Hi
You're new here and probably wil get banned when the scousers read this in the morning. Id change it if you want to have a long term future on here
Am I not allowed to question? I'm not a Chelsea fan nor am I trying to wind any one up I promise, they've both been flops but I just want to see who everyone thinks is a worse deal.
Do you agree 35million for Carroll is abit worse? (baring in mind he has never proved himself to even be worth 10mill).
You are welcome in my garden
Carroll. Torres was atleast a proven goalscorer in the premiership, champions league and at international level. Carroll was playing in the championship 6 months before his move.
Both been shocking
But as far as the clubs are concerned, Chelsea got worst deal.
At least liverpool got 15 million from the transaction. Chelsea have a loss of 50million.
A 15 million profit and a 50 million loss means the difference for both clubs is 65 million
Ouch abramovich
posted 1 minute ago
Carroll. Torres was atleast a proven goalscorer in the premiership, champions league and at international level. Carroll was playing in the championship 6 months before his move.
.....
But this is pre-deal
The question was what deal was worse. What Torres did prior to his move is irrelevant.
Both very poor IMO... On current form Torres is worth just £10m and Carroll is worth £5m
I was trying to point out that torres has proven he is a world-class player on many stages, carroll has done literally nothing to warrant a £35m price tag so it was a terrible deal.
posted 6 seconds ago
Both very poor IMO... On current form Torres is worth just £10m and Carroll is worth £5m
......
Both are worth nothing right now but at least we made profit from the transaction, unlike Chelsea
http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Liverpool-striker-Andy-Carroll-worth-f-all-claims-Newcastle-MD-Derek-Llambias-article829815.html
Carroll was far worse because he was valued at £1m only 12 months before Liverpool signed him.
Plus Liverpool signed him on the basis that he had a half decent season in the Championship (his level) and on 4 months of PL football.
Torres was a proven goalscorer and his contribution alone was worth £50m to Liverpool.
Torres still has that touch of class and is beginning to come good. I've been impressed with him this season and the goals will begin to fly in, unlike Carroll he hasn't lacked confidence and has just been unlucky. Also hasn't had the run of games he needs and is playing in a team which is slow and pretty one dimensional
comment by Hello My Name Is Vermaelen (U3896)
posted 34 seconds ago
I was trying to point out that torres has proven he is a world-class player on many stages, carroll has done literally nothing to warrant a £35m price tag so it was a terrible deal.
_______
Exactly my point. Has to be one of (if not) the worst panic-buys ever.
Torres still has that touch of class and is beginning to come good. I've been impressed with him this season and the goals will begin to fly in
....
Carrolls goals per minute is better than Torres'
Carrolls goals per minute is better than Torres'
No
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2086822/Top-flops-They-cost-85m-strikers-Andy-Carroll-Fernando-Torres-buy-goal.html
Who has had more assists out of the two?
Carrolls goals per minute is better than Torres'
No
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2086822/Top-flops-They-cost-85m-strikers-Andy-Carroll-Fernando-Torres-buy-goal.html
.....
That's only league.
Get full goal stats
Who has had more assists out of the two?
.....
Chelsea effectively paid Newcastle 35 million and gave Liverpool 15 million cash
Nice
comment by Mr Chelsea (U3579)
posted 20 minutes ago
Hi
You're new here and probably wil get banned when the scousers read this in the morning. Id change it if you want to have a long term future on here
______________
Honestly, what did you mean by this? are Liverpool void of any criticism on here?
No but whats the criticism?
We got 15 million profit from the transaction and Chelsea paid 50 million
Metro - there's no mistaking, Chelsea are worse off financially.
Metro - he kind of implied that it's not ok to say anything in a negative light about Liverpool, which I did in the article about them doing the worse deal.
15 million profit
No you never.
You burnt it on Downing
I remember reading a stat that Admin1 posted about complaints!
United were by far the most sensitive, I may have been responsible for a lot of those complaints though!
----------------------
Anyway, the article is about what is the worst deal so far! As far as I am concerned it is Torres that has been the biggest flop, just my opinion though...
Chelsea effectively paid Newcastle 35 million and gave Liverpool 15 million cash
_________________________
^ The prophecy of the deluded scousers who can't take the fact that they paid £35mil for a drunken Geordie with zero ability.
If Carroll is not scoring, which he isn't, what else does he offer the team ?
Sign in if you want to comment
Carroll v Torres
Page 1 of 4
posted on 15/1/12
Hi
You're new here and probably wil get banned when the scousers read this in the morning. Id change it if you want to have a long term future on here
posted on 15/1/12
Am I not allowed to question? I'm not a Chelsea fan nor am I trying to wind any one up I promise, they've both been flops but I just want to see who everyone thinks is a worse deal.
Do you agree 35million for Carroll is abit worse? (baring in mind he has never proved himself to even be worth 10mill).
posted on 15/1/12
You are welcome in my garden
posted on 15/1/12
Carroll. Torres was atleast a proven goalscorer in the premiership, champions league and at international level. Carroll was playing in the championship 6 months before his move.
posted on 15/1/12
Both been shocking
But as far as the clubs are concerned, Chelsea got worst deal.
At least liverpool got 15 million from the transaction. Chelsea have a loss of 50million.
A 15 million profit and a 50 million loss means the difference for both clubs is 65 million
Ouch abramovich
posted on 15/1/12
posted 1 minute ago
Carroll. Torres was atleast a proven goalscorer in the premiership, champions league and at international level. Carroll was playing in the championship 6 months before his move.
.....
But this is pre-deal
The question was what deal was worse. What Torres did prior to his move is irrelevant.
posted on 15/1/12
£35M isn't £35M
posted on 15/1/12
Both very poor IMO... On current form Torres is worth just £10m and Carroll is worth £5m
posted on 15/1/12
I was trying to point out that torres has proven he is a world-class player on many stages, carroll has done literally nothing to warrant a £35m price tag so it was a terrible deal.
posted on 15/1/12
posted 6 seconds ago
Both very poor IMO... On current form Torres is worth just £10m and Carroll is worth £5m
......
Both are worth nothing right now but at least we made profit from the transaction, unlike Chelsea
posted on 15/1/12
http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Liverpool-striker-Andy-Carroll-worth-f-all-claims-Newcastle-MD-Derek-Llambias-article829815.html
Carroll was far worse because he was valued at £1m only 12 months before Liverpool signed him.
Plus Liverpool signed him on the basis that he had a half decent season in the Championship (his level) and on 4 months of PL football.
Torres was a proven goalscorer and his contribution alone was worth £50m to Liverpool.
Torres still has that touch of class and is beginning to come good. I've been impressed with him this season and the goals will begin to fly in, unlike Carroll he hasn't lacked confidence and has just been unlucky. Also hasn't had the run of games he needs and is playing in a team which is slow and pretty one dimensional
posted on 15/1/12
comment by Hello My Name Is Vermaelen (U3896)
posted 34 seconds ago
I was trying to point out that torres has proven he is a world-class player on many stages, carroll has done literally nothing to warrant a £35m price tag so it was a terrible deal.
_______
Exactly my point. Has to be one of (if not) the worst panic-buys ever.
posted on 15/1/12
Torres still has that touch of class and is beginning to come good. I've been impressed with him this season and the goals will begin to fly in
....
Carrolls goals per minute is better than Torres'
posted on 15/1/12
Carrolls goals per minute is better than Torres'
No
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2086822/Top-flops-They-cost-85m-strikers-Andy-Carroll-Fernando-Torres-buy-goal.html
posted on 15/1/12
Who has had more assists out of the two?
posted on 15/1/12
Carrolls goals per minute is better than Torres'
No
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2086822/Top-flops-They-cost-85m-strikers-Andy-Carroll-Fernando-Torres-buy-goal.html
.....
That's only league.
Get full goal stats
posted on 15/1/12
Who has had more assists out of the two?
.....
Chelsea effectively paid Newcastle 35 million and gave Liverpool 15 million cash
Nice
posted on 15/1/12
comment by Mr Chelsea (U3579)
posted 20 minutes ago
Hi
You're new here and probably wil get banned when the scousers read this in the morning. Id change it if you want to have a long term future on here
______________
Honestly, what did you mean by this? are Liverpool void of any criticism on here?
posted on 15/1/12
No but whats the criticism?
We got 15 million profit from the transaction and Chelsea paid 50 million
posted on 15/1/12
Metro - there's no mistaking, Chelsea are worse off financially.
posted on 15/1/12
Metro - he kind of implied that it's not ok to say anything in a negative light about Liverpool, which I did in the article about them doing the worse deal.
posted on 15/1/12
15 million profit
No you never.
You burnt it on Downing
posted on 15/1/12
I remember reading a stat that Admin1 posted about complaints!
United were by far the most sensitive, I may have been responsible for a lot of those complaints though!
----------------------
Anyway, the article is about what is the worst deal so far! As far as I am concerned it is Torres that has been the biggest flop, just my opinion though...
posted on 15/1/12
Chelsea effectively paid Newcastle 35 million and gave Liverpool 15 million cash
_________________________
^ The prophecy of the deluded scousers who can't take the fact that they paid £35mil for a drunken Geordie with zero ability.
posted on 15/1/12
If Carroll is not scoring, which he isn't, what else does he offer the team ?
Page 1 of 4