If they are British do they want us to face strife
==================================
No, thats why many British people wanted to remain.
Rather than the other British people, who decided to take a leap in the dark, for god knows what reason, and probably face strife.
comment by Don't Click (U14639)
posted 7 hours, 22 minutes ago
http://tgr.ph/sF9p13
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The report by the IMF’s Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) goes above the head of the managing director, Christine Lagarde. It answers solely to the board of executive directors, and those from Asia and Latin America are clearly incensed at the way EU insiders used the Fund to rescue their own rich currency union and banking system.
---------------
Oh dear......
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/24/eu-britain-must-suffer-for-brexit
A Guardian columnist almost begging Europe to be nasty
Opening line...
"A prospect far more threatening than Brexit is emerging: a reasonable deal for the UK."
It is amazing/shocking how many organisations are willing everything to go wrong. A truly sad state of affairs.
It is amazing/shocking how many organisations are willing everything to go wrong. A truly sad state of affairs.
=======================================
A truly stupid statement.
Who exactly, wants everything to go wrong ?
In whos interest exactly would that be ?
The only people I have heard, who are quite willing for things to go a little pear shaped for a while, are actually brexit supporters generally.
Dont know how many ordinary people interviewed before and after this referendum, said things like, 'well, in the short to medium term we might suffer, but we will be fine in the long term'.
So you talk of people willing things to go wrong, in regard to those maybe in favour of remain, while many knew and know full well that there will be those who suffer almost immediately from the outcome of this referendum, yet still voted to leave the EU.
Now thats what I call a truly sad state of affairs.
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 51 minutes ago
It is amazing/shocking how many organisations are willing everything to go wrong. A truly sad state of affairs.
=======================================
A truly stupid statement.
Who exactly, wants everything to go wrong ?
In whos interest exactly would that be ?
The only people I have heard, who are quite willing for things to go a little pear shaped for a while, are actually brexit supporters generally.
Dont know how many ordinary people interviewed before and after this referendum, said things like, 'well, in the short to medium term we might suffer, but we will be fine in the long term'.
So you talk of people willing things to go wrong, in regard to those maybe in favour of remain, while many knew and know full well that there will be those who suffer almost immediately from the outcome of this referendum, yet still voted to leave the EU.
Now thats what I call a truly sad state of affairs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense. I'm assuming you've been living on Mars since the vote, otherwise you'd see companies already blaming Brexit for various things. If you believe that Lloyds are laying so many people off because of Brexit, then you're a fool. The Guardian in Ledley's example above. The rhetoric from so many organisations blaming Brexit for acts they were almost certainly going to carry out anyway are numerous.
And you comparing out voters being realistic about some short term pain for long term gain is baffling. The two situations are polar opposites. Strange comment to make.
18% more foreign visitors to London this July.
11% more British tourists.
Just numbers.
What's that in relation to?
comment by HRH King Ledley (U20095)
posted 8 minutes ago
18% more foreign visitors to London this July.
11% more British tourists.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
London voted in.
They were probably originally intending to visit Wales or Cornwall...
comment by HRH King Ledley (U20095)
posted 39 minutes ago
18% more foreign visitors to London this July.
11% more British tourists.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Getting in while they still can...
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 51 minutes ago
It is amazing/shocking how many organisations are willing everything to go wrong. A truly sad state of affairs.
=======================================
A truly stupid statement.
Who exactly, wants everything to go wrong ?
In whos interest exactly would that be ?
The only people I have heard, who are quite willing for things to go a little pear shaped for a while, are actually brexit supporters generally.
Dont know how many ordinary people interviewed before and after this referendum, said things like, 'well, in the short to medium term we might suffer, but we will be fine in the long term'.
So you talk of people willing things to go wrong, in regard to those maybe in favour of remain, while many knew and know full well that there will be those who suffer almost immediately from the outcome of this referendum, yet still voted to leave the EU.
Now thats what I call a truly sad state of affairs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense. I'm assuming you've been living on Mars since the vote, otherwise you'd see companies already blaming Brexit for various things. If you believe that Lloyds are laying so many people off because of Brexit, then you're a fool. The Guardian in Ledley's example above. The rhetoric from so many organisations blaming Brexit for acts they were almost certainly going to carry out anyway are numerous.
And you comparing out voters being realistic about some short term pain for long term gain is baffling. The two situations are polar opposites. Strange comment to make.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To an extent it suits the ppl who want to remain within the single market which requires a compromise on free labour of movement, ie Britain will have to accept maybe a large quota, or work permit of some sort for things to go wrong and brexit to be blamed. Because its Bexiteers who were in the majority and have to change their minds when any deal is announced. This is why the cabinet is so full of brexiteers. There really is no leaving the Single market because our legal systems are intertwined.
This is why its so frustrating at the level of political leadership in the EU. If Merkel and Hollande had given a deal to Cameron before the vote the 'remains' would have won.
Two months on, has the advisory referendum given rise to an imminent decision to invoke article 50?
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 40 minutes ago
Two months on, has the advisory referendum given rise to an imminent decision to invoke article 50?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No
Due to what is frankly incompetence from Cameron in not planning a strategy in the case of a Leave vote, despite him being the one that promised the referendum, it has fallen on a new PM to devise one
Anthing bad = Because of the Leave vote
Anything good = We have not left yet
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 1 hour, 56 minutes ago
has the world ended yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arguable, as we still haven't signed a left back. I predict the end of civilisation at around midnight on Wednesday....
comment by HRH King Ledley (U20095)
posted 4 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 40 minutes ago
Two months on, has the advisory referendum given rise to an imminent decision to invoke article 50?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No
Due to what is frankly incompetence from Cameron in not planning a strategy in the case of a Leave vote, despite him being the one that promised the referendum, it has fallen on a new PM to devise one
-----------
He delivered the referendum. Not sure what cause he had to build a plan around what is an "advisory until ratified by parliament" piece of public opinion.
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by HRH King Ledley (U20095)
posted 4 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 40 minutes ago
Two months on, has the advisory referendum given rise to an imminent decision to invoke article 50?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No
Due to what is frankly incompetence from Cameron in not planning a strategy in the case of a Leave vote, despite him being the one that promised the referendum, it has fallen on a new PM to devise one
-----------
He delivered the referendum. Not sure what cause he had to build a plan around what is an "advisory until ratified by parliament" piece of public opinion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course you have a plan for both situations in a two-outcome referendum.
He did not, so one is being formulated.
If you had a week off work to paint the house, you would not take it until you had picked the colour scheme and bought the paint would you?
That would be silly
Except your analogy is incorrect... Correct analogy would be that it was to contemplate whether the house needs painting.
Those that think it should would have a colour picked out and everything - well they should have done.
No, that is not correct.
What Cameron has done is offer his wife a choice of getting the house painted or not, of hus own method, though advising her to choose not to
Rather than prepare to paint, he did no such thing, then left her and passed the job on to her new "fella"
The new "fella" is now picking the colours, and method, amd will only start once he has that sorted .
That's not correct... there were people moaning about europe and wanting out for years.
Sign in if you want to comment
LIVE: Great Britain EU Referendum
Page 371 of 395
372 | 373 | 374 | 375 | 376
posted on 28/7/16
If they are British do they want us to face strife
==================================
No, thats why many British people wanted to remain.
Rather than the other British people, who decided to take a leap in the dark, for god knows what reason, and probably face strife.
posted on 28/7/16
http://tgr.ph/sF9p13
posted on 29/7/16
IMF Experts
posted on 29/7/16
comment by Don't Click (U14639)
posted 7 hours, 22 minutes ago
http://tgr.ph/sF9p13
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The report by the IMF’s Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) goes above the head of the managing director, Christine Lagarde. It answers solely to the board of executive directors, and those from Asia and Latin America are clearly incensed at the way EU insiders used the Fund to rescue their own rich currency union and banking system.
---------------
Oh dear......
posted on 29/7/16
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/24/eu-britain-must-suffer-for-brexit
A Guardian columnist almost begging Europe to be nasty
Opening line...
"A prospect far more threatening than Brexit is emerging: a reasonable deal for the UK."
posted on 29/7/16
Screw the Guardian.
posted on 29/7/16
It is amazing/shocking how many organisations are willing everything to go wrong. A truly sad state of affairs.
posted on 29/7/16
It is amazing/shocking how many organisations are willing everything to go wrong. A truly sad state of affairs.
=======================================
A truly stupid statement.
Who exactly, wants everything to go wrong ?
In whos interest exactly would that be ?
The only people I have heard, who are quite willing for things to go a little pear shaped for a while, are actually brexit supporters generally.
Dont know how many ordinary people interviewed before and after this referendum, said things like, 'well, in the short to medium term we might suffer, but we will be fine in the long term'.
So you talk of people willing things to go wrong, in regard to those maybe in favour of remain, while many knew and know full well that there will be those who suffer almost immediately from the outcome of this referendum, yet still voted to leave the EU.
Now thats what I call a truly sad state of affairs.
posted on 29/7/16
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 51 minutes ago
It is amazing/shocking how many organisations are willing everything to go wrong. A truly sad state of affairs.
=======================================
A truly stupid statement.
Who exactly, wants everything to go wrong ?
In whos interest exactly would that be ?
The only people I have heard, who are quite willing for things to go a little pear shaped for a while, are actually brexit supporters generally.
Dont know how many ordinary people interviewed before and after this referendum, said things like, 'well, in the short to medium term we might suffer, but we will be fine in the long term'.
So you talk of people willing things to go wrong, in regard to those maybe in favour of remain, while many knew and know full well that there will be those who suffer almost immediately from the outcome of this referendum, yet still voted to leave the EU.
Now thats what I call a truly sad state of affairs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense. I'm assuming you've been living on Mars since the vote, otherwise you'd see companies already blaming Brexit for various things. If you believe that Lloyds are laying so many people off because of Brexit, then you're a fool. The Guardian in Ledley's example above. The rhetoric from so many organisations blaming Brexit for acts they were almost certainly going to carry out anyway are numerous.
And you comparing out voters being realistic about some short term pain for long term gain is baffling. The two situations are polar opposites. Strange comment to make.
posted on 29/7/16
18% more foreign visitors to London this July.
11% more British tourists.
posted on 29/7/16
Just numbers.
What's that in relation to?
posted on 29/7/16
comment by HRH King Ledley (U20095)
posted 8 minutes ago
18% more foreign visitors to London this July.
11% more British tourists.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
London voted in.
They were probably originally intending to visit Wales or Cornwall...
posted on 29/7/16
comment by HRH King Ledley (U20095)
posted 39 minutes ago
18% more foreign visitors to London this July.
11% more British tourists.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Getting in while they still can...
posted on 29/7/16
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 51 minutes ago
It is amazing/shocking how many organisations are willing everything to go wrong. A truly sad state of affairs.
=======================================
A truly stupid statement.
Who exactly, wants everything to go wrong ?
In whos interest exactly would that be ?
The only people I have heard, who are quite willing for things to go a little pear shaped for a while, are actually brexit supporters generally.
Dont know how many ordinary people interviewed before and after this referendum, said things like, 'well, in the short to medium term we might suffer, but we will be fine in the long term'.
So you talk of people willing things to go wrong, in regard to those maybe in favour of remain, while many knew and know full well that there will be those who suffer almost immediately from the outcome of this referendum, yet still voted to leave the EU.
Now thats what I call a truly sad state of affairs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense. I'm assuming you've been living on Mars since the vote, otherwise you'd see companies already blaming Brexit for various things. If you believe that Lloyds are laying so many people off because of Brexit, then you're a fool. The Guardian in Ledley's example above. The rhetoric from so many organisations blaming Brexit for acts they were almost certainly going to carry out anyway are numerous.
And you comparing out voters being realistic about some short term pain for long term gain is baffling. The two situations are polar opposites. Strange comment to make.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To an extent it suits the ppl who want to remain within the single market which requires a compromise on free labour of movement, ie Britain will have to accept maybe a large quota, or work permit of some sort for things to go wrong and brexit to be blamed. Because its Bexiteers who were in the majority and have to change their minds when any deal is announced. This is why the cabinet is so full of brexiteers. There really is no leaving the Single market because our legal systems are intertwined.
This is why its so frustrating at the level of political leadership in the EU. If Merkel and Hollande had given a deal to Cameron before the vote the 'remains' would have won.
posted on 29/8/16
Two months on, has the advisory referendum given rise to an imminent decision to invoke article 50?
posted on 29/8/16
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 40 minutes ago
Two months on, has the advisory referendum given rise to an imminent decision to invoke article 50?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No
Due to what is frankly incompetence from Cameron in not planning a strategy in the case of a Leave vote, despite him being the one that promised the referendum, it has fallen on a new PM to devise one
posted on 29/8/16
has the world ended yet?
posted on 29/8/16
Anthing bad = Because of the Leave vote
Anything good = We have not left yet
posted on 29/8/16
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 1 hour, 56 minutes ago
has the world ended yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arguable, as we still haven't signed a left back. I predict the end of civilisation at around midnight on Wednesday....
posted on 29/8/16
we should build a wall
posted on 29/8/16
comment by HRH King Ledley (U20095)
posted 4 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 40 minutes ago
Two months on, has the advisory referendum given rise to an imminent decision to invoke article 50?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No
Due to what is frankly incompetence from Cameron in not planning a strategy in the case of a Leave vote, despite him being the one that promised the referendum, it has fallen on a new PM to devise one
-----------
He delivered the referendum. Not sure what cause he had to build a plan around what is an "advisory until ratified by parliament" piece of public opinion.
posted on 29/8/16
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by HRH King Ledley (U20095)
posted 4 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 40 minutes ago
Two months on, has the advisory referendum given rise to an imminent decision to invoke article 50?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No
Due to what is frankly incompetence from Cameron in not planning a strategy in the case of a Leave vote, despite him being the one that promised the referendum, it has fallen on a new PM to devise one
-----------
He delivered the referendum. Not sure what cause he had to build a plan around what is an "advisory until ratified by parliament" piece of public opinion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course you have a plan for both situations in a two-outcome referendum.
He did not, so one is being formulated.
If you had a week off work to paint the house, you would not take it until you had picked the colour scheme and bought the paint would you?
That would be silly
posted on 29/8/16
Except your analogy is incorrect... Correct analogy would be that it was to contemplate whether the house needs painting.
Those that think it should would have a colour picked out and everything - well they should have done.
posted on 29/8/16
No, that is not correct.
What Cameron has done is offer his wife a choice of getting the house painted or not, of hus own method, though advising her to choose not to
Rather than prepare to paint, he did no such thing, then left her and passed the job on to her new "fella"
The new "fella" is now picking the colours, and method, amd will only start once he has that sorted .
posted on 29/8/16
That's not correct... there were people moaning about europe and wanting out for years.
Page 371 of 395
372 | 373 | 374 | 375 | 376