or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 52 comments are related to an article called:

Maddison ??

Page 3 of 3

comment by Phenom (U20037)

posted on 2/8/22

Doesn't he have two years left on deal? Interesting if he doesn't sign one by next summer

comment by SimonB (U22811)

posted on 2/8/22

Somethings that's always been a big mystery ( and irritation ) to me is why Spurs are the only PL club where everyone is leaving or needs to be held onto.

Just about every segment on Sky Sports involves some non entity telling us Kane needs to go, or they need to hold onto Conte. Then the , well if they lose Son they are in trouble. Then we get German media outlets like Bild trying to fabricate a non existant tranfer to Bayern for Kane!

Then you come on places like here, and all we see are comments from people who know even less than the idiots on Sky, sprouting on about Kane leaving, or Kane needs to win this or that or he will walk.

Apart from the obvious Media narrative, coupled with the fans who continually fall for that narrative, everyone needs to understand how contractual law works.

Kane is under contract until 2024. Levy has the power and, put simply, Kane, or Son can't just walk away just because they want to. Levy needs to agree to it.

I am fairly sure Sky have a very expensive legal team, but chose to ignore the basic principles of law and continually go with the "let's keep theorising, but in a way that sounds like it will happen"

I mean, does it not occur to people that it is a bit strange that nobody is looking to move from any other team, according the the daily tittle tattle given out by the media ?

The like of Merson must be laughing his head off at this constant Spurs / Kane / Conte narrative. Some of which he personally has stoked up for obvious reasons.

Page 3 of 3

Sign in if you want to comment