and Fowler, where I agree with you GB, is that they were played too much.
League, cups, internationals, without a break.
I'm not saying that Sterling, for instance, should play the full 90 mins week in week out, but 20 to 30 minute run outs will help him.
A 20 to 30 minute game for the first team would probably be less strain than playing a full 90 mins plus in a youth / reserve game every week, where the tempo of the game is often much faster.
Sterling can only improve by getting experience of playing against the type of player he will come up against, and also the players he will be playing with, once he does break into the first team.

posted on 25/3/12

Exactly Red_led.

posted on 25/3/12

The way Ajax handle their youngsters,is to introduce them for 15-20 minute cameos,usually when the game is won.This way gives them the experience and also builds their confidence.The way we are playing at the moment,I cant see us being in that position,QPR game?,maybe this is what Kenny meant.
Ajax also have alot of their ex players returning to coach their youngsters and didnt seem to do them any harm in their game against us.

posted on 25/3/12

I read something else into his comments, in that, why should he have to rely on a 17 year old to get the team out of the poo when so-called, more experienced, and what's more, more EXPENSIVE players should be doing it.

I agree.

However I'd much rather he had said, 'It was left to a 17 year old to show them how it was done, 'cos they were a pile of shiite, and that's not fair!'

Of course you can't say things like that before the watershed, and especially not on the BBC.

Dunno. After the Bolton match the gauntlet was thrown down, threats were made. Now it seems to me like he's saying, 'Ah billhooks to it!'

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment