Comment deleted by Site Moderator
The top 3 spots were turned on their head over a 4 game period, ain’t nothing over yet.
Also Europe and domestic cup progression will play apart
be nice if we could do the treble
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
We can give a manager that time if they deserve it. Klopp was improving Liverpool year on year and his signings bar Karius have been spot on. If we gave Scolari for example the time and backing Klopp got we would have gone the way of Milan.
I'm happy to give managers time, but not for the sake of it.
think the rock solid defense is helping us out this season, money well spent
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Klopp is a good manager but for me the main/clear reason they’ve elevated themselves from 3rd/4th place team to title contenders on a level with City, is through proper, ruthless investment in their XI and squad. Got rid of players from their XI who aren’t good enough, the clear weaknesses. For us, this isn’t just striker, it’s also LB, and on the wing.
Tbf after a season or two of not winning the title it is more likely that teams like Liverpool (and maybe us this summer tbf) buy well, try and play catch up. We did it as well after 12-13, and won the title the following year.
On a side issue, if our board and fan base are patient enough, it's taken Klopp 4 years to get Pool to this point. Could we not give our Head Coach a similar amount of support?
---
To be fair, Klopp took over mid season and we were already struggling.
First season was well under way so that was more of a getting to know you period.
The real transition has taken place over the 3 full seasons he has been in charge.
But remember, Klopp had to sell his best player in order to recruit big.
It was equivalent to Sarri coming in and having to sell Hazard before getting you back to the top again which would be no small feat.
As for the title, there's over 50 points to play for. I think if we get to March and we've maintained a 7-10 point lead, I'd be very confident but as of now, we're 2 games away from it all crumbling.
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 11 minutes ago
On a side issue, if our board and fan base are patient enough, it's taken Klopp 4 years to get Pool to this point. Could we not give our Head Coach a similar amount of support?
---
To be fair, Klopp took over mid season and we were already struggling.
First season was well under way so that was more of a getting to know you period.
The real transition has taken place over the 3 full seasons he has been in charge.
But remember, Klopp had to sell his best player in order to recruit big.
It was equivalent to Sarri coming in and having to sell Hazard before getting you back to the top again which would be no small feat.
As for the title, there's over 50 points to play for. I think if we get to March and we've maintained a 7-10 point lead, I'd be very confident but as of now, we're 2 games away from it all crumbling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp had to abondon his principles of never buying players for the sake of winning the title, in order to propel Liverpool to the top
That's the story you won't get from Liverpool
When did klopp say he'd never buy players?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 11 minutes ago
On a side issue, if our board and fan base are patient enough, it's taken Klopp 4 years to get Pool to this point. Could we not give our Head Coach a similar amount of support?
---
To be fair, Klopp took over mid season and we were already struggling.
First season was well under way so that was more of a getting to know you period.
The real transition has taken place over the 3 full seasons he has been in charge.
But remember, Klopp had to sell his best player in order to recruit big.
It was equivalent to Sarri coming in and having to sell Hazard before getting you back to the top again which would be no small feat.
As for the title, there's over 50 points to play for. I think if we get to March and we've maintained a 7-10 point lead, I'd be very confident but as of now, we're 2 games away from it all crumbling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp had to abondon his principles of never buying players for the sake of winning the title, in order to propel Liverpool to the top
That's the story you won't get from Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think he abandoned anything. It was more a case of not having any other choice.
The Pogba fee changed the market. Any fool could see that.
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 11 minutes ago
On a side issue, if our board and fan base are patient enough, it's taken Klopp 4 years to get Pool to this point. Could we not give our Head Coach a similar amount of support?
---
To be fair, Klopp took over mid season and we were already struggling.
First season was well under way so that was more of a getting to know you period.
The real transition has taken place over the 3 full seasons he has been in charge.
But remember, Klopp had to sell his best player in order to recruit big.
It was equivalent to Sarri coming in and having to sell Hazard before getting you back to the top again which would be no small feat.
As for the title, there's over 50 points to play for. I think if we get to March and we've maintained a 7-10 point lead, I'd be very confident but as of now, we're 2 games away from it all crumbling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp had to abondon his principles of never buying players for the sake of winning the title, in order to propel Liverpool to the top
That's the story you won't get from Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think he abandoned anything. It was more a case of not having any other choice.
The Pogba fee changed the market. Any fool could see that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Changed what market? Cost a manager his job
You're the fool if you think Pogba transfer changed the market?
The market was already full of clubs buying for the glory!
Look at City, your nearest rivals now. All buying for glory
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I don't think he
anything. It was more a case of not having any other choice.
==============
What about the choice Poch made? Nurture and bring through young players?
Winks? Skipp? Foyth?
comment by Prankster (U6283)
posted 40 minutes ago
The top 3 spots were turned on their head over a 4 game period, ain’t nothing over yet.
Also Europe and domestic cup progression will play apart
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This.
Nowhere near over.
Some rival fans just want to create the narrative that the Liverpool fans think they've won it, or that the race is so far run that only Liverpool bottling it can stop them winning. I can imagine that s few have already drafted their LAL articles and have fingers hovering over the submit button
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 seconds ago
I don't think he
anything. It was more a case of not having any other choice.
==============
What about the choice Poch made? Nurture and bring through young players?
Winks? Skipp? Foyth?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because Klopp has brought no youth through into this Liverpool side
Don't agree, OP.
It isn't Liverpool's to lose. Specially if the gap is only 4 points after tomorrow?
Credit due to Liverpool to sustain the title race. But it's harder to stay at the top. I am sure Klopp knows that!
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 49 seconds ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 seconds ago
I don't think he
anything. It was more a case of not having any other choice.
==============
What about the choice Poch made? Nurture and bring through young players?
Winks? Skipp? Foyth?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because Klopp has brought no youth through into this Liverpool side
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Read my comments again.
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 11 minutes ago
On a side issue, if our board and fan base are patient enough, it's taken Klopp 4 years to get Pool to this point. Could we not give our Head Coach a similar amount of support?
---
To be fair, Klopp took over mid season and we were already struggling.
First season was well under way so that was more of a getting to know you period.
The real transition has taken place over the 3 full seasons he has been in charge.
But remember, Klopp had to sell his best player in order to recruit big.
It was equivalent to Sarri coming in and having to sell Hazard before getting you back to the top again which would be no small feat.
As for the title, there's over 50 points to play for. I think if we get to March and we've maintained a 7-10 point lead, I'd be very confident but as of now, we're 2 games away from it all crumbling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp had to abondon his principles of never buying players for the sake of winning the title, in order to propel Liverpool to the top
That's the story you won't get from Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think he abandoned anything. It was more a case of not having any other choice.
The Pogba fee changed the market. Any fool could see that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Changed what market? Cost a manager his job
You're the fool if you think Pogba transfer changed the market?
The market was already full of clubs buying for the glory!
Look at City, your nearest rivals now. All buying for glory
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it changed the market.
Whether it cost a manager his job is of no relevance.
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 6 minutes ago
I don't think he
anything. It was more a case of not having any other choice.
==============
What about the choice Poch made? Nurture and bring through young players?
Winks? Skipp? Foyth?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What about it?
Klopp currently sits atop of the table.
Klopp has also put two young British lads at full back..
If we reach the end of the season and Poch wins the title then perhaps your point is solid but I have a feeling you lot will be spending their summer urging your club to buy big.
Sign in if you want to comment
Pool's title to lose.
Page 1 of 4
posted on 2/1/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 2/1/19
The top 3 spots were turned on their head over a 4 game period, ain’t nothing over yet.
Also Europe and domestic cup progression will play apart
posted on 2/1/19
posted on 2/1/19
be nice if we could do the treble
posted on 2/1/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 2/1/19
We can give a manager that time if they deserve it. Klopp was improving Liverpool year on year and his signings bar Karius have been spot on. If we gave Scolari for example the time and backing Klopp got we would have gone the way of Milan.
I'm happy to give managers time, but not for the sake of it.
posted on 2/1/19
think the rock solid defense is helping us out this season, money well spent
posted on 2/1/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 2/1/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 2/1/19
Klopp is a good manager but for me the main/clear reason they’ve elevated themselves from 3rd/4th place team to title contenders on a level with City, is through proper, ruthless investment in their XI and squad. Got rid of players from their XI who aren’t good enough, the clear weaknesses. For us, this isn’t just striker, it’s also LB, and on the wing.
Tbf after a season or two of not winning the title it is more likely that teams like Liverpool (and maybe us this summer tbf) buy well, try and play catch up. We did it as well after 12-13, and won the title the following year.
posted on 2/1/19
On a side issue, if our board and fan base are patient enough, it's taken Klopp 4 years to get Pool to this point. Could we not give our Head Coach a similar amount of support?
---
To be fair, Klopp took over mid season and we were already struggling.
First season was well under way so that was more of a getting to know you period.
The real transition has taken place over the 3 full seasons he has been in charge.
But remember, Klopp had to sell his best player in order to recruit big.
It was equivalent to Sarri coming in and having to sell Hazard before getting you back to the top again which would be no small feat.
As for the title, there's over 50 points to play for. I think if we get to March and we've maintained a 7-10 point lead, I'd be very confident but as of now, we're 2 games away from it all crumbling.
posted on 2/1/19
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 11 minutes ago
On a side issue, if our board and fan base are patient enough, it's taken Klopp 4 years to get Pool to this point. Could we not give our Head Coach a similar amount of support?
---
To be fair, Klopp took over mid season and we were already struggling.
First season was well under way so that was more of a getting to know you period.
The real transition has taken place over the 3 full seasons he has been in charge.
But remember, Klopp had to sell his best player in order to recruit big.
It was equivalent to Sarri coming in and having to sell Hazard before getting you back to the top again which would be no small feat.
As for the title, there's over 50 points to play for. I think if we get to March and we've maintained a 7-10 point lead, I'd be very confident but as of now, we're 2 games away from it all crumbling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp had to abondon his principles of never buying players for the sake of winning the title, in order to propel Liverpool to the top
That's the story you won't get from Liverpool
posted on 2/1/19
When did klopp say he'd never buy players?
posted on 2/1/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 2/1/19
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 11 minutes ago
On a side issue, if our board and fan base are patient enough, it's taken Klopp 4 years to get Pool to this point. Could we not give our Head Coach a similar amount of support?
---
To be fair, Klopp took over mid season and we were already struggling.
First season was well under way so that was more of a getting to know you period.
The real transition has taken place over the 3 full seasons he has been in charge.
But remember, Klopp had to sell his best player in order to recruit big.
It was equivalent to Sarri coming in and having to sell Hazard before getting you back to the top again which would be no small feat.
As for the title, there's over 50 points to play for. I think if we get to March and we've maintained a 7-10 point lead, I'd be very confident but as of now, we're 2 games away from it all crumbling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp had to abondon his principles of never buying players for the sake of winning the title, in order to propel Liverpool to the top
That's the story you won't get from Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think he abandoned anything. It was more a case of not having any other choice.
The Pogba fee changed the market. Any fool could see that.
posted on 2/1/19
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 11 minutes ago
On a side issue, if our board and fan base are patient enough, it's taken Klopp 4 years to get Pool to this point. Could we not give our Head Coach a similar amount of support?
---
To be fair, Klopp took over mid season and we were already struggling.
First season was well under way so that was more of a getting to know you period.
The real transition has taken place over the 3 full seasons he has been in charge.
But remember, Klopp had to sell his best player in order to recruit big.
It was equivalent to Sarri coming in and having to sell Hazard before getting you back to the top again which would be no small feat.
As for the title, there's over 50 points to play for. I think if we get to March and we've maintained a 7-10 point lead, I'd be very confident but as of now, we're 2 games away from it all crumbling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp had to abondon his principles of never buying players for the sake of winning the title, in order to propel Liverpool to the top
That's the story you won't get from Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think he abandoned anything. It was more a case of not having any other choice.
The Pogba fee changed the market. Any fool could see that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Changed what market? Cost a manager his job
You're the fool if you think Pogba transfer changed the market?
The market was already full of clubs buying for the glory!
Look at City, your nearest rivals now. All buying for glory
posted on 2/1/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 2/1/19
I don't think he
anything. It was more a case of not having any other choice.
==============
What about the choice Poch made? Nurture and bring through young players?
Winks? Skipp? Foyth?
posted on 2/1/19
comment by Prankster (U6283)
posted 40 minutes ago
The top 3 spots were turned on their head over a 4 game period, ain’t nothing over yet.
Also Europe and domestic cup progression will play apart
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This.
Nowhere near over.
Some rival fans just want to create the narrative that the Liverpool fans think they've won it, or that the race is so far run that only Liverpool bottling it can stop them winning. I can imagine that s few have already drafted their LAL articles and have fingers hovering over the submit button
posted on 2/1/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 2/1/19
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 seconds ago
I don't think he
anything. It was more a case of not having any other choice.
==============
What about the choice Poch made? Nurture and bring through young players?
Winks? Skipp? Foyth?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because Klopp has brought no youth through into this Liverpool side
posted on 2/1/19
Don't agree, OP.
It isn't Liverpool's to lose. Specially if the gap is only 4 points after tomorrow?
Credit due to Liverpool to sustain the title race. But it's harder to stay at the top. I am sure Klopp knows that!
posted on 2/1/19
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 49 seconds ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 seconds ago
I don't think he
anything. It was more a case of not having any other choice.
==============
What about the choice Poch made? Nurture and bring through young players?
Winks? Skipp? Foyth?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because Klopp has brought no youth through into this Liverpool side
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Read my comments again.
posted on 2/1/19
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 11 minutes ago
On a side issue, if our board and fan base are patient enough, it's taken Klopp 4 years to get Pool to this point. Could we not give our Head Coach a similar amount of support?
---
To be fair, Klopp took over mid season and we were already struggling.
First season was well under way so that was more of a getting to know you period.
The real transition has taken place over the 3 full seasons he has been in charge.
But remember, Klopp had to sell his best player in order to recruit big.
It was equivalent to Sarri coming in and having to sell Hazard before getting you back to the top again which would be no small feat.
As for the title, there's over 50 points to play for. I think if we get to March and we've maintained a 7-10 point lead, I'd be very confident but as of now, we're 2 games away from it all crumbling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp had to abondon his principles of never buying players for the sake of winning the title, in order to propel Liverpool to the top
That's the story you won't get from Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think he abandoned anything. It was more a case of not having any other choice.
The Pogba fee changed the market. Any fool could see that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Changed what market? Cost a manager his job
You're the fool if you think Pogba transfer changed the market?
The market was already full of clubs buying for the glory!
Look at City, your nearest rivals now. All buying for glory
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it changed the market.
Whether it cost a manager his job is of no relevance.
posted on 2/1/19
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 6 minutes ago
I don't think he
anything. It was more a case of not having any other choice.
==============
What about the choice Poch made? Nurture and bring through young players?
Winks? Skipp? Foyth?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What about it?
Klopp currently sits atop of the table.
Klopp has also put two young British lads at full back..
If we reach the end of the season and Poch wins the title then perhaps your point is solid but I have a feeling you lot will be spending their summer urging your club to buy big.
Page 1 of 4