I didn´t know ManShity had bid for Torres.
They haven't. Liverpool fan trying to wum.
Notice the quotation marks. I'lll explain what they are if needed.
____
And how to use them correctly, that would be nice.
Anyway, this is getting really boring. It's summed up like this:
Liverpool fans are happy we've got Carroll.
Chelsea fans are happy they've got Torres.
Liverpool fans think Chelsea were ripped off.
Chelsea fans think Liverpool fans were ripped off.
Never the twain shall meet.
Chelsea fans know Liverpool fans were ripped off.
That wasn't a correction, it was a polite request.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
carroll was worth about 10m when we signed him. we bought him for 35.
torres was worth about 25m when chelsea signed him. they bought him for 50
35-10=25
50-25=25
we were ripped off the same amount
Funny wasn't Carroll worth 500k the year before.
carroll was worth about 10m
====
Correction.Carroll's value was £500,000 in Newcastle's club accounts so basically you overpaid by £34.5m
Torres was worth 70m (based on his career to date) but we paid 50m for him. Bargain.
Mike Ashley valued Barton at £0.
Is this a fair respresentation? No.
You two are very very childish.
The clubs accounts valued Carroll and also stated he was expendable.
wasn't Carroll worth 500k the year before.
_____________
That would be the same year you boys were slagging Torres for being 'past it', 'made of glass' and 'injury prone', aye?
(based on his career to date)
*******************************
that doesnt mean anything. the whole 'form is temporery, class is permanent' doesnt work if torres hasn't been consistent for over 2 years
I can't believe this thread is still going.
Torres
Robbing Hoody
You're one of the decent lfc posters so I'll level with you here . This whole wumming about Carroll/Torres started when Torres moved over to us. Majority of your lot on 606 werent able to handle it and posted article after article on our board about Torres. Smacked of bitter jealousy. Hence why we did the same and mocked you about Carroll
It's not, it's on permanent loop.
comment by Mr Chelsea
_________
Ah, so WE started it. Quick, over to the West Bank with you!...
Exactly Mr Chelsea. I mentioned this earlier.
If I change my name to Mr Moustache, we could do a rubbish version of Reservoir Dogs?
Liverpool are always to blame
Mr Chelsea- (U3579)
Fair enough. I think our attitude is exacerbated by the fact that all our signing have been slated by all rival teams.
comment by Mr Tola (U9044) posted 10 minutes ago
The clubs accounts valued Carroll and also stated he was expendable.
-----------------------------------------------
Ask their fans whether they thought that though. This is your problem Tola. You reply on sound bites, conjecture, generalisations and the like. It makes you a bit of a joke.
Who gives a toss about what an inept owner and his accoutants valued Carroll at? How does this evaluation, by businessmen not football men, effect whether he can kick a ball accurately with his left foot?
Sign in if you want to comment
Mancity bid 35 mil for Torres!!!!
Page 6 of 7
6 | 7
posted on 30/8/11
I didn´t know ManShity had bid for Torres.
posted on 30/8/11
They haven't. Liverpool fan trying to wum.
posted on 30/8/11
Notice the quotation marks. I'lll explain what they are if needed.
____
And how to use them correctly, that would be nice.
Anyway, this is getting really boring. It's summed up like this:
Liverpool fans are happy we've got Carroll.
Chelsea fans are happy they've got Torres.
Liverpool fans think Chelsea were ripped off.
Chelsea fans think Liverpool fans were ripped off.
Never the twain shall meet.
posted on 30/8/11
Chelsea fans know Liverpool fans were ripped off.
posted on 30/8/11
Think.
posted on 30/8/11
That wasn't a correction, it was a polite request.
posted on 30/8/11
Know.
posted on 30/8/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 30/8/11
No?
posted on 30/8/11
carroll was worth about 10m when we signed him. we bought him for 35.
torres was worth about 25m when chelsea signed him. they bought him for 50
35-10=25
50-25=25
we were ripped off the same amount
posted on 30/8/11
Funny wasn't Carroll worth 500k the year before.
posted on 30/8/11
carroll was worth about 10m
====
Correction.Carroll's value was £500,000 in Newcastle's club accounts so basically you overpaid by £34.5m
Torres was worth 70m (based on his career to date) but we paid 50m for him. Bargain.
posted on 30/8/11
Mike Ashley valued Barton at £0.
Is this a fair respresentation? No.
You two are very very childish.
posted on 30/8/11
The clubs accounts valued Carroll and also stated he was expendable.
posted on 30/8/11
wasn't Carroll worth 500k the year before.
_____________
That would be the same year you boys were slagging Torres for being 'past it', 'made of glass' and 'injury prone', aye?
posted on 30/8/11
(based on his career to date)
*******************************
that doesnt mean anything. the whole 'form is temporery, class is permanent' doesnt work if torres hasn't been consistent for over 2 years
posted on 30/8/11
I can't believe this thread is still going.
Torres
posted on 30/8/11
Robbing Hoody
You're one of the decent lfc posters so I'll level with you here . This whole wumming about Carroll/Torres started when Torres moved over to us. Majority of your lot on 606 werent able to handle it and posted article after article on our board about Torres. Smacked of bitter jealousy. Hence why we did the same and mocked you about Carroll
posted on 30/8/11
It's not, it's on permanent loop.
posted on 30/8/11
comment by Mr Chelsea
_________
Ah, so WE started it. Quick, over to the West Bank with you!...
posted on 30/8/11
Exactly Mr Chelsea. I mentioned this earlier.
posted on 30/8/11
BBRM
You did!
posted on 30/8/11
If I change my name to Mr Moustache, we could do a rubbish version of Reservoir Dogs?
posted on 30/8/11
Liverpool are always to blame
posted on 30/8/11
Mr Chelsea- (U3579)
Fair enough. I think our attitude is exacerbated by the fact that all our signing have been slated by all rival teams.
comment by Mr Tola (U9044) posted 10 minutes ago
The clubs accounts valued Carroll and also stated he was expendable.
-----------------------------------------------
Ask their fans whether they thought that though. This is your problem Tola. You reply on sound bites, conjecture, generalisations and the like. It makes you a bit of a joke.
Who gives a toss about what an inept owner and his accoutants valued Carroll at? How does this evaluation, by businessmen not football men, effect whether he can kick a ball accurately with his left foot?
Page 6 of 7
6 | 7