comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 14 seconds ago
Winston:
"I didn't say you ruined the thread either. For someone who needs thinks written literally, I'm surprised you made that mistake."
Also Winston in the previous comment to me:
"you picked out a rather unimportant point and turned it into a ridiculous ongoing debate that has completely ruined the thread"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep.
The debate ruined the thread.
Just because you started that debate doesn't mean you're entirely at fault, as evidenced by my other comment in that same post:
"I'm far from perfect but you must accept some fault here."
Clear?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok so I didn't ruin the thread? That's good of you to say.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We both have, along with others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are saying that I ruined the thread?
But you literally just wrote "I didn't say you ruined the thread "
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus. You are actually worse than me.
I'm saying that a group of people have contributed to ruining this thread. You're one of them.
In my view, if I were to say 'you have ruined the thread' then I'm implying that you alone are at fault, which is not what I believe.
I can't believe I'm having to explain this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never said that you accused me if "solely" ruining the thread. This is the problem when you make assumptions and apply incorrect inference rather than simply reading the meaning of the actual comments.
You said that I ruined this thread (regardless of if it was in a group you only directly referred to me). You then one comment later literally claimed that you never said this.
Why did you lie about this?
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 45 seconds ago
"Its easy to post nthat you've admitted something bit actually admitting it is seen through your actions, not just because you said it."
You heard it here first everyone.
Even if you literally admit fault, you've not necessarily admitted fault.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't know why you're laughing. This is the first correct statement you've made today. Oral admission does not mean actual admission. This is basic in human society.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm laughing because this is one of the most stupid comments I've seen on this forum. Ever.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
"Its easy to post nthat you've admitted something bit actually admitting it is seen through your actions, not just because you said it."
You heard it here first everyone.
Even if you literally admit fault, you've not necessarily admitted fault.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On the flip side you can say you didn’t do something, such as making a comparison, and that doesn’t necessarily mean you didn’t though yeah?
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
"Its easy to post nthat you've admitted something bit actually admitting it is seen through your actions, not just because you said it."
You heard it here first everyone.
Even if you literally admit fault, you've not necessarily admitted fault.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On the flip side you can say you didn’t do something, such as making a comparison, and that doesn’t necessarily mean you didn’t though yeah?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh man.
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 14 seconds ago
Winston:
"I didn't say you ruined the thread either. For someone who needs thinks written literally, I'm surprised you made that mistake."
Also Winston in the previous comment to me:
"you picked out a rather unimportant point and turned it into a ridiculous ongoing debate that has completely ruined the thread"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep.
The debate ruined the thread.
Just because you started that debate doesn't mean you're entirely at fault, as evidenced by my other comment in that same post:
"I'm far from perfect but you must accept some fault here."
Clear?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok so I didn't ruin the thread? That's good of you to say.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We both have, along with others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are saying that I ruined the thread?
But you literally just wrote "I didn't say you ruined the thread "
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus. You are actually worse than me.
I'm saying that a group of people have contributed to ruining this thread. You're one of them.
In my view, if I were to say 'you have ruined the thread' then I'm implying that you alone are at fault, which is not what I believe.
I can't believe I'm having to explain this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never said that you accused me if "solely" ruining the thread. This is the problem when you make assumptions and apply incorrect inference rather than simply reading the meaning of the actual comments.
You said that I ruined this thread (regardless of if it was in a group you only directly referred to me). You then one comment later literally claimed that you never said this.
Why did you lie about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh for god sake, this is actually becoming pathetic now.
I thought you thought I meant that you'd ruined it on your own, so I clarified it.
Maybe that was wrong. Jesus wept - are you actually for real? Does it matter?
It was a particularly reasonable inference to make... i was actually going out of my way to ensure you didn't think I was having a pop at you.
Unbelievable.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
"Its easy to post nthat you've admitted something bit actually admitting it is seen through your actions, not just because you said it."
You heard it here first everyone.
Even if you literally admit fault, you've not necessarily admitted fault.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On the flip side you can say you didn’t do something, such as making a comparison, and that doesn’t necessarily mean you didn’t though yeah?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What you've done here is remember what I wrote at the start incorrectly. Refresh your memory perhaps.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
"Its easy to post nthat you've admitted something bit actually admitting it is seen through your actions, not just because you said it."
You heard it here first everyone.
Even if you literally admit fault, you've not necessarily admitted fault.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On the flip side you can say you didn’t do something, such as making a comparison, and that doesn’t necessarily mean you didn’t though yeah?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What you've done here is remember what I wrote at the start incorrectly. Refresh your memory perhaps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robbing literally admitted he didn’t do something and you decided to ignore it because what you’ve inferred is more prescient in your mind.
You ruined the thread.
-You said I ruined the thread
I didn't say you ruined the thread.
-You said it. Heres the proof.
OK, you didn't ruin the thread, you made me do it anyway.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 14 seconds ago
Winston:
"I didn't say you ruined the thread either. For someone who needs thinks written literally, I'm surprised you made that mistake."
Also Winston in the previous comment to me:
"you picked out a rather unimportant point and turned it into a ridiculous ongoing debate that has completely ruined the thread"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep.
The debate ruined the thread.
Just because you started that debate doesn't mean you're entirely at fault, as evidenced by my other comment in that same post:
"I'm far from perfect but you must accept some fault here."
Clear?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok so I didn't ruin the thread? That's good of you to say.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We both have, along with others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are saying that I ruined the thread?
But you literally just wrote "I didn't say you ruined the thread "
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus. You are actually worse than me.
I'm saying that a group of people have contributed to ruining this thread. You're one of them.
In my view, if I were to say 'you have ruined the thread' then I'm implying that you alone are at fault, which is not what I believe.
I can't believe I'm having to explain this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never said that you accused me if "solely" ruining the thread. This is the problem when you make assumptions and apply incorrect inference rather than simply reading the meaning of the actual comments.
You said that I ruined this thread (regardless of if it was in a group you only directly referred to me). You then one comment later literally claimed that you never said this.
Why did you lie about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh for god sake, this is actually becoming pathetic now.
I thought you thought I meant that you'd ruined it on your own, so I clarified it.
Maybe that was wrong. Jesus wept - are you actually for real? Does it matter?
It was a particularly reasonable inference to make... i was actually going out of my way to ensure you didn't think I was having a pop at you.
Unbelievable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But I never said that I thought you were referring solely to me. In fact, in a previous comment I explicitly acknowledged that I didnt because I leterally wrote that you accused Robbing, and then you were accusing me.
However, you ignored the explicit written evidence Improvided, so that you could make your own assumptions incorrectly. You then lied about it for some reason, despite the evidence being within the comment, before tying yourself in knots.
It is literally a miniature version of this entire thread. Instead of simply reading what was written you applied an assumption that proved to be incorrect and won't admit you made a mistake.
No Fields, because I didn't claim that Robbing was doing it intentionally.
Keep up.
What did I lie about, welshpool?
Good luck with that.
By the way, this is utterly pathetic.
I was actually trying to be decent.
There's clearly a difference between saying 'you ruined the thread' and 'you're part of a group who have ruined the thread', and I was actually trying to ensure you didn't think I was having a pop at you.
And now you behave like this.
You have a massive problem with taking things literally.
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 3 minutes ago
You ruined the thread.
-You said I ruined the thread
I didn't say you ruined the thread.
-You said it. Heres the proof.
OK, you didn't ruin the thread, you made me do it anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Check the first thing you're comparing here. The first comment.
Oh dear.
Thor having a shocker here.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
No Fields, because I didn't claim that Robbing was doing it intentionally.
Keep up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robbing has decided he didn't make an implication, and there is no evidence in what he wrote that implies anything. As I've already shown, your inference is entirely based on your incorrect assumption that Robbing was doing this because he is a Liverpool fan.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
No Fields, because I didn't claim that Robbing was doing it intentionally.
Keep up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the first you’ve mentioned it being unintentional. This is a new revelation.
Or the cynic in me says you’re moving the goalposts
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
No Fields, because I didn't claim that Robbing was doing it intentionally.
Keep up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robbing has decided he didn't make an implication, and there is no evidence in what he wrote that implies anything. As I've already shown, your inference is entirely based on your incorrect assumption that Robbing was doing this because he is a Liverpool fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's entirely incorrect and not once have I given that as the reasoning for my view.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
No Fields, because I didn't claim that Robbing was doing it intentionally.
Keep up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the first you’ve mentioned it being unintentional. This is a new revelation.
Or the cynic in me says you’re moving the goalposts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not, actually.
This is the part where you're not intelligent enough to understand the point I've made.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
No Fields, because I didn't claim that Robbing was doing it intentionally.
Keep up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the first you’ve mentioned it being unintentional. This is a new revelation.
Or the cynic in me says you’re moving the goalposts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not, actually.
This is the part where you're not intelligent enough to understand the point I've made.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it not. When did you mention it previously?
Another underhand, unwarranted intellect comment. You do this when the debate isn’t going on the direction you want to to.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
No Fields, because I didn't claim that Robbing was doing it intentionally.
Keep up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the first you’ve mentioned it being unintentional. This is a new revelation.
Or the cynic in me says you’re moving the goalposts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not, actually.
This is the part where you're not intelligent enough to understand the point I've made.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it not. When did you mention it previously?
Another underhand, unwarranted intellect comment. You do this when the debate isn’t going on the direction you want to to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughout my entire explanation.
Hope this helps.
Winston
I will add I’ll rephrase. This is the first time I’ve seen you mention Robbing doing it unintentionally.
Maybe that’s better for you.
Liverpool gang out in force today.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 3 minutes ago
You ruined the thread.
-You said I ruined the thread
I didn't say you ruined the thread.
-You said it. Heres the proof.
OK, you didn't ruin the thread, you made me do it anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Check the first thing you're comparing here. The first comment.
Oh dear.
Thor having a shocker here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're living in you're own little imaginary and super convenient world.
Winston - you lied because you literally said in one comment that I ruined the thread.
You then said you didn't say I ruined the thread. This was a lie because you clearly had said this.
I then checked for clarification and you confirmed that you thought that I (in a group but that still means I am involved) did in fact ruin the thread.
So your lie was saying you didn't say I ruined the thread. It is literally there in black and white. Whether you intended it to be me in a group, or solely me, you said I ruined the thread.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 20 seconds ago
Winston
I will add I’ll rephrase. This is the first time I’ve seen you mention Robbing doing it unintentionally.
Maybe that’s better for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you've failed to understand the point I've been making.
If you'd understood it, you wouldn't need the word 'unintentional' to be written.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
No Fields, because I didn't claim that Robbing was doing it intentionally.
Keep up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the first you’ve mentioned it being unintentional. This is a new revelation.
Or the cynic in me says you’re moving the goalposts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not, actually.
This is the part where you're not intelligent enough to understand the point I've made.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it not. When did you mention it previously?
Another underhand, unwarranted intellect comment. You do this when the debate isn’t going on the direction you want to to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughout my entire explanation.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s throwing about the old ‘hope it helps’ sign off again. Another sign.
Could you point me to where you first mentioned it being unintentional please?
I may have missed it if it was in reply to someone else.
Sign in if you want to comment
Pool Gang V Winston
Page 11 of 41
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 14 seconds ago
Winston:
"I didn't say you ruined the thread either. For someone who needs thinks written literally, I'm surprised you made that mistake."
Also Winston in the previous comment to me:
"you picked out a rather unimportant point and turned it into a ridiculous ongoing debate that has completely ruined the thread"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep.
The debate ruined the thread.
Just because you started that debate doesn't mean you're entirely at fault, as evidenced by my other comment in that same post:
"I'm far from perfect but you must accept some fault here."
Clear?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok so I didn't ruin the thread? That's good of you to say.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We both have, along with others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are saying that I ruined the thread?
But you literally just wrote "I didn't say you ruined the thread "
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus. You are actually worse than me.
I'm saying that a group of people have contributed to ruining this thread. You're one of them.
In my view, if I were to say 'you have ruined the thread' then I'm implying that you alone are at fault, which is not what I believe.
I can't believe I'm having to explain this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never said that you accused me if "solely" ruining the thread. This is the problem when you make assumptions and apply incorrect inference rather than simply reading the meaning of the actual comments.
You said that I ruined this thread (regardless of if it was in a group you only directly referred to me). You then one comment later literally claimed that you never said this.
Why did you lie about this?
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 45 seconds ago
"Its easy to post nthat you've admitted something bit actually admitting it is seen through your actions, not just because you said it."
You heard it here first everyone.
Even if you literally admit fault, you've not necessarily admitted fault.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't know why you're laughing. This is the first correct statement you've made today. Oral admission does not mean actual admission. This is basic in human society.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm laughing because this is one of the most stupid comments I've seen on this forum. Ever.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
"Its easy to post nthat you've admitted something bit actually admitting it is seen through your actions, not just because you said it."
You heard it here first everyone.
Even if you literally admit fault, you've not necessarily admitted fault.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On the flip side you can say you didn’t do something, such as making a comparison, and that doesn’t necessarily mean you didn’t though yeah?
posted on 23/5/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
"Its easy to post nthat you've admitted something bit actually admitting it is seen through your actions, not just because you said it."
You heard it here first everyone.
Even if you literally admit fault, you've not necessarily admitted fault.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On the flip side you can say you didn’t do something, such as making a comparison, and that doesn’t necessarily mean you didn’t though yeah?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh man.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 14 seconds ago
Winston:
"I didn't say you ruined the thread either. For someone who needs thinks written literally, I'm surprised you made that mistake."
Also Winston in the previous comment to me:
"you picked out a rather unimportant point and turned it into a ridiculous ongoing debate that has completely ruined the thread"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep.
The debate ruined the thread.
Just because you started that debate doesn't mean you're entirely at fault, as evidenced by my other comment in that same post:
"I'm far from perfect but you must accept some fault here."
Clear?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok so I didn't ruin the thread? That's good of you to say.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We both have, along with others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are saying that I ruined the thread?
But you literally just wrote "I didn't say you ruined the thread "
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus. You are actually worse than me.
I'm saying that a group of people have contributed to ruining this thread. You're one of them.
In my view, if I were to say 'you have ruined the thread' then I'm implying that you alone are at fault, which is not what I believe.
I can't believe I'm having to explain this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never said that you accused me if "solely" ruining the thread. This is the problem when you make assumptions and apply incorrect inference rather than simply reading the meaning of the actual comments.
You said that I ruined this thread (regardless of if it was in a group you only directly referred to me). You then one comment later literally claimed that you never said this.
Why did you lie about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh for god sake, this is actually becoming pathetic now.
I thought you thought I meant that you'd ruined it on your own, so I clarified it.
Maybe that was wrong. Jesus wept - are you actually for real? Does it matter?
It was a particularly reasonable inference to make... i was actually going out of my way to ensure you didn't think I was having a pop at you.
Unbelievable.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
"Its easy to post nthat you've admitted something bit actually admitting it is seen through your actions, not just because you said it."
You heard it here first everyone.
Even if you literally admit fault, you've not necessarily admitted fault.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On the flip side you can say you didn’t do something, such as making a comparison, and that doesn’t necessarily mean you didn’t though yeah?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What you've done here is remember what I wrote at the start incorrectly. Refresh your memory perhaps.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
"Its easy to post nthat you've admitted something bit actually admitting it is seen through your actions, not just because you said it."
You heard it here first everyone.
Even if you literally admit fault, you've not necessarily admitted fault.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On the flip side you can say you didn’t do something, such as making a comparison, and that doesn’t necessarily mean you didn’t though yeah?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What you've done here is remember what I wrote at the start incorrectly. Refresh your memory perhaps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robbing literally admitted he didn’t do something and you decided to ignore it because what you’ve inferred is more prescient in your mind.
posted on 23/5/20
You ruined the thread.
-You said I ruined the thread
I didn't say you ruined the thread.
-You said it. Heres the proof.
OK, you didn't ruin the thread, you made me do it anyway.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 14 seconds ago
Winston:
"I didn't say you ruined the thread either. For someone who needs thinks written literally, I'm surprised you made that mistake."
Also Winston in the previous comment to me:
"you picked out a rather unimportant point and turned it into a ridiculous ongoing debate that has completely ruined the thread"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep.
The debate ruined the thread.
Just because you started that debate doesn't mean you're entirely at fault, as evidenced by my other comment in that same post:
"I'm far from perfect but you must accept some fault here."
Clear?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok so I didn't ruin the thread? That's good of you to say.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We both have, along with others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are saying that I ruined the thread?
But you literally just wrote "I didn't say you ruined the thread "
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus. You are actually worse than me.
I'm saying that a group of people have contributed to ruining this thread. You're one of them.
In my view, if I were to say 'you have ruined the thread' then I'm implying that you alone are at fault, which is not what I believe.
I can't believe I'm having to explain this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never said that you accused me if "solely" ruining the thread. This is the problem when you make assumptions and apply incorrect inference rather than simply reading the meaning of the actual comments.
You said that I ruined this thread (regardless of if it was in a group you only directly referred to me). You then one comment later literally claimed that you never said this.
Why did you lie about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh for god sake, this is actually becoming pathetic now.
I thought you thought I meant that you'd ruined it on your own, so I clarified it.
Maybe that was wrong. Jesus wept - are you actually for real? Does it matter?
It was a particularly reasonable inference to make... i was actually going out of my way to ensure you didn't think I was having a pop at you.
Unbelievable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But I never said that I thought you were referring solely to me. In fact, in a previous comment I explicitly acknowledged that I didnt because I leterally wrote that you accused Robbing, and then you were accusing me.
However, you ignored the explicit written evidence Improvided, so that you could make your own assumptions incorrectly. You then lied about it for some reason, despite the evidence being within the comment, before tying yourself in knots.
It is literally a miniature version of this entire thread. Instead of simply reading what was written you applied an assumption that proved to be incorrect and won't admit you made a mistake.
posted on 23/5/20
No Fields, because I didn't claim that Robbing was doing it intentionally.
Keep up.
posted on 23/5/20
What did I lie about, welshpool?
Good luck with that.
By the way, this is utterly pathetic.
I was actually trying to be decent.
There's clearly a difference between saying 'you ruined the thread' and 'you're part of a group who have ruined the thread', and I was actually trying to ensure you didn't think I was having a pop at you.
And now you behave like this.
You have a massive problem with taking things literally.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 3 minutes ago
You ruined the thread.
-You said I ruined the thread
I didn't say you ruined the thread.
-You said it. Heres the proof.
OK, you didn't ruin the thread, you made me do it anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Check the first thing you're comparing here. The first comment.
Oh dear.
Thor having a shocker here.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
No Fields, because I didn't claim that Robbing was doing it intentionally.
Keep up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robbing has decided he didn't make an implication, and there is no evidence in what he wrote that implies anything. As I've already shown, your inference is entirely based on your incorrect assumption that Robbing was doing this because he is a Liverpool fan.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
No Fields, because I didn't claim that Robbing was doing it intentionally.
Keep up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the first you’ve mentioned it being unintentional. This is a new revelation.
Or the cynic in me says you’re moving the goalposts
posted on 23/5/20
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
No Fields, because I didn't claim that Robbing was doing it intentionally.
Keep up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robbing has decided he didn't make an implication, and there is no evidence in what he wrote that implies anything. As I've already shown, your inference is entirely based on your incorrect assumption that Robbing was doing this because he is a Liverpool fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's entirely incorrect and not once have I given that as the reasoning for my view.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
No Fields, because I didn't claim that Robbing was doing it intentionally.
Keep up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the first you’ve mentioned it being unintentional. This is a new revelation.
Or the cynic in me says you’re moving the goalposts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not, actually.
This is the part where you're not intelligent enough to understand the point I've made.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
No Fields, because I didn't claim that Robbing was doing it intentionally.
Keep up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the first you’ve mentioned it being unintentional. This is a new revelation.
Or the cynic in me says you’re moving the goalposts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not, actually.
This is the part where you're not intelligent enough to understand the point I've made.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it not. When did you mention it previously?
Another underhand, unwarranted intellect comment. You do this when the debate isn’t going on the direction you want to to.
posted on 23/5/20
posted on 23/5/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
No Fields, because I didn't claim that Robbing was doing it intentionally.
Keep up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the first you’ve mentioned it being unintentional. This is a new revelation.
Or the cynic in me says you’re moving the goalposts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not, actually.
This is the part where you're not intelligent enough to understand the point I've made.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it not. When did you mention it previously?
Another underhand, unwarranted intellect comment. You do this when the debate isn’t going on the direction you want to to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughout my entire explanation.
Hope this helps.
posted on 23/5/20
Winston
I will add I’ll rephrase. This is the first time I’ve seen you mention Robbing doing it unintentionally.
Maybe that’s better for you.
posted on 23/5/20
Liverpool gang out in force today.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 3 minutes ago
You ruined the thread.
-You said I ruined the thread
I didn't say you ruined the thread.
-You said it. Heres the proof.
OK, you didn't ruin the thread, you made me do it anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Check the first thing you're comparing here. The first comment.
Oh dear.
Thor having a shocker here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're living in you're own little imaginary and super convenient world.
posted on 23/5/20
Winston - you lied because you literally said in one comment that I ruined the thread.
You then said you didn't say I ruined the thread. This was a lie because you clearly had said this.
I then checked for clarification and you confirmed that you thought that I (in a group but that still means I am involved) did in fact ruin the thread.
So your lie was saying you didn't say I ruined the thread. It is literally there in black and white. Whether you intended it to be me in a group, or solely me, you said I ruined the thread.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 20 seconds ago
Winston
I will add I’ll rephrase. This is the first time I’ve seen you mention Robbing doing it unintentionally.
Maybe that’s better for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you've failed to understand the point I've been making.
If you'd understood it, you wouldn't need the word 'unintentional' to be written.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
No Fields, because I didn't claim that Robbing was doing it intentionally.
Keep up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the first you’ve mentioned it being unintentional. This is a new revelation.
Or the cynic in me says you’re moving the goalposts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not, actually.
This is the part where you're not intelligent enough to understand the point I've made.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it not. When did you mention it previously?
Another underhand, unwarranted intellect comment. You do this when the debate isn’t going on the direction you want to to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughout my entire explanation.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s throwing about the old ‘hope it helps’ sign off again. Another sign.
Could you point me to where you first mentioned it being unintentional please?
I may have missed it if it was in reply to someone else.
Page 11 of 41
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16