comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 4 minutes ago
I read a while back that the FBI are anti Clinton unlike the rest of the establishment, because they think she's been treated leniently. if the emails have important info and it was covered up and she won there would be a massive outcry afterwards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely if that was the case the FBI would have prosecuted her in the email malarkey instead of saying she didn't do anything intentionally wrong?

comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 7 minutes ago
Yeah trump is doing the country no favours by insinuating that he won't accept the democratic wishes of the people.

The latest bunch of emails being subpoenaed aren't clintons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trump is exactly right, the system is rigged, unbelievable the news coverage and they blow up all these s3x scandal about Trump with zero proof but ignore the real story of Clinton's corruption.

comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 4 minutes ago
I read a while back that the FBI are anti Clinton unlike the rest of the establishment, because they think she's been treated leniently. if the emails have important info and it was covered up and she won there would be a massive outcry afterwards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely if that was the case the FBI would have prosecuted her in the email malarkey instead of saying she didn't do anything intentionally wrong?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not what they said.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 4 minutes ago
I read a while back that the FBI are anti Clinton unlike the rest of the establishment, because they think she's been treated leniently. if the emails have important info and it was covered up and she won there would be a massive outcry afterwards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely if that was the case the FBI would have prosecuted her in the email malarkey instead of saying she didn't do anything intentionally wrong?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't remember exactly what it said, when I search Clinton FBI now it just comes up with the new story about the emails. But basically about how many people in the FBI would prefer Trump.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

D4thincarnation

I understand DT’s comments in relation to electoral fraud were debunked by various fact checking organisations.

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/10/trumps-bogus-voter-fraud-claims/

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 8 minutes ago
D4thincarnation

I understand DT’s comments in relation to electoral fraud were debunked by various fact checking organisations.

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/10/trumps-bogus-voter-fraud-claims/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The system is rigged. You don't see how Clinton was in cahoots with the DNC and the media to get the nominee over Sanders?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 8 minutes ago
D4thincarnation

I understand DT’s comments in relation to electoral fraud were debunked by various fact checking organisations.

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/10/trumps-bogus-voter-fraud-claims/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The system is rigged. You don't see how Clinton was in cahoots with the DNC and the media to get the nominee over Sanders?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet, as I understand it, there has been no palpable evidence which supports DT’s claims?

Impeding a federal investigation and destroying subpoenaed evidence is a federal crime.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who's been convicted of that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? of destroying evidence in a federal investigation. I expect

---------

Bit of a random thing to bring to the table then

comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 8 minutes ago
D4thincarnation

I understand DT’s comments in relation to electoral fraud were debunked by various fact checking organisations.

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/10/trumps-bogus-voter-fraud-claims/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The system is rigged. You don't see how Clinton was in cahoots with the DNC and the media to get the nominee over Sanders?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet, as I understand it, there has been no palpable evidence which supports DT’s claims?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The obvious media bias.
You had all her leaked e-mails which they hardly touched, and strangely after that, that tape came out and all these women came forward.

Trump needs to lock them all up when he comes to power

D4thincarnation

I also understand that DT’s media bias paranoia has also been, (as well as vote rigging) independently debunked.

Somewhat ironic that whoever wins, they could be impeached before Christmas.

comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 9 minutes ago
D4thincarnation

I also understand that DT’s media bias paranoia has also been, (as well as vote rigging) independently debunked.

Somewhat ironic that whoever wins, they could be impeached before Christmas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it hasn't.

But it's probably the media telling you that to fit the agenda.

The leaked e-mails prove what was going on, but you are unlikely to hear about that because they aren't covering it?

comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 9 minutes ago
D4thincarnation

I also understand that DT’s media bias paranoia has also been, (as well as vote rigging) independently debunked.

Somewhat ironic that whoever wins, they could be impeached before Christmas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it hasn't.

But it's probably the media telling you that to fit the agenda.

The leaked e-mails prove what was going on, but you are unlikely to hear about that because they aren't covering it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Republicans complaining about Media bias

You'd think Fox and Murdoch never existed

comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 9 minutes ago
D4thincarnation

I also understand that DT’s media bias paranoia has also been, (as well as vote rigging) independently debunked.

Somewhat ironic that whoever wins, they could be impeached before Christmas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it hasn't.

But it's probably the media telling you that to fit the agenda.

The leaked e-mails prove what was going on, but you are unlikely to hear about that because they aren't covering it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Republicans complaining about Media bias

You'd think Fox and Murdoch never existed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how much coverage did Hillary's corruption get, many newspaper headlines? Did the Clinton News Network run it?

Tell me do you think that it is acceptable for Countries like Oman, Morocco, Saudi, and other middle east, countries with appalling human rights abuses countries to give the secretary of state massive donations they get their weapon shipments get Okayed by her.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDc8PVCvfKs

This is about as close as you get to evidence. tbf both sides probably always been doing it. The whole system is rotten and corrupt to the core, for all Trump's faults he is one of the only major politicians I can remember to have the balls to call out most of this stuff.

Fox isn't exactly protrump

Trump, less likely to start a major war.

comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 31 minutes ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDc8PVCvfKs

This is about as close as you get to evidence. tbf both sides probably always been doing it. The whole system is rotten and corrupt to the core, for all Trump's faults he is one of the only major politicians I can remember to have the balls to call out most of this stuff.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is because Trump is not a politician

comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 24 minutes ago
Fox isn't exactly protrump
----------------------------------------------------------------------
100% pro republican and anti Clinton

comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 30 minutes ago
Fox isn't exactly protrump
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just ask Megan Kelly