1. Did they use the babysitting service provided? NO
2. Did they use any listening devices? NO
3. Did they leave three children under 4 alone while going out drinking? YES
4. Did they do this every night? YES
5. Did they,under British law,endanger Maddie? YES
6. In the UK is significant harm a form of child abuse? YES
7. Is significant harm used by the UK courts in child abuse cases? YES
8. Does leaving the children as they did qualify under these rules ? YES
9. Did Kate sit writing timelines instead of searching for Maddie? YES
10. Are the frequent checks by the Tapas group challenged by other witnesses? YES
11. Was the bedroom withing sight of where they sat? NO
12, Were they within earshot? NO
13. Did anyone other than Tanner see any abductor? NO
14. Has anyone come up with a credible abductor? NO
15. Is there any evidence of an abduction? NO
16. Were the shutters in the room tampered with? NO
17. Did Kate say the shutters were tampered with? YES
18. Did Kate change her story to saying the door was unlocked? YES
19. Was the door unlocked on any other night? NO
20. Is there any physical evidence at all of a break in? NO
21. Is there any physical evidence of another party being in the room? NO
23. Were the McCann's told not to inform the media? YES
24. Were they told it might harm the chances of finding Maddie alive? YES
25. Were the media informed by a McCann family member? YES
26. Were specially trained British dogs brought in to search the apartment ? YES
27. Did they find anything? YES
28. Have these dogs been successful in over 200 cases? YES
29. Do sniffer dogs lie? NO
30. Do the specially trained dogs get confused by other smells? NO
31. Did they find cadaver(dead body) scent in the apartment? YES
32. Did they find blood? YES
33. Did they find cadaver scent behind the sofa? YES
34. On the child's toy? YES
35. In a cupboard in the room? YES
36. Did they find cadaver scent on Kate's clothes? YES
37. Did Kate explain this by saying she had examined dead bodies before holiday? YES
38. Is there any record of her doing so? NO
39. Has anyone come forward to say they saw her doing so? NO
40. Was the hire car rented after Maddie disappeared ? YES
41. Were tests done on DNA found in the car? YES
42. Did the dogs alert to the hire car? YES
43. Is a billion to one odds that it may be someone else's DNA? YES
44. Were the doors and boot left open to get rid of the smell in the car? YES
45. Did the parents explain it away as rotting meat? YES
46. Smelling due to taking rubbish to the tip in the hire car? YES
47. Smelling due to dirty nappies in the hire car? YES
48. Smell due to sea bass in the hire car? YES
49. Did the parents say the dogs were wrong? YES
50. Do you need tons of excuses if the dogs are just plain wrong? NO
51. Have the dogs ever been wrong? NO
52. Did Kate & Gerry flee Portugal? YES
53. Did they hire extradition lawyers? YES
54. Did the McCann's hire libel lawyers to gag anyone with a different view? YES
55. Did the government lend spin doctor Clarence Mitchell to the parents? YES
56. Dio spin doctors twist the truth for a favourable outcome? YES
57. Are they paid to do this? YES
58. Did the McCann's set up a fund in order to search for Maddie? YES
59. Did they use the money donated for anything other than searching? YES
60. Do the parents have a media monitoring unit? YES
61. Are there internet trolls helping the parents to quash getting at the truth? YES
62. Have the Portuguese police been portrayed as incompetent? YES
63. Did they look at all aspects of the case? YES
64. Did they conclude any abduction took place? NO
65. Did they conclude that Maddie was dead and the parents responsible? YES
66. Are there two British investigations into Maddie being missing? YES
67. Are they investigating ALL aspects of the case? NO
68. Have they been told by the government to focus on abduction only? YES
69. Have they come up with any evidence of an abduction? NO
70. Have they come up with any credible suspects? NO
71. Have they questioned the tapas group or parents over the case? NO
72. Have the parents made millions from Maddie being missing? YES
73. Did Kate write a book mentioning torn genitalia that the twins might read? YES
74. Did Gerry have his wallet stolen at Waterloo station as he claimed? NO
75. Does the CCTV footage from that day bear out his claims? NO
76. Did the Portuguese police ask British government for medical records? YES
77. Were they handed over? NO
78. Did they ask for bank statements? YES
79. Were they handed over ? NO
80. Did they ask for mobile phone records? YES
81. Were they handed over? NO
82. Have the media printed the McCann version of events? YES
83. Are the media intimidated by threats of libel? YES
84. Have the parents admitted they are responsible for Maddie's disappearance? NO
85. Have the parents faced any criminal charges to date? NO
86. No charges for manslaughter? NO
87. For neglect? NO
88. Did the McCann's say they would take a polygraph(lie detector test) ? YES
89. Did the McCann "people" contact Don Cargill head of polygraph studies?YES
90. Did the McCann's tell the world they would take one to prove innocence? YES
91. Have they taken one in the 2'000+ days since saying they would? NO
92. Did the parents impose a list of conditions for taking one? YES
93. Did Don Cargill say the list was "impossible to satisfy"? YES
94. Did Don Cargill state "They had no intention of taking one"? YES
95. Did Clarence Mitchell say they were innocent and did not need to do one? YES
96. IS Amaral on trial because he wrote a book stating the facts of the case? YES
97. Is it a proper account of the police investigation ? YES
98. Have the McCann's fought desperately to have this book banned? YES
99. Is it banned? NO
100. Is maddie missing because of the actions of the parents? YES
48 questions I would like Kate McCann to answer.
1. Why did you not physically search for Madeleine?
2. Why did you leave the twins when you realised Madeleine was missing, risking them also being taken?
3. What did you mean by 'they've taken her'. Who's 'they' Kate?
4. Why did you refuse to answer police questioning that could have helped find your daughter?
5. At the time, Gordon Brown was Chancellor of the Exchequer, not the Foreign Secretary. So why did he put so much pressure on the Portuguese police?
6. Why did you wash cuddle cat?
7. Where is Madeleine's pink blanket now, we know it was on her bed 4th May?
8. Why did you lie about the shutters being smashed/jemmied/broken?
9. Why did you change your original statement from the door being locked to the door being unlocked?
10. Why did you presume Madeleine had been abducted when there was no evidence to suggest she had been?
11. What happened to the blue sports bag that was in your wardrobe?
12. Why didn't the twins wake up the night Madeleine disappeared when there were people constantly walking in and out of their room?
13. Why did you dismiss the dogs evidence knowing that they had been right in at least 200 cases?
14. Why was Madeleine's DNA found in the boot of the hire car that had been hired 24 days after her disappearance?
15. How could you and Gerry find it in you to laugh/jog/play tennis days after your daughters disappearance?
16. Why did you get the media involved so early on ignoring the advise from the Portuguese police?
17. Why did it take 45 minutes for the police to be called?
18. Why are there so many inconsistency in all of your statements?
19. Why were the checks more consistent on the night Madeleine was reported missing?
20. Why was Madeleine crying for an hour and 15 minutes even though phone records prove Kate was in the apartment 3 minutes before?
21. Why did you hire Carter Ruck lawyers, especially the one that specialised in extraditions?
22. Why has only 10% of the fund been spent on the search?
23. Why did you suppress the E-Fits that are being used in the current investigation, is it because the Smiths identified your husband as the man they saw carrying Madeleine towards the beach the night of Madeleine's disappearance?
24. Why is your online shop still up and running even though there is 2 ongoing investigations?
25. Why did the government assign their spin doctor to control what is said about you in the media less than 24 hours after Madeleine's disappearance?
26. Why did you leave Portugal so quickly after being made arguidos?
27. Why did you lie about cuddle cat being high up on a shelf?
28. What on earth did you mean by this comment - "The police don't want a murder in Portugal and all the publicity about them not having paedophile laws here, so they're blaming us,"?
29. Why did you celebrate Madeleine's 4th birthday, shouldn't you have been searching?
30. Why is the fund not registered with the Charities Commission?
31. Why do you think it's acceptable to talk about your child's 'perfect genitals being torn apart' in your book?
32. Why is there no mention of Katerina Gaspers statement in your book, accusing David Payne of making inappropriate comments about your child to your husband?
33. Why did you draw so much attention to Madeleine's eye after the PJ warned you it could push the 'abductors' to harm her?
34. Why did you discount Mrs Fenns account of the crying?
35. What files does Theresa May have that she refuses to share with Portugal?
36. Why did you refuse to do reconstruction?
37. Why have you said you wish Gonçalo to be miserable and feel fear, he did everything possible to search for your child until he uncovered the truth of what you did to her?
38. Why were you happy with courting the media as long as they only reported an abduction?
39. Why are you suing people that are asking questions or purporting a theory?
40. Why did you spend £100K getting the police files translated but haven't released them?
41. Will you refund anyone who gave donations who have now read the evidence, should they want one?
42. How could the curtains 'Whooosh!' When they were trapped between the bed and the chair?
43. Why did it take you 144 days to get the twins tested to see if they had been sedated the night Madeleine disappeared?
44. What was in Gerry CATS file before it was sanitised?
45. How did the intruder manage to leave no forensic evidence?
46. Why was there no DNA found belonging to Madeleine in the apartment, forcing Gerry to return home to collect her pillowcase?
47. WHERE THE HELL ARE YOU WHILST THE POLICE ARE DIGGING UP LUZ KATE?
48. Why will you go to Portugal to attend the libel trial in the hope of receiving a million pound pay out but not while the police are trying to dig up your child's body?
comment by Diafol Coch 77 - A Reputable Poster (U2462)
posted 1 minute ago
The bottom line for me is this.
They shouldn't have left her alone and the abductor shouldn't have committed the crime.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were on holiday in a resort and complex that had no history of violence or sexxual preditors.
It was 13 years ago and things were different back then(because of this case and other high profile cases).You are in holiday mood in a safe enviroment and you make an error of judgement.
Many many others have done the same as you beforehand with no consequences,you are the ones who pay and you pay dearly.
Your 3 yr old daughter is missing and your worst nightmare is happening,not only is it happening it's taking place in a foreign country and in front of the world's media.
What is normal to anyone in this situation.Yet some on here are condemning the McCanns for how they reacted to the media
Those saying that others without kids wouldn't understand are protesting too much. I reckon they've killed kids in the past and are trying to cover it up now. Something just not right about them
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by RB&W "PPE for NHS heroes" (U21434)
posted 50 seconds ago
Robb
She invoked her right to remain silent in protest at being treated as a suspect.
She later said that she refused to co-operate because she thought the police treating her as a suspect was distracting them from the work they should have been doing to find Madeleine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine your daughter at the age of 4 yrs old was abducted.Imagine that you've already answered all questions put to you as a distraught parent wanting the best for your daughter.
Then imagine being totally innocent of any crime committed being told you are a prime suspect.
Put yourself in their shoes
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd have answered every question asked by the police in an attempt to prove my innocence so that they would discount me as the guilry party and start looking for my child.
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 31 seconds ago
Some people on this thread, especially so-called parents, have absolutely no compassion or humanity for either the abducted child or her parents.
Grow up ffs!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apparently they look guilty which is enough to find them guilty in the court of public opinion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As soon as I saw Ian Huntley on TV I said to my mum that he did it. I know a few other people that felt the same. There is something not right about the McCanns. They are hiding something. But I suspect it is more likely to hide the level that they neglected their children rather than hiding the fact that they were actually involved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How exactly are they hiding that? The whole world knows they left the kids alone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think that they have probably lied about how often they were checking on the kids.
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 - A Reputable Poster (U2462)
posted 1 minute ago
The bottom line for me is this.
They shouldn't have left her alone and the abductor shouldn't have committed the crime.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were on holiday in a resort and complex that had no history of violence or sexxual preditors.
It was 13 years ago and things were different back then(because of this case and other high profile cases).You are in holiday mood in a safe enviroment and you make an error of judgement.
Many many others have done the same as you beforehand with no consequences,you are the ones who pay and you pay dearly.
Your 3 yr old daughter is missing and your worst nightmare is happening,not only is it happening it's taking place in a foreign country and in front of the world's media.
What is normal to anyone in this situation.Yet some on here are condemning the McCanns for how they reacted to the media
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Things have changed in 13 years? Give over. It's not a generation ago. Leaving their kids like they did was neglect. Unfortunately their daughter paid the price.
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
The whole 48 questions thing is irrelevant to this debate anyway.
....
It was very relevant to a question someone asked. Just because it doesn’t fit your agenda didn’t mean it is irrelevant.
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 6 hours, 10 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 - A Reputable Poster (U2462)
posted 1 minute ago
The bottom line for me is this.
They shouldn't have left her alone and the abductor shouldn't have committed the crime.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were on holiday in a resort and complex that had no history of violence or sexxual preditors.
It was 13 years ago and things were different back then(because of this case and other high profile cases).You are in holiday mood in a safe enviroment and you make an error of judgement.
Many many others have done the same as you beforehand with no consequences,you are the ones who pay and you pay dearly.
Your 3 yr old daughter is missing and your worst nightmare is happening,not only is it happening it's taking place in a foreign country and in front of the world's media.
What is normal to anyone in this situation.Yet some on here are condemning the McCanns for how they reacted to the media
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Things have changed in 13 years? Give over. It's not a generation ago. Leaving their kids like they did was neglect. Unfortunately their daughter paid the price.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The answer to 14 is apparently yes.
The question for the others is Wht aren't they in prison.
Where did the 48 questions come from?
It's the bottom line for me too Diafol. But I don't put the two things anywhere near each other in terms of culpability.
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 39 minutes ago
It's the bottom line for me too Diafol. But I don't put the two things anywhere near each other in terms of culpability.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know it's not exactly the same but when I moved in with my partner for our first house together it was rented accommodation in a pretty rough part of town.
The first night i was there I daftly left my mountain bike by the back door overnight and by the morning it had gone. My fault for leaving it out but mainly the theif's fault for pinching it. All my mistake cost me though is an old bike but it also taught me a lesson in security. I've never had anything pinched from my house since.
Some top quality investigative analysis from the JA606 team here.
This was my personal favourite:
"As soon as I saw Ian Huntley on TV I said to my mum that he did it. I know a few other people that felt the same. There is something not right about the McCanns. They are hiding something."
Elvis, you have a gift mate - please offer your services to law enforcement.
Maybe design your own uniform. With a cape.
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 9 hours, 11 minutes ago
The whole 48 questions thing is irrelevant to this debate anyway.
The debate is about this German guy and if he is found guilty, will people apologise to the mccanns for finding them guilty in their minds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
will i feck apologise to them.
what part of they left their 3 very young children alone, in a foreign country to go out on the razz do you not understand.
i have absolutely zero fecking sympathy for those unts whatsoever, the sympathy should ALL lie with the poor girl that they fecking neglected because they deemed a few wines as more important.
their lack of care is what putt Maddie in that position.
the fact they kept their other 2 kids is a fecking disgrace.
What's incredible is that these two parents, who apparently were involved in the death of their daughter, have managed to do such a good job of the cover up that a worldwide investigation involving both the local police and the UK police has been unable to uncover ANY evidence of their involvement.
They are clearly master criminals and our only hope is that the sharp minds of social media can piece it all together.
comment by dunc manson... you must follow ole... you must follow ole (U11713)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 9 hours, 11 minutes ago
The whole 48 questions thing is irrelevant to this debate anyway.
The debate is about this German guy and if he is found guilty, will people apologise to the mccanns for finding them guilty in their minds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
will i feck apologise to them.
what part of they left their 3 very young children alone, in a foreign country to go out on the razz do you not understand.
i have absolutely zero fecking sympathy for thoseunts whatsoever, the sympathy should ALL lie with the poor girl that they fecking neglected because they deemed a few wines as more important.
their lack of care is what putt Maddie in that position.
the fact they kept their other 2 kids is a fecking disgrace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeez, so much judgemental wrath. If that’s what you say to them, I wonder what you feel about the German guy who did it (if he’s found guilty). I suspect you apportion equal blame to both the parents and the killer based on how little empathy you have to the parents.
how is it judgemental... its what they fecking did Robb... their daughter is probably dead ( regardless of who did it) ultimately because of their neglect... and they deserve sympathy for that?
not in my eyes, like i said, the only one deserving of any sympathy is Maddie herself, and if she is dead, i hope for her sake it was quick.
the 2 people that she should have been able to rely on more than anyone let her down in the worst way.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 minutes ago
What's incredible is that these two parents, who apparently were involved in the death of their daughter, have managed to do such a good job of the cover up that a worldwide investigation involving both the local police and the UK police has been unable to uncover ANY evidence of their involvement.
They are clearly master criminals and our only hope is that the sharp minds of social media can piece it all together.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Having a suspicious face overrides the fact that there is no evidence.
Also Kate was drinking red wine in 2016.
comment by dunc manson... you must follow ole... you must follow ole (U11713)
posted 49 seconds ago
how is it judgemental... its what they fecking did Robb... their daughter is probably dead ( regardless of who did it) ultimately because of their neglect... and they deserve sympathy for that?
not in my eyes, like i said, the only one deserving of any sympathy is Maddie herself, and if she is dead, i hope for her sake it was quick.
the 2 people that she should have been able to rely on more than anyone let her down in the worst way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So do you blame them as much as the killer?
comment by dunc manson... you must follow ole... you must... (U11713)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 9 hours, 11 minutes ago
The whole 48 questions thing is irrelevant to this debate anyway.
The debate is about this German guy and if he is found guilty, will people apologise to the mccanns for finding them guilty in their minds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
will i feck apologise to them.
what part of they left their 3 very young children alone, in a foreign country to go out on the razz do you not understand.
i have absolutely zero fecking sympathy for thoseunts whatsoever, the sympathy should ALL lie with the poor girl that they fecking neglected because they deemed a few wines as more important.
their lack of care is what putt Maddie in that position.
the fact they kept their other 2 kids is a fecking disgrace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but advocating that the other two children are taken into care?
Facking hell, there's some bizarre people in this world.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 27 seconds ago
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but advocating that the other two children are taken into care?
Facking hell, there's some bizarre people in this world.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some people want their pound of flesh.
They should win parents of the year according to you two jokers
comment by CanULeiva (U18359)
posted 3 minutes ago
They should win parents of the year according to you two jokers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, that’s exactly what we’re saying 🙄
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but advocating that the other two children are taken into care?
Facking hell, there's some bizarre people in this world.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah, theyre the ones that leave their kids unattended while they go out on the pisssss.
if that was any normal family they would have lost their remaining kids.
those unts dont deserve kids
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by dunc manson... you must follow ole... you must follow ole (U11713)
posted 49 seconds ago
how is it judgemental... its what they fecking did Robb... their daughter is probably dead ( regardless of who did it) ultimately because of their neglect... and they deserve sympathy for that?
not in my eyes, like i said, the only one deserving of any sympathy is Maddie herself, and if she is dead, i hope for her sake it was quick.
the 2 people that she should have been able to rely on more than anyone let her down in the worst way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So do you blame them as much as the killer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what, you want a blame percentage or something ffs
the fact is simple... no neglect, no missing child.
and lets be honest here Robb, there is still a chance that she was killed by her parents (albeit by accident possibly).
how many so called leads and suspects have fallen by the wayside
Sign in if you want to comment
Madeleine McCann
Page 14 of 64
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19
posted on 4/6/20
1. Did they use the babysitting service provided? NO
2. Did they use any listening devices? NO
3. Did they leave three children under 4 alone while going out drinking? YES
4. Did they do this every night? YES
5. Did they,under British law,endanger Maddie? YES
6. In the UK is significant harm a form of child abuse? YES
7. Is significant harm used by the UK courts in child abuse cases? YES
8. Does leaving the children as they did qualify under these rules ? YES
9. Did Kate sit writing timelines instead of searching for Maddie? YES
10. Are the frequent checks by the Tapas group challenged by other witnesses? YES
11. Was the bedroom withing sight of where they sat? NO
12, Were they within earshot? NO
13. Did anyone other than Tanner see any abductor? NO
14. Has anyone come up with a credible abductor? NO
15. Is there any evidence of an abduction? NO
16. Were the shutters in the room tampered with? NO
17. Did Kate say the shutters were tampered with? YES
18. Did Kate change her story to saying the door was unlocked? YES
19. Was the door unlocked on any other night? NO
20. Is there any physical evidence at all of a break in? NO
21. Is there any physical evidence of another party being in the room? NO
23. Were the McCann's told not to inform the media? YES
24. Were they told it might harm the chances of finding Maddie alive? YES
25. Were the media informed by a McCann family member? YES
26. Were specially trained British dogs brought in to search the apartment ? YES
27. Did they find anything? YES
28. Have these dogs been successful in over 200 cases? YES
29. Do sniffer dogs lie? NO
30. Do the specially trained dogs get confused by other smells? NO
31. Did they find cadaver(dead body) scent in the apartment? YES
32. Did they find blood? YES
33. Did they find cadaver scent behind the sofa? YES
34. On the child's toy? YES
35. In a cupboard in the room? YES
36. Did they find cadaver scent on Kate's clothes? YES
37. Did Kate explain this by saying she had examined dead bodies before holiday? YES
38. Is there any record of her doing so? NO
39. Has anyone come forward to say they saw her doing so? NO
40. Was the hire car rented after Maddie disappeared ? YES
41. Were tests done on DNA found in the car? YES
42. Did the dogs alert to the hire car? YES
43. Is a billion to one odds that it may be someone else's DNA? YES
44. Were the doors and boot left open to get rid of the smell in the car? YES
45. Did the parents explain it away as rotting meat? YES
46. Smelling due to taking rubbish to the tip in the hire car? YES
47. Smelling due to dirty nappies in the hire car? YES
48. Smell due to sea bass in the hire car? YES
49. Did the parents say the dogs were wrong? YES
50. Do you need tons of excuses if the dogs are just plain wrong? NO
51. Have the dogs ever been wrong? NO
52. Did Kate & Gerry flee Portugal? YES
53. Did they hire extradition lawyers? YES
54. Did the McCann's hire libel lawyers to gag anyone with a different view? YES
55. Did the government lend spin doctor Clarence Mitchell to the parents? YES
56. Dio spin doctors twist the truth for a favourable outcome? YES
57. Are they paid to do this? YES
58. Did the McCann's set up a fund in order to search for Maddie? YES
59. Did they use the money donated for anything other than searching? YES
60. Do the parents have a media monitoring unit? YES
61. Are there internet trolls helping the parents to quash getting at the truth? YES
62. Have the Portuguese police been portrayed as incompetent? YES
63. Did they look at all aspects of the case? YES
64. Did they conclude any abduction took place? NO
65. Did they conclude that Maddie was dead and the parents responsible? YES
66. Are there two British investigations into Maddie being missing? YES
67. Are they investigating ALL aspects of the case? NO
68. Have they been told by the government to focus on abduction only? YES
69. Have they come up with any evidence of an abduction? NO
70. Have they come up with any credible suspects? NO
71. Have they questioned the tapas group or parents over the case? NO
72. Have the parents made millions from Maddie being missing? YES
73. Did Kate write a book mentioning torn genitalia that the twins might read? YES
74. Did Gerry have his wallet stolen at Waterloo station as he claimed? NO
75. Does the CCTV footage from that day bear out his claims? NO
76. Did the Portuguese police ask British government for medical records? YES
77. Were they handed over? NO
78. Did they ask for bank statements? YES
79. Were they handed over ? NO
80. Did they ask for mobile phone records? YES
81. Were they handed over? NO
82. Have the media printed the McCann version of events? YES
83. Are the media intimidated by threats of libel? YES
84. Have the parents admitted they are responsible for Maddie's disappearance? NO
85. Have the parents faced any criminal charges to date? NO
86. No charges for manslaughter? NO
87. For neglect? NO
88. Did the McCann's say they would take a polygraph(lie detector test) ? YES
89. Did the McCann "people" contact Don Cargill head of polygraph studies?YES
90. Did the McCann's tell the world they would take one to prove innocence? YES
91. Have they taken one in the 2'000+ days since saying they would? NO
92. Did the parents impose a list of conditions for taking one? YES
93. Did Don Cargill say the list was "impossible to satisfy"? YES
94. Did Don Cargill state "They had no intention of taking one"? YES
95. Did Clarence Mitchell say they were innocent and did not need to do one? YES
96. IS Amaral on trial because he wrote a book stating the facts of the case? YES
97. Is it a proper account of the police investigation ? YES
98. Have the McCann's fought desperately to have this book banned? YES
99. Is it banned? NO
100. Is maddie missing because of the actions of the parents? YES
48 questions I would like Kate McCann to answer.
1. Why did you not physically search for Madeleine?
2. Why did you leave the twins when you realised Madeleine was missing, risking them also being taken?
3. What did you mean by 'they've taken her'. Who's 'they' Kate?
4. Why did you refuse to answer police questioning that could have helped find your daughter?
5. At the time, Gordon Brown was Chancellor of the Exchequer, not the Foreign Secretary. So why did he put so much pressure on the Portuguese police?
6. Why did you wash cuddle cat?
7. Where is Madeleine's pink blanket now, we know it was on her bed 4th May?
8. Why did you lie about the shutters being smashed/jemmied/broken?
9. Why did you change your original statement from the door being locked to the door being unlocked?
10. Why did you presume Madeleine had been abducted when there was no evidence to suggest she had been?
11. What happened to the blue sports bag that was in your wardrobe?
12. Why didn't the twins wake up the night Madeleine disappeared when there were people constantly walking in and out of their room?
13. Why did you dismiss the dogs evidence knowing that they had been right in at least 200 cases?
14. Why was Madeleine's DNA found in the boot of the hire car that had been hired 24 days after her disappearance?
15. How could you and Gerry find it in you to laugh/jog/play tennis days after your daughters disappearance?
16. Why did you get the media involved so early on ignoring the advise from the Portuguese police?
17. Why did it take 45 minutes for the police to be called?
18. Why are there so many inconsistency in all of your statements?
19. Why were the checks more consistent on the night Madeleine was reported missing?
20. Why was Madeleine crying for an hour and 15 minutes even though phone records prove Kate was in the apartment 3 minutes before?
21. Why did you hire Carter Ruck lawyers, especially the one that specialised in extraditions?
22. Why has only 10% of the fund been spent on the search?
23. Why did you suppress the E-Fits that are being used in the current investigation, is it because the Smiths identified your husband as the man they saw carrying Madeleine towards the beach the night of Madeleine's disappearance?
24. Why is your online shop still up and running even though there is 2 ongoing investigations?
25. Why did the government assign their spin doctor to control what is said about you in the media less than 24 hours after Madeleine's disappearance?
26. Why did you leave Portugal so quickly after being made arguidos?
27. Why did you lie about cuddle cat being high up on a shelf?
28. What on earth did you mean by this comment - "The police don't want a murder in Portugal and all the publicity about them not having paedophile laws here, so they're blaming us,"?
29. Why did you celebrate Madeleine's 4th birthday, shouldn't you have been searching?
30. Why is the fund not registered with the Charities Commission?
31. Why do you think it's acceptable to talk about your child's 'perfect genitals being torn apart' in your book?
32. Why is there no mention of Katerina Gaspers statement in your book, accusing David Payne of making inappropriate comments about your child to your husband?
33. Why did you draw so much attention to Madeleine's eye after the PJ warned you it could push the 'abductors' to harm her?
34. Why did you discount Mrs Fenns account of the crying?
35. What files does Theresa May have that she refuses to share with Portugal?
36. Why did you refuse to do reconstruction?
37. Why have you said you wish Gonçalo to be miserable and feel fear, he did everything possible to search for your child until he uncovered the truth of what you did to her?
38. Why were you happy with courting the media as long as they only reported an abduction?
39. Why are you suing people that are asking questions or purporting a theory?
40. Why did you spend £100K getting the police files translated but haven't released them?
41. Will you refund anyone who gave donations who have now read the evidence, should they want one?
42. How could the curtains 'Whooosh!' When they were trapped between the bed and the chair?
43. Why did it take you 144 days to get the twins tested to see if they had been sedated the night Madeleine disappeared?
44. What was in Gerry CATS file before it was sanitised?
45. How did the intruder manage to leave no forensic evidence?
46. Why was there no DNA found belonging to Madeleine in the apartment, forcing Gerry to return home to collect her pillowcase?
47. WHERE THE HELL ARE YOU WHILST THE POLICE ARE DIGGING UP LUZ KATE?
48. Why will you go to Portugal to attend the libel trial in the hope of receiving a million pound pay out but not while the police are trying to dig up your child's body?
posted on 4/6/20
comment by Diafol Coch 77 - A Reputable Poster (U2462)
posted 1 minute ago
The bottom line for me is this.
They shouldn't have left her alone and the abductor shouldn't have committed the crime.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were on holiday in a resort and complex that had no history of violence or sexxual preditors.
It was 13 years ago and things were different back then(because of this case and other high profile cases).You are in holiday mood in a safe enviroment and you make an error of judgement.
Many many others have done the same as you beforehand with no consequences,you are the ones who pay and you pay dearly.
Your 3 yr old daughter is missing and your worst nightmare is happening,not only is it happening it's taking place in a foreign country and in front of the world's media.
What is normal to anyone in this situation.Yet some on here are condemning the McCanns for how they reacted to the media
posted on 5/6/20
Those saying that others without kids wouldn't understand are protesting too much. I reckon they've killed kids in the past and are trying to cover it up now. Something just not right about them
posted on 5/6/20
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by RB&W "PPE for NHS heroes" (U21434)
posted 50 seconds ago
Robb
She invoked her right to remain silent in protest at being treated as a suspect.
She later said that she refused to co-operate because she thought the police treating her as a suspect was distracting them from the work they should have been doing to find Madeleine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine your daughter at the age of 4 yrs old was abducted.Imagine that you've already answered all questions put to you as a distraught parent wanting the best for your daughter.
Then imagine being totally innocent of any crime committed being told you are a prime suspect.
Put yourself in their shoes
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd have answered every question asked by the police in an attempt to prove my innocence so that they would discount me as the guilry party and start looking for my child.
posted on 5/6/20
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 31 seconds ago
Some people on this thread, especially so-called parents, have absolutely no compassion or humanity for either the abducted child or her parents.
Grow up ffs!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apparently they look guilty which is enough to find them guilty in the court of public opinion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As soon as I saw Ian Huntley on TV I said to my mum that he did it. I know a few other people that felt the same. There is something not right about the McCanns. They are hiding something. But I suspect it is more likely to hide the level that they neglected their children rather than hiding the fact that they were actually involved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How exactly are they hiding that? The whole world knows they left the kids alone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think that they have probably lied about how often they were checking on the kids.
posted on 5/6/20
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 - A Reputable Poster (U2462)
posted 1 minute ago
The bottom line for me is this.
They shouldn't have left her alone and the abductor shouldn't have committed the crime.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were on holiday in a resort and complex that had no history of violence or sexxual preditors.
It was 13 years ago and things were different back then(because of this case and other high profile cases).You are in holiday mood in a safe enviroment and you make an error of judgement.
Many many others have done the same as you beforehand with no consequences,you are the ones who pay and you pay dearly.
Your 3 yr old daughter is missing and your worst nightmare is happening,not only is it happening it's taking place in a foreign country and in front of the world's media.
What is normal to anyone in this situation.Yet some on here are condemning the McCanns for how they reacted to the media
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Things have changed in 13 years? Give over. It's not a generation ago. Leaving their kids like they did was neglect. Unfortunately their daughter paid the price.
posted on 5/6/20
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
The whole 48 questions thing is irrelevant to this debate anyway.
....
It was very relevant to a question someone asked. Just because it doesn’t fit your agenda didn’t mean it is irrelevant.
posted on 5/6/20
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 6 hours, 10 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 - A Reputable Poster (U2462)
posted 1 minute ago
The bottom line for me is this.
They shouldn't have left her alone and the abductor shouldn't have committed the crime.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were on holiday in a resort and complex that had no history of violence or sexxual preditors.
It was 13 years ago and things were different back then(because of this case and other high profile cases).You are in holiday mood in a safe enviroment and you make an error of judgement.
Many many others have done the same as you beforehand with no consequences,you are the ones who pay and you pay dearly.
Your 3 yr old daughter is missing and your worst nightmare is happening,not only is it happening it's taking place in a foreign country and in front of the world's media.
What is normal to anyone in this situation.Yet some on here are condemning the McCanns for how they reacted to the media
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Things have changed in 13 years? Give over. It's not a generation ago. Leaving their kids like they did was neglect. Unfortunately their daughter paid the price.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The answer to 14 is apparently yes.
The question for the others is Wht aren't they in prison.
posted on 5/6/20
Where did the 48 questions come from?
posted on 5/6/20
It's the bottom line for me too Diafol. But I don't put the two things anywhere near each other in terms of culpability.
posted on 5/6/20
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 39 minutes ago
It's the bottom line for me too Diafol. But I don't put the two things anywhere near each other in terms of culpability.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know it's not exactly the same but when I moved in with my partner for our first house together it was rented accommodation in a pretty rough part of town.
The first night i was there I daftly left my mountain bike by the back door overnight and by the morning it had gone. My fault for leaving it out but mainly the theif's fault for pinching it. All my mistake cost me though is an old bike but it also taught me a lesson in security. I've never had anything pinched from my house since.
posted on 5/6/20
Some top quality investigative analysis from the JA606 team here.
This was my personal favourite:
"As soon as I saw Ian Huntley on TV I said to my mum that he did it. I know a few other people that felt the same. There is something not right about the McCanns. They are hiding something."
Elvis, you have a gift mate - please offer your services to law enforcement.
Maybe design your own uniform. With a cape.
posted on 5/6/20
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 9 hours, 11 minutes ago
The whole 48 questions thing is irrelevant to this debate anyway.
The debate is about this German guy and if he is found guilty, will people apologise to the mccanns for finding them guilty in their minds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
will i feck apologise to them.
what part of they left their 3 very young children alone, in a foreign country to go out on the razz do you not understand.
i have absolutely zero fecking sympathy for those unts whatsoever, the sympathy should ALL lie with the poor girl that they fecking neglected because they deemed a few wines as more important.
their lack of care is what putt Maddie in that position.
the fact they kept their other 2 kids is a fecking disgrace.
posted on 5/6/20
What's incredible is that these two parents, who apparently were involved in the death of their daughter, have managed to do such a good job of the cover up that a worldwide investigation involving both the local police and the UK police has been unable to uncover ANY evidence of their involvement.
They are clearly master criminals and our only hope is that the sharp minds of social media can piece it all together.
posted on 5/6/20
comment by dunc manson... you must follow ole... you must follow ole (U11713)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 9 hours, 11 minutes ago
The whole 48 questions thing is irrelevant to this debate anyway.
The debate is about this German guy and if he is found guilty, will people apologise to the mccanns for finding them guilty in their minds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
will i feck apologise to them.
what part of they left their 3 very young children alone, in a foreign country to go out on the razz do you not understand.
i have absolutely zero fecking sympathy for thoseunts whatsoever, the sympathy should ALL lie with the poor girl that they fecking neglected because they deemed a few wines as more important.
their lack of care is what putt Maddie in that position.
the fact they kept their other 2 kids is a fecking disgrace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeez, so much judgemental wrath. If that’s what you say to them, I wonder what you feel about the German guy who did it (if he’s found guilty). I suspect you apportion equal blame to both the parents and the killer based on how little empathy you have to the parents.
posted on 5/6/20
how is it judgemental... its what they fecking did Robb... their daughter is probably dead ( regardless of who did it) ultimately because of their neglect... and they deserve sympathy for that?
not in my eyes, like i said, the only one deserving of any sympathy is Maddie herself, and if she is dead, i hope for her sake it was quick.
the 2 people that she should have been able to rely on more than anyone let her down in the worst way.
posted on 5/6/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 minutes ago
What's incredible is that these two parents, who apparently were involved in the death of their daughter, have managed to do such a good job of the cover up that a worldwide investigation involving both the local police and the UK police has been unable to uncover ANY evidence of their involvement.
They are clearly master criminals and our only hope is that the sharp minds of social media can piece it all together.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Having a suspicious face overrides the fact that there is no evidence.
Also Kate was drinking red wine in 2016.
posted on 5/6/20
comment by dunc manson... you must follow ole... you must follow ole (U11713)
posted 49 seconds ago
how is it judgemental... its what they fecking did Robb... their daughter is probably dead ( regardless of who did it) ultimately because of their neglect... and they deserve sympathy for that?
not in my eyes, like i said, the only one deserving of any sympathy is Maddie herself, and if she is dead, i hope for her sake it was quick.
the 2 people that she should have been able to rely on more than anyone let her down in the worst way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So do you blame them as much as the killer?
posted on 5/6/20
comment by dunc manson... you must follow ole... you must... (U11713)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 9 hours, 11 minutes ago
The whole 48 questions thing is irrelevant to this debate anyway.
The debate is about this German guy and if he is found guilty, will people apologise to the mccanns for finding them guilty in their minds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
will i feck apologise to them.
what part of they left their 3 very young children alone, in a foreign country to go out on the razz do you not understand.
i have absolutely zero fecking sympathy for thoseunts whatsoever, the sympathy should ALL lie with the poor girl that they fecking neglected because they deemed a few wines as more important.
their lack of care is what putt Maddie in that position.
the fact they kept their other 2 kids is a fecking disgrace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This
posted on 5/6/20
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but advocating that the other two children are taken into care?
Facking hell, there's some bizarre people in this world.
posted on 5/6/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 27 seconds ago
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but advocating that the other two children are taken into care?
Facking hell, there's some bizarre people in this world.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some people want their pound of flesh.
posted on 5/6/20
They should win parents of the year according to you two jokers
posted on 5/6/20
comment by CanULeiva (U18359)
posted 3 minutes ago
They should win parents of the year according to you two jokers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, that’s exactly what we’re saying 🙄
posted on 5/6/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but advocating that the other two children are taken into care?
Facking hell, there's some bizarre people in this world.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah, theyre the ones that leave their kids unattended while they go out on the pisssss.
if that was any normal family they would have lost their remaining kids.
those unts dont deserve kids
posted on 5/6/20
comment by Robb Sancho (U22311)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by dunc manson... you must follow ole... you must follow ole (U11713)
posted 49 seconds ago
how is it judgemental... its what they fecking did Robb... their daughter is probably dead ( regardless of who did it) ultimately because of their neglect... and they deserve sympathy for that?
not in my eyes, like i said, the only one deserving of any sympathy is Maddie herself, and if she is dead, i hope for her sake it was quick.
the 2 people that she should have been able to rely on more than anyone let her down in the worst way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So do you blame them as much as the killer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what, you want a blame percentage or something ffs
the fact is simple... no neglect, no missing child.
and lets be honest here Robb, there is still a chance that she was killed by her parents (albeit by accident possibly).
how many so called leads and suspects have fallen by the wayside
Page 14 of 64
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19