or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 113 comments are related to an article called:

Too many Forest Fouls

Page 1 of 5

posted on 25/11/13

Do you not have a job?

posted on 25/11/13

Too many forest fools.

5s

comment by Treedom (U8839)

posted on 25/11/13

Ramdini.

Another way of looking at this.

Maybe the Forest players wanted to stay on their feet and play football instead of going down easily to break up play?

Maybe this is why we had 60% possession, as our players don't fall down at the slightest touch?

I did notice that the Burnley players were shouting for anything that looked 50 / 50. Also drop rather easily any where in the oppositions half and then flood the penalty box waiting for a ball into the box.

Just an observation...

posted on 25/11/13

I thought the handball stopped a clear goalscoring opportunity and the Comedy Chilean should have been sent off for his cynical action. I noticed his first (only?) contribution against England was also to immediately foul somebody and get booked, I guess through force of habit.

Artoo's interviews are getting funnier. He has a habit of telling the interviewer what he should think ("Ah know you will agree with me that......" and of being generally disrespectful to the other team, in this case Dyche, referring to him as "their manager", rather than the politer term: "Sean". It's no wonder he is held in such low regard by his fellow-managers. It's curious that he believes the result was a "travesty" because Forest had more of the play, yet he didn't have a similar opinion when Forest were completely dominated by Leicester in the previous game.

posted on 25/11/13

At least Cox came good at last

Hard to miss.

posted on 25/11/13

Nice to know you were all watching anyway.

posted on 25/11/13

Treedom trying to blame the victim for your crimes isn't on - misogynist.

If you're going to hack other teams are going to dive, especially when your hacking going unpunished was what gave you your early season success. There is no action without reaction.

I have to agree with Billy though, I couldn't for the life of me understand why Forest weren't top of the league after that performance.

Sometimes I feel like there is a conspiracy against him.

posted on 25/11/13

Against us Forest committed a foul nearly every three minutes and three times as many as us. They were the home team as well so probably had the benefit of the doubt in a lot of cases.

I would like to think that it is just a case of Forest playing the pressing game when the opposition has the ball and sometimes they are over enthusiastic but the more likely explanation is that they are just dirty.

posted on 25/11/13

Beat you one nil though didn't we.

posted on 25/11/13

Deservedly so as well SHH. Wont moan like you lot of mardy kids did when we beat you the previous year.

posted on 25/11/13

Unhealthy interest in Forest as usual

posted on 25/11/13

It is a problem all Forest fans have Jack.

posted on 25/11/13

..and a lot who claim to be Derby fans

comment by sutton (U3208)

posted on 25/11/13

Whenever you see the name Ramdini you know it will be followed by rubbish of the highest order.

After the way you lot kicked your way to slim victory over us last year you'd think you might not be so keen to bring this stuff up. Buxton should have ended up in court for a series of assults.

But this is a very Derby post. Everything is looked at through evil Forest glasses. Not even a second spent looking at themselves.

posted on 25/11/13

"Whenever you see the name Ramdini you know it will be followed by rubbish of the highest order."

A rare flash of self-deprecating insight from sutton.

posted on 25/11/13

"Buxton should have ended up in court for a series of assults." (sic)



Anyone like to hazard a guess which club has exactly that, a player up in court for assault?



posted on 25/11/13

This must be "irony".

JUSTICE FOR JOHN BELL

posted on 25/11/13

Is this the same Jake Buxton whose career was nearly left in ruins after Dextor Blackstock's horrendous assassination attempt in the 2nd half. Shame.

posted on 25/11/13

"But this is a very Derby post. Everything is looked at through evil Forest glasses. Not even a second spent looking at themselves."

See that sort of thing all of the time, especially from certain individuals who like to post about us a lot of the time. No self awareness whatsoever

posted on 25/11/13

My reaction to this would be "So what?".

If Forest commit more fouls than Derby and Leicester and they get promoted ahead of the other two, then whose the fools?

There is more than one way to win a football match and, in all honesty, none of the Championship teams are going to earn the Brazil tag any time soon.

It's a tough league and you need to be tough to get out of it.

posted on 25/11/13

...so the club that has sufficient squad depth to negate all the suspensions that their 'tackle-to-kill' policy brings SHOULD aim to maim? If you can't win within the rules, win without them?

How very typical of a "Fk the creditors, let's go bust again!!" Leicester fan to think (other people's) money should be a solution..

posted on 25/11/13

666 - aim to maim? Get a grip mate. Not one dangerous tackle in the whole game.

posted on 25/11/13

Is that your professional medical opinion, SHH..?

posted on 25/11/13

And by the way - just checked the stats for the weekend games. Fouls by Forest: 11 - Fouls by Derby: 11

Idiots.

posted on 25/11/13

Don't be such a woman, SHH; it's a man's game.

Page 1 of 5

Sign in if you want to comment