Another false assumption
And how have you come to that conclusion?

Are you Dalglish or did you work for Liverpool last season

comment by Sir Alfredo (U11118)

posted 2 seconds ago

Anfield Rap.

Depends on your definition of ground breaking. Messi he wasn't. But he was above average in your team.
=====================================
I thought a second ago he was on per with everyone that finished 6th a second ago?

You're seriously confusing me
Make up your mind

Is this clown still going?



The point of the article was that Kenny made a mistake selling him. Since then we have established that Meireles wanted to leave which makes the article nul and void, so what are you still going on about now?

To its an opinion. And like you said we are all entitled to one.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

I thought a second ago he was on per with everyone that finished 6th a second ago

I never said he was on PAR (is that what you mean) with everyone else.

Opinion based on false and poor assumptions then?
Liverpool fans wouldn't come to such a conclusion but seems you know much more than us.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Well no. Seeing as Dalglish constantly hauled him off due to 'fitness issues.' Must have affected his performance too, knowing he'd be gone after the hour mark.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

How do you know it must have affected his performance?

Wouldn't it be for his own good to be taken off if his fitness isn't very good?

If I may ask, have you ever played the game?

Yes, but the 31 other players didn't start most games, and know that they'd be subbed despite what they did. You drew 1-1 with Wigan at Anfield, and Meireles was still subbed despite being your best player.

If what you're saying is true and he couldn't last 60 mins. He would not be an international. Regardless of ability.

How do you know Meireles was our best player?
If a player is tired and exhausted why would you carry on playing him?????

Like I said. I question the extent of the fatigue he suffered from.

Even if you do manage the top4, I can't imagine the likes of Barcelona worrying about facing the likes of Charlie Adam next season.

-

Didn't you guys hear? We're not allowed to buy any more players, ever.

Maybe he is old and gets tired easily???

Do you class 28/29 as old? 32/33 is old. But age is not an excuse to support your point about fatigue.

Nero. Charlie Adam is still going to play for you next year.

comment by Sir Alfredo (U11118)

True. Doesn't mean he'll be starting week in - week out, though.

You haven't worked at top level of the profession so wouldn't know the effects of fatigue on a professional footballer.

Also you don't know the extent of fatigue since you haven't worked with the player.

But I would expect something who's played the game and someone with common sense to predict correctly.

Do you class 28/29 as old?
========================
Yes certainly older than
27
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
.
.
.

So when did you play at the top level and work with RM, honestlivpool? please enlighten us.

comment by Sir Alfredo (U11118)

posted 2 minutes ago

Nero. Charlie Adam is still going to play for you next year.
=====================================
It doesn't mean he'll start week in week out, or am I getting something wrong?