Phil dowd walked in the room
He tried to park the bus at 1-0 instead of attacking strange tactics Bo if you ask me.
Man city 16 shots Chelsea 6 shots
Man utd 19 shots Chelsea 9 shots Courtois man of the match Savage Man utd are ripped apart but they were far worse then the west ham side we faced.
Dirty team Chelsea, I am a goner first but have lots of time for City proper footballing side and my money on you again to walk it.
I think your cassette tape must have a problem, Boris.
It was 5Live but it might as well have been a cassette considering it keeps trotting out the same old shizzle.
Put Mikel on when 1 up. As Souness implied, surrendered the initiative. Tactically astute, but has expensive world class players so is it that difficult ?
Jose is the big winner this weekend. Gained a point on City when could have easily lost 3pts ground to them, given the fixtures the two teams had.
City's slip up yesterday meant whatever happened today at our place counted for less than it might have.
Hopefully he'll pull further away from you next weekend too
PS: I doubt he will though
Er, City were up against a top 4 team, Chelsea had mid-table opposition.
Boris 3rd place Chelsea held Man utd.
West Ham 11th Man city 10th, West Ham closing the gap
Man city close to overtaking Blackburn rovers who were champions to.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premier_League_records_and_statistics#All-time_FA_Premier_League_Table
Hang on to those memories Hafi, you'll need them in the coming years as you morph into Liverpool 2.0.
Can't really see us going midtable for years ala Liverpool....
Considering City and Chelsea's struggles against us with huge budgets it will be interesting to see just how long they can keep ahead of us without a huge financial advantage...
.............................................
Er, City were up against a top 4 team, Chelsea had mid-table opposition.
...........................................
Chelsea were playing the team that is likely to finish higher in the table.
"Considering City and Chelsea's struggles against us with huge budgets it will be interesting to see just how long they can keep ahead of us without a huge financial advantage..."
You've got to be kidding at least a little bit there saf...?
Well you had a bigger budget than us, Chelsea as well for a number of years, now the tide has turned slightly in that department it will be give us an advantage (compared to before) over the coming years.
Fat Sam is the real genius
He should manage Real Madrid, y' know!
Yeah poor old Man United the paupers of the league
"Well you had a bigger budget than us, Chelsea as well for a number of years, now the tide has turned slightly in that department it will be give us an advantage (compared to before) over the coming years."
It's hardly the tide has turned though, your playing squad was still directly comparable in terms of cost to assemble and you've outspent us for three and a half years now.
The first year out squad was worth more than yours, we won the league. It's not lack of money that's been the issue, it's where you spent it for a bit.
Money earned,money given. City squeaked 2 titles with the failings of United 2012 and Liverpool 2014,and have been shown up badly every year so far in c/l. You are in a good place now but,if you think United will be a Liverpool mach 2 you forget we had that 68-93 whereas you lot had it til the oil arrived. You won't see any 'thank you sheikh mansour' banners in his own country though. Why is that?
"Money earned,money given."
Hmmm
Sponsorship deals,global marketing before most others had heard of it coupled with success=money earned.
Total stranger arrives with no attachments to club gives 1bn pounds approx,sponsors the club,build new complex,gets success=money given. What's to 'hmm'?
The Purity of Capital, it always amuses me when that creeps into a football debate.
"Sponsorship deals,global marketing before most others had heard of it coupled with success=money earned.
Total stranger arrives with no attachments to club gives 1bn pounds approx,sponsors the club,build new complex,gets success=money given. What's to 'hmm'?"
Everything you've missed, that's a very romanticised (and incorrect) view of history you have going on there. You did great with your sponsorship growth, certain things happened to enable it though.
Let's look back over the years at Uniteds' owners, we'll start when the club was taken over by a convicted criminal in the 1960's, move on to his pervert son before looking at a pair of Irish speculators and local lads, the Glazers.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
All I heard.......
Page 1 of 3
posted on 26/10/14
Phil dowd walked in the room
posted on 26/10/14
He tried to park the bus at 1-0 instead of attacking strange tactics Bo if you ask me.
posted on 26/10/14
Man city 16 shots Chelsea 6 shots
Man utd 19 shots Chelsea 9 shots Courtois man of the match Savage Man utd are ripped apart but they were far worse then the west ham side we faced.
posted on 26/10/14
Dirty team Chelsea, I am a goner first but have lots of time for City proper footballing side and my money on you again to walk it.
posted on 26/10/14
I think your cassette tape must have a problem, Boris.
posted on 26/10/14
It was 5Live but it might as well have been a cassette considering it keeps trotting out the same old shizzle.
posted on 26/10/14
Put Mikel on when 1 up. As Souness implied, surrendered the initiative. Tactically astute, but has expensive world class players so is it that difficult ?
posted on 26/10/14
Jose is the big winner this weekend. Gained a point on City when could have easily lost 3pts ground to them, given the fixtures the two teams had.
City's slip up yesterday meant whatever happened today at our place counted for less than it might have.
Hopefully he'll pull further away from you next weekend too
PS: I doubt he will though
posted on 27/10/14
Er, City were up against a top 4 team, Chelsea had mid-table opposition.
posted on 27/10/14
Boris 3rd place Chelsea held Man utd.
West Ham 11th Man city 10th, West Ham closing the gap
Man city close to overtaking Blackburn rovers who were champions to.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premier_League_records_and_statistics#All-time_FA_Premier_League_Table
posted on 27/10/14
Hang on to those memories Hafi, you'll need them in the coming years as you morph into Liverpool 2.0.
posted on 27/10/14
Can't really see us going midtable for years ala Liverpool....
Considering City and Chelsea's struggles against us with huge budgets it will be interesting to see just how long they can keep ahead of us without a huge financial advantage...
.............................................
Er, City were up against a top 4 team, Chelsea had mid-table opposition.
...........................................
Chelsea were playing the team that is likely to finish higher in the table.
posted on 27/10/14
"Considering City and Chelsea's struggles against us with huge budgets it will be interesting to see just how long they can keep ahead of us without a huge financial advantage..."
You've got to be kidding at least a little bit there saf...?
posted on 27/10/14
Well you had a bigger budget than us, Chelsea as well for a number of years, now the tide has turned slightly in that department it will be give us an advantage (compared to before) over the coming years.
posted on 27/10/14
Fat Sam is the real genius
posted on 27/10/14
He should manage Real Madrid, y' know!
posted on 27/10/14
Yeah poor old Man United the paupers of the league
posted on 27/10/14
"Well you had a bigger budget than us, Chelsea as well for a number of years, now the tide has turned slightly in that department it will be give us an advantage (compared to before) over the coming years."
It's hardly the tide has turned though, your playing squad was still directly comparable in terms of cost to assemble and you've outspent us for three and a half years now.
The first year out squad was worth more than yours, we won the league. It's not lack of money that's been the issue, it's where you spent it for a bit.
posted on 27/10/14
Money earned,money given. City squeaked 2 titles with the failings of United 2012 and Liverpool 2014,and have been shown up badly every year so far in c/l. You are in a good place now but,if you think United will be a Liverpool mach 2 you forget we had that 68-93 whereas you lot had it til the oil arrived. You won't see any 'thank you sheikh mansour' banners in his own country though. Why is that?
posted on 27/10/14
"Money earned,money given."
Hmmm
posted on 27/10/14
Sponsorship deals,global marketing before most others had heard of it coupled with success=money earned.
Total stranger arrives with no attachments to club gives 1bn pounds approx,sponsors the club,build new complex,gets success=money given. What's to 'hmm'?
posted on 27/10/14
The Purity of Capital, it always amuses me when that creeps into a football debate.
posted on 27/10/14
"Sponsorship deals,global marketing before most others had heard of it coupled with success=money earned.
Total stranger arrives with no attachments to club gives 1bn pounds approx,sponsors the club,build new complex,gets success=money given. What's to 'hmm'?"
Everything you've missed, that's a very romanticised (and incorrect) view of history you have going on there. You did great with your sponsorship growth, certain things happened to enable it though.
posted on 27/10/14
Let's look back over the years at Uniteds' owners, we'll start when the club was taken over by a convicted criminal in the 1960's, move on to his pervert son before looking at a pair of Irish speculators and local lads, the Glazers.
posted on 27/10/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 1 of 3