The manager reverted to his old ways off the park. He’s looked a mess since we won the title last season and he’s lost all motivation by the looks of it. I’ve never seen him so lethargic looking.
We were 2-0 against rangers and he sat in the dugout no giving a fluck
It’s been an almighty fluck up this season, 10 is gone so it’s important we regroup and ensure we win the title next season as that’s likely to mean straight into the CL group stages the following season as well.
the strange thing is and as some on recent threads have said Lawell did very well for celtic (and himself ofc) he implemented a successful model of signing mid price talent with potential and selling on for huge profit.
Thats obviously a model Rangers are planning to follow.
The problem is that in that model you need to find replacements at the same price you paid for those assets not the price you recouped. Celtic had been doing that.
Somewhere along the line though (maybe about 3 seasons ago) the recruitment has changed. The money has absolutely been provided but what has been brought in has been disastrous.
Did something massively change in recruitment/scouting?
John Park has been a massive loss outside of the striking department.
We also stopped scouting English league 1 and 2 where there are bargain buys to be had and opted for foreign transfers that by and large have turned out to be disasters.
The guy rangers got from Southampton, is it Wilson? He’s highly regarded in his role whereas we have Lawwell doing that job as well as being CEO
Can't help yourselves, putting your foot in the schit again. Class but to be expected now, you're a basketcase club.
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 6 minutes ago
the strange thing is and as some on recent threads have said Lawell did very well for celtic (and himself ofc) he implemented a successful model of signing mid price talent with potential and selling on for huge profit.
Thats obviously a model Rangers are planning to follow.
The problem is that in that model you need to find replacements at the same price you paid for those assets not the price you recouped. Celtic had been doing that.
Somewhere along the line though (maybe about 3 seasons ago) the recruitment has changed. The money has absolutely been provided but what has been brought in has been disastrous.
Did something massively change in recruitment/scouting?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like everything else when you change staff for the same money and hope for a return on investment you run the risk of them not being as good, not becoming the reality from the prospect and it runs right through the business including the role of recruitment.
Coupled with what seems like never ending success there can often be an arrogance in the belief you can do no wrong.
Lawwell’s statement, amazingly has made things worse. How is that even possible?
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 21 seconds ago
Lawwell’s statement, amazingly has made things worse. How is that even possible?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See above re arrogance
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 6 minutes ago
the strange thing is and as some on recent threads have said Lawell did very well for celtic (and himself ofc) he implemented a successful model of signing mid price talent with potential and selling on for huge profit.
Thats obviously a model Rangers are planning to follow.
The problem is that in that model you need to find replacements at the same price you paid for those assets not the price you recouped. Celtic had been doing that.
Somewhere along the line though (maybe about 3 seasons ago) the recruitment has changed. The money has absolutely been provided but what has been brought in has been disastrous.
Did something massively change in recruitment/scouting?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like everything else when you change staff for the same money and hope for a return on investment you run the risk of them not being as good, not becoming the reality from the prospect and it runs right through the business including the role of recruitment.
Coupled with what seems like never ending success there can often be an arrogance in the belief you can do no wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hubris seen it many times in business
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competen... (U3633)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 6 minutes ago
the strange thing is and as some on recent threads have said Lawell did very well for celtic (and himself ofc) he implemented a successful model of signing mid price talent with potential and selling on for huge profit.
Thats obviously a model Rangers are planning to follow.
The problem is that in that model you need to find replacements at the same price you paid for those assets not the price you recouped. Celtic had been doing that.
Somewhere along the line though (maybe about 3 seasons ago) the recruitment has changed. The money has absolutely been provided but what has been brought in has been disastrous.
Did something massively change in recruitment/scouting?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like everything else when you change staff for the same money and hope for a return on investment you run the risk of them not being as good, not becoming the reality from the prospect and it runs right through the business including the role of recruitment.
Coupled with what seems like never ending success there can often be an arrogance in the belief you can do no wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hubris seen it many times in business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And Celtic is a business
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competen... (U3633)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 6 minutes ago
the strange thing is and as some on recent threads have said Lawell did very well for celtic (and himself ofc) he implemented a successful model of signing mid price talent with potential and selling on for huge profit.
Thats obviously a model Rangers are planning to follow.
The problem is that in that model you need to find replacements at the same price you paid for those assets not the price you recouped. Celtic had been doing that.
Somewhere along the line though (maybe about 3 seasons ago) the recruitment has changed. The money has absolutely been provided but what has been brought in has been disastrous.
Did something massively change in recruitment/scouting?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like everything else when you change staff for the same money and hope for a return on investment you run the risk of them not being as good, not becoming the reality from the prospect and it runs right through the business including the role of recruitment.
Coupled with what seems like never ending success there can often be an arrogance in the belief you can do no wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hubris seen it many times in business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And Celtic is a business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In decline it seems 👍
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competen... (U3633)
posted 49 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competen... (U3633)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 6 minutes ago
the strange thing is and as some on recent threads have said Lawell did very well for celtic (and himself ofc) he implemented a successful model of signing mid price talent with potential and selling on for huge profit.
Thats obviously a model Rangers are planning to follow.
The problem is that in that model you need to find replacements at the same price you paid for those assets not the price you recouped. Celtic had been doing that.
Somewhere along the line though (maybe about 3 seasons ago) the recruitment has changed. The money has absolutely been provided but what has been brought in has been disastrous.
Did something massively change in recruitment/scouting?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like everything else when you change staff for the same money and hope for a return on investment you run the risk of them not being as good, not becoming the reality from the prospect and it runs right through the business including the role of recruitment.
Coupled with what seems like never ending success there can often be an arrogance in the belief you can do no wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hubris seen it many times in business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And Celtic is a business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In decline it seems 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As are almost every business in this climate.
See the Villa game is called off again.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competen... (U3633)
posted 49 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competen... (U3633)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 6 minutes ago
the strange thing is and as some on recent threads have said Lawell did very well for celtic (and himself ofc) he implemented a successful model of signing mid price talent with potential and selling on for huge profit.
Thats obviously a model Rangers are planning to follow.
The problem is that in that model you need to find replacements at the same price you paid for those assets not the price you recouped. Celtic had been doing that.
Somewhere along the line though (maybe about 3 seasons ago) the recruitment has changed. The money has absolutely been provided but what has been brought in has been disastrous.
Did something massively change in recruitment/scouting?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like everything else when you change staff for the same money and hope for a return on investment you run the risk of them not being as good, not becoming the reality from the prospect and it runs right through the business including the role of recruitment.
Coupled with what seems like never ending success there can often be an arrogance in the belief you can do no wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hubris seen it many times in business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And Celtic is a business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In decline it seems 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As are almost every business in this climate.
See the Villa game is called off again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think a few bears may have a thing or two to say noo
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Nobody is knocking the past achievements everyone appreciates the success and we’re surprised about how long it lasted
The gripe is how can we fall so far in such a short space of time
comment by Ghod#18 (U9390)
posted 9 seconds ago
The gripe is how can we fall so far in such a short space of time
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You capture the gravity of the situation
I know a guy whose step brother is the Analytics guy at Celtic who was there and his wife and kids were there too
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 seconds ago
Right........
And?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wife and kids there ?, aye ok no problem
comment by Laudrup (U12366)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 seconds ago
Right........
And?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wife and kids there ?, aye ok no problem
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yes...and..?
comment by Zico - IX (U21900)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Laudrup (U12366)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 seconds ago
Right........
And?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wife and kids there ?, aye ok no problem
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yes...and..?
--------------------😁🤣😂😂🤣😁--------------------------------------------------
Honestly Laudrup
We can see that you know someone in analytics at Celtic and that his wife and kids are there too.
What about it?
Sign in if you want to comment
Celtic Academy players on furlough
Page 4 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 14/1/21
The manager reverted to his old ways off the park. He’s looked a mess since we won the title last season and he’s lost all motivation by the looks of it. I’ve never seen him so lethargic looking.
We were 2-0 against rangers and he sat in the dugout no giving a fluck
It’s been an almighty fluck up this season, 10 is gone so it’s important we regroup and ensure we win the title next season as that’s likely to mean straight into the CL group stages the following season as well.
posted on 14/1/21
the strange thing is and as some on recent threads have said Lawell did very well for celtic (and himself ofc) he implemented a successful model of signing mid price talent with potential and selling on for huge profit.
Thats obviously a model Rangers are planning to follow.
The problem is that in that model you need to find replacements at the same price you paid for those assets not the price you recouped. Celtic had been doing that.
Somewhere along the line though (maybe about 3 seasons ago) the recruitment has changed. The money has absolutely been provided but what has been brought in has been disastrous.
Did something massively change in recruitment/scouting?
posted on 14/1/21
John Park has been a massive loss outside of the striking department.
We also stopped scouting English league 1 and 2 where there are bargain buys to be had and opted for foreign transfers that by and large have turned out to be disasters.
posted on 14/1/21
The guy rangers got from Southampton, is it Wilson? He’s highly regarded in his role whereas we have Lawwell doing that job as well as being CEO
posted on 14/1/21
Can't help yourselves, putting your foot in the schit again. Class but to be expected now, you're a basketcase club.
posted on 14/1/21
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 6 minutes ago
the strange thing is and as some on recent threads have said Lawell did very well for celtic (and himself ofc) he implemented a successful model of signing mid price talent with potential and selling on for huge profit.
Thats obviously a model Rangers are planning to follow.
The problem is that in that model you need to find replacements at the same price you paid for those assets not the price you recouped. Celtic had been doing that.
Somewhere along the line though (maybe about 3 seasons ago) the recruitment has changed. The money has absolutely been provided but what has been brought in has been disastrous.
Did something massively change in recruitment/scouting?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like everything else when you change staff for the same money and hope for a return on investment you run the risk of them not being as good, not becoming the reality from the prospect and it runs right through the business including the role of recruitment.
Coupled with what seems like never ending success there can often be an arrogance in the belief you can do no wrong.
posted on 14/1/21
Lawwell’s statement, amazingly has made things worse. How is that even possible?
posted on 14/1/21
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 21 seconds ago
Lawwell’s statement, amazingly has made things worse. How is that even possible?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See above re arrogance
posted on 14/1/21
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 6 minutes ago
the strange thing is and as some on recent threads have said Lawell did very well for celtic (and himself ofc) he implemented a successful model of signing mid price talent with potential and selling on for huge profit.
Thats obviously a model Rangers are planning to follow.
The problem is that in that model you need to find replacements at the same price you paid for those assets not the price you recouped. Celtic had been doing that.
Somewhere along the line though (maybe about 3 seasons ago) the recruitment has changed. The money has absolutely been provided but what has been brought in has been disastrous.
Did something massively change in recruitment/scouting?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like everything else when you change staff for the same money and hope for a return on investment you run the risk of them not being as good, not becoming the reality from the prospect and it runs right through the business including the role of recruitment.
Coupled with what seems like never ending success there can often be an arrogance in the belief you can do no wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hubris seen it many times in business
posted on 14/1/21
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competen... (U3633)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 6 minutes ago
the strange thing is and as some on recent threads have said Lawell did very well for celtic (and himself ofc) he implemented a successful model of signing mid price talent with potential and selling on for huge profit.
Thats obviously a model Rangers are planning to follow.
The problem is that in that model you need to find replacements at the same price you paid for those assets not the price you recouped. Celtic had been doing that.
Somewhere along the line though (maybe about 3 seasons ago) the recruitment has changed. The money has absolutely been provided but what has been brought in has been disastrous.
Did something massively change in recruitment/scouting?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like everything else when you change staff for the same money and hope for a return on investment you run the risk of them not being as good, not becoming the reality from the prospect and it runs right through the business including the role of recruitment.
Coupled with what seems like never ending success there can often be an arrogance in the belief you can do no wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hubris seen it many times in business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And Celtic is a business
posted on 14/1/21
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competen... (U3633)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 6 minutes ago
the strange thing is and as some on recent threads have said Lawell did very well for celtic (and himself ofc) he implemented a successful model of signing mid price talent with potential and selling on for huge profit.
Thats obviously a model Rangers are planning to follow.
The problem is that in that model you need to find replacements at the same price you paid for those assets not the price you recouped. Celtic had been doing that.
Somewhere along the line though (maybe about 3 seasons ago) the recruitment has changed. The money has absolutely been provided but what has been brought in has been disastrous.
Did something massively change in recruitment/scouting?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like everything else when you change staff for the same money and hope for a return on investment you run the risk of them not being as good, not becoming the reality from the prospect and it runs right through the business including the role of recruitment.
Coupled with what seems like never ending success there can often be an arrogance in the belief you can do no wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hubris seen it many times in business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And Celtic is a business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In decline it seems 👍
posted on 14/1/21
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competen... (U3633)
posted 49 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competen... (U3633)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 6 minutes ago
the strange thing is and as some on recent threads have said Lawell did very well for celtic (and himself ofc) he implemented a successful model of signing mid price talent with potential and selling on for huge profit.
Thats obviously a model Rangers are planning to follow.
The problem is that in that model you need to find replacements at the same price you paid for those assets not the price you recouped. Celtic had been doing that.
Somewhere along the line though (maybe about 3 seasons ago) the recruitment has changed. The money has absolutely been provided but what has been brought in has been disastrous.
Did something massively change in recruitment/scouting?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like everything else when you change staff for the same money and hope for a return on investment you run the risk of them not being as good, not becoming the reality from the prospect and it runs right through the business including the role of recruitment.
Coupled with what seems like never ending success there can often be an arrogance in the belief you can do no wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hubris seen it many times in business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And Celtic is a business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In decline it seems 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As are almost every business in this climate.
See the Villa game is called off again.
posted on 14/1/21
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competen... (U3633)
posted 49 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competen... (U3633)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum... (U14864)
posted 6 minutes ago
the strange thing is and as some on recent threads have said Lawell did very well for celtic (and himself ofc) he implemented a successful model of signing mid price talent with potential and selling on for huge profit.
Thats obviously a model Rangers are planning to follow.
The problem is that in that model you need to find replacements at the same price you paid for those assets not the price you recouped. Celtic had been doing that.
Somewhere along the line though (maybe about 3 seasons ago) the recruitment has changed. The money has absolutely been provided but what has been brought in has been disastrous.
Did something massively change in recruitment/scouting?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like everything else when you change staff for the same money and hope for a return on investment you run the risk of them not being as good, not becoming the reality from the prospect and it runs right through the business including the role of recruitment.
Coupled with what seems like never ending success there can often be an arrogance in the belief you can do no wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hubris seen it many times in business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And Celtic is a business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In decline it seems 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As are almost every business in this climate.
See the Villa game is called off again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think a few bears may have a thing or two to say noo
posted on 14/1/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/1/21
Nobody is knocking the past achievements everyone appreciates the success and we’re surprised about how long it lasted
The gripe is how can we fall so far in such a short space of time
posted on 14/1/21
comment by Ghod#18 (U9390)
posted 9 seconds ago
The gripe is how can we fall so far in such a short space of time
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You capture the gravity of the situation
posted on 14/1/21
I know a guy whose step brother is the Analytics guy at Celtic who was there and his wife and kids were there too
posted on 14/1/21
Right........
And?
posted on 14/1/21
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 seconds ago
Right........
And?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wife and kids there ?, aye ok no problem
posted on 14/1/21
comment by Laudrup (U12366)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 seconds ago
Right........
And?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wife and kids there ?, aye ok no problem
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yes...and..?
posted on 14/1/21
comment by Zico - IX (U21900)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Laudrup (U12366)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 seconds ago
Right........
And?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wife and kids there ?, aye ok no problem
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yes...and..?
--------------------😁🤣😂😂🤣😁--------------------------------------------------
posted on 14/1/21
Great patter that 😁🤣😂
posted on 14/1/21
Is it no
Right and?
posted on 14/1/21
Honestly Laudrup
We can see that you know someone in analytics at Celtic and that his wife and kids are there too.
What about it?
posted on 14/1/21
You mean in Dubai?
Page 4 of 8
6 | 7 | 8