Agreed on both. I think Amorim is just tired of this petulance and also knows Garnacho will not be at our club next season. Thinks he's Ronaldo, talent of Bebe (that's harsh, I know, but if he had the right attitude, we wouldn't be desperate to get rid of him)
I’d be slow to get rid of Garnacho. He’s a player where one day it may all click and he’ll become elite.
He’s one of the top goal contributors under the age of 21 in Europe.
The problem is that he’s been over relied upon due to the fitness and failings of others and because he’s played so much he’s understandably annoyed to be dropped for a final. Not that I agree with his petulance.
Looks like he will go.
We will be worse for it.
He will be a top player for a Spanish / Italian club in 2-3 years time.
All to accommodate a system that doesn’t work, by a manager who has already proved he’s not up to it. Madness.
comment by Keanos Magic Hat (U10101)
posted 4 minutes ago
Looks like he will go.
We will be worse for it.
He will be a top player for a Spanish / Italian club in 2-3 years time.
All to accommodate a system that doesn’t work, by a manager who has already proved he’s not up to it. Madness.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I still refuse to write off Amorim. He’s done an awful job so far though and tired of hearing excuses for him.
comment by Keanos Magic Hat (U10101)
posted 2 minutes ago
Looks like he will go.
We will be worse for it.
He will be a top player for a Spanish / Italian club in 2-3 years time.
All to accommodate a system that doesn’t work, by a manager who has already proved he’s not up to it. Madness.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough. But what system do you think Garnacho shines in? He thinks he's Ronaldo so I know what system he thinks he shines in. And he may well become a very very good footballer.
But I fail to see how anyone who has watched Garnacho over the last 2 days, weeks, months or years is buying into this arrogance. He has to go out there and justify it somewhere else when he inevitably moves, but he hadn't shown it for us. He'd have started otherwise and you know it. It's not a personal vendetta, it's a team selection and he didn't do enough to make himself a starter
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
Not sure how good he thinks he is, but he knows he’s much better than Mason Mount. Garnacho’s gone backwards massively under Clownmorim.
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hilarious that when he plays rasmus every game. What a bell
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴 (U1192)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hilarious that when he plays rasmus every game. What a bell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They don't play the same position. Garnacho regularly starts, he's regularly a selfish pr**k who thinks he's the second coming of Cristiano, yet even a Portuguese manager can't warm to him. What a bell indeed
Amorim is Utd’s AVB, he’s so far out of his depth here and shows what a poor league it is in Portugal
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't get it either tbh. To start Mount over him was dubious but he should have changed it at HT as it clearly wasn't working for us.
In fact he could have even started both and dropped Hojlund and thrown Spurs a curve ball. Hojlund is like playing with a man down anyway.
I do think he's struggling to handle managing a big club. The Rashford stuff, now Garnacho and he's barely giving Kobbie a look in. Perhaps it's just too much for him to handle?
Can't afford to sack him anyway. That's our transfer kitty. 😂
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't get it either tbh. To start Mount over him was dubious but he should have changed it at HT as it clearly wasn't working for us.
In fact he could have even started both and dropped Hojlund and thrown Spurs a curve ball. Hojlund is like playing with a man down anyway.
I do think he's struggling to handle managing a big club. The Rashford stuff, now Garnacho and he's barely giving Kobbie a look in. Perhaps it's just too much for him to handle?
Can't afford to sack him anyway. That's our transfer kitty. 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason he didn't change it was because Garnacho is so one dimensional that he could only be effective as a last 20 minute sub. I'm not trying to sound like an Amorim fanboy but I refuse to see how anybody who has had the misfortune of watching Garnacho play doesn't realise that's the only role he could perform in that game. What the hell else would he have done? He's never shown it
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴 (U1192)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hilarious that when he plays rasmus every game. What a bell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They don't play the same position. Garnacho regularly starts, he's regularly a selfish pr**k who thinks he's the second coming of Cristiano, yet even a Portuguese manager can't warm to him. What a bell indeed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That wasn't the point I was making. He dropped nacho because he missed a big chance....
Rasmus has missed plenty, and remains in the first 11
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴 (U1192)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴 (U1192)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hilarious that when he plays rasmus every game. What a bell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They don't play the same position. Garnacho regularly starts, he's regularly a selfish pr**k who thinks he's the second coming of Cristiano, yet even a Portuguese manager can't warm to him. What a bell indeed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That wasn't the point I was making. He dropped nacho because he missed a big chance....
Rasmus has missed plenty, and remains in the first 11
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because there are options in his position. There are none in Rasmus's. It's the same point, you just done realise our limitations
Mason Mount isn’t an option, he’s absolute shiiiiit.
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't get it either tbh. To start Mount over him was dubious but he should have changed it at HT as it clearly wasn't working for us.
In fact he could have even started both and dropped Hojlund and thrown Spurs a curve ball. Hojlund is like playing with a man down anyway.
I do think he's struggling to handle managing a big club. The Rashford stuff, now Garnacho and he's barely giving Kobbie a look in. Perhaps it's just too much for him to handle?
Can't afford to sack him anyway. That's our transfer kitty. 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason he didn't change it was because Garnacho is so one dimensional that he could only be effective as a last 20 minute sub. I'm not trying to sound like an Amorim fanboy but I refuse to see how anybody who has had the misfortune of watching Garnacho play doesn't realise that's the only role he could perform in that game. What the hell else would he have done? He's never shown it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Frustrates me a lot at times too..... however he hasn't done worse than Mount. If anything he's been slightly better.
A false 9 was an option for us last night but he decided to continue the Hojlund farce which hasn't worked all season. I think he had a really bad night sadly did Ruben. Got it all badly wrong.
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't get it either tbh. To start Mount over him was dubious but he should have changed it at HT as it clearly wasn't working for us.
In fact he could have even started both and dropped Hojlund and thrown Spurs a curve ball. Hojlund is like playing with a man down anyway.
I do think he's struggling to handle managing a big club. The Rashford stuff, now Garnacho and he's barely giving Kobbie a look in. Perhaps it's just too much for him to handle?
Can't afford to sack him anyway. That's our transfer kitty. 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason he didn't change it was because Garnacho is so one dimensional that he could only be effective as a last 20 minute sub. I'm not trying to sound like an Amorim fanboy but I refuse to see how anybody who has had the misfortune of watching Garnacho play doesn't realise that's the only role he could perform in that game. What the hell else would he have done? He's never shown it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Frustrates me a lot at times too..... however he hasn't done worse than Mount. If anything he's been slightly better.
A false 9 was an option for us last night but he decided to continue the Hojlund farce which hasn't worked all season. I think he had a really bad night sadly did Ruben. Got it all badly wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He certainly did. But again, what part of Garnacho's game or footballing history makes you think he could play through the middle? That wouldn't just be brave, it would be unprecedented to stick an entitled and inconsistent winger in the middle just so him and his brother didn't cry about it after? Or am I misreading this? Is Garnacho actually right here? Where being a useless, entitled piece of shiiite should be rewarded? A new haircut is worthy of the centre stage his performances didn't warrant? It's United, of course the fans back him. Same sh*t, different year.
I said it at the weekend that I'd have started Garnacho up front with Hojlund on the bench. That could have meant Bruno further forward with Ugarte or Mainoo in the middle.
I’d have started Mazraoui up front instead of that useless Danish cuuuunt.
I give up. Yeah we definitely should have started Garnacho up front, I was so stupid to think he was an entitled little bollix and definitely shouldn't have started up front in a cup final, given he'd never played there before 👌
He should have started instead of Mason Mount. He’s just one of every other footballer in the squad that should have played over Hojlund, who wouldn’t even start for Southampton.
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
He should have started instead of Mason Mount. He’s just one of every other footballer in the squad that should have played over Hojlund, who wouldn’t even start for Southampton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd start my granny over Hojlund. And she's long dead. As for Garnacho, I'd start Mount over him any day of the week. Because the attitude of the players at this football club absolutely sucks and Garnacho is a great example of it. He's achieved nothing in his career and yet is universally disliked, not because he plays for United but because he thinks playing for United makes him a big deal
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't get it either tbh. To start Mount over him was dubious but he should have changed it at HT as it clearly wasn't working for us.
In fact he could have even started both and dropped Hojlund and thrown Spurs a curve ball. Hojlund is like playing with a man down anyway.
I do think he's struggling to handle managing a big club. The Rashford stuff, now Garnacho and he's barely giving Kobbie a look in. Perhaps it's just too much for him to handle?
Can't afford to sack him anyway. That's our transfer kitty. 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason he didn't change it was because Garnacho is so one dimensional that he could only be effective as a last 20 minute sub. I'm not trying to sound like an Amorim fanboy but I refuse to see how anybody who has had the misfortune of watching Garnacho play doesn't realise that's the only role he could perform in that game. What the hell else would he have done? He's never shown it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Frustrates me a lot at times too..... however he hasn't done worse than Mount. If anything he's been slightly better.
A false 9 was an option for us last night but he decided to continue the Hojlund farce which hasn't worked all season. I think he had a really bad night sadly did Ruben. Got it all badly wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He certainly did. But again, what part of Garnacho's game or footballing history makes you think he could play through the middle? That wouldn't just be brave, it would be unprecedented to stick an entitled and inconsistent winger in the middle just so him and his brother didn't cry about it after? Or am I misreading this? Is Garnacho actually right here? Where being a useless, entitled piece of shiiite should be rewarded? A new haircut is worthy of the centre stage his performances didn't warrant? It's United, of course the fans back him. Same sh*t, different year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho didn't have to be the one to play through the middle tbf. Could have played Bruno as false 9 or maybe even Mount himself and had Garnacho and Amad as the runners.
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't get it either tbh. To start Mount over him was dubious but he should have changed it at HT as it clearly wasn't working for us.
In fact he could have even started both and dropped Hojlund and thrown Spurs a curve ball. Hojlund is like playing with a man down anyway.
I do think he's struggling to handle managing a big club. The Rashford stuff, now Garnacho and he's barely giving Kobbie a look in. Perhaps it's just too much for him to handle?
Can't afford to sack him anyway. That's our transfer kitty. 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason he didn't change it was because Garnacho is so one dimensional that he could only be effective as a last 20 minute sub. I'm not trying to sound like an Amorim fanboy but I refuse to see how anybody who has had the misfortune of watching Garnacho play doesn't realise that's the only role he could perform in that game. What the hell else would he have done? He's never shown it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Frustrates me a lot at times too..... however he hasn't done worse than Mount. If anything he's been slightly better.
A false 9 was an option for us last night but he decided to continue the Hojlund farce which hasn't worked all season. I think he had a really bad night sadly did Ruben. Got it all badly wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He certainly did. But again, what part of Garnacho's game or footballing history makes you think he could play through the middle? That wouldn't just be brave, it would be unprecedented to stick an entitled and inconsistent winger in the middle just so him and his brother didn't cry about it after? Or am I misreading this? Is Garnacho actually right here? Where being a useless, entitled piece of shiiite should be rewarded? A new haircut is worthy of the centre stage his performances didn't warrant? It's United, of course the fans back him. Same sh*t, different year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho didn't have to be the one to play through the middle tbf. Could have played Bruno as false 9 or maybe even Mount himself and had Garnacho and Amad as the runners.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So when did Bruno as a false 9 ever work? Why would you push Bruno out of position, based on Garnacho's performance? I don't get it. His arrogance fools people
Sign in if you want to comment
Garnacho & Amorim
Page 1 of 2
posted 1 week ago
Agreed on both. I think Amorim is just tired of this petulance and also knows Garnacho will not be at our club next season. Thinks he's Ronaldo, talent of Bebe (that's harsh, I know, but if he had the right attitude, we wouldn't be desperate to get rid of him)
posted 1 week ago
I’d be slow to get rid of Garnacho. He’s a player where one day it may all click and he’ll become elite.
He’s one of the top goal contributors under the age of 21 in Europe.
The problem is that he’s been over relied upon due to the fitness and failings of others and because he’s played so much he’s understandably annoyed to be dropped for a final. Not that I agree with his petulance.
posted 1 week ago
Looks like he will go.
We will be worse for it.
He will be a top player for a Spanish / Italian club in 2-3 years time.
All to accommodate a system that doesn’t work, by a manager who has already proved he’s not up to it. Madness.
posted 1 week ago
comment by Keanos Magic Hat (U10101)
posted 4 minutes ago
Looks like he will go.
We will be worse for it.
He will be a top player for a Spanish / Italian club in 2-3 years time.
All to accommodate a system that doesn’t work, by a manager who has already proved he’s not up to it. Madness.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I still refuse to write off Amorim. He’s done an awful job so far though and tired of hearing excuses for him.
posted 1 week ago
comment by Keanos Magic Hat (U10101)
posted 2 minutes ago
Looks like he will go.
We will be worse for it.
He will be a top player for a Spanish / Italian club in 2-3 years time.
All to accommodate a system that doesn’t work, by a manager who has already proved he’s not up to it. Madness.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough. But what system do you think Garnacho shines in? He thinks he's Ronaldo so I know what system he thinks he shines in. And he may well become a very very good footballer.
But I fail to see how anyone who has watched Garnacho over the last 2 days, weeks, months or years is buying into this arrogance. He has to go out there and justify it somewhere else when he inevitably moves, but he hadn't shown it for us. He'd have started otherwise and you know it. It's not a personal vendetta, it's a team selection and he didn't do enough to make himself a starter
posted 1 week ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
posted 1 week ago
Not sure how good he thinks he is, but he knows he’s much better than Mason Mount. Garnacho’s gone backwards massively under Clownmorim.
posted 1 week ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
posted 1 week ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hilarious that when he plays rasmus every game. What a bell
posted 1 week ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴 (U1192)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hilarious that when he plays rasmus every game. What a bell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They don't play the same position. Garnacho regularly starts, he's regularly a selfish pr**k who thinks he's the second coming of Cristiano, yet even a Portuguese manager can't warm to him. What a bell indeed
posted 1 week ago
Amorim is Utd’s AVB, he’s so far out of his depth here and shows what a poor league it is in Portugal
posted 1 week ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't get it either tbh. To start Mount over him was dubious but he should have changed it at HT as it clearly wasn't working for us.
In fact he could have even started both and dropped Hojlund and thrown Spurs a curve ball. Hojlund is like playing with a man down anyway.
I do think he's struggling to handle managing a big club. The Rashford stuff, now Garnacho and he's barely giving Kobbie a look in. Perhaps it's just too much for him to handle?
Can't afford to sack him anyway. That's our transfer kitty. 😂
posted 1 week ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't get it either tbh. To start Mount over him was dubious but he should have changed it at HT as it clearly wasn't working for us.
In fact he could have even started both and dropped Hojlund and thrown Spurs a curve ball. Hojlund is like playing with a man down anyway.
I do think he's struggling to handle managing a big club. The Rashford stuff, now Garnacho and he's barely giving Kobbie a look in. Perhaps it's just too much for him to handle?
Can't afford to sack him anyway. That's our transfer kitty. 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason he didn't change it was because Garnacho is so one dimensional that he could only be effective as a last 20 minute sub. I'm not trying to sound like an Amorim fanboy but I refuse to see how anybody who has had the misfortune of watching Garnacho play doesn't realise that's the only role he could perform in that game. What the hell else would he have done? He's never shown it
posted 1 week ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴 (U1192)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hilarious that when he plays rasmus every game. What a bell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They don't play the same position. Garnacho regularly starts, he's regularly a selfish pr**k who thinks he's the second coming of Cristiano, yet even a Portuguese manager can't warm to him. What a bell indeed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That wasn't the point I was making. He dropped nacho because he missed a big chance....
Rasmus has missed plenty, and remains in the first 11
posted 1 week ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴 (U1192)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴 (U1192)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hilarious that when he plays rasmus every game. What a bell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They don't play the same position. Garnacho regularly starts, he's regularly a selfish pr**k who thinks he's the second coming of Cristiano, yet even a Portuguese manager can't warm to him. What a bell indeed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That wasn't the point I was making. He dropped nacho because he missed a big chance....
Rasmus has missed plenty, and remains in the first 11
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because there are options in his position. There are none in Rasmus's. It's the same point, you just done realise our limitations
posted 1 week ago
Mason Mount isn’t an option, he’s absolute shiiiiit.
posted 1 week ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't get it either tbh. To start Mount over him was dubious but he should have changed it at HT as it clearly wasn't working for us.
In fact he could have even started both and dropped Hojlund and thrown Spurs a curve ball. Hojlund is like playing with a man down anyway.
I do think he's struggling to handle managing a big club. The Rashford stuff, now Garnacho and he's barely giving Kobbie a look in. Perhaps it's just too much for him to handle?
Can't afford to sack him anyway. That's our transfer kitty. 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason he didn't change it was because Garnacho is so one dimensional that he could only be effective as a last 20 minute sub. I'm not trying to sound like an Amorim fanboy but I refuse to see how anybody who has had the misfortune of watching Garnacho play doesn't realise that's the only role he could perform in that game. What the hell else would he have done? He's never shown it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Frustrates me a lot at times too..... however he hasn't done worse than Mount. If anything he's been slightly better.
A false 9 was an option for us last night but he decided to continue the Hojlund farce which hasn't worked all season. I think he had a really bad night sadly did Ruben. Got it all badly wrong.
posted 1 week ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't get it either tbh. To start Mount over him was dubious but he should have changed it at HT as it clearly wasn't working for us.
In fact he could have even started both and dropped Hojlund and thrown Spurs a curve ball. Hojlund is like playing with a man down anyway.
I do think he's struggling to handle managing a big club. The Rashford stuff, now Garnacho and he's barely giving Kobbie a look in. Perhaps it's just too much for him to handle?
Can't afford to sack him anyway. That's our transfer kitty. 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason he didn't change it was because Garnacho is so one dimensional that he could only be effective as a last 20 minute sub. I'm not trying to sound like an Amorim fanboy but I refuse to see how anybody who has had the misfortune of watching Garnacho play doesn't realise that's the only role he could perform in that game. What the hell else would he have done? He's never shown it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Frustrates me a lot at times too..... however he hasn't done worse than Mount. If anything he's been slightly better.
A false 9 was an option for us last night but he decided to continue the Hojlund farce which hasn't worked all season. I think he had a really bad night sadly did Ruben. Got it all badly wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He certainly did. But again, what part of Garnacho's game or footballing history makes you think he could play through the middle? That wouldn't just be brave, it would be unprecedented to stick an entitled and inconsistent winger in the middle just so him and his brother didn't cry about it after? Or am I misreading this? Is Garnacho actually right here? Where being a useless, entitled piece of shiiite should be rewarded? A new haircut is worthy of the centre stage his performances didn't warrant? It's United, of course the fans back him. Same sh*t, different year.
posted 1 week ago
I said it at the weekend that I'd have started Garnacho up front with Hojlund on the bench. That could have meant Bruno further forward with Ugarte or Mainoo in the middle.
posted 1 week ago
I’d have started Mazraoui up front instead of that useless Danish cuuuunt.
posted 1 week ago
I give up. Yeah we definitely should have started Garnacho up front, I was so stupid to think he was an entitled little bollix and definitely shouldn't have started up front in a cup final, given he'd never played there before 👌
posted 1 week ago
He should have started instead of Mason Mount. He’s just one of every other footballer in the squad that should have played over Hojlund, who wouldn’t even start for Southampton.
posted 1 week ago
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
He should have started instead of Mason Mount. He’s just one of every other footballer in the squad that should have played over Hojlund, who wouldn’t even start for Southampton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd start my granny over Hojlund. And she's long dead. As for Garnacho, I'd start Mount over him any day of the week. Because the attitude of the players at this football club absolutely sucks and Garnacho is a great example of it. He's achieved nothing in his career and yet is universally disliked, not because he plays for United but because he thinks playing for United makes him a big deal
posted 1 week ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't get it either tbh. To start Mount over him was dubious but he should have changed it at HT as it clearly wasn't working for us.
In fact he could have even started both and dropped Hojlund and thrown Spurs a curve ball. Hojlund is like playing with a man down anyway.
I do think he's struggling to handle managing a big club. The Rashford stuff, now Garnacho and he's barely giving Kobbie a look in. Perhaps it's just too much for him to handle?
Can't afford to sack him anyway. That's our transfer kitty. 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason he didn't change it was because Garnacho is so one dimensional that he could only be effective as a last 20 minute sub. I'm not trying to sound like an Amorim fanboy but I refuse to see how anybody who has had the misfortune of watching Garnacho play doesn't realise that's the only role he could perform in that game. What the hell else would he have done? He's never shown it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Frustrates me a lot at times too..... however he hasn't done worse than Mount. If anything he's been slightly better.
A false 9 was an option for us last night but he decided to continue the Hojlund farce which hasn't worked all season. I think he had a really bad night sadly did Ruben. Got it all badly wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He certainly did. But again, what part of Garnacho's game or footballing history makes you think he could play through the middle? That wouldn't just be brave, it would be unprecedented to stick an entitled and inconsistent winger in the middle just so him and his brother didn't cry about it after? Or am I misreading this? Is Garnacho actually right here? Where being a useless, entitled piece of shiiite should be rewarded? A new haircut is worthy of the centre stage his performances didn't warrant? It's United, of course the fans back him. Same sh*t, different year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho didn't have to be the one to play through the middle tbf. Could have played Bruno as false 9 or maybe even Mount himself and had Garnacho and Amad as the runners.
posted 1 week ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 21 minutes ago
Been travelling all day and missed a lot of the fall out. What's happened? What's been said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho has essentially said he feels hard done by the get only 20 mins after playing a bigger part in each previous round and Amorim gave a dig back that he didn’t play because he missed a big chance in the semi final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't get it either tbh. To start Mount over him was dubious but he should have changed it at HT as it clearly wasn't working for us.
In fact he could have even started both and dropped Hojlund and thrown Spurs a curve ball. Hojlund is like playing with a man down anyway.
I do think he's struggling to handle managing a big club. The Rashford stuff, now Garnacho and he's barely giving Kobbie a look in. Perhaps it's just too much for him to handle?
Can't afford to sack him anyway. That's our transfer kitty. 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason he didn't change it was because Garnacho is so one dimensional that he could only be effective as a last 20 minute sub. I'm not trying to sound like an Amorim fanboy but I refuse to see how anybody who has had the misfortune of watching Garnacho play doesn't realise that's the only role he could perform in that game. What the hell else would he have done? He's never shown it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Frustrates me a lot at times too..... however he hasn't done worse than Mount. If anything he's been slightly better.
A false 9 was an option for us last night but he decided to continue the Hojlund farce which hasn't worked all season. I think he had a really bad night sadly did Ruben. Got it all badly wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He certainly did. But again, what part of Garnacho's game or footballing history makes you think he could play through the middle? That wouldn't just be brave, it would be unprecedented to stick an entitled and inconsistent winger in the middle just so him and his brother didn't cry about it after? Or am I misreading this? Is Garnacho actually right here? Where being a useless, entitled piece of shiiite should be rewarded? A new haircut is worthy of the centre stage his performances didn't warrant? It's United, of course the fans back him. Same sh*t, different year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Garnacho didn't have to be the one to play through the middle tbf. Could have played Bruno as false 9 or maybe even Mount himself and had Garnacho and Amad as the runners.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So when did Bruno as a false 9 ever work? Why would you push Bruno out of position, based on Garnacho's performance? I don't get it. His arrogance fools people
Page 1 of 2