or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 599 comments are related to an article called:

Epstein List to be released

Page 21 of 24

posted on 6/1/24

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
These guys are shamelessly defending the perv. Who the fack do they think they're kidding. When it comes to evidence they can't evade they just say it's fake.

I am not saying they're defending the perv, but they're defending the perv.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whereas you know all about it, from the newspapers and X. Plus of course your secret source.
I've said umpteen times I don't like him, they can castrate him for all I care.
But what new evidence do you have?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You cited social media and a convicted sextrafficker earlier

posted on 6/1/24

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
These guys are shamelessly defending the perv. Who the fack do they think they're kidding. When it comes to evidence they can't evade they just say it's fake.

I am not saying they're defending the perv, but they're defending the perv.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whereas you know all about it, from the newspapers and X. Plus of course your secret source.
I've said umpteen times I don't like him, they can castrate him for all I care.
But what new evidence do you have?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You cited social media and a convicted sextrafficker earlier
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And?

posted on 6/1/24

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 7 minutes ago

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whereas you know all about it, from the newspapers and X. Plus of course your secret source.
I've said umpteen times I don't like him, they can castrate him for all I care.
But what new evidence do you have?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wait. So none of this came from the Maxwell and Epstein cases and Andrew himself? Just newspapers and X?

You don't like him? That's all you've to to say about an RF member who stayed at the house of a convicted pedo and traffiker?

As for new evidence why don't you read the unsealed documents if you care so much

posted on 6/1/24

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
These guys are shamelessly defending the perv. Who the fack do they think they're kidding. When it comes to evidence they can't evade they just say it's fake.

I am not saying they're defending the perv, but they're defending the perv.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whereas you know all about it, from the newspapers and X. Plus of course your secret source.
I've said umpteen times I don't like him, they can castrate him for all I care.
But what new evidence do you have?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You cited social media and a convicted sextrafficker earlier
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Newspapers and Twitter are unreliable yet social media and a sextrafficker you believe

Show us one post on here from myself and others you've debated citing a newspaper or Twitter. All I've posted is from the the BBC.

posted on 6/1/24

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
These guys are shamelessly defending the perv. Who the fack do they think they're kidding. When it comes to evidence they can't evade they just say it's fake.

I am not saying they're defending the perv, but they're defending the perv.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whereas you know all about it, from the newspapers and X. Plus of course your secret source.
I've said umpteen times I don't like him, they can castrate him for all I care.
But what new evidence do you have?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You cited social media and a convicted sextrafficker earlier
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Newspapers and Twitter are unreliable yet social media and a sextrafficker you believe

Show us one post on here from myself and others you've debated citing a newspaper or Twitter. All I've posted is from the the BBC.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, don't believe or disbelieve. Don't know.

posted on 6/1/24

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
These guys are shamelessly defending the perv. Who the fack do they think they're kidding. When it comes to evidence they can't evade they just say it's fake.

I am not saying they're defending the perv, but they're defending the perv.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whereas you know all about it, from the newspapers and X. Plus of course your secret source.
I've said umpteen times I don't like him, they can castrate him for all I care.
But what new evidence do you have?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You cited social media and a convicted sextrafficker earlier
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Newspapers and Twitter are unreliable yet social media and a sextrafficker you believe

Show us one post on here from myself and others you've debated citing a newspaper or Twitter. All I've posted is from the the BBC.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, don't believe or disbelieve. Don't know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Go on, one post from the papers or twitter

posted on 6/1/24

Why does this guy care so much about us discussing some unsealed documents in one of the highest profile cases in history but doesn't appear to give much of a toss about Royalty hanging about with a convicted pedo

posted on 6/1/24

MU52

"Nope, don't believe or disbelieve. Don't know."

You told me a pic of Andrew with his hands around Guiffre's hips was fake based on social media and Maxwell the sextrafficker.

Keep contradicting yourself

posted on 6/1/24

comment by Real Fans Don't WUM (U23132)
posted 3 minutes ago
Why does this guy care so much about us discussing some unsealed documents in one of the highest profile cases in history but doesn't appear to give much of a toss about Royalty hanging about with a convicted pedo


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dunno, he didn't have a problem with Elvis using the link to a random website using a quote from the Mail though. But, even though we haven't cited either, he doesn't trust the papers or twitter.

posted on 6/1/24

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Real Fans Don't WUM (U23132)
posted 3 minutes ago
Why does this guy care so much about us discussing some unsealed documents in one of the highest profile cases in history but doesn't appear to give much of a toss about Royalty hanging about with a convicted pedo


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dunno, he didn't have a problem with Elvis using the link to a random website using a quote from the Mail though. But, even though we haven't cited either, he doesn't trust the papers or twitter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know we've had a 16 year old article from the daily rag and "social media evidence" the photo was fake. From people that apparently don't care about any of this.

posted on 6/1/24

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 12 minutes ago
MU52

"Nope, don't believe or disbelieve. Don't know."

You told me a pic of Andrew with his hands around Guiffre's hips was fake based on social media and Maxwell the sextrafficker.

Keep contradicting yourself
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. Read again. I said she denied it, not me

posted on 6/1/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 hours, 54 minutes ago
Do you honestly think a high profile Royal would knowingly asscociate with a pedo considering he would have had a Government security detail with him at all times?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jimmy Saville says hello from beyond the grave.

posted on 6/1/24

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 12 minutes ago
MU52

"Nope, don't believe or disbelieve. Don't know."

You told me a pic of Andrew with his hands around Guiffre's hips was fake based on social media and Maxwell the sextrafficker.

Keep contradicting yourself
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. Read again. I said she denied it, not me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Behave lad, are you on the WUM now?

You said there's no evidence of the two being together. I replied that there's a photo of him with his hands around her hips. You responded 'yeah but social media and Maxwell said its fake'.

Why post that reply if you didn't believe its fake? You're either on the wind up or a bit dim.

Still no links to papers or twitter posted by us?

posted on 6/1/24

comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 hours, 54 minutes ago
Do you honestly think a high profile Royal would knowingly asscociate with a pedo considering he would have had a Government security detail with him at all times?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jimmy Saville says hello from beyond the grave.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you think Saville would have been Knighted if the palace knew he was a pedo?

posted on 6/1/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 hours, 54 minutes ago
Do you honestly think a high profile Royal would knowingly asscociate with a pedo considering he would have had a Government security detail with him at all times?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jimmy Saville says hello from beyond the grave.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you think Saville would have been Knighted if the palace knew he was a pedo?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspicion and look the other way ignorance was rife before it became public knowledge.

posted on 6/1/24

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 hours, 54 minutes ago
Do you honestly think a high profile Royal would knowingly asscociate with a pedo considering he would have had a Government security detail with him at all times?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jimmy Saville says hello from beyond the grave.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you think Saville would have been Knighted if the palace knew he was a pedo?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspicion and look the other way ignorance was rife before it became public knowledge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was knighted in 1990, the first time I heard rumours was probably 6/7 years later and that was off someone who had once worked with him.

posted on 6/1/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 hours, 54 minutes ago
Do you honestly think a high profile Royal would knowingly asscociate with a pedo considering he would have had a Government security detail with him at all times?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jimmy Saville says hello from beyond the grave.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you think Saville would have been Knighted if the palace knew he was a pedo?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes.

posted on 6/1/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 hours, 54 minutes ago
Do you honestly think a high profile Royal would knowingly asscociate with a pedo considering he would have had a Government security detail with him at all times?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jimmy Saville says hello from beyond the grave.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you think Saville would have been Knighted if the palace knew he was a pedo?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspicion and look the other way ignorance was rife before it became public knowledge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was knighted in 1990, the first time I heard rumours was probably 6/7 years later and that was off someone who had once worked with him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So no vetting?
I suppose they just give these knighthood thingies out willy-nilly.

posted on 6/1/24

comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 hours, 54 minutes ago
Do you honestly think a high profile Royal would knowingly asscociate with a pedo considering he would have had a Government security detail with him at all times?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jimmy Saville says hello from beyond the grave.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you think Saville would have been Knighted if the palace knew he was a pedo?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspicion and look the other way ignorance was rife before it became public knowledge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was knighted in 1990, the first time I heard rumours was probably 6/7 years later and that was off someone who had once worked with him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So no vetting?
I suppose they just give these knighthood thingies out willy-nilly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Obviously there was vetting.

Go on, tell me you knew Saville was a sicko in 2001.

posted on 6/1/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 hours, 54 minutes ago
Do you honestly think a high profile Royal would knowingly asscociate with a pedo considering he would have had a Government security detail with him at all times?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jimmy Saville says hello from beyond the grave.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you think Saville would have been Knighted if the palace knew he was a pedo?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspicion and look the other way ignorance was rife before it became public knowledge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was knighted in 1990, the first time I heard rumours was probably 6/7 years later and that was off someone who had once worked with him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So no vetting?
I suppose they just give these knighthood thingies out willy-nilly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Obviously there was vetting.

Go on, tell me you knew Saville was a sicko in 2001.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Go on tell me you were shocked and didn't think 'yeah that fits' when it all came out.

posted on 6/1/24

"Obviously there was vetting"

Didn't they do a great job

posted on 6/1/24

The BBC knew.

posted on 6/1/24

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 hours, 54 minutes ago
Do you honestly think a high profile Royal would knowingly asscociate with a pedo considering he would have had a Government security detail with him at all times?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jimmy Saville says hello from beyond the grave.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you think Saville would have been Knighted if the palace knew he was a pedo?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspicion and look the other way ignorance was rife before it became public knowledge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was knighted in 1990, the first time I heard rumours was probably 6/7 years later and that was off someone who had once worked with him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So no vetting?
I suppose they just give these knighthood thingies out willy-nilly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Obviously there was vetting.

Go on, tell me you knew Saville was a sicko in 2001.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Go on tell me you were shocked and didn't think 'yeah that fits' when it all came out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said previously that I learned about it before it was widely known and yes, I was surprised.

posted on 6/1/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 hours, 54 minutes ago
Do you honestly think a high profile Royal would knowingly asscociate with a pedo considering he would have had a Government security detail with him at all times?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jimmy Saville says hello from beyond the grave.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you think Saville would have been Knighted if the palace knew he was a pedo?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspicion and look the other way ignorance was rife before it became public knowledge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was knighted in 1990, the first time I heard rumours was probably 6/7 years later and that was off someone who had once worked with him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There were complaints of sexual abuse from Saville back in the 1970s. Same with Rolf Harris, who was commissioned to paint the Queen's 80th birthday portrait in 2005.

It's been stated several times by people that were around Saville at the time he was active that it was well known. Just because you personally only heard rumours after 1990 doesn't mean it wasn't known in other circles.

posted on 6/1/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 hours, 54 minutes ago
Do you honestly think a high profile Royal would knowingly asscociate with a pedo considering he would have had a Government security detail with him at all times?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jimmy Saville says hello from beyond the grave.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you think Saville would have been Knighted if the palace knew he was a pedo?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspicion and look the other way ignorance was rife before it became public knowledge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was knighted in 1990, the first time I heard rumours was probably 6/7 years later and that was off someone who had once worked with him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So no vetting?
I suppose they just give these knighthood thingies out willy-nilly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Obviously there was vetting.

Go on, tell me you knew Saville was a sicko in 2001.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's a fvkin video of John Lydon doing an interview from 1978 on youtube accusing him. After which Lydon was banned from BBC and apparently still is.

Page 21 of 24

Sign in if you want to comment