Toor, you seem extra agitated today
comment by RED666 (U6562) posted 1 second ago
Rooney should of been a red no doubt,
------------------------------------------------
The player could have died. He should have received a ten game ban. Words Suarez may or may not have said got him eight games, surely assualt should have been more?
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
Good, so stop whining.
"So back to Carra's tackle on Nani; did you think it deserved a red?"
Now we're onto whining about a decision even further back.
--------------------------------------
Did you even bother to read the thread before you started posting? It is a thread about bad decisions in the past. Ergo, every decision that is brought up on this thread is going to be about decisions in the past. It isn't whining - most people are actually having a laugh about the decisions. Do you ever post anything without trying to point score? Its bloody pathetic it really is.
yet you, all knowing idiot, say it shouldn't be done
---------------------------------------------------
Where do i say it should'nt be done? i've just done it here, don't go making stuff up now for effect.
comment by Pride of the North (U6803) posted 1 minute ago
Toor, you seem extra agitated today
----------------------------
I'm just sick of the whining from United fans. Get decisions for years and when one, which could have went either way goes against them, they whine for days about it.
Ergo, every decision that is brought up on this thread is going to be about decisions in the past.
---
Surely you can't talk about any decision that hasn't happened in the past...Unless you're discussing the penalty Howard Webb is going to give us on Sunday....
He should have got a retrospective 3 game ban. Don't even try to bring the Suarez/Evra debate up in this thread.
Toor if the player himself said it was the worst tackle he ever made how the hell can you defend it.
It's not point scoring ffs.
I'm just sick of the whining from United fans. Get decisions for years and when one, which could have went either way goes against them, they whine for days about it.
----
This thread isn't about decisions that have gone for, or against United. No one is moaning on here, except you.
comment by Jay MUFC (U16498) posted 30 seconds ago
Ergo, every decision that is brought up on this thread is going to be about decisions in the past.
---
Surely you can't talk about any decision that hasn't happened in the past...Unless you're discussing the penalty Howard Webb is going to give us on Sunday....
He should have got a retrospective 3 game ban. Don't even try to bring the Suarez/Evra debate up in this thread.
----------------------
Three games for assualt which could have killed the guy and eight games for words? Even the mostbiased United fan must see how ridiculous that is.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Jay MUFC (U16498) posted 6 seconds ago
We aren't whining TOOR, we are discussing bad refereeing decisions. As you can see, decisions for and against United have appeared on here, also several decisions relating to City, and Leeds. Just a discussion, no attempts at point scoring.
-------------------------------
Sorry it's the whining on the hundreds of articles after United were dumped out of Europe which has got to me. It seemed it was due to continue here.
OK - bad decisions. How about when Rooney run up behind a player and elbowed him in the head? No card and no retrospective punishment. What was your take on that one?
--------------------------
Are you talking about the one against Wigan? If so, you need to watch the incident again. He didn't run up behind him at all. Rooney was running after the ball and McCarthy stepped in front of him to block him off, so Rooney brought up his arm. It was actually that forearm that made contact with McCarthy, not the elbow. It could have been a red at a stretch, but I think it would have been harsh.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by RED666 (U6562) posted 1 minute ago
Do you know for a fact!! he was rested???
-----------------------------------------------------------
Of course I don't know it as a fact but it's a fairly stonewall thought. Your first team were rested, Nani was part of your first team. I mean it's not rocket science here.
---------------------------
As has been said, you are just guessing. Its not rocket science to say that he wouldnt have been available due to injury.
Toor
Do you stitch scratches?
comment by Mancblueloz grassing up refs to the fuzz since... (U6305) posted 3 minutes ago
Toor if the player himself said it was the worst tackle he ever made how the hell can you defend it.
It's not point scoring ffs.
-----------------------
I haven't defended it. I'm saying it could have been a red.
Three games for assualt which could have killed the guy and eight games for words? Even the mostbiased United fan must see how ridiculous that is.
---
Racial abuse is a far more widespread problem than physical assault (at an extreme stretch). Normally, an elbow sees a straight red, and a 3 game ban. The Suarez incident was unprecedented, and a relatively original case. If anything, Suarez's ban was correct, and Terry's afterwards, was wrong and should have been longer.
Could have should have you mean!!!
Are you talking about the one against Wigan? If so, you need to watch the incident again. He didn't run up behind him at all. Rooney was running after the ball and McCarthy stepped in front of him to block him off, so Rooney brought up his arm. It was actually that forearm that made contact with McCarthy, not the elbow. It could have been a red at a stretch, but I think it would have been harsh.
------------------------
Well there you go people. No point debating with this type. Blinded by bias.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Jay MUFC (U16498) posted 30 seconds ago
Ergo, every decision that is brought up on this thread is going to be about decisions in the past.
---
Surely you can't talk about any decision that hasn't happened in the past...Unless you're discussing the penalty Howard Webb is going to give us on Sunday....
He should have got a retrospective 3 game ban. Don't even try to bring the Suarez/Evra debate up in this thread.
----------------------
Three games for assualt which could have killed the guy and eight games for words? Even the mostbiased United fan must see how ridiculous that is.
---------------------------------
Which assault are you talking about?
comment by RED666 (U6562) posted 0 seconds ago
Could have should have you mean!!!
-----------------------
No, could have, in my opinion. I can see the argument from both sides.
Carragher wanted to hit him hard, Nani's feet were too quick for him. It was a bad tackle. It could have been red.
Blinded bias says the guy who thinks Carragher could have got a red card
"Which assault are you talking about?"
When Rooney ran up behind a player and elbowed him to the head, with it going unpunished.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 39 seconds ago
Are you talking about the one against Wigan? If so, you need to watch the incident again. He didn't run up behind him at all. Rooney was running after the ball and McCarthy stepped in front of him to block him off, so Rooney brought up his arm. It was actually that forearm that made contact with McCarthy, not the elbow. It could have been a red at a stretch, but I think it would have been harsh.
------------------------
Well there you go people. No point debating with this type. Blinded by bias.
-------------------------------
Watch this video and then tell me what part of my post was incorrect. We both know you wont though. You'll just ignore it and carry on your wumming,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjVU6Twg2lg
WUMming?
I'm a grow man ffs. I'm not a child.
Just because somebody has the audacity to question a United player, doesn't mean they are WUMming or a bad referee etc.
I can't watch the video, I'm in work. However I remember it clearly. Rooney ran up behind him and because he didn't get free air to run into, he elbowed him to the head. He could have killed him. But of course, he goes unpunished.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
"Which assault are you talking about?"
When Rooney ran up behind a player and elbowed him to the head, with it going unpunished.
-------------------------
You see I got confused because you said 3 games for an assault. I presumed you mean the Rooney/McCarthy incident, but Rooney didn't get a 3 game ban, so wondered if you meant another incident.
comment by Statman John (U7425) posted 21 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
"Which assault are you talking about?"
When Rooney ran up behind a player and elbowed him to the head, with it going unpunished.
-------------------------
You see I got confused because you said 3 games for an assault. I presumed you mean the Rooney/McCarthy incident, but Rooney didn't get a 3 game ban, so wondered if you meant another incident.
----------------------------------
I have no idea what you're talking about. My memory is bad but not that bad. You must have me confused with somebody else.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 46 seconds ago
WUMming?
I'm a grow man ffs. I'm not a child.
Just because somebody has the audacity to question a United player, doesn't mean they are WUMming or a bad referee etc.
I can't watch the video, I'm in work. However I remember it clearly. Rooney ran up behind him and because he didn't get free air to run into, he elbowed him to the head. He could have killed him. But of course, he goes unpunished.
------------------------------------
And you say you are not wumming? Behave yourself. Everyone knows you are a wum. Just look at the response you got from fans of all teams when you came on the thread.
If you genuinely think that Rooney ran up behind McCarthy, which we both know you dont really, then you ought to watch the video I posted when you get home. McCarthy steps in front of Rooney to block him off. That isn't even in question.
Sign in if you want to comment
After this weeks
Page 3 of 14
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 8/3/13
Toor, you seem extra agitated today
posted on 8/3/13
comment by RED666 (U6562) posted 1 second ago
Rooney should of been a red no doubt,
------------------------------------------------
The player could have died. He should have received a ten game ban. Words Suarez may or may not have said got him eight games, surely assualt should have been more?
posted on 8/3/13
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
Good, so stop whining.
"So back to Carra's tackle on Nani; did you think it deserved a red?"
Now we're onto whining about a decision even further back.
--------------------------------------
Did you even bother to read the thread before you started posting? It is a thread about bad decisions in the past. Ergo, every decision that is brought up on this thread is going to be about decisions in the past. It isn't whining - most people are actually having a laugh about the decisions. Do you ever post anything without trying to point score? Its bloody pathetic it really is.
posted on 8/3/13
yet you, all knowing idiot, say it shouldn't be done
---------------------------------------------------
Where do i say it should'nt be done? i've just done it here, don't go making stuff up now for effect.
posted on 8/3/13
comment by Pride of the North (U6803) posted 1 minute ago
Toor, you seem extra agitated today
----------------------------
I'm just sick of the whining from United fans. Get decisions for years and when one, which could have went either way goes against them, they whine for days about it.
posted on 8/3/13
Ergo, every decision that is brought up on this thread is going to be about decisions in the past.
---
Surely you can't talk about any decision that hasn't happened in the past...Unless you're discussing the penalty Howard Webb is going to give us on Sunday....
He should have got a retrospective 3 game ban. Don't even try to bring the Suarez/Evra debate up in this thread.
posted on 8/3/13
Toor if the player himself said it was the worst tackle he ever made how the hell can you defend it.
It's not point scoring ffs.
posted on 8/3/13
I'm just sick of the whining from United fans. Get decisions for years and when one, which could have went either way goes against them, they whine for days about it.
----
This thread isn't about decisions that have gone for, or against United. No one is moaning on here, except you.
posted on 8/3/13
comment by Jay MUFC (U16498) posted 30 seconds ago
Ergo, every decision that is brought up on this thread is going to be about decisions in the past.
---
Surely you can't talk about any decision that hasn't happened in the past...Unless you're discussing the penalty Howard Webb is going to give us on Sunday....
He should have got a retrospective 3 game ban. Don't even try to bring the Suarez/Evra debate up in this thread.
----------------------
Three games for assualt which could have killed the guy and eight games for words? Even the mostbiased United fan must see how ridiculous that is.
posted on 8/3/13
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Jay MUFC (U16498) posted 6 seconds ago
We aren't whining TOOR, we are discussing bad refereeing decisions. As you can see, decisions for and against United have appeared on here, also several decisions relating to City, and Leeds. Just a discussion, no attempts at point scoring.
-------------------------------
Sorry it's the whining on the hundreds of articles after United were dumped out of Europe which has got to me. It seemed it was due to continue here.
OK - bad decisions. How about when Rooney run up behind a player and elbowed him in the head? No card and no retrospective punishment. What was your take on that one?
--------------------------
Are you talking about the one against Wigan? If so, you need to watch the incident again. He didn't run up behind him at all. Rooney was running after the ball and McCarthy stepped in front of him to block him off, so Rooney brought up his arm. It was actually that forearm that made contact with McCarthy, not the elbow. It could have been a red at a stretch, but I think it would have been harsh.
posted on 8/3/13
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by RED666 (U6562) posted 1 minute ago
Do you know for a fact!! he was rested???
-----------------------------------------------------------
Of course I don't know it as a fact but it's a fairly stonewall thought. Your first team were rested, Nani was part of your first team. I mean it's not rocket science here.
---------------------------
As has been said, you are just guessing. Its not rocket science to say that he wouldnt have been available due to injury.
posted on 8/3/13
Toor
Do you stitch scratches?
posted on 8/3/13
comment by Mancblueloz grassing up refs to the fuzz since... (U6305) posted 3 minutes ago
Toor if the player himself said it was the worst tackle he ever made how the hell can you defend it.
It's not point scoring ffs.
-----------------------
I haven't defended it. I'm saying it could have been a red.
posted on 8/3/13
Three games for assualt which could have killed the guy and eight games for words? Even the mostbiased United fan must see how ridiculous that is.
---
Racial abuse is a far more widespread problem than physical assault (at an extreme stretch). Normally, an elbow sees a straight red, and a 3 game ban. The Suarez incident was unprecedented, and a relatively original case. If anything, Suarez's ban was correct, and Terry's afterwards, was wrong and should have been longer.
posted on 8/3/13
Could have should have you mean!!!
posted on 8/3/13
Are you talking about the one against Wigan? If so, you need to watch the incident again. He didn't run up behind him at all. Rooney was running after the ball and McCarthy stepped in front of him to block him off, so Rooney brought up his arm. It was actually that forearm that made contact with McCarthy, not the elbow. It could have been a red at a stretch, but I think it would have been harsh.
------------------------
Well there you go people. No point debating with this type. Blinded by bias.
posted on 8/3/13
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Jay MUFC (U16498) posted 30 seconds ago
Ergo, every decision that is brought up on this thread is going to be about decisions in the past.
---
Surely you can't talk about any decision that hasn't happened in the past...Unless you're discussing the penalty Howard Webb is going to give us on Sunday....
He should have got a retrospective 3 game ban. Don't even try to bring the Suarez/Evra debate up in this thread.
----------------------
Three games for assualt which could have killed the guy and eight games for words? Even the mostbiased United fan must see how ridiculous that is.
---------------------------------
Which assault are you talking about?
posted on 8/3/13
comment by RED666 (U6562) posted 0 seconds ago
Could have should have you mean!!!
-----------------------
No, could have, in my opinion. I can see the argument from both sides.
Carragher wanted to hit him hard, Nani's feet were too quick for him. It was a bad tackle. It could have been red.
posted on 8/3/13
Blinded bias says the guy who thinks Carragher could have got a red card
posted on 8/3/13
"Which assault are you talking about?"
When Rooney ran up behind a player and elbowed him to the head, with it going unpunished.
posted on 8/3/13
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 39 seconds ago
Are you talking about the one against Wigan? If so, you need to watch the incident again. He didn't run up behind him at all. Rooney was running after the ball and McCarthy stepped in front of him to block him off, so Rooney brought up his arm. It was actually that forearm that made contact with McCarthy, not the elbow. It could have been a red at a stretch, but I think it would have been harsh.
------------------------
Well there you go people. No point debating with this type. Blinded by bias.
-------------------------------
Watch this video and then tell me what part of my post was incorrect. We both know you wont though. You'll just ignore it and carry on your wumming,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjVU6Twg2lg
posted on 8/3/13
WUMming?
I'm a grow man ffs. I'm not a child.
Just because somebody has the audacity to question a United player, doesn't mean they are WUMming or a bad referee etc.
I can't watch the video, I'm in work. However I remember it clearly. Rooney ran up behind him and because he didn't get free air to run into, he elbowed him to the head. He could have killed him. But of course, he goes unpunished.
posted on 8/3/13
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
"Which assault are you talking about?"
When Rooney ran up behind a player and elbowed him to the head, with it going unpunished.
-------------------------
You see I got confused because you said 3 games for an assault. I presumed you mean the Rooney/McCarthy incident, but Rooney didn't get a 3 game ban, so wondered if you meant another incident.
posted on 8/3/13
comment by Statman John (U7425) posted 21 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
"Which assault are you talking about?"
When Rooney ran up behind a player and elbowed him to the head, with it going unpunished.
-------------------------
You see I got confused because you said 3 games for an assault. I presumed you mean the Rooney/McCarthy incident, but Rooney didn't get a 3 game ban, so wondered if you meant another incident.
----------------------------------
I have no idea what you're talking about. My memory is bad but not that bad. You must have me confused with somebody else.
posted on 8/3/13
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 46 seconds ago
WUMming?
I'm a grow man ffs. I'm not a child.
Just because somebody has the audacity to question a United player, doesn't mean they are WUMming or a bad referee etc.
I can't watch the video, I'm in work. However I remember it clearly. Rooney ran up behind him and because he didn't get free air to run into, he elbowed him to the head. He could have killed him. But of course, he goes unpunished.
------------------------------------
And you say you are not wumming? Behave yourself. Everyone knows you are a wum. Just look at the response you got from fans of all teams when you came on the thread.
If you genuinely think that Rooney ran up behind McCarthy, which we both know you dont really, then you ought to watch the video I posted when you get home. McCarthy steps in front of Rooney to block him off. That isn't even in question.
Page 3 of 14
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10