Paedophiles say they are born that way.
-----------------
What an utterly stupid comparison
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why should anyone be forced to accept that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Accept what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Homosexuality. Many people, for many reasons, do not accept it - including these sports people. Why should they be denied the right to do their job on the basis of their private beliefs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's as ridiculous as not accepting black people, people with ginger hair, accepting women etc. I'm pretty sure people are born gay, they don't choose to be, same as the other examples I mentioned.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Paedophiles say they are born that way. Murder is one of the most natural human instincts. Neither is acceptable to the majority of us.
Many people see homosexuality as a big a crime as either of those. And if that belief is kept private and they don't push hate or act on it then why should they not be allowed their belief? Why should they be forced to wear a symbol of something they are against?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I do think the Poppy is different to this too. You can have an ethical stance on war etc because, ultimately, war is a choice. Being homosexual isn't.
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why should anyone be forced to accept that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Accept what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Homosexuality. Many people, for many reasons, do not accept it - including these sports people. Why should they be denied the right to do their job on the basis of their private beliefs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's as ridiculous as not accepting black people, people with ginger hair, accepting women etc. I'm pretty sure people are born gay, they don't choose to be, same as the other examples I mentioned.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Paedophiles say they are born that way. Murder is one of the most natural human instincts. Neither is acceptable to the majority of us.
Many people see homosexuality as a big a crime as either of those. And if that belief is kept private and they don't push hate or act on it then why should they not be allowed their belief? Why should they be forced to wear a symbol of something they are against?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are you using paedophillia to compare with homosexuality? These are vastly different things
I will never be able to get my head around homophobia.
Especially from people claiming to be Christians. Have they not read the New Testament.
God alive some of the people on here as reasonable as they come across when discussing football, really are weird
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why should anyone be forced to accept that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Accept what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Homosexuality. Many people, for many reasons, do not accept it - including these sports people. Why should they be denied the right to do their job on the basis of their private beliefs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's as ridiculous as not accepting black people, people with ginger hair, accepting women etc. I'm pretty sure people are born gay, they don't choose to be, same as the other examples I mentioned.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Even if people did choose to be gay though, who actually gives the slightest shīt?
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 44 seconds ago
Paedophiles say they are born that way.
-----------------
What an utterly stupid comparison
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? Is having natural urges to fack kids any different to natural urges to fack someone of the same gender? it is all just natural, and they are born that way.
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 44 seconds ago
Paedophiles say they are born that way.
-----------------
What an utterly stupid comparison
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? Is having natural urges to fack kids any different to natural urges to fack someone of the same gender? it is all just natural, and they are born that way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
D'jeezus youre digging deeper and deeper, you're better off just leaving this post and give your head a wobble
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 44 seconds ago
Paedophiles say they are born that way.
-----------------
What an utterly stupid comparison
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? Is having natural urges to fack kids any different to natural urges to fack someone of the same gender? it is all just natural, and they are born that way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely you can see the difference though. In terms of why society would accept one (between consenting adults) and the other (where there's a under-age victim)
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why should anyone be forced to accept that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Accept what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Homosexuality. Many people, for many reasons, do not accept it - including these sports people. Why should they be denied the right to do their job on the basis of their private beliefs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's as ridiculous as not accepting black people, people with ginger hair, accepting women etc. I'm pretty sure people are born gay, they don't choose to be, same as the other examples I mentioned.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Even if people did choose to be gay though, who actually gives the slightest shīt?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Religious people, mainly. The sportsmen referred to in the article being examples. Equally, if people didn't want to wear a symbol to support LBGTQwhatever why should anyone give the slightest shiiit? But here we are, with sportsmen unable to play because clearly people do give a shiiiit about them not wearing a rainbow.
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 44 seconds ago
Paedophiles say they are born that way.
-----------------
What an utterly stupid comparison
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? Is having natural urges to fack kids any different to natural urges to fack someone of the same gender? it is all just natural, and they are born that way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely you can see the difference though. In terms of why society would accept one (between consenting adults) and the other (where there's a under-age victim)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whom chose the age? The same people who declared homosexuality a crime?
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 44 seconds ago
Paedophiles say they are born that way.
-----------------
What an utterly stupid comparison
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? Is having natural urges to fack kids any different to natural urges to fack someone of the same gender? it is all just natural, and they are born that way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because children are not deemed to have the mental capacity to consent to sěx. It is where the term 'statutory rāpeee' comes from.
Genuinely cannot believe I'm having to explain this to someone.
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 44 seconds ago
Paedophiles say they are born that way.
-----------------
What an utterly stupid comparison
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? Is having natural urges to fack kids any different to natural urges to fack someone of the same gender? it is all just natural, and they are born that way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because children are not deemed to have the mental capacity to consent to sěx. It is where the term 'statutory rāpeee' comes from.
Genuinely cannot believe I'm having to explain this to someone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 26 seconds ago
Think DJ’s on the wum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Must be surely?
I read about this yesterday.
My opinion is that it should be down to the players if they want to wear it or not, unless they are contractually obliged to do so.
I’d be interested to know if they could wear the same kit, minus the Pride element. I think it states that all team members should wear identical kits though (I haven’t read the article today).
There was a player that refused to take the knee in the PL, forget who it was. Is this really any difference?
I suppose it would boil down to the reasons the players gave for refusing to wear the kit. I don’t know if they have made that public, rather just a generic club statement. Apologies if the article today alludes more to this aspect.
Became obvious when he started comparing it to paedophilia.
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 44 seconds ago
Paedophiles say they are born that way.
-----------------
What an utterly stupid comparison
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? Is having natural urges to fack kids any different to natural urges to fack someone of the same gender? it is all just natural, and they are born that way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because children are not deemed to have the mental capacity to consent to sěx. It is where the term 'statutory rāpeee' comes from.
Genuinely cannot believe I'm having to explain this to someone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who decided that though? Many societies feel "kids" are mentally capable to make that decision.
The term "statutory raape" comes from law makers. The same place that made homosexuality a crime in many places.
You say one is silly and the other isn't, yet many societies disagree with you and say it is the other way round.
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 7 seconds ago
Think DJ’s on the wum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, that's too easy a get out for him. I think he actually believes in what he's saying
Paedophiles even campaign to be included in the LGBTQ... rainbow
You say one is silly and the other isn't, yet many societies disagree with you and say it is the other way round.
-----------------
They are wrong
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 7 seconds ago
Think DJ’s on the wum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, that's too easy a get out for him. I think he actually believes in what he's saying
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doubt it. DJ’s not this stupid.
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 10 seconds ago
You say one is silly and the other isn't, yet many societies disagree with you and say it is the other way round.
-----------------
They are wrong
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is your opinion. The sportsmen also have an opinion, why should they not be allowed that?
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 10 minutes ago
Just let the players who don’t wanna wear it do so, then the whole world can see who the homophobes are so we can all laugh at them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The whole world? You live in a bubble. I'd say the only ones that are forcing it are just a few countries. Mainly, UK, western Europe, US/Canada and Australia.
Sign in if you want to comment
Pride
Page 2 of 20
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 27/7/22
Paedophiles say they are born that way.
-----------------
What an utterly stupid comparison
posted on 27/7/22
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why should anyone be forced to accept that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Accept what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Homosexuality. Many people, for many reasons, do not accept it - including these sports people. Why should they be denied the right to do their job on the basis of their private beliefs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's as ridiculous as not accepting black people, people with ginger hair, accepting women etc. I'm pretty sure people are born gay, they don't choose to be, same as the other examples I mentioned.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Paedophiles say they are born that way. Murder is one of the most natural human instincts. Neither is acceptable to the majority of us.
Many people see homosexuality as a big a crime as either of those. And if that belief is kept private and they don't push hate or act on it then why should they not be allowed their belief? Why should they be forced to wear a symbol of something they are against?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 27/7/22
I do think the Poppy is different to this too. You can have an ethical stance on war etc because, ultimately, war is a choice. Being homosexual isn't.
posted on 27/7/22
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why should anyone be forced to accept that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Accept what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Homosexuality. Many people, for many reasons, do not accept it - including these sports people. Why should they be denied the right to do their job on the basis of their private beliefs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's as ridiculous as not accepting black people, people with ginger hair, accepting women etc. I'm pretty sure people are born gay, they don't choose to be, same as the other examples I mentioned.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Paedophiles say they are born that way. Murder is one of the most natural human instincts. Neither is acceptable to the majority of us.
Many people see homosexuality as a big a crime as either of those. And if that belief is kept private and they don't push hate or act on it then why should they not be allowed their belief? Why should they be forced to wear a symbol of something they are against?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are you using paedophillia to compare with homosexuality? These are vastly different things
posted on 27/7/22
I will never be able to get my head around homophobia.
Especially from people claiming to be Christians. Have they not read the New Testament.
posted on 27/7/22
God alive some of the people on here as reasonable as they come across when discussing football, really are weird
posted on 27/7/22
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why should anyone be forced to accept that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Accept what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Homosexuality. Many people, for many reasons, do not accept it - including these sports people. Why should they be denied the right to do their job on the basis of their private beliefs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's as ridiculous as not accepting black people, people with ginger hair, accepting women etc. I'm pretty sure people are born gay, they don't choose to be, same as the other examples I mentioned.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Even if people did choose to be gay though, who actually gives the slightest shīt?
posted on 27/7/22
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 44 seconds ago
Paedophiles say they are born that way.
-----------------
What an utterly stupid comparison
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? Is having natural urges to fack kids any different to natural urges to fack someone of the same gender? it is all just natural, and they are born that way.
posted on 27/7/22
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 44 seconds ago
Paedophiles say they are born that way.
-----------------
What an utterly stupid comparison
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? Is having natural urges to fack kids any different to natural urges to fack someone of the same gender? it is all just natural, and they are born that way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
D'jeezus youre digging deeper and deeper, you're better off just leaving this post and give your head a wobble
posted on 27/7/22
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 44 seconds ago
Paedophiles say they are born that way.
-----------------
What an utterly stupid comparison
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? Is having natural urges to fack kids any different to natural urges to fack someone of the same gender? it is all just natural, and they are born that way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely you can see the difference though. In terms of why society would accept one (between consenting adults) and the other (where there's a under-age victim)
posted on 27/7/22
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why should anyone be forced to accept that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Accept what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Homosexuality. Many people, for many reasons, do not accept it - including these sports people. Why should they be denied the right to do their job on the basis of their private beliefs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's as ridiculous as not accepting black people, people with ginger hair, accepting women etc. I'm pretty sure people are born gay, they don't choose to be, same as the other examples I mentioned.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Even if people did choose to be gay though, who actually gives the slightest shīt?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Religious people, mainly. The sportsmen referred to in the article being examples. Equally, if people didn't want to wear a symbol to support LBGTQwhatever why should anyone give the slightest shiiit? But here we are, with sportsmen unable to play because clearly people do give a shiiiit about them not wearing a rainbow.
posted on 27/7/22
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 44 seconds ago
Paedophiles say they are born that way.
-----------------
What an utterly stupid comparison
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? Is having natural urges to fack kids any different to natural urges to fack someone of the same gender? it is all just natural, and they are born that way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely you can see the difference though. In terms of why society would accept one (between consenting adults) and the other (where there's a under-age victim)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whom chose the age? The same people who declared homosexuality a crime?
posted on 27/7/22
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 44 seconds ago
Paedophiles say they are born that way.
-----------------
What an utterly stupid comparison
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? Is having natural urges to fack kids any different to natural urges to fack someone of the same gender? it is all just natural, and they are born that way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because children are not deemed to have the mental capacity to consent to sěx. It is where the term 'statutory rāpeee' comes from.
Genuinely cannot believe I'm having to explain this to someone.
posted on 27/7/22
Think DJ’s on the wum.
posted on 27/7/22
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 44 seconds ago
Paedophiles say they are born that way.
-----------------
What an utterly stupid comparison
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? Is having natural urges to fack kids any different to natural urges to fack someone of the same gender? it is all just natural, and they are born that way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because children are not deemed to have the mental capacity to consent to sěx. It is where the term 'statutory rāpeee' comes from.
Genuinely cannot believe I'm having to explain this to someone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 27/7/22
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 26 seconds ago
Think DJ’s on the wum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Must be surely?
posted on 27/7/22
I read about this yesterday.
My opinion is that it should be down to the players if they want to wear it or not, unless they are contractually obliged to do so.
I’d be interested to know if they could wear the same kit, minus the Pride element. I think it states that all team members should wear identical kits though (I haven’t read the article today).
There was a player that refused to take the knee in the PL, forget who it was. Is this really any difference?
I suppose it would boil down to the reasons the players gave for refusing to wear the kit. I don’t know if they have made that public, rather just a generic club statement. Apologies if the article today alludes more to this aspect.
posted on 27/7/22
Became obvious when he started comparing it to paedophilia.
posted on 27/7/22
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 44 seconds ago
Paedophiles say they are born that way.
-----------------
What an utterly stupid comparison
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why? Is having natural urges to fack kids any different to natural urges to fack someone of the same gender? it is all just natural, and they are born that way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because children are not deemed to have the mental capacity to consent to sěx. It is where the term 'statutory rāpeee' comes from.
Genuinely cannot believe I'm having to explain this to someone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who decided that though? Many societies feel "kids" are mentally capable to make that decision.
The term "statutory raape" comes from law makers. The same place that made homosexuality a crime in many places.
You say one is silly and the other isn't, yet many societies disagree with you and say it is the other way round.
posted on 27/7/22
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 7 seconds ago
Think DJ’s on the wum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, that's too easy a get out for him. I think he actually believes in what he's saying
posted on 27/7/22
Paedophiles even campaign to be included in the LGBTQ... rainbow
posted on 27/7/22
You say one is silly and the other isn't, yet many societies disagree with you and say it is the other way round.
-----------------
They are wrong
posted on 27/7/22
comment by TENƎꓕ (U17162)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 7 seconds ago
Think DJ’s on the wum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, that's too easy a get out for him. I think he actually believes in what he's saying
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doubt it. DJ’s not this stupid.
posted on 27/7/22
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 10 seconds ago
You say one is silly and the other isn't, yet many societies disagree with you and say it is the other way round.
-----------------
They are wrong
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is your opinion. The sportsmen also have an opinion, why should they not be allowed that?
posted on 27/7/22
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 10 minutes ago
Just let the players who don’t wanna wear it do so, then the whole world can see who the homophobes are so we can all laugh at them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The whole world? You live in a bubble. I'd say the only ones that are forcing it are just a few countries. Mainly, UK, western Europe, US/Canada and Australia.
Page 2 of 20
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10