The reason why giggs and scholes played for so long at top level was helped by carrick. Scholes and giggs even say they would not have been able to play without carrick helping them out.
comment by hafijur MUFC +PUFC (U6578)
posted 9 minutes ago
He is though the best midfielder in england.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He certainly is. If you discount the dozen or more who are better.
Whose better? He was statistically best english midfielder of 2012/13, best man utd player in 2013/14 season going by performance indicators. I think if carrick name was carrickinho he would have got to play more times in tournaments.
Who's better:
Gerrard
Lampard
Arteta
Cazorla
Matic
Yaya
Fabregas
Ramsey
Eriksen
I think if carrick name was carrickinho he would have got to play more times in tournaments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bollòcks.
Carrick is better then Lampard and Gerrard. Its funny it only took his only 1 apperance to look good in a midfield with gerrard and lampard lol and that was even before he played for man utd.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6jqE4rMejw
Carrick has NEVER been better than Gerrard and Lampard. Dont be an idiot.
Carrick is way better then Gerrard. Lampard is more of a striker then a midfielder.
I have old fifa phone game played with west ham utd a championship team against liverpool checked rating of west ham players and carrick is the best rated west ham utd player with 80 lol and he scored 2 long range goals and was the best player on the pitch and won 4-0 with a minute per half over liverpool world class dificulty lol.
Carrick outshines gerrard to easily.
Ok now I know youre just being a stupid wum.
Hargreaves carrick scholes all in the man utd 2007-2008 team was amazing. While england were playing 2nd tier england players and failed to qualify for euro 2008 lol.
Gerrard and Lampard were world class footballers. Carrick was not. He was very good, but they were on another level. They are comparable to Scholes, but Carrick is not.
Carrick is not better than Gerrard, but he is, and was, far better than Lampard.
Nowhere near the same level of valuable input from the West Ham reject.
Gerrard was unfortunate to be a diamond amongst dross, whereas Lampard was fortunate to be a donkey amidst diamonds.
Sign in if you want to comment
Assessing Woys Fùck Ups...
Page 2 of 2
posted on 15/6/14
The reason why giggs and scholes played for so long at top level was helped by carrick. Scholes and giggs even say they would not have been able to play without carrick helping them out.
posted on 15/6/14
comment by hafijur MUFC +PUFC (U6578)
posted 9 minutes ago
He is though the best midfielder in england.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He certainly is. If you discount the dozen or more who are better.
posted on 15/6/14
Whose better? He was statistically best english midfielder of 2012/13, best man utd player in 2013/14 season going by performance indicators. I think if carrick name was carrickinho he would have got to play more times in tournaments.
posted on 15/6/14
Who's better:
Gerrard
Lampard
Arteta
Cazorla
Matic
Yaya
Fabregas
Ramsey
Eriksen
posted on 15/6/14
I think if carrick name was carrickinho he would have got to play more times in tournaments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bollòcks.
posted on 15/6/14
Carrick is better then Lampard and Gerrard. Its funny it only took his only 1 apperance to look good in a midfield with gerrard and lampard lol and that was even before he played for man utd.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6jqE4rMejw
posted on 15/6/14
Carrick has NEVER been better than Gerrard and Lampard. Dont be an idiot.
posted on 15/6/14
Carrick is way better then Gerrard. Lampard is more of a striker then a midfielder.
posted on 15/6/14
I have old fifa phone game played with west ham utd a championship team against liverpool checked rating of west ham players and carrick is the best rated west ham utd player with 80 lol and he scored 2 long range goals and was the best player on the pitch and won 4-0 with a minute per half over liverpool world class dificulty lol.
Carrick outshines gerrard to easily.
posted on 15/6/14
Ok now I know youre just being a stupid wum.
posted on 15/6/14
Hargreaves carrick scholes all in the man utd 2007-2008 team was amazing. While england were playing 2nd tier england players and failed to qualify for euro 2008 lol.
posted on 15/6/14
Gerrard and Lampard were world class footballers. Carrick was not. He was very good, but they were on another level. They are comparable to Scholes, but Carrick is not.
posted on 19/6/14
Carrick is not better than Gerrard, but he is, and was, far better than Lampard.
Nowhere near the same level of valuable input from the West Ham reject.
Gerrard was unfortunate to be a diamond amongst dross, whereas Lampard was fortunate to be a donkey amidst diamonds.
Page 2 of 2