Comment deleted by Site Moderator

it's good here.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

it's a life changer

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

That seems pretty conclusive whether or not Venebals should have let him on the pitch tbh.

........
THIS
============

exactly. fairly typical of you. instead of telling him the comment was about a different game, you just accepted the comment.

dishonest

desperate

obsessed

wrong

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

I didn't ignore them though did I ?

you know full well, you little lieing , that it was you who ignored comments from relevant parties.

you posted so much irrelevant crap that I didn't have time to go through it immediately, as I said at the time.

when I did, I immediately pointed out, that the comment you had passed off as relating to the game where he faked his knee up, was in fact about a different game.

I also pointed out how you clearly remembered fak all about the game, because you thought he had played on for several minutes after he tore his cruciate ligament.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

As for you ignoring the comments - you did - you spouted a load of shít and then went back to one of the points....

And btw - that quote where Edin said it was conclusive WAS, I repeat WAS about the FA CUP FINAL.
==============

no it wasn't, it was about the semi final, as you knew (because you put semi final when you posted the comment). his interview after that game confirms that the comments relate to that game.

if you think there are other comments you've put, that back up your claim that gazza's state of mind was fine for the game and he didn't need calming down, please tell me what they were. im fascinated to know how you think you've given a schooling on this thread, when you've just shown that you know fak all about it and just started mouthing off, so then had to go and buy a book about it.

maybe at the same time as showing me these great comments of yours, you can explain why he kicked someone in the chest and turned away red in the face and almost frothing at the mouth ? maybe you can tell me why his captain said he needed calming down ? maybe you can tell me why the ref said he should have sent him off ? maybe you can tell me why he faked his leg up ?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

this was my reply to your comments alan, so I didn't ignore them :



"So you got schooled on our original debate and now you are focusing on a different point, tht I've already explained."
================

tbh, ive missed the bit you have got so excited about.

from what I can tell, since my last summary of the thread, you have added the following :

- a claim that gazza carried on playing for quite a few minutes after he tore his cruciate ligament

-a claim that there is no way the referee could have known gazza was injured when he tore his cruciate ligament

- another claim that you can explain what the referee was thinking at the time of the incident, better than than the referee can explain what he was thinking

-another claim that the foul which the ref has said was a red card offence was not a red card offence (I think you have previously described it as 'barely a yellow'

- a quote from gazza about when he moved house

- a quote from gazza about the semi-final

- a claim that gazza fulfilled his talent by playing in Scotland


Is there some crucial bit that ive missed ?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

i don't need to read the book galv, i remember it

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

So, who is claiming to have :

1. read the book
2. written the book
3. invented the book

Comment deleted by Site Moderator