£12m raising to £15m with add ons
comment by Big Willy-Sanchez..Big name players don't sign for Pool. (U1100)
posted 1 minute ago
How much was Hazard ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Around £32M me think...
not really
all i have seen so far from him is poor corners, some not bad crossing.
barely any taking on his man...
awful awful shooting.
OK, Di Maria has got a wicked cross on him but whats the point of crossing if we have noone in the box to attack the ball?
He wastes possession every single time he crosses it.
I was going he was going to be running at defenses non stop causing havoc but he has been pretty mediocre to be honest and for 60 odd facking million, we were mugged off yet again
Di Maria being conference standard still could have scored on another day that volley from pass off mata and created the goal which fellaini header was saved before rvp rifled in.
Its funny Fabregas and Di Maria didn't have the best of games but had a hand in each teams goals.
comment by DaStuDogg (U9291)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by IAWT (U10012)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Jordan Henderson's Backheel (Formally Kelly Is God) (U6983)
posted 1 minute ago
For me:
Current Ability:
Di Maria > Sanchez > Hazard
Potential Ability:
Hazard > Sanchez > Di Maria
In terms of value for money:
Hazard > Sanchez > Di Maria
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your current ability put Sanchez in front of Hazard. But your value for money put Hazard in front to Sanchez, when both players cost almost the same
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presumably he's taking into account the greater long-term potential of Hazard.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pure speculation then..... I don't like speculation
Also, Sanchez is only 2 years older so has lots of room for improvement.
Di Maria looks amazing. He ccreated a lot of chances RVP has missed.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by IAWT (U10012)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by DaStuDogg (U9291)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by IAWT (U10012)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Jordan Henderson's Backheel (Formally Kelly Is God) (U6983)
posted 1 minute ago
For me:
Current Ability:
Di Maria > Sanchez > Hazard
Potential Ability:
Hazard > Sanchez > Di Maria
In terms of value for money:
Hazard > Sanchez > Di Maria
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your current ability put Sanchez in front of Hazard. But your value for money put Hazard in front to Sanchez, when both players cost almost the same
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presumably he's taking into account the greater long-term potential of Hazard.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pure speculation then..... I don't like speculation
Also, Sanchez is only 2 years older so has lots of room for improvement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a fair point I was just explaining why it's not a contradiction that he considers Hazard better value for money despite not currently considering him to be as good.
comment by Hafi's Man Utd Red Devils 14/15 PL Champi... (U6578)
posted 2 minutes ago
Di Maria being conference standard still could have scored on another day that volley from pass off mata and created the goal which fellaini header was saved before rvp rifled in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
on another day, Sanogo could be the top scorer in the league
2 of dimarias 4 assists were mishit shots and one goal an attempted assist that went in by accident
He looks a real threat but the end product isn't reallly there
I'd take sanchez
TKT Di Maria first game he created 3 sitters for our players against Burnley hard to miss for RVP and Mata first half and RVP 2nd half but they somehow messed them up. Di Maria would have had about 12 assists if he had Ronaldo playing in this team.
I like Sanchez, his work rate is brilliant and I would not swap him for Di Maria... that said, Di Maria is a top class player.
OP, I might be wrong her but how has Sanchez played 6 Euro games?
2 qualifiers and 3 group games? no?
http://www.squawka.com/players/angel-di-maria/stats#performance-score#manchester-united-%28current%29#english-barclays-premier-league#8#season-2014/2015#126#all-matches#1-9#by-match
http://www.squawka.com/players/alexis-sanchez/stats#performance-score#arsenal-%28current%29#english-barclays-premier-league#8#season-2014/2015#126#all-matches#1-9#by-match
Di Maria created 23 chances compared to Sanchez 18. Honestly some of the misses off Di Maria passes that have cost us points in most of our way games he has played could feature in miss of the season compilation.
im glad we have di maria though.
we do need someone else on the right too.
i just wish we had the 2010 valencia, if we did we would be tearing teams apart
comment by IAWT (U10012)
posted 31 minutes ago
comment by Jordan Henderson's Backheel (Formally Kelly Is God) (U6983)
posted 1 minute ago
For me:
Current Ability:
Di Maria > Sanchez > Hazard
Potential Ability:
Hazard > Sanchez > Di Maria
In terms of value for money:
Hazard > Sanchez > Di Maria
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your current ability put Sanchez in front of Hazard. But your value for money put Hazard in front to Sanchez, when both players cost almost the same
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because I think Hazard has more potential maybe???
Oops thanks DaStuDogg
Like you say though all of this is speculation it's just my opinion that Hazard was better value for money because he has a couple more years to develop into a better player.
Every side in the league would happily take and start both players
OP, I might be wrong her but how has Sanchez played 6 Euro games?
2 qualifiers and 3 group games? no?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
.....I meant 5...........
Impossible to separate but I think on current from Sanchez.
Too many aimless balls from deep into the box from Di Maria and losing possession in innocuous situations for me so far.
He's been refreshing and generally good but overhyped so far. Needs to be playing on the wing and get at his man more, which I don;t doubt will come as we see a more settled United side.
comment by Big Willy-Sanchez..Big name players don't sign for Pool. (U1100)
posted 11 minutes ago
Seriously though i would take an on form Walcott over Di Maria.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LOL. Okay.
comment by Big Willy-Sanchez..Big name players don't sign for Pool. (U1100)
posted 14 minutes ago
Seriously though i would take an on form Walcott over Di Maria.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably why you sweep roads instead of managing football teams
Sign in if you want to comment
Sanchez or Di Maria in your team??
Page 2 of 3
posted on 28/10/14
£12m raising to £15m with add ons
posted on 28/10/14
Markovic by a distance
posted on 28/10/14
comment by Big Willy-Sanchez..Big name players don't sign for Pool. (U1100)
posted 1 minute ago
How much was Hazard ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Around £32M me think...
posted on 28/10/14
not really
all i have seen so far from him is poor corners, some not bad crossing.
barely any taking on his man...
awful awful shooting.
OK, Di Maria has got a wicked cross on him but whats the point of crossing if we have noone in the box to attack the ball?
He wastes possession every single time he crosses it.
I was going he was going to be running at defenses non stop causing havoc but he has been pretty mediocre to be honest and for 60 odd facking million, we were mugged off yet again
posted on 28/10/14
Di Maria being conference standard still could have scored on another day that volley from pass off mata and created the goal which fellaini header was saved before rvp rifled in.
posted on 28/10/14
Its funny Fabregas and Di Maria didn't have the best of games but had a hand in each teams goals.
posted on 28/10/14
comment by DaStuDogg (U9291)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by IAWT (U10012)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Jordan Henderson's Backheel (Formally Kelly Is God) (U6983)
posted 1 minute ago
For me:
Current Ability:
Di Maria > Sanchez > Hazard
Potential Ability:
Hazard > Sanchez > Di Maria
In terms of value for money:
Hazard > Sanchez > Di Maria
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your current ability put Sanchez in front of Hazard. But your value for money put Hazard in front to Sanchez, when both players cost almost the same
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presumably he's taking into account the greater long-term potential of Hazard.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pure speculation then..... I don't like speculation
Also, Sanchez is only 2 years older so has lots of room for improvement.
posted on 28/10/14
Di Maria looks amazing. He ccreated a lot of chances RVP has missed.
posted on 28/10/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/14
comment by IAWT (U10012)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by DaStuDogg (U9291)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by IAWT (U10012)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Jordan Henderson's Backheel (Formally Kelly Is God) (U6983)
posted 1 minute ago
For me:
Current Ability:
Di Maria > Sanchez > Hazard
Potential Ability:
Hazard > Sanchez > Di Maria
In terms of value for money:
Hazard > Sanchez > Di Maria
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your current ability put Sanchez in front of Hazard. But your value for money put Hazard in front to Sanchez, when both players cost almost the same
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presumably he's taking into account the greater long-term potential of Hazard.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pure speculation then..... I don't like speculation
Also, Sanchez is only 2 years older so has lots of room for improvement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a fair point I was just explaining why it's not a contradiction that he considers Hazard better value for money despite not currently considering him to be as good.
posted on 28/10/14
comment by Hafi's Man Utd Red Devils 14/15 PL Champi... (U6578)
posted 2 minutes ago
Di Maria being conference standard still could have scored on another day that volley from pass off mata and created the goal which fellaini header was saved before rvp rifled in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
on another day, Sanogo could be the top scorer in the league
posted on 28/10/14
2 of dimarias 4 assists were mishit shots and one goal an attempted assist that went in by accident
He looks a real threat but the end product isn't reallly there
I'd take sanchez
posted on 28/10/14
TKT Di Maria first game he created 3 sitters for our players against Burnley hard to miss for RVP and Mata first half and RVP 2nd half but they somehow messed them up. Di Maria would have had about 12 assists if he had Ronaldo playing in this team.
posted on 28/10/14
I like Sanchez, his work rate is brilliant and I would not swap him for Di Maria... that said, Di Maria is a top class player.
OP, I might be wrong her but how has Sanchez played 6 Euro games?
2 qualifiers and 3 group games? no?
posted on 28/10/14
http://www.squawka.com/players/angel-di-maria/stats#performance-score#manchester-united-%28current%29#english-barclays-premier-league#8#season-2014/2015#126#all-matches#1-9#by-match
http://www.squawka.com/players/alexis-sanchez/stats#performance-score#arsenal-%28current%29#english-barclays-premier-league#8#season-2014/2015#126#all-matches#1-9#by-match
Di Maria created 23 chances compared to Sanchez 18. Honestly some of the misses off Di Maria passes that have cost us points in most of our way games he has played could feature in miss of the season compilation.
posted on 28/10/14
Sanchez. Case closed
posted on 28/10/14
im glad we have di maria though.
we do need someone else on the right too.
i just wish we had the 2010 valencia, if we did we would be tearing teams apart
posted on 28/10/14
comment by IAWT (U10012)
posted 31 minutes ago
comment by Jordan Henderson's Backheel (Formally Kelly Is God) (U6983)
posted 1 minute ago
For me:
Current Ability:
Di Maria > Sanchez > Hazard
Potential Ability:
Hazard > Sanchez > Di Maria
In terms of value for money:
Hazard > Sanchez > Di Maria
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your current ability put Sanchez in front of Hazard. But your value for money put Hazard in front to Sanchez, when both players cost almost the same
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because I think Hazard has more potential maybe???
posted on 28/10/14
Oops thanks DaStuDogg
Like you say though all of this is speculation it's just my opinion that Hazard was better value for money because he has a couple more years to develop into a better player.
posted on 28/10/14
Every side in the league would happily take and start both players
posted on 28/10/14
OP, I might be wrong her but how has Sanchez played 6 Euro games?
2 qualifiers and 3 group games? no?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
.....I meant 5...........
posted on 28/10/14
posted on 28/10/14
Impossible to separate but I think on current from Sanchez.
Too many aimless balls from deep into the box from Di Maria and losing possession in innocuous situations for me so far.
He's been refreshing and generally good but overhyped so far. Needs to be playing on the wing and get at his man more, which I don;t doubt will come as we see a more settled United side.
posted on 28/10/14
comment by Big Willy-Sanchez..Big name players don't sign for Pool. (U1100)
posted 11 minutes ago
Seriously though i would take an on form Walcott over Di Maria.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LOL. Okay.
posted on 28/10/14
comment by Big Willy-Sanchez..Big name players don't sign for Pool. (U1100)
posted 14 minutes ago
Seriously though i would take an on form Walcott over Di Maria.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably why you sweep roads instead of managing football teams
Page 2 of 3