Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Sizzle

I have a feeling the recent email announcement, (which appears to have been politically motivated) could make the result extremely close. Or certainly a lot closer than many expect.

Needs to by ignoring crimes politicians commit?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Hence why they are investigating, would you rather an investigation didn't take place?

How can they be made up when both are awful

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Sir Digby

I think Sizzle was noting that many voter’s minds have already been made up. In that the email issue will not have influenced many people to change their minds.

With her private server? The one they said she had committed a crime on already but let her off as they couldn't be sure if she knew what she was doing. Good candidate

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 1 minute ago
Sir Digby

I think Sizzle was noting that many voter’s minds have already been made up. In that the email issue will not have influenced many people to change their minds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I know...

Those voters would have been made up for over a year and will be lifelong voters of that party. The swing voters will not though, both have over 50% dissaproval ratings

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

The campaign has certainly been remarkable.

A poor to middling politician vs a ‘celebrity’ is the best the US have to offer.

comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 6 seconds ago
The campaign has certainly been remarkable.

A poor to middling politician vs a ‘celebrity’ is the best the US have to offer.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Such a breath of fresh air compared to back home where they're all terrorists and bigots

Manfrombelmonty

I don’t agree that either represent a breath of fresh air. It is unknown what type of politician DT will make never mind POTUS. Regardless of who wins, the US electorate is utterly divided, which will be reflected in congress. Making it even harder for a POTUS to push through strategy.

I also foresee significant public disorder following the result.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

The electorate is already divided. Look at the republican congress right now. They've no intention of working for the betterment of the country. They just act like a bunch of sulking children who can't get it all their own way.

Not sure about this public disorder though. You think the republicans spurred on by their hatred and bigotry might flip and burn a few cars?

Clinton also wants to sell off social security to the her donors. A nice big bonus for them where they can make billions of the backs the American public

What a nasty woman.

Do you know why she deleted them?


----------------

The FBi already had the emails relevant to the case didn't they. So she deleted those that weren't. Isn't that it?

Manfrombelmonty

If HC does win, DT has already been stoking the fires. Election rigging etc, and with an already disenfranchised following I can’t see them accepting the result quietly.

My understanding of the email issue is that the FBI have only just rec’d a warrant to view the latest emails. The content remains unknown.

Which is why I thought it was bizarre the announcement was made public. I also understand the emails are not relate to ones sent or received by HC?

Trump was closing in polls before the email scandal was news, 3% behind but the polls are always skewed a few % in favour of Clinton imo. it's difficult to call because of the electoral college system which favours democrats, reckon it will be very close with some shock results in some states.

Yeah trump is doing the country no favours by insinuating that he won't accept the democratic wishes of the people.

The latest bunch of emails being subpoenaed aren't clintons.

I read a while back that the FBI are anti Clinton unlike the rest of the establishment, because they think she's been treated leniently. if the emails have important info and it was covered up and she won there would be a massive outcry afterwards.

comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 10 minutes ago

Do you know why she deleted them?


----------------

The FBi already had the emails relevant to the case didn't they. So she deleted those that weren't. Isn't that it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, they were 55,000 e-mail on her private server which she used for national security work. The FBI subpoenaed them for their investigation. And that is where she deleted 33,000 of them, claiming the were family and friends emails about her daughters wedding and yoga classes.

I'm not buying it, are you.


The wikileaks e=mails give you a glimpse of the corruption she was up to, from her false position she give the public to get votes to selling off the state pension to her biggest donor, as well as fixing the primaries against Sanders.