Martial you can't run away from this with that excuse sorry, I made my point openly, you chose to take it up with me, that simple

I had no reason to combat your point so I didn't, facts don't lie. You tried to take me on and for whatever reason you are now trying to get out of it.

Just own up one way or the other mate, simple as.

At the end of the day you didn't have to respond to me originally. You did so now deal with it.

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 1 minute ago
Martial you can't run away from this with that excuse sorry, I made my point openly, you chose to take it up with me, that simple

I had no reason to combat your point so I didn't, facts don't lie. You tried to take me on and for whatever reason you are now trying to get out of it.

Just own up one way or the other mate, simple as.

At the end of the day you didn't have to respond to me originally. You did so now deal with it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

maybe i am missing something but you actually agreed with me and my point initially --

and then realized after you had agreed with me you had slipped up and did not want to agree with me

------------------- " so now deal with it "

This is embarrassing for you Martial.How can we take you serious about wanting to debate F1 when you just run away from it like this?

I made a statement, you took it up with me.

Nothing more, nothing less.

Must try harder, or at least pay attention to what you are debating

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 31 seconds ago
This is embarrassing for you Martial.How can we take you serious about wanting to debate F1 when you just run away from it like this?

I made a statement, you took it up with me.

Nothing more, nothing less.

Must try harder, or at least pay attention to what you are debating

----------------------------------------------------------------------

its embarrassing for you because you forgot you agreed with me and i had to remind you

why agree in the first place ( this should be good )

I agreed with you because...... wait for it..... I agreed with you. I made a different point which you took up with me, did my initial point confuse you, if so please point out where.

Seems you are unaware of the ability for people to debate things different to what you debate

If you didn't want to debate my point then why take me on?

Kids!

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 1 minute ago
I agreed with you because...... wait for it..... I agreed with you. I made a different point which you took up with me, did my initial point confuse you, if so please point out where.

Seems you are unaware of the ability for people to debate things different to what you debate

If you didn't want to debate my point then why take me on?

Kids!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

but why agree in the first place to my very simplistic and basic point ------- which you did
--------------------it makes any argument afterwards illogical and without credibility on your part

Because they are different things, do you not know that?

I didn't make you disagree with me. You chose to take it up with me of your own free will. I wasn't addressing you for a reply.

So which is it?

You running away? Or didn't you know what you were debating?

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 8 minutes ago
Because they are different things, do you not know that?

I didn't make you disagree with me. You chose to take it up with me of your own free will. I wasn't addressing you for a reply.

So which is it?

You running away? Or didn't you know what you were debating?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

yeh but why agree in the first place to my very simplistic point -

---------- when you agree with my very simplistic point as you did and then completely change your tune as you did you lose all credibility in a debate and your argument lacks any credibility because you agreed in the first place

Simplistic do as simplistic say.

I see Martial I see. Well thats a bit of a long way to go about it but what you are saying is you didn't know what you were debating about, gotcha

I can't see any other reason why you'd be going on about something I have never debated. Next time just ask if you don't know what you're on about

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 35 seconds ago
I see Martial I see. Well thats a bit of a long way to go about it but what you are saying is you didn't know what you were debating about, gotcha

I can't see any other reason why you'd be going on about something I have never debated. Next time just ask if you don't know what you're on about
----------------------------------------------------------------------

it seems you were not sure what you were debating about either because you agreed with me in the first place -

------------ maybe you need to think first before you just agree with people willy nilly on here and then just change your mind willy nilly
--------------------------- you tend to end up looking a bit daft and losing all credibility if you do that on here

Which part of this confuses you, this is all I posted and you took me up on it?

"I think theres a fairly major point being missed here. Regardless of whether McLaren passed information onto Honda or not they do not know how the Mercedes PU works. Yes they can see what the engine physically looks like but we all know that by now, it get snapped every Thursday at Grand Prix's.

Only Mercedes really knows whats going on inside and with the control units. Yes Honda can build a engine that 'looks' the same, but to build one that is the same, well that's another story. I feel this simple point has been somewhat ignored irrationally

Plus Honda-McLaren was announced in May 2013, so unless they threw away a years worth of work they won't have been entirely copying what the Merecedes lump 'looks' like."



So if you understood what you were debating the other option is you are running away from the debate, gotcha

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 11 minutes ago
Which part of this confuses you, this is all I posted and you took me up on it?

"I think theres a fairly major point being missed here. Regardless of whether McLaren passed information onto Honda or not they do not know how the Mercedes PU works. Yes they can see what the engine physically looks like but we all know that by now, it get snapped every Thursday at Grand Prix's.

Only Mercedes really knows whats going on inside and with the control units. Yes Honda can build a engine that 'looks' the same, but to build one that is the same, well that's another story. I feel this simple point has been somewhat ignored irrationally

Plus Honda-McLaren was announced in May 2013, so unless they threw away a years worth of work they won't have been entirely copying what the Merecedes lump 'looks' like."



So if you understood what you were debating the other option is you are running away from the debate, gotcha

----------------------------------------------------------------------

dear dear me -- you posts are starting to get very longwinded now nsix -

as i said you first agreed with my very very simplistic point and then you disagreed with my very simplistic point -
---------------- how do you really expect me to take you seriously when you lose credibility in such a fashion

I never once disagreed with your point Martial

We've been debating a entirely different point.


Run away Martial, run run away, this is hilarious!

I might feel a little sorry for you if it was simply you didn't know what you were debating!

@ Biff

Read it yet Biff?

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 7 minutes ago
I never once disagreed with your point Martial

We've been debating a entirely different point.


Run away Martial, run run away, this is hilarious!

I might feel a little sorry for you if it was simply you didn't know what you were debating!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

yeh --------- you did

first you agreed and then you disagreed to what was a very strait forward and simple point -

-------------- bit of a credibility bypass when you do things like that on here nsix

---------------

Show me one place where I disagreed... Simple, you're saying it so you must know

Then I'll show you my post for the 7th time that you chose to disagree with

Whom is lacking credibility?

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 30 minutes ago
Show me one place where I disagreed... Simple, you're saying it so you must know

Then I'll show you my post for the 7th time that you chose to disagree with

Whom is lacking credibility?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

the mere fact you argued against my opinion after you agreed with it would mean that you disagreed -

---------- dear dear me nsix dont make me explain it ABC fashion to you mate

Come on Martial, don't make claims that you can't back up, you know i will show you up there

Show me where I disagreed with you,one time, thats all it needs. Not running away from this as well now are we


This is pathetic, all because you disagreed with my stand alone point and couldn't follow it through!

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 32 minutes ago
Come on Martial, don't make claims that you can't back up, you know i will show you up there

Show me where I disagreed with you,one time, thats all it needs. Not running away from this as well now are we


This is pathetic, all because you disagreed with my stand alone point and couldn't follow it through!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

dear dear me nsix

you are desperate as usual -- just about every reply you posted you disagreed with my opinion , how can that not be disagreeing when dont agree with my very simplistic opinion -

so what is it
---------- now you do agree with my opinion again

Try again Martial.

"I think theres a fairly major point being missed here. Regardless of whether McLaren passed information onto Honda or not they do not know how the Mercedes PU works. Yes they can see what the engine physically looks like but we all know that by now, it get snapped every Thursday at Grand Prix's.

Only Mercedes really knows whats going on inside and with the control units. Yes Honda can build a engine that 'looks' the same, but to build one that is the same, well that's another story. I feel this simple point has been somewhat ignored irrationally

Plus Honda-McLaren was announced in May 2013, so unless they threw away a years worth of work they won't have been entirely copying what the Merecedes lump 'looks' like."

All I ever said. Keep up

N666WM05RB7 my old bruvver, you are not posting gobbleygook that is why martial is confused. Please post some gobbleygook

Who is this Martian you speak of JR?

Oh you mean Biff, the deluded neurosurgical, aerodynamicist F1 power unit designer?