or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 80 comments are related to an article called:

Devonshire & Euro Ranking

Page 2 of 4

posted on 8/11/11

Why do you even care? Do you really need to create a thread?! Wow... Check you out.

posted on 8/11/11

Are you assuming the winner of the Europa League will get the same points for winning as Porto?

posted on 8/11/11

Cpofl

It is only your opinion he is wrong and is not fact because you have no way proven your case.

Please feel free to explain away the 8pt deficit.

posted on 8/11/11

Are you assuming the winner of the Europa League will get the same points for winning as Porto?
============================

I have been generous and assumed that but Devonshire said quater finals so that will be even lower than the 31 I have assumed for winning it so he will infcat be even more wrong.

posted on 8/11/11

I'm not trying to "desperately" , "prove" , "make excuses" or do anything.

I merely note that if Spurs get a certain number of pts this season (20 odd) , then UEFA ranking parity is achieved with LFC for the start of the 2012/13 season.

Also note that Devonshire is responding to a comment of mine the other day that I thought even if LFC are dealt with as per last season, their UEFA ranking (the key to an easier task in the CL group stages) would still be much higher than ours. It appears I am badly wrong in this respect.

posted on 8/11/11

Please feel free to explain away the 8pt deficit.
==========================

What 8pt defecit?
Incase you didn't read it Devonshire said you only neede to reach the quaters to pass Liverpool.That is FACTUALLY wrong.

posted on 8/11/11

I merely note that if Spurs get a certain number of pts this season (20 odd) , then UEFA ranking parity is achieved with LFC for the start of the 2012/13 season.
======================

Jolly good but that has zero to do with my correctly pointing out that Devonshire was incorrect in what he said today. That is why I said 'saw your article earlier'
Just accept it.He was wrong.

posted on 8/11/11

"I have been generous and assumed that but Devonshire said quater finals so that will be even lower than the 31 I have assumed for winning it so he will infcat be even more wrong."
---------------------------------------------------------------------

I may be wrong but, i think the coefficients for clubs are based on a percentage of the league coefficient for the country. Wouldn't England's ranking be higher than Portugal's?

posted on 8/11/11

I may be wrong but, i think the coefficients for clubs are based on a percentage of the league coefficient for the country. Wouldn't England's ranking be higher than Portugal's?
=================================

Those points are issued before a single ball has been kicked.The fact Portugals is lower actually allows them to score more points for beating teams from a higher ranked nation.
You can read all about it here http://kassiesa.home.xs4all.nl/bert/uefa/calc.html but regardless there is no way a team can get close to 31 points in the quaters regardless of the national coefficient.
Keep trying though

posted on 8/11/11

comment by CPofL.Battling against SNCPO and their desire to relive the 80's. (U9740)
posted 39 seconds ago

Please feel free to explain away the 8pt deficit.
==========================

What 8pt defecit?
Incase you didn't read it Devonshire said you only neede to reach the quaters to pass Liverpool.That is FACTUALLY wrong.

-----------------------------------------------------------

On the basis that Liverpool will lose 24pts and Spurs 16pts. Going by your current scores that will put us on 47pts and Liverpool on 65 pts.

That means from now until the end of season Spurs need to find 19pts to pass Liverpool.

He may come the end of season be factually wrong. However, as it stands now you cannot be certain of this today so it is not fact.

posted on 8/11/11

On the basis that Liverpool will lose 24pts and Spurs 16pts.
===========================

Why do you keep babbling about next season and losing points? That has NOTHING to do with what Devonshire said

posted on 8/11/11

comment by CPofL.Battling against SNCPO and their desire to relive the 80's. (U9740)
posted 7 seconds ago

On the basis that Liverpool will lose 24pts and Spurs 16pts.
===========================

Why do you keep babbling about next season and losing points? That has NOTHING to do with what Devonshire said

---------------------------------------------

It has everything to do with it. If we hit 25.9 pts apon reaching the QF we will be ranked higher than Liverpool for next season. That is a big ask and so if I was to put any money on it you will probably be proved right. But this is not fact yet.

posted on 8/11/11

"Those points are issued before a single ball has been kicked.The fact Portugals is lower actually allows them to score more points for beating teams from a higher ranked nation."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pardon me for being worthy of a patronising smiley but, could you explain that to me again? perhaps you could direct me to the specific page on your link.

posted on 8/11/11

perhaps you could direct me to the specific page on your link.
================================

Really?

Ok here goes.

Click on the link in my oiginal posting.
Then look at the following positions.
9 Liverppool
66 Bolton
67 Villa

Now all those 3 teams are not in Europe this season but have been allotted 1.9 points which is Englands coefficient see ENGLAND between 107 and 108.
So every English team is alloted 1.9 points regardless of being in Europe or not.Spurs have currently 6.9 points. 5 they have earnt and 1.9 for the national ranking which as I said is alloted before a single ball is kicked.

Keep on.

posted on 8/11/11

It has everything to do with it. If we hit 25.9
=============================

It is not possible to reach 25.9pts at the quater final stage

Bloody hell.

posted on 8/11/11

"That means from now until the end of season Spurs need to find 19pts to pass Liverpool."

Can it even be done ??
For the KO stage, is each leg ranked as per the group stages (2 pts per win, 1 per draw etc) ??

posted on 8/11/11

Seriously.

What he said was incorrect.
It has nothing to do with coefficients
Nothing to do with next year.

He was quite simply wrong.

Now,lets move on to somehting you might understand as maths is clearly not it.

A....B....C.....

posted on 8/11/11

Can it even be done ??
================

Not by the quater finals.

Hallelujah someone has final realised.

posted on 8/11/11

"Not by the quater finals."

What are the point allocations in the KO phase of the tournament ??

posted on 8/11/11

Going back to my original point then, your comparison with Porto last year was not a fair one as teams from different leagues have different coefficients and therefore, will not earn the same points for winning the Europa League.

Having looked at your link i don't see any confirmation of your contention

"The fact Portugals is lower actually allows them to score more points for beating teams from a higher ranked nation."

posted on 8/11/11

There is 1 additional point for reaching the quaters.Other than that it is the same 2 for win 1 for lose.

Semis is 1 extra Final 1 extra.
CL gets more.

In addition one bonus point is allocated for reaching the quarter final, the semi final and the final. Qualification for the group-stage of the Champions League is awarded with 4 bonus points

So it is not possible to pass Liverpool by reaching the quaters.Thank you.

posted on 8/11/11

Going back to my original point then, your comparison with Porto last year was not a fair one
========================

In that you can't earn as many as that then yes,you are right.I was trying to be too generous.
You are correct.You will be way less than 31 by the quaters.

posted on 8/11/11

Don't you think this was a remarkable waste of time to prove a point?

posted on 8/11/11

I smell the blood of a pedant....

posted on 8/11/11

I was just about to read through the comments then I realised - what's the point in trying to find the point of a pointless article?

Page 2 of 4

Sign in if you want to comment