Guys that sort of decision has gone our way this season too. Feck it. Plenty of time and football left to play in this game.

Var doesnt do level

comment by Ace (U22467)
posted 1 minute ago
It’s level, it’s impossible to objectively state that it was offside therefore it has to be on.

—————————

100%

Usually I'm just like meh with though offsides, but usually you see a shoulder, hand, armpit or some bs offside by a mm to rule it out. But that one both their boots we exactly level and everything else of kane was behind the line

comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by The Hybrid Doos (U10416)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by The Hybrid Doos (U10416)
posted 35 seconds ago
Picture isn’t clear, the angle is off, it’s not clear and obvious, goal should be given
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In defence, offside shouldn't be about clear and obvious. Offside is offside, whether it be a fraction or a metre.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
VAR was brought in for clear and obvious mistakes, not minuscule decisions like that
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not for offside

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thing is, the pictures are not of a high enough quality and the image always has some motion blur, it shouldn’t be used to determine small margins like that, benefit should be given to the attacking team. Also the angle isn’t straight on either so it causes an issue, it can create a false perception.

comment by Ace (U22467)
posted about a minute ago
It’s level, it’s impossible to objectively state that it was offside therefore it has to be on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ignoring team bias, fans want to see goals, benefit of the doubt should always be given to the attacking side. Level should be onside

Kanes face is getting bigger

Clubs definitely should be questioning the use of var over the summer

comment by The Hybrid Doos (U10416)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by The Hybrid Doos (U10416)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by The Hybrid Doos (U10416)
posted 35 seconds ago
Picture isn’t clear, the angle is off, it’s not clear and obvious, goal should be given
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In defence, offside shouldn't be about clear and obvious. Offside is offside, whether it be a fraction or a metre.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
VAR was brought in for clear and obvious mistakes, not minuscule decisions like that
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not for offside

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thing is, the pictures are not of a high enough quality and the image always has some motion blur, it shouldn’t be used to determine small margins like that, benefit should be given to the attacking team. Also the angle isn’t straight on either so it causes an issue, it can create a false perception.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh I agree mate I'm just saying that offside is offside. But I completely agree with your comment.

Giving offside because a player has a bigger boot than the other guy is a joke

comment by Ace (U22467)
posted 1 minute ago
It’s level, it’s impossible to objectively state that it was offside therefore it has to be on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are right but the thing to do there would probably be to go with on field decision as it cannot be proven one way or the other

Would’ve been offside without VAR anyway that one, so can’t really argue. Linesman had his flag up so still wouldn’t have counted. Doesn’t mean it’s right of course.

Game is much more open now

comment by Michael. (U1170)
posted 16 seconds ago
Would’ve been offside without VAR anyway that one, so can’t really argue. Linesman had his flag up so still wouldn’t have counted. Doesn’t mean it’s right of course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gd point

comment by Michael. (U1170)
posted 13 seconds ago
Would’ve been offside without VAR anyway that one, so can’t really argue. Linesman had his flag up so still wouldn’t have counted. Doesn’t mean it’s right of course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

To be fair, why the fack is the lino flagging such a tight call anyway

Lucas behind that defense is a good one to use in the second half

Clowns

Ffs

Dier is facjing terrible

Too easy. Kids defending

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Dier fack of to Roma ASAP.

Where the funk Bale not tracking back?

Facking hate him

Reggie sleeping