Smid - looking forward to NNH retracting his claims about stonewallers not being given because, you know, the ref didn't give it and that means it wasn't a penalty and we should all move on etc etc



We moved on fairly quickly.

That’s what good teams do.

I’ve not seen it tbh, I’m just going by the general concensus that it wasn’t a penalty just like Sundays wasn’t a penalty .

So ram yer aye bit

comment by IvanGolacIsMagic 🐍 (U5291)
posted 1 minute ago
Getting put off balance isn't a penalty ffs

It's a contact sport. You're taught as a defender to try to put the player off balance if he's getting a shot away.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing that you run the risk of giving away a foul ya numpty

You can't just go around pushing people and leaning into them ...those can be fouls ...be letter of the law it's a foul....even an attempt at a grab is a foul


If it's using strength to win a ball that's one thing , but that's not what you've said

You've failed

“i'm delighted we are still undefeated in over a year ”





Almost cult like

comment by Ibrox Elite hullo hullo (U5255)
posted 2 minutes ago
“Made it all the sweeter when we scored and the icing on the cake is that it was a soft penalty
”



Yes, I’m sure you were delighted with a draw due to a dodgy penalty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yip , sure was

I’ve not seen it tbh
======

shutit then

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Nah, I’ll continue to say it wasn’t a penalty until a see it !


General concensus n that

We moved on fairly quickly.
________________________

You just brought it up ya daft kant, that's not moving on quickly


CT - not all contact = penalty. And not all contact is capable of knocking a player over, despite what Sinclair, McGregor and the rest of the Celtic dressing room seem intent to prove.

I was asked what penalties should we have got and I calmly replied.

It appears these decisions are upsetting you Ivan, you should remain calm, you’ll be back with the big boys soon enough.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

ivans just raging cause even dodgy decisions couldnt help united.

It’s very amusing watching the squirming over decisions we’re getting.

We can’t be touched off the park, running away with it on it and now the referees are giving us favourable decisions.

The ludge’s will be flooking carnage if this keeps up.

I think scientists should do experiments surrounding Celtic perceptions of penalties.

It seems to me that within the first half an hour of the decision they are all fairly honest and admit that it wasn't a foul, but then as time goes on they become more and more adamant that it wasn't a foul until they get to the critical point of throwing up the time they didn't get a throw in in 1984 when it clearly came off the Morton full back first to justify why they should have got the penalty.

They should also study why they smell so bad.

I had an Aberdeen n Celtic double last night


Fooked in the first half . First time our players show up in weeks anaw the bassas. 3/1 on the sheep looked great value

Lighten up CT you should know not to take every comment so seriously.
_---
I stopped taking your 'unbiased comments' seriously a while ago if I'm honest . I just like pointing out how all over the shop you got with your next post

Consistency is important in wummery

“It’s very amusing watching the squirming over decisions we’re getting. ”



Oh it’s VERY pleasing

“It seems to me that within the first half an hour of the decision they are all fairly honest and admit that it wasn't a foul, but then as time goes on they become more and more adamant that it wasn't a foul until they get to the critical point of throwing up the time they didn't get a throw in in 1984 when it clearly came off the Morton full back first to justify why they should have got the penalty.
”






The Celtic way

comment by IvanGolacIsMagic 🐍 (U5291)
posted 7 minutes ago
We moved on fairly quickly.
________________________

You just brought it up ya daft kant, that's not moving on quickly


CT - not all contact = penalty. And not all contact is capable of knocking a player over, despite what Sinclair, McGregor and the rest of the Celtic dressing room seem intent to prove.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody said that all contact is a foul ...but what you said was wrong, and those types of contacts can be fouls ...you can admit that if you wish ?

For me
Sinclair's was a penalty
Last night , having watched it again...no chance !

CT - what I said wasn't wrong. Unless of course I've missed the announcement that we have moved to a non-contact sport?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

lasleys wife must be pure ragin this morning.

comment by IvanGolacIsMagic 🐍 (U5291)
posted 7 seconds ago
CT - what I said wasn't wrong. Unless of course I've missed the announcement that we have moved to a non-contact sport?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not that bit Ivan

Bit leaning into players and putting them off balance can easily be a foul ?
Yes or no?

Bit leaning into players and putting them off balance can easily be a foul ?
Yes or no?
________________________________

If you use excessive force, yes.

If you don't use excessive force, then no.