Just read Vardy's buyout clause is £30m and that's for a 30 year old. I think it's pretty evident that we won't be selling any of our players for the measly sums being banded around.
http://www.101greatgoals.com/blog/jamie-vardys-buyout-clause-new-leicester-contract-revealed-times/
I read Barca are preparing a £15m bid for Mahrez which is just laughable and the £29m that Liverpool think they might have to pay for Player of the Year is also a joke. Where on earth do they get these figures from?
http://www.liverpool-kop.com/2016/03/radknapp-hails-mahrez-lfc-leicester-premier-league.html?m=1
If anyone out there is thinking Mahrez is going to be sold for less than Vardy, as a 24 year old, then they're wildly optimistic. He's got three years left on his contract and we don't want to sell so it will take a huge offer for us to accept. I think that is very much highlighted by the £30m demanded for Vardy, which nobody will pay. Mahrez is better than Hazard and he's supposedly worth £85m so Mahrez has to be at least that.
Warning off the big boys!!
posted on 10/3/16
confirmation bias
noun
the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories.
posted on 10/3/16
comment by Rauben_Hoody (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
confirmation bias
noun
the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arro in a nutshell
posted on 10/3/16
I think it will turn out that he doesn't have a clause in his contract and I will be justified for selecting which is more credible. I won't be wrong!
posted on 10/3/16
How will you ever know if he has a clause without access to the contract?
"I won't be wrong!"
And this just sums you up.
posted on 10/3/16
What has happened to Matth?
posted on 10/3/16
'Warning off the big boys' suggests that you have received a warning. I think you meant 'warding'
posted on 10/3/16
comment by Robben (U1145)
posted 11 hours, 52 minutes ago
People that have watched the PL for longer than the 2 recent seasons Leicester have been involved in, will know what I mean.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair point, I'd never actually heard of the PL till last season
posted on 10/3/16
After all that, he doesn't even have a claus according to Sky.
posted on 10/3/16
comment by Robben (U1145)
posted 10 hours, 28 minutes ago
How will you ever know if he has a clause without access to the contract?
"I won't be wrong!"
And this just sums you up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because these are the kinds of things you learn about if in fact there is one that's why
You know you argue for arguments sake. Some nobody from The Times with no credible link to the club, reports that there is a clause but nobody from the club has confirmed that therefore I believe it to be bollox. It seems a reasoned thought process to me.
Sky are more credible than a nobody journo because they do actually communicate with the club, therefore I take what they report more seriously.
I say I won't be wrong because if there was a clause we would know about it and we don't, it's been denied. It therefore seems perfectly reasonable for me to be confident there is no such clause and conclude that The Times journo was talking shiitt!
El Mundo Deportivo are a reputable Barca news source and if they are saying Barca won't be trying to sign him then I would class that as being accurate because they know more than anyone else.
There's a lot of rubbish out there and you have to sift through the bullshiitt to find the truth and it will turn out that Sky and El Mundo Deportivo are right. I just goose to believe the right reports and you clearly don't
posted on 10/3/16
^ choose ffs not goose fooking iPhone 😡